bentprops
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2008
- Messages
- 757
- Reaction score
- 948
This is an easy one . . .
car rocks, company sucks,
Drinking the bong water again?This is an easy one . . .
On earth, we measure speed as distance traveled VS time. Time the time to travel along (around) the Earth's 25,000 mile circumference is 24 hours, 1440 minutes, or 86,400 SECONDS.
Compare the centrifugal force of traveling 1000mph along a circumference of 25,000 miles (132,000,000 feet . . .) VS 20mph along a circumference of 50 feet (like a carnival swing ride) - This is why you don't fly off the earth, and the imperceitibly small centrifugal force is more than offset by earths gravity.
Effectively - the arc of the earth is so slight, you are effectively traveling over 1000MPH on what is NEARLY a flat surface VS the scale of a human. All you would have is the sensation of speed, but there is none because the atmosphere around you is traveling at the same speed you are.
BB5This is an easy one . . .
On earth, we measure speed as distance traveled VS time. Time the time to travel along (around) the Earth's 25,000 mile circumference is 24 hours, 1440 minutes, or 86,400 SECONDS.
Compare the centrifugal force of traveling 1000mph along a circumference of 25,000 miles (132,000,000 feet . . .) VS 20mph along a circumference of 50 feet (like a carnival swing ride) - This is why you don't fly off the earth, and the imperceitibly small centrifugal force is more than offset by earths gravity.
Effectively - the arc of the earth is so slight, you are effectively traveling over 1000MPH on what is NEARLY a flat surface VS the scale of a human. All you would have is the sensation of speed, but there is none because the atmosphere around you is traveling at the same speed you are.
No, i was referring to a person standing on earth. An airplane is being propelled thru the atmosphere, at a speed greater than "standing still" i.e. - it's moving relative to the surface and surrounding atmosphereBB5
wouldn't that calculation effect Air travel??
no doubt there is atmospheric wind...
clouds, chemtrails (I had to throw that in ..LOL) etc. but those winds are not moving at that velocity.. IMO
No, just physics - I don't dictate them, I'm just affected by them like the rest of usDrinking the bong water again? View attachment 1354537
I don't have enough tinfoil to wrap all that . . .
so which side of the moon blocked out the sun?? the dark side which has never been reviewed?? or the only side visible??Ok - Solar Eclipse happening now.
So . . .what is the flat earth theory behind how this works?
It would be interesting to have photos of the dark side during an eclipse.so which side of the moon blocked out the sun?? the dark side which has never been reviewed?? or the only side visible??
BB5
I never thought about this shit EVER... until four years ago..
Looks like this:It would be interesting to have photos of the dark side during an eclipse.
so which side of the moon blocked out the sun?? the dark side which has never been reviewed?? or the only side visible??
BB5
I never thought about this shit EVER... until four years ago..
Hahhahahahah!
You're a roofer, right ?Hahhahahahah!
1969 - real time audio and video, as it happened, broadcast world wide, from the moons surface!
2024 - takes 24hrs to confirm if we landed upright, and 3-4 days for a pic. No video or audio.
Just sayin….its real hard to swallow
No, but I’m looking forward to hearing how this factors in to having landed on the moonYou're a roofer, right ?
so which side of the moon blocked out the sun?? the dark side which has never been reviewed?? or the only side visible??
BB5
I never thought about this shit EVER... until four years ago..
If not, perhaps you're just new to this thread, because certainly those doubts causing your difficulty with swallowing are well covered herein.No, but I’m looking forward to hearing how this factors in to having landed on the moon
If not, perhaps you're just new to this thread, because certainly those doubts causing your difficulty with swallowing are well covered herein.
Regardless, my reason for inquiring had absolutely nothing to do with our having landed on the moon or our ability to transmit the world wide broadcast of it back to earth.
I inquired simply because I'm conducting an informal RDP survey based on the parameters of the infamous "Duck Test", in that regard, thank you for participating.
I believe one or more of the bigger skeptics in the thread are/were roofers.So, again - how would being a roofer play in to this?
Your attempt at wordy humor has muddled your message...
So, again - how would being a roofer play in to this?
Your attempt at wordy humor has muddled your message..
Just this threadI believe one or more of the bigger skeptics in the thread are/were roofers.
You must forgive me, not a roofer, but I've been on a few.Just this thread
Oh I thought your response tactfully and respectfully applied not only to this thread but at least three or four others.You must forgive me, not a roofer, but I've been on a few.
Oh I thought your response tactfully and respectfully applied not only to this thread but at least three or four others.
Certainly being a skeptic is admirable, I certainly am.
I think if one is truly interested, then it's prudent to put in the effort to seek out the answers for one's self. They are certainly there for the finding.
Well if you're not just chumming the waters like RDP's most infamous roofer, the jump in your time machine and go way way back to page # 13, post # 608.I'm regularly on THIS thread lol
Hey, see, you found your picture from the moon!
Now you're doing Vins of your own posts. I've already explained why this is a fallacy (using references), but since you didn't understand the Unified S-Band scheme the first time around, I'm not going to bother again.
Scientific explanation: We are all inside a atmospheric “cocoon” , held in by Newton’s Laws of Gravity and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, much like people inside a plane all travel at the same speed, even though outside the plane is moving at 500 mph.
So this would mean that at some point in our atmosphere we are in a bubble, or embryo where all those inside the “bubbble” move at the same speed whether it be a plane, person or planet.
Yet when dropping a kite rises in wind. A feather floats gently to the ground. A book falls with force generated and brick falls faster than all.
And there is no place science describes where this Earth bubble ends in our atmosphere and the 1,000 mph per minute plus 1,000 miles per second plus 500,000 mph are ever felt.
Hmmm.
How long did the ball remain in the 110.5 degree water before dropping it in the 31.5 degree water?So the other day...
I dropped a 10lb ball into 110.5 degree water.
Then I dropped the same 10lb ball in 31.5 degree water.
Both pools of water were the same depth...
Which ball reached the bottom first?
Was the ball round or flat?So the other day...
I dropped a 10lb ball into 110.5 degree water.
Then I dropped the same 10lb ball in 31.5 degree water.
Both pools of water were the same depth...
Which ball reached the bottom first?
Was the ball round or flat?
Now you're doing Vins of your own posts. I've already explained why this is a fallacy (using references), but since you didn't understand the Unified S-Band scheme the first time around, I'm not going to bother again.
You have 10lb balls?So the other day...
I dropped a 10lb ball into 110.5 degree water.
Then I dropped the same 10lb ball in 31.5 degree water.
Both pools of water were the same depth...
Which ball reached the bottom first?
You have 10lb balls?