WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Obamagate -Spy Gate, Obama accused of wiretapping Trump Tower

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
10,912
Reaction score
27,310
Libturds all upset over Barrs use of the word "spying"
well, boo fuckin hoo, cry me a river.
For 2 years they accuse (and use the media to accuse) Trump of being an agent of Russia.
while its proven that it was the DNC and the Clinton campaign who were actually in cahoots with Russia.
Swing from rope you fukin spying turds.
 

boatdoc55

Rest Easy Retired Boat Mechanic 😢🚤
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
7,814
Reaction score
11,273
Libturds all upset over Barrs use of the word "spying"
well, boo fuckin hoo, cry me a river.
For 2 years they accuse (and use the media to accuse) Trump of being an agent of Russia.
while its proven that it was the DNC and the Clinton campaign who were actually in cahoots with Russia.
Swing from rope you fukin spying turds.
That a boy!!!
gallows.jpg
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,350
Reaction score
25,774

KevinR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
2,591
Reaction score
4,308
Yes. Great article indeed. Thanks for posting. Wonder if anti Trumpers will bother to read it.
 

500bbc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
27,439
Reaction score
43,508
https://nypost.com/2019/04/15/behin...the-trump-campaign/amp/?utm_source=reddit.com

Great article by Andrew McCarthy.

I suggest ALL turds read it and stop looking like the buffoons you are.

View attachment 745655

Face it...................the worst ever morons!!!!!
They don't need to read it, they know the Talking Turd admin along with the FBI, DOJ, CIA, NSA, all national news media, British intelligence, Australian intelligence and more were involved in trying to frame Trump then attempting a coup when that failed.

They fully support the actions and would have been ecstatic if the coup was successful.

They are that fucking stupid.
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,233
Reaction score
50,240
No, not blind faith. Also the word of the director of the FBI Comey, the former Director of National Intelligence Clapper, Trey Gowdey, John McCain, Paul Ryan and all the others saying this appears to be BS. And that list includes the Heat Street columnist cited by Trump who says her article DOES NOT support Trump's claim. He and Mark Levin have flat out fabricated this BS and it is going to blow up in their faces- not that any of you die hard Trump supporters will care or even admit remembering this when the White House stops talking about the latest embarrassment.

Trump is alleging an illegal wiretap, so yeah a conviction would be a good piece of vidence supporting that claim. And since his party controls all three branches of the Federal government I don't think that is an unreasonably high bar. But guess what, even the Republicans in Congress are largely saying WTF about these crazy allegations. This will not convince anybody other than Trump, Mark Levin, the hacks at Breitbart, and the good folks at RDP who hated Hillary enough to accept a deal with the Devil.

Yep- Germany does not enjoy any 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure. Every US citizen including Trump does. If one of our intelligence agencies got a warrant (which they would need to get the phone companies cooperation), they got it by giving a judge probable cause that somebody in Trumps circle broke a pretty serious law.

Dude, I promise I am absolutely gleeful over this story. Trump has shown his party he is completely unhinged. His FBI director has asked Justice to publicly repudiate him. Conservative darlings like Trey Gowdy are saying this is BS. Yeah, it's gonna get VERY entertaining and I am peeing my pants with excitement as Trump embarrasses himself over this nonsense!

Retarded Wojack Circle.jpg
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,389
Reaction score
143,442
Uh oh, John Solomon on Mark Levin today saying he will break a story in a couple weeks that links Barry to spying in a Jan 2016 meeting at the WH.

Bongino has a theory that they tried this with Romney but didn't need to put it in full play, so they just pulled it out of the archives to run it in the 16 campaign as an insurance policy. The whole thing smells of entrapment.

The next few months seem to be gearing up for events that will make Watergate seem like kindergarten games!!!!!!

8DF66329-061E-49C8-A9EF-432BCA4385F7.png
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,977
Reaction score
21,130
Obama's DOJ/FBI directly and purposely ignored the Woods Procedure (The procedure used to sign off and validate evidence to a FISA Judge, as being reliable, and corroborated) When Comey and Rosenstein signed off on the FISA warrant request using the Steele Dossier as primary evidence of PC, which just a couple months later they admitted to Trump was 'Salacious, and Unverified'...

