WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Obamagate -Spy Gate, Obama accused of wiretapping Trump Tower

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
11,319
Reaction score
29,143
I forgot about Flake lmao

530 hands flake a nice check and Flake taps out. Fucking hilarious [emoji23] [emoji23][emoji23]

Flake, LMAO. Must be a good reason he hasn't popped his head back up...
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,740
Reaction score
152,335
Obama May Want To Call Eric Holder After Virtue-Signaling "No Precedent" For Flynn Motion

Former President Barack Obama is being quoted from a private call that the “rule of law is at risk” after the Justice Department moved to dismiss the case against former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Obama reportedly told members of the Obama Alumni Association that “There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.”


Without doubting the exhaustive search referenced by President Obama, he might have tried calling one “alum”: former Attorney General Eric Holder. Holder moved to dismiss such a case based on prosecutorial errors in front of the very same judge, Judge Emmet Sullivan. [Notably, CNN covered the statements this morning without noting the clearly false claim over the lack of any precedent for the Flynn motion]


Desperate, desperate turds!!! 🤣
 

RVR SWPR

Almost Off the Grid
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
9,601
Reaction score
13,504
:)
D38990F8-170E-4452-A981-F8002ADEFC05.jpeg
 

Angler

Tritoon Racing
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
6,400
Reaction score
16,097
This thread sure didn't age well for the Libtards... 😂
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,364
Reaction score
25,804
No and No as the IG report has stated.

But then again you think a 1 trillion dollar larger government is smaller, so we are both wasting our time.
Again, the IG asks people if they did it...and they said no. Yet Yates said yes, they did. This when shit hits fan. Get masks on for this, not the ‘Rona!!!!!

Buckle up cupcake.
 

KevinR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
2,591
Reaction score
4,308
If Obama, Clinton and their team don’t go to jail, it sure as shit does not mean they did not develop the illegal, illicit and sleazy plan and execute such plan.

They were so certain she would win and they would never be caught, they were even more brazen. You can’t make this shit up.

So now Barry comes out taking the high road regarding “the law” and the DOJ, also hammering Trump on the virus, swinging wildly from the corner he painted himself into. Hoping his Democrats and their PR department the media will save him.

Imagine the nightmares he must have at night. Fricken love it.
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,600
Reaction score
22,053
Again, the IG asks people if they did it...and they said no. Yet Yates said yes, they did. This when shit hits fan. Get masks on for this, not the ‘Rona!!!!!

Buckle up cupcake.


All buckled up. Look forward to the continuned whining......:rolleyes:

Has Congress found any evidence?
Several senior Republicans have rejected the allegations after congressional committees looked into them.

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr said on 16 March there were "no indications" that Trump Tower was the subject of surveillance by any element of the US government either before or after Election Day 2016.

Earlier that day, House Speaker Paul Ryan also said "no such wiretap existed".

And the previous day, House of Representatives Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes said: "We don't have any evidence."

"I don't think there was an actual tap of Trump Tower," he told a news conference.

"Are you going to take the tweets literally?" asked Rep Nunes. "If so, clearly the president was wrong."
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
53,356
Reaction score
102,466
All buckled up. Look forward to the continuned whining......:rolleyes:

Has Congress found any evidence?
Several senior Republicans have rejected the allegations after congressional committees looked into them.

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr said on 16 March there were "no indications" that Trump Tower was the subject of surveillance by any element of the US government either before or after Election Day 2016.

Earlier that day, House Speaker Paul Ryan also said "no such wiretap existed".

And the previous day, House of Representatives Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes said: "We don't have any evidence."

"I don't think there was an actual tap of Trump Tower," he told a news conference.

"Are you going to take the tweets literally?" asked Rep Nunes. "If so, clearly the president was wrong."

B689243C-4E52-4F3C-A8D7-B5EF7E66FE3B.jpeg
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,364
Reaction score
25,804
All buckled up. Look forward to the continuned whining......:rolleyes:

Has Congress found any evidence?
Several senior Republicans have rejected the allegations after congressional committees looked into them.

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr said on 16 March there were "no indications" that Trump Tower was the subject of surveillance by any element of the US government either before or after Election Day 2016.

Earlier that day, House Speaker Paul Ryan also said "no such wiretap existed".

And the previous day, House of Representatives Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes said: "We don't have any evidence."

"I don't think there was an actual tap of Trump Tower," he told a news conference.

"Are you going to take the tweets literally?" asked Rep Nunes. "If so, clearly the president was wrong."
Better get some mail in votes lined up, your TDS-30 is flaring up real bad.
 

KevinR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
2,591
Reaction score
4,308
All buckled up. Look forward to the continuned whining......:rolleyes:

Has Congress found any evidence?
Several senior Republicans have rejected the allegations after congressional committees looked into them.

