Uncle Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 9,959
- Reaction score
- 11,116
Im talking about exports.Because we are the biggest consumer market in the world, by a lot. Why do you think Mexico and Canada caved so quickly?
Im talking about exports.Because we are the biggest consumer market in the world, by a lot. Why do you think Mexico and Canada caved so quickly?
It’s called Emergency orders. They change agreements when terrorists are allowed through the border
How about this idea.
Drop all the Tariffs.
1) if any illegal or drugs get through, boom, 6 months of Tariffs.
2) if, during that 6 months any illegals or drugs get through, the clock starts over.
Canadian aerospace company wants to buy 10 boards from me. I tell them 10K a board.
They say great, I'll take one per month for ten months if you guarantee that price for all 10.
Where does a 6 month deal like that leave them and me?
If we put on tariff so do they, and my price goes up 25%.
They buy from my competition in Germany who can guarantee business continuity.
What happens to that contract if they go out of business in 3 months?
What happens if they say piss off in 4 months?
That contract would be iron clad?
Based on 2 decades of transactions with CAE corp they are approved client up to 500K.
Credit isnt the problem though, the problem is I cant guarantees a price unless Im willing to eat any tariff that might fall out of the sky.
Then don't guarantee a price. Problem solved.
If your customers are this fragile you have bigger issues.....
or is this just you creating anecdotes that don't have a history of coming true (like 8 years ago) so you can complain about them?
Tell your customer to tell their government to stop levying tariffs?
Then you lose the business.
This is how OEM businesses work. They do not need everything all at once, but make a deal they can fix their price on.
Im pointing what the problem is when you dont have a stable structure.
This is already happening I cant guarantee my US customer a price past 30 days.
UD
There always has been winners and losers
I’d say we are winning more than losing . Tariffs or not
Lots of us suffered in our life times
I had to , Revaluate decisions I made , either poor or good .sometimes my fault sometimes
Not. The covid policy in California just about cratered my life.
in America you can make the decision on what you need to do . Complain about it
Or figure a way to profit from it .
But to say people in this thread don’t understand. Is pure bullshit .
We all understand what’s at stake . Yes you your business might be affected, negatively.
maybe the business , down the street
Will be affected in a positive way
Always two sides to every story.
Just my .02
This "but what about me, specifically me?!" mentality is EXACTLY why every fucking piece of legislation is loaded with pork for the last 40-50 years. And ironically the genesis of why we are in the situation we are in where leveraging the threat of tariffs is necessary. Everyone wants a carve out, an exception, a white glove treatment.
I guess if you can't navigate this, then your employer will find someone that will, or they will lose.
Exactly like brgrcru said.
Based on 2 decades of transactions with CAE corp they are approved client up to 500K.
Credit isnt the problem though, the problem is I cant guarantees a price unless Im willing to eat any tariff that might fall out of the sky.
If he locked in prices when biden had the prices of shit increasing out of control he can do it under the tariffs.So you've always locked in your price for 10 months or more, regardless of possible increases that may occur due to unforeseen circumstances and have no way out if they do increase?
So you've always locked in your price for 10 months or more, regardless of possible increases that may occur due to unforeseen circumstances and have no way out if they do increase?
Sometimes.
It depends on the deal and who it's with.
Sometimes we'll buy 100% of the parts and build and hold the product and ship on schedule for known entities.
We do this for Tv station chains all around the world, movie studios, and certain medical and military clients.
If he locked in prices when biden had the prices of shit increasing out of control he can do it under the tariffs.
You've said in the past this company has done well and I applaud them for the foresight to keep money in the reserves. Sounds like this is a perfect example to use some of it and secure that 100K PO.![]()
I sympathize.The covid policy in California just about cratered my life.
Id have to build in tariff into the price or Id lose money and If I do that, I cant win the deal by a 25% margin to begin with.
People that believe this are the same one who think the view is a news outlet..
Order the supplies through an Australian supplierHere's a good one -
My Australian competitor get to build their product using the same non tariffed chips, but then they can bring the finished product in to the US with no Tariff because its " Australian"
Order the supplies through an Australian supplier
I will suck it and gladly pay more for things made, grown, enginnered and built in the US. 2017 was not that long ago my friend, we need to get back to making things in the US for US consumption.We're not going to suck it up - you are. (or the buyers of the goods in this case)
Just like you have been since 2017.