We know it was Bullshit because the initial warrant used for the 2 hop rule was for Carter Page, If there was actual evidence of his involvement in criminal activity he would most certainly have a conviction now, as they have run amok digging up decades old Tax and Document crimes on everyone else, and generating process crimes and perjury traps along the way to justify their investigation. They couldn't get anything on Page, because there was nothing, no crime to begin with, no probable cause, they signed off on knowingly fake information to create a political investigation against the opposition candidate. Period.

Crooks, Crooks defended by idiots.

It would appear that the investigators disagree with you. It was not the Steele dossier used as "primary evidence of PC", but actions by Trump's own foreign policy advisor as the basis.

From the report released today.

“In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July 31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.”
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,350
Reaction score
25,774
It would appear that the investigators disagree with you. It was not the Steele dossier used as "primary evidence of PC", but actions by Trump's own foreign policy advisor as the basis.

From the report released today.

“In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July 31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.”
LOL, Papadopoulos, the ultimate wannabee. I think the investigators are getting a look at, and the mere fact that paid professionals said they trusted this meathead is reason enough to dig a bit deeper to see if this was a known false lead too. The fact that Papadouchebag was a drunk bragger took 2 seconds to see, but for some reason our best and brightest chose to try to get the President of the United States caught up in a coup with that turd as the smoking gun? Thats rich!!!
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,233
Reaction score
50,240
It would appear that the investigators disagree with you. It was not the Steele dossier used as "primary evidence of PC", but actions by Trump's own foreign policy advisor as the basis.

From the report released today.

“In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July 31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.”

You mean the Actions that were initiated by the FBI's own 'informant' Stefan Halper and his foreign counterparts in Alexander Downer, and Joseph Mifsud.

https://thehill.com/homenews/news/4...o-investigate-examples-of-spying-while-he-was

BTW they were denied their FISA warrant the first time around back then during the summer of 2016, They came back in October with the Dossier and got the FISA, and the two hop which allowed them to basically tap all comms of the entire campaign. but we have been over this already, and you don't seem to care about those inconvenient facts.

:)
 
Last edited:

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,389
Reaction score
143,442
It would appear that the investigators disagree with you. It was not the Steele dossier used as "primary evidence of PC", but actions by Trump's own foreign policy advisor as the basis.

From the report released today.

“In late July 2016, soon after WikiLeaks's first release of stolen documents, a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos had suggested to a representative of that foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. That information prompted the FBI on July 31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.”

464EC993-C373-4711-B3CA-4D31931E96C6.gif


Good job Turrrrrrrrrrrdeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

8A429004-B96B-43F7-93D0-F075418F08E1.gif
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,977
Reaction score
21,130
You mean the Actions that were initiated by the FBI's own 'informant' Stefan Halper and his foreign counterparts in Alexander Downer, and Joseph Mifsud.

https://thehill.com/homenews/news/4...o-investigate-examples-of-spying-while-he-was

BTW they were denied their FISA warrant the first time around back then during the summer of 2016, but we have been over this already, and you don't seem to care about those inconvenient facts.

:)


I completely understand those arguments from Trumpkins that a warrant should not have ever been issued. But the fact remains that the court disagreed and did issue it. And after issuing it, re-issued it multiple times.

I also completely understand that Trumpkins like yourself believe that Clinton is clearly guilty of a litany of crimes despite a similar process with similar legal conclusions, yet Trump is wholly innocent and has been completely and totally exonerated from absolutely everything. No shock of that contradiction either.

Bottom line is the only place this eventually gets resolved with respect to Trump is at the ballot box. If a majority of states believe Trump, he gets re-elected, if not, he doesn't.

No one is going to change anyone's mind or their vote. Good thing though that this process has pointed out is that half the country has little in common with the other half, and to try to reconcile those differences is not going to happen.

All Republics in history have eventually failed, some individuals just like to hurry the process along.
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,233
Reaction score
50,240
I completely understand those arguments from Trumpkins that a warrant should not have ever been issued. But the fact remains that the court disagreed and did issue it. And after issuing it, re-issued it multiple times.

I also completely understand that Trumpkins like yourself believe that Clinton is clearly guilty of a litany of crimes despite a similar process with similar legal conclusions, yet Trump is wholly innocent and has been completely and totally exonerated from absolutely everything. No shock of that contradiction either.

