WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Did we land on the moon?

bentprops

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
756
Reaction score
948
Screenshot 2024-04-03 at 08.33.42.png
 

Bigbore500r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
18,166
Reaction score
37,999
This is an easy one . . .

On earth, we measure speed as distance traveled VS time. Time the time to travel along (around) the Earth's 25,000 mile circumference is 24 hours, 1440 minutes, or 86,400 SECONDS.

Compare the centrifugal force of traveling 1000mph along a circumference of 25,000 miles (132,000,000 feet . . .) VS 20mph along a circumference of 50 feet (like a carnival swing ride) - This is why you don't fly off the earth, and the imperceitibly small centrifugal force is more than offset by earths gravity.

Effectively - the arc of the earth is so slight, you are effectively traveling over 1000MPH on what is NEARLY a flat surface VS the scale of a human. All you would have is the sensation of speed, but there is none because the atmosphere around you is traveling at the same speed you are.
 

bentprops

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
756
Reaction score
948
This is an easy one . . .

On earth, we measure speed as distance traveled VS time. Time the time to travel along (around) the Earth's 25,000 mile circumference is 24 hours, 1440 minutes, or 86,400 SECONDS.

Compare the centrifugal force of traveling 1000mph along a circumference of 25,000 miles (132,000,000 feet . . .) VS 20mph along a circumference of 50 feet (like a carnival swing ride) - This is why you don't fly off the earth, and the imperceitibly small centrifugal force is more than offset by earths gravity.

Effectively - the arc of the earth is so slight, you are effectively traveling over 1000MPH on what is NEARLY a flat surface VS the scale of a human. All you would have is the sensation of speed, but there is none because the atmosphere around you is traveling at the same speed you are.
Drinking the bong water again?
Screenshot 2024-04-03 at 09.09.24.png
 

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,858
Reaction score
33,567
This is an easy one . . .

On earth, we measure speed as distance traveled VS time. Time the time to travel along (around) the Earth's 25,000 mile circumference is 24 hours, 1440 minutes, or 86,400 SECONDS.

Compare the centrifugal force of traveling 1000mph along a circumference of 25,000 miles (132,000,000 feet . . .) VS 20mph along a circumference of 50 feet (like a carnival swing ride) - This is why you don't fly off the earth, and the imperceitibly small centrifugal force is more than offset by earths gravity.

Effectively - the arc of the earth is so slight, you are effectively traveling over 1000MPH on what is NEARLY a flat surface VS the scale of a human. All you would have is the sensation of speed, but there is none because the atmosphere around you is traveling at the same speed you are.
BB5

wouldn't that calculation effect Air travel??

no doubt there is atmospheric wind...
clouds, chemtrails (I had to throw that in ..LOL) etc. but those winds are not moving at that velocity.. IMO
 

Bigbore500r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
18,166
Reaction score
37,999
BB5

wouldn't that calculation effect Air travel??

no doubt there is atmospheric wind...
clouds, chemtrails (I had to throw that in ..LOL) etc. but those winds are not moving at that velocity.. IMO
No, i was referring to a person standing on earth. An airplane is being propelled thru the atmosphere, at a speed greater than "standing still" i.e. - it's moving relative to the surface and surrounding atmosphere
 

Bigbore500r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
18,166
Reaction score
37,999
I don't have enough tinfoil to wrap all that . . .

Do you at least agree that this is what happens when you crest a small hill at speed, VS driving at speed on a flat road?

What you posted with the Merry Go Round, Carnival Swing, then "Dinner at 1600 km/h" is explained by what is shown below....unless you have another theory of why this happens? Lol

1712179241886.png
 

Bigbore500r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
18,166
Reaction score
37,999
Ok - Solar Eclipse happening now.

So . . .what is the flat earth theory behind how this works?
 

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,858
Reaction score
33,567
Ok - Solar Eclipse happening now.

So . . .what is the flat earth theory behind how this works?
so which side of the moon blocked out the sun?? the dark side which has never been reviewed?? or the only side visible??

BB5

I never thought about this shit EVER... until four years ago..
 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,249
Reaction score
23,314
so which side of the moon blocked out the sun?? the dark side which has never been reviewed?? or the only side visible??

BB5

I never thought about this shit EVER... until four years ago..
It would be interesting to have photos of the dark side during an eclipse.
 

rivermobster

Club Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
59,293
Reaction score
59,599

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
Hahhahahahah!