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr said on 16 March there were "no indications" that Trump Tower was the subject of surveillance by any element of the US government either before or after Election Day 2016.

Earlier that day, House Speaker Paul Ryan also said "no such wiretap existed".

And the previous day, House of Representatives Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes said: "We don't have any evidence."

"I don't think there was an actual tap of Trump Tower," he told a news conference.

"Are you going to take the tweets literally?" asked Rep Nunes. "If so, clearly the president was wrong."

530 are you just ignoring the transcripts that have been released? Person after person says no evidence of Russian collusion. Over and over and over.

The Dems have said for 3 years there’s all this evidence, yada, yada, yada. All based upon the wiretaps and the secret testimonies that have now been released

So Burr, Ryan, etc said no wiretaps. Big whoop. We are supposed to believe them? Why? Cuz there is an R behind their name?

Under testimony the Obama gang said they had nothing, but kept running out to the cameras saying we got it all!
 

JDKRXW

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
3,122
Reaction score
4,269
From the sidelines, it's plain as the nose on his face........Obama is worried.
But not as worried as Schiff is right now.
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,600
Reaction score
22,053
530 are you just ignoring the transcripts that have been released? Person after person says no evidence of Russian collusion. Over and over and over.

The Dems have said for 3 years there’s all this evidence, yada, yada, yada. All based upon the wiretaps and the secret testimonies that have now been released

So Burr, Ryan, etc said no wiretaps. Big whoop. We are supposed to believe them? Why? Cuz there is an R behind their name?

Under testimony the Obama gang said they had nothing, but kept running out to the cameras saying we got it all!


Based upon my reading of the reports, it is reasonable given all the facts to conclude that an “investigation“ was appropriate and legal as the IG report states, yet conclude there was no criminal collusion.

Consistent with that premise, there were no articles of impeachment based upon “collusion”.

The problem remains that Trump supporters believe that if there was no collusion, all investigations must be illegal. And that is simply not the case with respect to our constitution and rule of law.

But in either event, because there is a lot of grey involved, I would not be worried if I was a former Obama official as the record and the IG report provides significant reasonable doubt as to the Trump supported argument that the entire investigation was solely based upon nefarious and illegal motives.
 

mjc

Retired Neighbor
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
12,470
Reaction score
10,077
Watching 530 (and the others) try to spin, twist, and pretzel things is like watching a helicopter pilot go to full throttle and get ready for liftoff, but forgetting to pull the collective to actually get somewhere. Lots of noise and hot air, but everybody watching knows that he is actually going nowhere.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk
So HRC we could not have a bigger deficit?
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,600
Reaction score
22,053
So HRC we could not have a bigger deficit?


YZ can answer for himself as it is all speculation.

The facts under your scenario would have been that a Democrat was in the White House and both the Senate and the House would have been controlled by the Republicans. And even if the D’s still won the House in 2018, they would not have the Senate.

And since a D was in the executive branch under your scenario, my speculation would be that the R controlled congress would have never acquiesced to lifting the sequester let alone a trillion dollars of addional annual spending as it would have been contrary to fighting off the liberals and contrary to pre-Trump conservative fiscal values. And if the R’s lost the House in 2018, the R controlled senate would have held off bigger government under HRC. That speculation is consistent with how the R party dealt with the previous D in the executive branch.

So no, I believe deficits would have been smaller under HRC as the R’s would have stood up to HRC and a larger and more expansive government. They would have stood up for conservative values that they are clearly afraid to do with Trump in the executive branch.
 
Last edited:

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,740
Reaction score
152,335
YZ can answer for himself as it is all speculation.

The facts under your scenario would have been that a Democrat was in the White House and both the Senate and the House would have been controlled by the Republicans. And even if the D’s still won the House in 2018, they would not have the Senate.

And since a D was in the executive branch under your scenario, my speculation would be that the R controlled congress would have never acquiesced to lifting the sequester let alone a trillion dollars of addional annual spending as it would have been contrary to fighting off the liberals and contrary to pre-Trump conservative fiscal values. And if the R’s lost the House in 2018, the R controlled senate would have held off bigger government under HRC. That speculation is consistent with how the R party dealt with the previous D in the executive branch.

So no, I believe deficits would have been smaller under HRC as the R’s would have stood up to HRC and a larger and more expansive government. They would have stood up for conservative values that they are clearly afraid to do with Trump in the executive branch.

And China and their anti-American globalists whores would have kept on thriving.

It’s worth it, we will crush you in the end!! ;)
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
16,181
Reaction score
29,853
@530RL

I'm just gonna leave this here.
Entrapment
The act of government agents or officials that induces a person to commit a crime he or she is not previously disposed to commit.


Entrapment is a defense to criminal charges when it is established that the agent or official originated the idea of the crime and induced the accused to engage in it.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,740
Reaction score
152,335
@530RL

I'm just gonna leave this here.
Entrapment
The act of government agents or officials that induces a person to commit a crime he or she is not previously disposed to commit.


