WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Did we land on the moon?

spectras only

spectras only

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,250
Reaction score
13,402
Japan's Lunar lander, ouch. They should have had some [ 3 ] robotic arms built into it to right itself like a bug, in a scenario like this.🤔:p

1708289835692.png
 
B

BHC Vic

cobra performance boats
Joined
May 24, 2014
Messages
25,641
Reaction score
20,195
Just watched a bunch of stuff on hermatite on the moon. That’s all I got
 
S

sintax

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2008
Messages
7,016
Reaction score
11,713
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,855
Reaction score
33,567
maybe now they can take a picture of the Earth from the moon...

Case closed
 
DUN

DUN

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 12, 2020
Messages
661
Reaction score
1,826
Last edited:
jet496

jet496

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
3,616
Reaction score
6,343
The earth is 3 times the size of the moon yet it looks the same size as the moon does from earth. This is a picture from the news today of the recent landing. Maybe I'm missing something. Just curious.
 

Attachments

  • lander-artist1.jpg
    lander-artist1.jpg
    124.2 KB · Views: 75
DUN

DUN

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 12, 2020
Messages
661
Reaction score
1,826
jet496 said:
The earth is 3 times the size of the moon yet it looks the same size as the moon does from earth. This is a picture from the news today of the recent landing. Maybe I'm missing something. Just curious.
Click to expand...


 
Crazyhippy

Crazyhippy

Haters gonna Hate
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
6,939
Reaction score
5,649
jet496 said:
The earth is 3 times the size of the moon yet it looks the same size as the moon does from earth. This is a picture from the news today of the recent landing. Maybe I'm missing something. Just curious.
Click to expand...

It is basic camera focal length distortion.

You can see it for yourself. Super basic example, doable by anyone with a smart phone or camera.
Set a coke/beer can on your desk, zoom all the way out. Move until the coke can takes up say half of your screen (something semi repeatable, could make it the size of your thumb if you prefer). Snap a picture with something of decent size in the background (doorway, tree, neighbors house). Now without moving the can, or background object, zoom all the way in. Obviously you will have to move back from the can, but make it the same size it was in the first picture. And then compare the size of the background pictures...

Tada, you have just debunked a moon landing hoax argument!
 
Bigbore500r

Bigbore500r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
18,166
Reaction score
37,999
jet496 said:
The earth is 3 times the size of the moon yet it looks the same size as the moon does from earth. This is a picture from the news today of the recent landing. Maybe I'm missing something. Just curious.
Click to expand...
That's not a photo, its an artistic rendering.

In fact - there are no photos or video available yet of the landing from yesterday. They were struggling to get basic communication and to confirm the lander was still intact and upright. They're expecting the first image sometime today.

Seems even more AMAZING that we broadcast the '69 Apollo landing live to the world as it happened, doesn't it? :D
 
Taboma

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
jet496 said:
The earth is 3 times the size of the moon yet it looks the same size as the moon does from earth. This is a picture from the news today of the recent landing. Maybe I'm missing something. Just curious.
Click to expand...
Ask the artist that drew it. As of yesterday evening the Odysseus was barely capable of transmitting a weak signal, let alone any images and what took the picture you posted ?
 
Taboma

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
Bigbore500r said:
That's not a photo, its an artistic rendering.

In fact - there are no photos or video available yet of the landing from yesterday. They were struggling to get basic communication and to confirm the lander was still intact and upright. They're expecting the first image sometime today.

Seems even more AMAZING that we broadcast the '69 Apollo landing live to the world as it happened, doesn't it? :D
Click to expand...
Beat me to it ✌️

And now I'm in Dave's penalty box for attempting to post again --- So soon ????????? :mad:
 
Taboma

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
Bigbore500r said:
That's not a photo, its an artistic rendering.

In fact - there are no photos or video available yet of the landing from yesterday. They were struggling to get basic communication and to confirm the lander was still intact and upright. They're expecting the first image sometime today.