Bottom line is the only place this eventually gets resolved with respect to Trump is at the ballot box. If a majority of states believe Trump, he gets re-elected, if not, he doesn't.

No one is going to change anyone's mind or their vote. Good thing though that this process has pointed out is that half the country has little in common with the other half, and to try to reconcile those differences is not going to happen.

All Republics in history have eventually failed, some individuals just like to hurry the process along.


Ahh yes, the 'constitutional conservative' is here to preach about the courts, but conveniently leaves out the fact that the prosecution (in this case Comey, McCabe, Etc) Knowingly presented evidence (The dossier) as true and valid, and as coming from multiple independently verified sources (The Yahoo news Article which actually was just circular reporting from the same source), and signed and vouched for it, in violation of the Woods procedure, lied to the Court to get them to sign off on the warrant.

If you believe the only resolution comes at the ballot box then it speaks volumes about your political beliefs.

:)
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,857
Reaction score
35,305
LOL, Papadopoulos, the ultimate wannabee. I think the investigators are getting a look at, and the mere fact that paid professionals said they trusted this meathead is reason enough to dig a bit deeper to see if this was a known false lead too. The fact that Papadouchebag was a drunk bragger took 2 seconds to see, but for some reason our best and brightest chose to try to get the President of the United States caught up in a coup with that turd as the smoking gun? Thats rich!!!

He was a dangerous loose cannon. After all, he was sentenced to and served 12 days in jail. Obviously a major player in the conspiracy and collusion.
 
Last edited:

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,233
Reaction score
50,240
He was a dangerous loose cannon. After all, he was sentenced to and served 14 days in jail. Obviously a major player in the conspiracy and collusion.

Yes, and from a process crime directly resulting from the invest, not from an actual crime related to anything he did outside the Russian investigation acting as a member of the campaign. They got him to trip up in an interview over an incorrect date and timeline over a scale of just a few weeks over a year after the fact and charged him false statements. Brilliant work lads. :cool:
 

Hullbilly

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
7,719
Reaction score
12,661
I think Turdy McFlakekin is the newest paid shill...no one can possibly intentionally be this stoooooooopid on accident.
 

RVR SWPR

Almost Off the Grid
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
9,536
Reaction score
13,319
MEANWHILE
RASMUSSEN THURSDAY 4/18/19
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance.
 

RVR SWPR

Almost Off the Grid
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
9,536
Reaction score
13,319
MEANWHILE:QUOTE:ZEROHEDGE
Jobless claims keep grinding lower and lower.
The last time this few Americans sought the help of government after losing a job was in November 1969. Initial Jobless Claims tumbled another 5K from the prior week's revised 197K to just 192K: the second consecutive sub-200K print in 50 years, and the lowest print since September 1969.
 

MSum661

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
4,524
Reaction score
6,829
You mean the Actions that were initiated by the FBI's own 'informant' Stefan Halper and his foreign counterparts in Alexander Downer, and Joseph Mifsud.

https://thehill.com/homenews/news/4...o-investigate-examples-of-spying-while-he-was

BTW they were denied their FISA warrant the first time around back then during the summer of 2016, They came back in October with the Dossier and got the FISA, and the two hop which allowed them to basically tap all comms of the entire campaign. but we have been over this already, and you don't seem to care about those inconvenient facts.

:)

Mueller never did charge Mifsud, although He did charge other russian agents and companies. Odd? Right?
Is Mifsud a M16 asset? lol.
Flash back to guccifer2.0, what if guccifer2.0 was created by a DNC insider to make it look like a Russian hacker breaking into Shillary's email server with an identity footprint that could only lead back to them? How hard would that be? Wait for it..."Orange Man Bad"!
And, odd again that Mueller brings up 2.0 in his report but his team never moved to examine the server before She destroyed all the evidence.

Bottom Line: Clinton HAD to win.

Lots to look forward to.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,389
Reaction score
143,442
I completely understand those arguments from Trumpkins that a warrant should not have ever been issued. But the fact remains that the court disagreed and did issue it. And after issuing it, re-issued it multiple times.