1969 - real time audio and video, as it happened, broadcast world wide, from the moons surface!

2024 - takes 24hrs to confirm if we landed upright, and 3-4 days for a pic. No video or audio.

Just sayin….its real hard to swallow 😂
You're a roofer, right ? 🤦‍♂️
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,204
Reaction score
50,086
so which side of the moon blocked out the sun?? the dark side which has never been reviewed?? or the only side visible??

BB5

I never thought about this shit EVER... until four years ago..

Lol the 'dark side' of the moon isn't dark dude, it has been extensively reviewed
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
No, but I’m looking forward to hearing how this factors in to having landed on the moon 😂
If not, perhaps you're just new to this thread, because certainly those doubts causing your difficulty with swallowing are well covered herein. 🤔

Regardless, my reason for inquiring had absolutely nothing to do with our having landed on the moon or our ability to transmit the world wide broadcast of it back to earth.
I inquired simply because I'm conducting an informal RDP survey based on the parameters of the infamous "Duck Test", in that regard, thank you for participating. 😁;)
 

Bigbore500r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
18,166
Reaction score
37,999
If not, perhaps you're just new to this thread, because certainly those doubts causing your difficulty with swallowing are well covered herein. 🤔

Regardless, my reason for inquiring had absolutely nothing to do with our having landed on the moon or our ability to transmit the world wide broadcast of it back to earth.
I inquired simply because I'm conducting an informal RDP survey based on the parameters of the infamous "Duck Test", in that regard, thank you for participating. 😁;)

So, again - how would being a roofer play in to this?
Your attempt at wordy humor has muddled your message...
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
So, again - how would being a roofer play in to this?
Your attempt at wordy humor has muddled your message..

If you were a regular participant in this and other similar RDP threads of similar "Rabbit Hole" topics, you wouldn't have to ask. 😁
Circle of knowing.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: t&y

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
You must forgive me, not a roofer, but I've been on a few.
Oh I thought your response tactfully and respectfully applied not only to this thread but at least three or four others.
Certainly being a skeptic is admirable, I certainly am.
I think if one is truly interested, then it's prudent to put in the effort to seek out the answers for one's self. They are certainly there for the finding.
 

Bigbore500r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
18,166
Reaction score
37,999
Oh I thought your response tactfully and respectfully applied not only to this thread but at least three or four others.
Certainly being a skeptic is admirable, I certainly am.
I think if one is truly interested, then it's prudent to put in the effort to seek out the answers for one's self. They are certainly there for the finding.

I'm regularly on THIS thread lol
 

bentprops

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
756
Reaction score
948
1) Modern Science and Astronomy tells us:

  • We are traveling some 24,000 miles around at the Equator each day in a 24 hour period. This means we are spinning at 1,000 mph every moment of every day at the beltline of Planet Earth. (24,000 mi/24 hrs = 1,000 mph)
7c58ea3a1baf8e9af774455614cd0554.jpg


  • We are some 93 million miles from the Sun and additionally traveling some 583 million miles around the Sun in 365 days, or a return to ones birthday. This equates to some 68,000 mph or 1,000 miles per second (190,000,000/365/60/60)
sun-movement-milky-way-101222-02.jpg


  • We are additionally told that our solar system travels around our entire Milky Way Galaxy over a 25,940 year time period, or also know as Plato’s Great Year. This means our entire solar system, led by the Sun is also moving at over 500,000 mph.
  • We are also told that our galaxy rotates around four other neighboring galaxies.
Wow, that’s a lot of motion and spin going on.

Yet we never, ever feel any motion.
 

bentprops

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
756
Reaction score
948
When we travel in an airplane we can go East to West or North to South or West to East or South to North and except for jet streams, weather and trade winds, we arrive at our destinations at relatively the same time.

  • The distance from San Francisco to Hawaii (East to West) is nearly equidistant as the air miles and time traveling from San Francisco to New York (West to East). The travel times by airplane are within one-half hour of each other.
How is this possible on an Earth that is rotating from the West to the East at 1,000 mph?

If I am traveling from SFO to Hawaii on a commercial jet traveling at 500 mph, I should travel the 3,000 miles to Hawaii in just 1 1/2 hours instead of the 5 1/4 hours it takes since the Earth is spinning towards the plane some 1,000 miles every hour.

