bentprops
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2008
- Messages
- 757
- Reaction score
- 948
One photo has to be edited. Because the shadows are almost at a 90 degree angle.I'll toss this in here quite possibly for the second time in this same thread, since this same phenomenon was addressed before.
View attachment 1350971 View attachment 1350972
Why aren't shadows parallel in the Moon photos?
Photos taken on the Moon show shadows that are converging. Shouldn't these shadows be parallel to each other?www.spacecentre.nz
The phone call is BS lol.Russian Astronauts, says never went into space.
Buz Aldrin, told a 6y/o.... we haven't been to the moon... but maybe one day we will.
Lunar module that would not withstand
15mph travel speed without complete disintegrating..
One picture of the Flat earth.. shit I'll take globe earth taken from the Moon...
will proof someone landed and or orbited around the moon..
telephone call from Earth to the moon with 2 second delay in 1969... REALLY??? LOL
Crickets..
man I'm routing for ya Butch.
Prove we've been to the moon.
Because the about posted shit.. smells BAD!!
Thanks for the comedy tho..
Happy Sunday
I haven't a clue what you're referring to, I see nothing remotely close to a 90 deg angle ----One photo has to be edited. Because the shadows are almost at a 90 degree angle.
The phone call is BS lol.
What @bentprops posted……I haven't a clue what you're referring to, I see nothing remotely close to a 90 deg angle ----
View attachment 1351194
Entertainment, thats why we are here right?
Not necessarily altered or a all camera lens anomaly, simply because we don't know the height, position, relative camera position and object distance or shape (Like appendages as one example), of the object casting the left shadow. As an example, we can't see the left portion of that image in order to tell if there's more shadow we're not seeing. Here's a very simple example of changing perspective can create an illusion of convergence and this is an affect anyone can see with the naked eye.What @bentprops posted……
But look at his photo. The astronaut’s shadow doesn’t fit.Not necessarily altered or a all camera lens anomaly, simply because we don't know the height, position, relative camera position and object distance or shape (Like appendages as one example), of the object casting the left shadow. As an example, we can't see the left portion of that image in order to tell if there's more shadow we're not seeing. Here's a very simple example of changing perspective can create an illusion of convergence and this is an affect anyone can see with the naked eye.
The other effect that can cause rather drastic convergence of shadows is height and angle differential --- in other words, a taller tree, leaning, can create a shadow that intersects another instead of appearing parallel.
View attachment 1351196
View attachment 1351197
But look at his photo. The astronaut’s shadow doesn’t fit.
Assuming it’s a legit photo.
It’s not helpful when scientists reconfigure hoaxes and can’t replicate the scenario lol.
You’re thinking too hard. Do like the rest of us, and accept it on faith.It’s not helpful when scientists reconfigure hoaxes and can’t replicate the scenario lol.
I read your article and it totally makes sense. But none of their examples have shadows like @bentprops photo.
Maybe the photos edited? But the shadows are almost 75-90 degrees different.
Edit. They reference the photo. But you gotta admit it’s the only one in that article that has that drastic of angles.
Which then you circle back to the conspiracy. Why is it just that photo that’s “out of wack”?
It’s not helpful when scientists reconfigure hoaxes and can’t replicate the scenario lol.
I read your article and it totally makes sense. But none of their examples have shadows like @bentprops photo.
Maybe the photos edited? But the shadows are almost 75-90 degrees different.
Edit. They reference the photo. But you gotta admit it’s the only one in that article that has that drastic of angles.
Which then you circle back to the conspiracy. Why is it just that photo that’s “out of wack”?
Why is it with every conspiracy “they” can never really nail down the event?
Here’s a question. Did we ever send astronauts to study the dark side/light side of the moon? I realize the dark side is way too cold to explore, but we had to have looked at the edge?
Edit. The answer is yes lol. But then why don’t we have photos of the stars off the dark side. Seems like a pretty spectacular shot?
It doesn’t change that the shadow angles are almost 90 degrees off. You have to admit that’s “off” at best.In order to spare the life of yet another horse, I'll allow you the honor of answering the first question yourself.
If not, I swear, I'll kill another F*cking horse.
