TCHB
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2008
- Messages
- 11,096
- Reaction score
- 8,011
July and the temps pic up.
That is true!I just want to thank the rate payers.
We need some nuclear plants stat.....
1973 Richard Nixon talked about energy independence....build a 1000 nuclear plants by 2000...well that never happened and Europe just turned back on the coal plants as they are struggling due to Russian dependence... crazy how we shutter nuclear, and try and push things that are far less efficient...
There are a few types of transformers at most Power Plants.A lot of you guys seem to know about this power grid business. I’m wondering how the Hoover Dam explosion fits into the matrix?
Grid is humming along just fine, normal loads lol
Yet every messaging board I’m on, people are asking about backup generator installs because their power gets shut down for several hours.
I know you’ll say well the grid has capacity… but is it possible that we have this capacity because across CA, entire city blocks are getting no power… while the utilities are doing “maintenance”
Our power was out 3 hours yesterday, my parents the day before for 4 hours, Shinto posted his was out the other day etc etc, yet the pie and bar graphs make it all look peachy.
Remember, the average age of the assets powering the US is beyond the “lifespan” is was designed for.Quite possibly, power was off for about four hours on Balboa Island yesterday.
I dare you to have this conversation with NVE….A utility has no reason to run to failure. The more money you spend the more the Utility makes. I have worked on many rate cases and not once PUC said approved first round. There was always major cuts to the utility budgets. The IPP side is all about the details of the PPA. If you have a capacity contract with no penalties for outages and very low threshold for full payment you run it completely differently. I have a friend that just took over a large utility (COO) and one of his main jobs is to increase reliability and handle the rate case. Without the cash it can not improve.
SCE has been replacing poles for 40 years that know. The new power plants are very strict on how many starts, hours and whe maintenance is performed. It is part of the financing agreements.I dare you to have this conversation with NVE….
DARE… DOUBLE DOG DARE….
Especially when feeding the strip…
If NVE see’s a problem coming, and trips the strip offline to perform maintenance and prevent a catastrophic failure. They get sued by the casino’s who force them to prove in court of law they had to trip the line, and do maintenance. Which cost them money regardless of they win or lose due to the legal costs.
If they run to failure, there is no lawsuit. Yes the casinos are down for a longer period of time if they dont have backup power.
Guess which option is cheaper… maintenance or run to failure?
BUT I PROMISE YOU ONE THING… NVE runs to failue… I have dug up the LV strip many times, and installed at least 500,000ft of 138kV/230kV EHV Cables all over Vegas. Provided alot of other assets to them over my career.
There are alot of utilitys who run to failure, for lots of reasons.
Seriously how many utility’s are replacing pole tops/pad mounts based on a condition assessment? Very freaking few, most run to failure. Because the cost outways the benefits. Transmission, Distribution and Substation assetts are all treated differently, due to the business of that utility. IOU/COOP/MUNI’s are all different finance models, which is why they operate there systems differently.
I didnt bring Poles into this… Poles are alot different that Pole Top Transformers and Padmount transformers.SCE has been replacing poles for 40 years that know. The new power plants are very strict on how many starts, hours and whe maintenance is performed. It is part of the financing agreements.
Poles are alot different that Pole Top Transformers and Padmount transformers.
The key reasons why these are difficult to perform a condition assessment on, is the fact they have very small volumes of mineral oil in them. Due to that small volume if you did perform a DGA, you would have to de energize that unit and you would have to replenish the oil that your drained from that unit after that DGA.
I do not know of one IOU on the WEST COAST that does DGA’s on their Pole Tops or Padmounts…. NOT one, and a good friend of mine invented a product that creates a “drain port” for these type of units that can be installed in the field. But he cannot sell them.
Why…. Because its cheaper to run to failure on those assetts. The cost of maintenance is way to high compared to the replacedment cost.
Thinks about the cost of a 2500kva 12kV/480v padmount…
Lets say its $30k for arguements sake. We both know its alot cheaper.. .closer to $20k than 30K… But use $30k for this..
Now what does it cost for a SCE Union crew to perform annual maintenance on that unit/year.
Can you do that maintenance for less than $1000/year, when you factor in everything it costs for that crew to be in the field.
Then multiply that number times 30 years… which is the “design life” of that unit.
See… numbers dont add up… cheaper to run to failure.
Owe, and the Pole situation is an entirely different cost/benefit model… its completely apples/oranges to this conversation. But I am willing to dig in if you want tI thought
I thought you were talking about power plant main transformers not the the shopping mall small transformers or local neighborhood small units. The transformers that I delt with were on 500 MW machines. My one station alone had over 2,000MWs output. In the 50 years now we only lost one main transformer from a internal fault. It happened at year 14 in service.
I happen to know a thing or 2 about SCE maintenance...
We don’t check oil on any of the distribution transformers that I know of. Maybe specific very large important customers but that would not be the norm.