I've never had an international business. But what I have personally done was order millions of dollars in Lumber for distributions centers back in the day. We are talking over 2 decades ago. Guess what, the cost of that lumber to our distribution center was good for about 3 days. We didn't just throw our hands in the air and say... Well if I can't get a guaranteed price for the next 10 months I'm just not going to buy Lumber.The only way to avoid this is downsize here and build there - Id prefer not to do that, but I may have no choice.
I can tell most dont understand it or they wouldn't ask the question they do.
How many guys here have an international business ?
I've never had an international business. But what I have personally done was order millions of dollars in Lumber for distributions centers back in the day. We are talking over 2 decades ago. Guess what, the cost of that lumber to our distribution center was good for about 3 days. We didn't just throw our hands in the air and say... Well if I can't get a guaranteed price for the next 10 months I'm just not going to buy Lumber.
I get it, your business is not based off of a commodity, but the business model to deal with changing cost of supply has been around long before I was ever in that game and it's still going on today. If you have a customer demanding a price point then you need to adjust your end to cover what you know, based on your years of experience, to cover the ups and downs of supply chain.
Who has a gun to your head forcing you to sell internationally?
Every single investor in the company who wants exactly what you want in your investment portfolio, annual gains.Who has a gun to your head forcing you to sell internationally?
I will suck it and gladly pay more for things made, grown, enginnered and built in the US. 2017 was not that long ago my friend, we need to get back to making things in the US for US consumption.
Every single investor in the company who wants exactly what you want in your investment portfolio, annual gains.
We (me) have been sucking it up since NAFTA in the mid 90's. These trade "agreements" have gutted the middle class in the US as well as US companies. The regulations enforced on US manufacturing in the name of environmental concerns and worker concerns. Yet, in the same breath, we have not and do not enforce these on China, Mexico and any other swinging dick that paid off politicians to sign off on these historically bad for the US trade agreements. At the time we were told these trade agreements would provide the promise of being a " service industry based economy". I heard that a lot in the mid 90's from the bought and paid for US media and Bill Clinton.We're not going to suck it up - you are. (or the buyers of the goods in this case)
Just like you have been since 2017.
Most small deals arent time and date sensitive like I described but big ones always are.
I used to sell software that aided large scale construction and we introduced "BIM" building information modeling so architectural forms could schedule components like when 600 windows (or a lumber package) arrived, because you dont want it on site and to pay for it until you are ready, but they have a 6 month lead time so you have to order way out and negotiate delivery
Price stability and terms rule the day for things like this.
Building Tv stations is a little like that.
The gun to my head is in the form of having to continually grow to keep up with the cost of doing business and paying poeple more and more year after year.
Once you find and win international business you scale your business to accommodate it - take that away and you have to scale back.
Pretty much every public company you bother to buy stock or invest in your 401K with has some form of Geo based breakdown in revenue.
Tv stations are dead, if that is your core customer i hope you don't have long before you cash out and retire.
Every cellphone, drone, action camera, has x265 encoding software, every streaming platform online can take these streams and rebroadcast to the entire world.
Just turn on King of the Hammers tomorrow....
This is the future of live broadcast media. Not Tv stations ising rack gear to relay their signals to remotes or broadcast towers.
We (me) have been sucking it up since NAFTA in the mid 90's. These trade "agreements" have gutted the middle class in the US as well as US companies. The regulations enforced on US manufacturing in the name of environmental concerns and worker concerns. Yet, in the same breath, we have not and do not enforce these on China, Mexico and any other swinging dick that paid off politicians to sign off on these historically bad for the US trade agreements. At the time we were told these trade agreements would provide the promise of being a " service industry based economy". I heard that a lot in the mid 90's from the bought and paid for US media and Bill Clinton.
Service Industry meant foreign investors on our stock market and managing their money, and to a lesser extent US business owners via middle man association making money off of shit made outside the US in south America or China ( with no equivalent regulations for environmental concerns or labor laws, workers rights etc.) that was imported in to the US and sold at a much cheaper price than US made products. Tell me I am wrong.
I recognized this in the early 90's when I was in my early 20's.