Seems even more AMAZING that we broadcast the '69 Apollo landing live to the world as it happened, doesn't it? :D
Click to expand...
Not amazing when you've read the various stories of just how much money, number of various companies, people and effort was put towards making that live event possible. That was anything but some casual -- " Oh hey, let's broadcast this for the world to see" event, not even close, that was a mission undertaking all of it's own.
 
hallett21

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,248
Reaction score
23,313
Bigbore500r said:
That's not a photo, its an artistic rendering.

In fact - there are no photos or video available yet of the landing from yesterday. They were struggling to get basic communication and to confirm the lander was still intact and upright. They're expecting the first image sometime today.

Seems even more AMAZING that we broadcast the '69 Apollo landing live to the world as it happened, doesn't it? :D
Click to expand...
And a phone call to the commander in chief lol.
 
jet496

jet496

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
3,616
Reaction score
6,343
Taboma said:
Ask the artist that drew it. As of yesterday evening the Odysseus was barely capable of transmitting a weak signal, let alone any images and what took the picture you posted ?
Click to expand...
LOL. Yea, we watched it live, crystal clear transmission in 1969 yet they can't even transmit a picture. Note that I never even thought about it not really happening until recently, but the evidence is, well, compelling.
 
Taboma

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
jet496 said:
LOL. Yea, we watched it live, crystal clear transmission in 1969 yet they can't even transmit a picture. Note that I never even thought about it not really happening until recently, but the evidence is, well, compelling.
Click to expand...
who is THEY ? What evidence ?
Is this in regards to yesterdays landing ?
If you've read anything you know they had serious problems and were in a way lucky to get it down intact and upright. The Eagle Cam was suppose to have ejected 100 feet above the lunar surface in order to shoot live shots of the landing itself. Due to the problems and reboot required they decided to disconnect the power to it to mitigate further problems. They intent to deploy that camera and another once they get all systems stabilized.
 
S

sintax

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2008
Messages
7,016
Reaction score
11,713
Taboma said:
who is THEY ? What evidence ?
Is this in regards to yesterdays landing ?
If you've read anything you know they had serious problems and were in a way lucky to get it down intact and upright. The Eagle Cam was suppose to have ejected 100 feet above the lunar surface in order to shoot live shots of the landing itself. Due to the problems and reboot required they decided to disconnect the power to it to mitigate further problems. They intent to deploy that camera and another once they get all systems stabilized.
Click to expand...


1708737846153.gif
 
Taboma

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
hallett21 said:
I gotta admit what @bentprops posted seems to have a much more drastic angle change. I did read the article and it’s very informative.
Click to expand...
That image he posted was taken from that article and it explains it, context, it's important.

The only differences I see is that somebody removed the Gold H and added two red lines in order to attempt to prove some rather meaningless intersection as the content of the article explains.

figure10.jpg
 
Last edited:
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,855
Reaction score
33,567
Russian Astronauts, says never went into space.

Buz Aldrin, told a 6y/o.... we haven't been to the moon... but maybe one day we will.

Lunar module that would not withstand
15mph travel speed without complete disintegrating..


One picture of the Flat earth.. shit I'll take globe earth taken from the Moon...

will proof someone landed and or orbited around the moon..


telephone call from Earth to the moon with 2 second delay in 1969... REALLY??? LOL

Crickets..

man I'm routing for ya Butch.

Prove we've been to the moon.

Because the about posted shit.. smells BAD!!


Thanks for the comedy tho..


Happy Sunday
 
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,855
Reaction score
33,567
20240324_190434.jpg



here's a bone...

show me!!!

maybe someone can now photoshop an image (Fake) lol
 
rrrr

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,803
Reaction score
35,125
rmarion said:
Crickets..
Click to expand...
I've provided factual explanations with backup for most of the items on your list. If you choose not to believe those facts, that's on you.

But I'll try one more time with the LM. There's no atmosphere in space. It's a vacuum. There is no aerodynamic drag in a vacuum.

I don't have to prove anything. Your ignorance of basic science is the problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top