Entrapment is a defense to criminal charges when it is established that the agent or official originated the idea of the crime and induced the accused to engage in it.

I’m just gunna add

@530RL

Bill Priestap’s handwritten notes of a meeting of top FBI officials debating the best way to set up the 33-year military veteran were unsealed.

“What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”

F582EC59-2A07-4A1B-8A17-E637F5D3FF7B.gif
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,364
Reaction score
25,804
I’m just gunna add

@530RL

Bill Priestap’s handwritten notes of a meeting of top FBI officials debating the best way to set up the 33-year military veteran were unsealed.

“What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”

View attachment 875307
I think he meant to say: "...COVID-19, COVID-19...errrr, RUSSIA, RUSSIA...errrr, UKRAINE, UKRAINE....Trump said pussy..."

fuck democrats, especially those remotely involved with anything political or legal.
 

RVR SWPR

Almost Off the Grid
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
9,601
Reaction score
13,504
Well,no matter the opinions,Flynn going to walk and made whole no matter what Judge Sullivan decides.Trump as usual will handle the bullshit in the DNC “Leech Line”.Well Done Mr. Barr.
 

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
14,899
Reaction score
36,486





Paul Sperry

@paulsperry_


BREAKING: FBI HQ agreed to pay Steele a large undisclosed sum on Oct 3, 2016 "for his work on the dossier," his handler FBI Agent Michael Gaeta revealed in declassified transcript. Meeting took place as FBI scrambled to gather evidence to support FISA warrant to spy on Trump camp
8:07 PM · May 10, 2020·Twitter Web App
2.1K
Retweets

3.5K
Likes
 

TeamGreene

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
4,978
Reaction score
10,587
What's really astounding about all of this is the evolution of the deniers throughout this whole deal. From the start it was Trump is crazy it didn't happen to now well it was a legitimate investigation so the tapping was warranted. Now we see that there was never any credible evidence of any collusion between Trump and the Russians. But you still had all of the dems running to the camera's and promoting the lie. TDS is real and it deeply affects the mind.
 

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
14,899
Reaction score
36,486
May 11 2020
4212
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 319406 No.9129645 📁
May 11 2020 18:09:55 (EST) NEW
Anonymous ID: e66ef7 No.9129604 📁
May 11 2020 18:08:47 (EST) NEW
>>9129529
We are ready and awaiting your go order sir o7
>>9129604
Rain coming.
Bring the pain.
You'll know when.
Q
4211
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 319406 No.9129529 📁
May 11 2020 18:06:24 (EST) NEW
Anonymous ID: b80dc5 No.9129511 📁
May 11 2020 18:05:22 (EST) NEW
76B756AC_B65A_4828_B757_7209734C6EC6.jpeg⬇

>>9129285
Q Slow and Steady wins the race.
>>9129511
We are ready to unleash hell.
Memes ready?
Q
4210
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 319406 No.9129285
May 11 2020 17:51:58 (EST) NEW
Anonymous ID: 6e0ab6 No.9129266
May 11 2020 17:50:15 (EST) NEW
Screenshot_20200511_154739.png⬇

>>9129266
IDEN another leaker.
These people are stupid.
Q
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,740
Reaction score
152,335
Grenell Takes Action To 'Unmask' Obama Officials Involved In Unmasking Scandal


Richard Grenell, President Trump's acting Director of National Intelligence who successfully pressured Adam Schiff (D-CA) into releasing bombshell transcripts from the Russia investigation, is now after former officials from the Obama administration involved in the so-called "unmasking" of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn during his conversations with the former Russian ambassador following the 2016 election, according to ABC News.

Obama crying .gif
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,364
Reaction score
25,804
Can one of the folks from the left help me out. What exactly drove Richard M. Nixon to resign?
 

Angler

Tritoon Racing
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
6,400
Reaction score
16,097
Quit trashing Obama's accomplishments. He has done more than any other President before him.
Here is a list of his impressive accomplishments:

1. First President to be photographed smoking a joint.
2. First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
3. First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.
4. First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.
5. First President to violate the War Powers Act.
6. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
7. First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.
8. First President to spend a trillion dollars on "shovel-ready" jobs when there was no such thing as "shovel-ready" jobs.
9. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.
10. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
11. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.
12. First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
13. First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign.
14. First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space.
15. First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.
16. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
17. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
18. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases.
19. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.
20. First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
21. First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.
22. First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal).
23. First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
24. First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.
25. First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists.
26. First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office.
27. First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records.
28. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
29. First President to go on multiple "global apology tours" and concurrent "insult our friends" tours.
30. First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers.
31. First President to have personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.
32. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.
33. First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense.
34. First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.
35. First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona).
36. First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they "volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences."
37. Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.
 
Top