If I am traveling West to East from SFO to NYC, in the direction the Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph, and my plane is only traveling at only 500 mph, I should never be able to make it to NYC. Instead it takes a little over 5 hours, same as SFO to Hawaii.

If I am traveling from Buenos Aries, Argentina along nearly the same longitudinal plane as NYC, from South to North, and the flight takes 8 hours, the plane would have to aim towards Near Asia to meet the Earth spinning West to East at 1,000 mph. But it doesn’t.

When Felix Baumgartner made history in 2012 and jumped from 24 miles up reaching speeds of over 800 mph and free fell for over 4 minutes.

Yet he never had to adjust for an Earth that would of moved some 66.66 miles from where he actually landed while in free fall.
 

bentprops

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
756
Reaction score
948
Scientific explanation: We are all inside a atmospheric “cocoon” , held in by Newton’s Laws of Gravity and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, much like people inside a plane all travel at the same speed, even though outside the plane is moving at 500 mph.

So this would mean that at some point in our atmosphere we are in a bubble, or embryo where all those inside the “bubbble” move at the same speed whether it be a plane, person or planet.

Yet when dropping a kite rises in wind. A feather floats gently to the ground. A book falls with force generated and brick falls faster than all.

And there is no place science describes where this Earth bubble ends in our atmosphere and the 1,000 mph per minute plus 1,000 miles per second plus 500,000 mph are ever felt.

Hmmm.
 

bentprops

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
756
Reaction score
948
Where are all the stars? No smog, should be tons of them. Also seem to be missing some tracks.
Screenshot 2024-04-12 at 16.33.05.png
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,475
Reaction score
22,305
I'm regularly on THIS thread lol
Well if you're not just chumming the waters like RDP's most infamous roofer, the jump in your time machine and go way way back to page # 13, post # 608.
If you follow that link and read it, you will discover that there's a very rational reason to those questions you find troubling. In short, the reason was, this landing was the zenith moment of the Space Race and there were only two primary objectives --- Place a man on the moon's surface and equally important was this amazing feat to broadcast it live, world wide to over 650 million people.
If you bother to read how it was accomplished, how much was spent and how many people and how much equipment was required, you'll understand why it's not done routinely.

Here, I'll help ---- the link from post # 608. There's also more websites from private companies that were involved and their roles, it's staggering how many players were involved.

 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,249
Reaction score
23,314
Say what you want but this thread was on the rails through page 5 lol
 

rivermobster

Club Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
59,293
Reaction score
59,599
Scientific explanation: We are all inside a atmospheric “cocoon” , held in by Newton’s Laws of Gravity and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, much like people inside a plane all travel at the same speed, even though outside the plane is moving at 500 mph.

So this would mean that at some point in our atmosphere we are in a bubble, or embryo where all those inside the “bubbble” move at the same speed whether it be a plane, person or planet.

Yet when dropping a kite rises in wind. A feather floats gently to the ground. A book falls with force generated and brick falls faster than all.

And there is no place science describes where this Earth bubble ends in our atmosphere and the 1,000 mph per minute plus 1,000 miles per second plus 500,000 mph are ever felt.

Hmmm.

So the other day...

I dropped a 10lb ball into 110.5 degree water.

Then I dropped the same 10lb ball in 31.5 degree water.

Both pools of water were the same depth...

Which ball reached the bottom first?

🤔
 

Kachina26

Inmate #RDP158
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
10,504
Reaction score
17,336
So the other day...

I dropped a 10lb ball into 110.5 degree water.

Then I dropped the same 10lb ball in 31.5 degree water.

Both pools of water were the same depth...

Which ball reached the bottom first?

🤔
How long did the ball remain in the 110.5 degree water before dropping it in the 31.5 degree water?
 

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,858
Reaction score
33,567
Now you're doing Vins of your own posts. I've already explained why this is a fallacy (using references), but since you didn't understand the Unified S-Band scheme the first time around, I'm not going to bother again.

here's your lunar module vacuum theory..

NEXT
 

Bigbore500r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
18,166
Reaction score
37,999
So the other day...

I dropped a 10lb ball into 110.5 degree water.

Then I dropped the same 10lb ball in 31.5 degree water.

Both pools of water were the same depth...

Which ball reached the bottom first?

🤔
You have 10lb balls?
 
Top