![]()
Hypersensitve Camera Beams Back Photo of the Dark Side of the Moon
I can see you on the dark side of the Moon.petapixel.com
Most of the simple answer to the 2nd question you should figure out from the answer to the 1st. (Hint, it would require a camera positioned on the dark side)
If not, well, I suppose because we already have two satellites with really cool expensive telescopes for taking very very beautiful images of stars.
View attachment 1351309
RRRRI've provided factual explanations with backup for most of the items on your list. If you choose not to believe those facts, that's on you.
But I'll try one more time with the LM. There's no atmosphere in space. It's a vacuum. There is no aerodynamic drag in a vacuum.
I don't have to prove anything. Your ignorance of basic science is the problem.
It doesn’t change that the shadow angles are almost 90 degrees off. You have to admit that’s “off” at best.
The solution to the question shouldn’t be “well we have way better cameras”.
There’s a big gap between 1960s film, current day photography and interstellar photography.
Well this is a new one, so I'll bite. Where did you hear that two astronauts stated they did not land on the moon?RRRR
show me ONE picture of Earth, taken from the Moon "Landing"
Ignorance = Lunar Module
Ignorance = Phone call from the Moon
Ignorance = Not believing Two Astronauts who STATE, they did not land on the Moon.
One Picture = Your dream becomes reality
Keep the Dream Alive
TY..Well this is a new one, so I'll bite. Where did you hear that two astronauts stated they did not land on the moon?
I’m appreciating the addition of buzzards lol
Its already in hereTY..
Russian Astronaut
post #894
I gotta search where Buzz.. tells the 6 y/o.. maybe one day we will land on the moon..
Telegram
t.me
Telegram vid... I'll try to find it somewhere else.. if you can view it.
Its already in here
TY..
Russian Astronaut
post #894
I gotta search where Buzz.. tells the 6 y/o.. maybe one day we will land on the moon..
Telegram
t.me
Telegram vid... I'll try to find it somewhere else.. if you can view it.
You can find anyting you want on the net, dudes having babies, jet boats smoking v drives, heck i even see a chevy with 300k miles on it. All this stuff is irrelevant. What is relevant is the goverment is your enemy, not your neighbor.![]()
Fact Check: Video shows Aldrin recalling Apollo 11 moment, not saying moon landing was fake
An Instagram post claims to show a video of Buzz Aldrin saying the moon landing didn't happen. But Aldrin's words were taken out of context.www.usatoday.com
Buzz words not mine...![]()
Fact Check: Video shows Aldrin recalling Apollo 11 moment, not saying moon landing was fake
An Instagram post claims to show a video of Buzz Aldrin saying the moon landing didn't happen. But Aldrin's words were taken out of context.www.usatoday.com
You can find anyting you want on the net, dudes having babies, jet boats smoking v drives, heck i even see a chevy with 300k miles on it. All this stuff is irrelevant. What is relevant is the goverment is your enemy, not your neighbor.
I bet you didn't see a single one of those Stars when that part of the Earth was facing the SunYou know I'm not a big conspiracy theorist.. but I have been in desolate areas with minimal light pollution (hell Havasu when I moved here was pretty dim) and you can see so many stars it's unbelievable..
I don't understand how on the surface of the moon you wouldn't see billions or trillions of them in the background?
RD
We’ll get to cloning humans shortly sir.90's Scientist: We cloned a sheep! We landed a robot on Mars!
Scientist Today: For the last time, the earth is round.........
This is my first time stopping in on this thread. What’s the outcome after 19 pages? Did we land on the moon?![]()
So another 19 pages?Depends who you ask!![]()
So another 19 pages?
All these guys are trying to keep the tread going long enough till somebody ACTUALLY does ...This is my first time stopping in on this thread. What’s the outcome after 19 pages? Did we land on the moon?![]()
I call this artwork "Conspiracy Wood"Bhhahahahahahahahaahaha! Nice Work!
I kept him clothed, given its supposedly cold in the moon? Counting down to see who complains about the shadow......
Bhhahahahahahahahaahaha! Nice Work!
I kept him clothed, given its supposedly cold in the moon? Counting down to see who complains about the shadow......
Already got the carDepends if @bentprops gets his new Speed, or not.
Me thinks posting nonsense in this thread is passing the time for him while he is waiting!![]()
Already got the car
car rocks, company sucks,Well WTF dude! Where is the ride review???
How was the edge of the earth??![]()