UD, I believe you are older than me, how in the hell can you justify the selling out of American industrial might and sovereignty? Buying cheap products from third world countries and enemies of the US then reselling in my mind is criminal. Free Trade is an absolute joke and anyone that says that is either a full blown idiot, so self centered on their own financial benefit they are not able to see the damage to the US middle class and economy or a flat at liar. Which are you?
We've been building that remote streaming stuff almost 10 years now, and it's H.265, thats just one encoding format.
(you dont make movies or produce in that format if you need to do anything other than chop it up and deliver it but we can talk about where you use what formats in another thread)
That was one example of a complex customer, one that invests on a large timeline that wants stable pricing.
Where do you think the semiconductors are manufactured for all of this?
We power netflix, hulu, amazon, and pretty much all the streaming services that are the new TV stations.
We ship between 7500 and 10K pieces of kit per month to big and small end users.
Perfect, so the initial anecdote you described is just an edge case.... If we carve out exemptions from major trade policy tools, for every edge case, we end up with no tools and just a big sign facing the world that says "bend us over, we're willing" restrict your markets to us, and we'll open ours wide to you....
That is the entire crux of this.
Everyone keeps blaming the move offshore on the government. In reality business moved supply chains offshore because the American consumer wanted cheaper, faster and better.Businesses that build for, and require long term deliveries at stable prices are not edge cases.
Bringing the industry back here so I can buy from it fixes the problem.
Where is the re-shoring?
Everyone keeps blaming the move offshore on the government. In reality business moved supply chains offshore because the American consumer wanted cheaper, faster and better.
Peole say buy American, then off they go to Walmart or the equivalent even though there is a domestically produced version of almost everything they buy. But if they bought the American made version of everything they would end up with a lot less of goods and services and their standard of living would be less.
The consumer did this, not the government. To think the government is going to fix this is going to lead to a lot of frustrated people.
Everyone keeps blaming the move offshore on the government. In reality business moved supply chains offshore because the American consumer wanted cheaper, faster and better.
Peole say buy American, then off they go to Walmart or the equivalent even though there is a domestically produced version of almost everything they buy. But if they bought the American made version of everything they would end up with a lot less of goods and services and their standard of living would be less.
The consumer did this, not the government. To think the government is going to fix this is going to lead to a lot of frustrated people.
Its hard to win when the competition plays by a different rulebookLol, the move offshore came 100% from the government, all of the red tape, regulations, taxes, and complication drove the price and pain of doing business here to a breaking point for many of the durable industries.
Where is the re-shoring?
Your belief is that global competition, specifically imports from global competitors with lower costs had nothing to do with it? That is an interesting view that discounts competition and free markets.Lol, the move offshore came 100% from the government, all of the red tape, regulations, taxes, and complication drove the price and pain of doing business here to a breaking point for many of the durable industries.
Your belief is that global competition, specifically imports from global competitors with lower costs had nothing to do with it? That is an interesting view that discounts competition and free markets.
Most objective individuals would recognize that global competition and more choice for the consumer drove US companies to search for ways to satisfy the customers demands.
The costs in America are due to Americans having a high standard of living and expecting that standard of living to continue. Americans do not want the standard of living that those individuals are willing to experience.Hey genius, costs are lower because these 3rd world shit holes can operate businesses much cheaper, because they aren't burdened by the insane rules that get imposed over here. In fact it's just the opposite, they roll out the red carpet and give special privilege to get the foreign capital investments.
You pretend not to know things that you clearly know. This is why your arguments are boring and stale, and why you have no ability to persuade or influence anyone here.
The costs in America are due to Americans having a high standard of living and expecting that standard of living to continue. Americans do not want the standard of living that those individuals are willing to experience.
You ever ask yourself why do all the low cost manufacturing shit holes not operate in a free market capitalistic system? Maybe because free market systems result in higher wages and higher standards of living?
Certainly excess regulation and excess government intervention is a part of America's higher costs, but your solution to allow the government even more control over markets is ironically exactly what you blame for the downfall. Your belief that government is 100 percent the problem, and the solution is for the government to lard on more rules and taxes is the solution, is an odd twist of logic.
Lets say we have a product that requires manual assembly by a human.Your belief is that global competition, specifically imports from global competitors with lower costs had nothing to do with it? That is an interesting view that discounts competition and free markets.
Most objective individuals would recognize that global competition and more choice for the consumer drove US companies to search for ways to satisfy the customers demands.