I also completely understand that Trumpkins like yourself believe that Clinton is clearly guilty of a litany of crimes despite a similar process with similar legal conclusions, yet Trump is wholly innocent and has been completely and totally exonerated from absolutely everything. No shock of that contradiction either.

Bottom line is the only place this eventually gets resolved with respect to Trump is at the ballot box. If a majority of states believe Trump, he gets re-elected, if not, he doesn't.

No one is going to change anyone's mind or their vote. Good thing though that this process has pointed out is that half the country has little in common with the other half, and to try to reconcile those differences is not going to happen.

All Republics in history have eventually failed, some individuals just like to hurry the process along.

Next time you want to admit you were wrong..........just say you were wrong. ;)

How’s the sweat shops going whore?
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,857
Reaction score
35,305
I completely understand those arguments from Trumpkins that a warrant should not have ever been issued. But the fact remains that the court disagreed and did issue it. And after issuing it, re-issued it multiple times.

Except the warrants were issued under false circumstances.

It's become obvious the court issued the warrants based on evidence that was falsified, and the FBI lied when they said the material had been vetted and verified. They also tossed in the Yahoo news circular reference as a decoy.

Read this old NPR story with today's knowledge and report back.

I particularly like Schiff's statement:

The ranking Democrat on the House intelligence committee, Rep. Adam Schiff, told NPR on Monday that there was more evidence beyond the Steele reporting in the FISA application, but that he could not discuss what it was because it remains classified.

What other evidence is there? None, as far as I can tell.

https://www.npr.org/2018/07/23/6313...-the-much-discussed-carter-page-fisa-document
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,350
Reaction score
25,774
I completely understand those arguments from Trumpkins that a warrant should not have ever been issued. But the fact remains that the court disagreed and did issue it. And after issuing it, re-issued it multiple times.

I also completely understand that Trumpkins like yourself believe that Clinton is clearly guilty of a litany of crimes despite a similar process with similar legal conclusions, yet Trump is wholly innocent and has been completely and totally exonerated from absolutely everything. No shock of that contradiction either.

Bottom line is the only place this eventually gets resolved with respect to Trump is at the ballot box. If a majority of states believe Trump, he gets re-elected, if not, he doesn't.

No one is going to change anyone's mind or their vote. Good thing though that this process has pointed out is that half the country has little in common with the other half, and to try to reconcile those differences is not going to happen.

All Republics in history have eventually failed, some individuals just like to hurry the process along.


"All Republics in history have eventually failed, some individuals just like to hurry the process along." Wow, you actually admit how much you hate America, and your active participation in its downfall. Solid.
 

wzuber

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
7,940
Reaction score
11,562
but that he could not discuss what it was because it remains classified.
funny ol' shit for brains schiff "has a piece of info. that's "classified"" and refuses to disclose, yet demands the full M. report be disclosed viotating any and all laws, protocols etc. That's fucking rich right there. haha He's such a piece of shit
 

TeamGreene

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
4,940
Reaction score
10,446
Ahh yes, the 'constitutional conservative' is here to preach about the courts, but conveniently leaves out the fact that the prosecution (in this case Comey, McCabe, Etc) Knowingly presented evidence (The dossier) as true and valid, and as coming from multiple independently verified sources (The Yahoo news Article which actually was just circular reporting from the same source), and signed and vouched for it, in violation of the Woods procedure, lied to the Court to get them to sign off on the warrant.

If you believe the only resolution comes at the ballot box then it speaks volumes about your political beliefs.

:)
B-FUCKING-NAG!
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
52,973
Reaction score
100,757
For true Democrats “political beliefs” went out the window about 10 years ago.
For the Trump haters, “political beliefs” went out the window about 2 years ago
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,233
Reaction score
50,240

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,350
Reaction score
25,774
If there was a wire tap it is because one of our law enforcement or intelligence agencies convinced a
Judge that there was probable cause to believe somebody in Trumps circle broke some pretty serious laws. Or Trump could just be full of shit about there being a warrant. I'd say 50/50 odds.
Hahahahahahahahahahhaaaaaaaaaa
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,977
Reaction score
21,130
Any ideas on how long until convictions in a court of law versus the court of Trump supporter opinion?

When will Obama be in jail? Soon? Any timelines?
 
Top