Our standard for overhead transformers. I’d if you are replacing the pole and the transformer is over 25yrs it gets replaced period.
You guys would be very surprised how much money we spend on infrastructure upgrades each year.
Yes it’s not uncommon for power to go out. Especially in Metro west where infrastructure is much older.
But think about this. If we warn you and do maintenance and your power is off the customer is upset. If the power goes out due to failure the customer gets upset. If a car hits a structure and knocks out power the customer gets upset.
If a fire starts because of our asset the customer gets upset. If we turn the power off to prevent fires the customer gets upset.
If we raise rates to upgrade infrastructure customers get upset.
There are many employees that work their tail off every day to plan upgrades to make the grid more reliable day in and day out.
We are far from perfect but we are getting better.
I was right in the middle of deregulation and it was a huge mess.I have had the pleasure to work with many of guys at SCE over the years, and they have taught me alot of what I know today.
I am a huge supporter of the Utility’s and I feel the regulatory bodys are forcing the utility’s to spend their budgets in areas that sacrifices the replacement/maintenance budgets.
WHICH IS A KEY REASON WHY THE AVERAGE OF OF THE ASSETTS IS BEYOND ITS DESIGN LIFE…
I am not blaming SCE for the CPUC/NERC/FERC/CONGRESS/GOVERNORS or any of the other idiots that force stupid policys.
Its just where we are today, and as I know the average age is increasing, not decreasing. THATS ANOTHER MAJOR PROBLEM, meaning we are just kicking the can down the road further.
To clarify… I am also referencing NATION WIDE assett age… not just SCE/PGE/SDGE. Politicians are way to short sited and pushing a green agenda without focusing on costs to consumer or the impacts to the grid.
I was a SCE customer from 1997-2022…. Lived in Murrieta CA… but today, I live in Reno… and I pay almost 11cents/kwh… My electricity bill dropped by 70%… SCE and NVE are both IOU’s why is there such a huge difference in the costs to the rate payers…. Yep bad CA policys of deregulation/renewable goals.
Grid is humming along just fine, normal loads lol
Yet every messaging board I’m on, people are asking about backup generator installs because their power gets shut down for several hours.
I know you’ll say well the grid has capacity… but is it possible that we have this capacity because across CA, entire city blocks are getting no power… while the utilities are doing “maintenance”
Our power was out 3 hours yesterday, my parents the day before for 4 hours, Shinto posted his was out the other day etc etc, yet the pie and bar graphs make it all look peachy.
Would seem that Labor Day weekend temps for most all of CA could be punishing. I'm optimistic, but I think I'll fill up a couple of gas cans I've allowed to get a bit low --- oh and fire up the baby Honda, as it's getting to be that time of the year again.Hot week in a pretty big area and schools back in session. http://www.caiso.com/todaysoutlook/pages/default.aspx
The weekends and especially holiday weekends drop demand.Would seem that Labor Day weekend temps for most all of CA could be punishing. I'm optimistic, but I think I'll fill up a couple of gas cans I've allowed to get a bit low --- oh and fire up the baby Honda, as it's getting to be that time of the year again.
The high local temps clear to the beach as forecast for this weekend, will "Test" the local distribution components, aside from the grid capacity.The weekends and especially holiday weekends drop demand.
Normal for Ca…1. flex alerts are normal. People get a break on their bill if they need their air conditioner or pool flexed for a about a hour. My sister is a flex customer for the past 11 years and has been flexed 4 hours in total.
Tucker is all about ratings.
Grid not even pushed yet.
In 2000 the alerts started to change at different points. The utilities were made to come up contingency plans and alerts for all kinds of things including earthquakes where we loose load.Normal for Ca…
If supply met demand, then why is there a Flex Alert…
I agree you CAISO Chart shows something different.
Bottom Line is quite simple for me. There is no need for a Flex alert if Supply met demand. Flex Alerts prove the grid is being pushed pretty hard, which creates the Flex Alert.
Why should a rate payer in a moderately temperate region of the service territory subsidize the person who chooses to live in the hottest part of the service territory? Why should a rate payer in a low fire risk area with better fire services subsidize the person who live is a rural fire prone part of the territory. Flex alert is basically demand based pricing like Uber. Building full peak supply side infrastructure to give electric welfare to people who choose hard to service locations isn’t a supply and demand model…Normal for Ca…
If supply met demand, then why is there a Flex Alert…
I agree you CAISO Chart shows something different.
Bottom Line is quite simple for me. There is no need for a Flex alert if Supply met demand. Flex Alerts prove the grid is being pushed pretty hard, which creates the Flex Alert.
So, ”excessive heat will stress grid”, triggering flex alert.In 2000 the alerts started to change at different points. The utilities were made to come up contingency plans and alerts for all kinds of things including earthquakes where we loose load.