WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Did we land on the moon?

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,711
Reaction score
24,528
I'll toss this in here quite possibly for the second time in this same thread, since this same phenomenon was addressed before.

View attachment 1350971 View attachment 1350972

One photo has to be edited. Because the shadows are almost at a 90 degree angle.
Russian Astronauts, says never went into space.

Buz Aldrin, told a 6y/o.... we haven't been to the moon... but maybe one day we will.

Lunar module that would not withstand
15mph travel speed without complete disintegrating..


One picture of the Flat earth.. shit I'll take globe earth taken from the Moon...

will proof someone landed and or orbited around the moon..


telephone call from Earth to the moon with 2 second delay in 1969... REALLY??? LOL

Crickets..

man I'm routing for ya Butch.

Prove we've been to the moon.

Because the about posted shit.. smells BAD!!


Thanks for the comedy tho..


Happy Sunday
The phone call is BS lol.
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,815
Reaction score
22,979
One photo has to be edited. Because the shadows are almost at a 90 degree angle.

The phone call is BS lol.
I haven't a clue what you're referring to, I see nothing remotely close to a 90 deg angle ----

Camera Shadow Illusion.jpg
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,815
Reaction score
22,979
What @bentprops posted……
Not necessarily altered or a all camera lens anomaly, simply because we don't know the height, position, relative camera position and object distance or shape (Like appendages as one example), of the object casting the left shadow. As an example, we can't see the left portion of that image in order to tell if there's more shadow we're not seeing. Here's a very simple example of changing perspective can create an illusion of convergence and this is an affect anyone can see with the naked eye.
The other effect that can cause rather drastic convergence of shadows is height and angle differential --- in other words, a taller tree, leaning, can create a shadow that intersects another instead of appearing parallel.

Side and front perspective.jpg


Two rods.jpg
 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,711
Reaction score
24,528
Not necessarily altered or a all camera lens anomaly, simply because we don't know the height, position, relative camera position and object distance or shape (Like appendages as one example), of the object casting the left shadow. As an example, we can't see the left portion of that image in order to tell if there's more shadow we're not seeing. Here's a very simple example of changing perspective can create an illusion of convergence and this is an affect anyone can see with the naked eye.
The other effect that can cause rather drastic convergence of shadows is height and angle differential --- in other words, a taller tree, leaning, can create a shadow that intersects another instead of appearing parallel.

View attachment 1351196

View attachment 1351197
But look at his photo. The astronaut’s shadow doesn’t fit.

Assuming it’s a legit photo.
 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,711
Reaction score
24,528
It’s not helpful when scientists reconfigure hoaxes and can’t replicate the scenario lol.

I read your article and it totally makes sense. But none of their examples have shadows like @bentprops photo.

Maybe the photos edited? But the shadows are almost 75-90 degrees different.

Edit. They reference the photo. But you gotta admit it’s the only one in that article that has that drastic of angles.

Which then you circle back to the conspiracy. Why is it just that photo that’s “out of wack”?
 
Last edited:

BabyRay

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,234
Reaction score
3,008
It’s not helpful when scientists reconfigure hoaxes and can’t replicate the scenario lol.

I read your article and it totally makes sense. But none of their examples have shadows like @bentprops photo.

Maybe the photos edited? But the shadows are almost 75-90 degrees different.

Edit. They reference the photo. But you gotta admit it’s the only one in that article that has that drastic of angles.

Which then you circle back to the conspiracy. Why is it just that photo that’s “out of wack”?
You’re thinking too hard. Do like the rest of us, and accept it on faith.

Actually, I think common sense works too. 😊 Yes, Americans landed on the moon. If one can’t understand the science, just realize there are too many people and entities involved for it to be any kind of hoax.
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,815
Reaction score
22,979
It’s not helpful when scientists reconfigure hoaxes and can’t replicate the scenario lol.

I read your article and it totally makes sense. But none of their examples have shadows like @bentprops photo.

Maybe the photos edited? But the shadows are almost 75-90 degrees different.

Edit. They reference the photo. But you gotta admit it’s the only one in that article that has that drastic of angles.

Which then you circle back to the conspiracy. Why is it just that photo that’s “out of wack”?
Well Beaten-2.jpg
 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,711
Reaction score
24,528
Why is it with every conspiracy “they” can never really nail down the event?

Kennedy assassination

9/11 building 7

Etc etc.

Like I’ve said multiple times….. we went there and landed. But the photos, audio and videos are sketchy at best. The moon landing should not be the premise of how shadows affect backlighting.

😁😁😁


Edit. I guess I should say how backlighting effects shadows.
 
Last edited:

RiverDave

In it to win it
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
126,912
Reaction score
167,058
You know I'm not a big conspiracy theorist.. but I have been in desolate areas with minimal light pollution (hell Havasu when I moved here was pretty dim) and you can see so many stars it's unbelievable..

I don't understand how on the surface of the moon you wouldn't see billions or trillions of them in the background?

RD
 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,711
Reaction score
24,528
Here’s a question. Did we ever send astronauts to study the dark side/light side of the moon? I realize the dark side is way too cold to explore, but we had to have looked at the edge?

Edit. The answer is yes lol. But then why don’t we have photos of the stars off the dark side. Seems like a pretty spectacular shot?
 
Last edited:

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,815
Reaction score
22,979
Here’s a question. Did we ever send astronauts to study the dark side/light side of the moon? I realize the dark side is way too cold to explore, but we had to have looked at the edge?

Edit. The answer is yes lol. But then why don’t we have photos of the stars off the dark side. Seems like a pretty spectacular shot?

In order to spare the life of yet another horse, I'll allow you the honor of answering the first question yourself.
If not, I swear, I'll kill another F*cking horse. 😈


Most of the simple answer to the 2nd question you should figure out from the answer to the 1st. (Hint, it would require a camera positioned on the dark side)

If not, well, I suppose because we already have two satellites with really cool expensive telescopes for taking very very beautiful images of stars.

ORION.jpg
 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,711
Reaction score
24,528
In order to spare the life of yet another horse, I'll allow you the honor of answering the first question yourself.
If not, I swear, I'll kill another F*cking horse. 😈


Most of the simple answer to the 2nd question you should figure out from the answer to the 1st. (Hint, it would require a camera positioned on the dark side)

If not, well, I suppose because we already have two satellites with really cool expensive telescopes for taking very very beautiful images of stars.

View attachment 1351309
It doesn’t change that the shadow angles are almost 90 degrees off. You have to admit that’s “off” at best.

The solution to the question shouldn’t be “well we have way better cameras”.

There’s a big gap between 1960s film, current day photography and interstellar photography.
 

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
14,945
Reaction score
36,640
I've provided factual explanations with backup for most of the items on your list. If you choose not to believe those facts, that's on you.

But I'll try one more time with the LM. There's no atmosphere in space. It's a vacuum. There is no aerodynamic drag in a vacuum.

I don't have to prove anything. Your ignorance of basic science is the problem.
RRRR

show me ONE picture of Earth, taken from the Moon "Landing"

Ignorance = Lunar Module

Ignorance = Phone call from the Moon

Ignorance = Not believing Two Astronauts who STATE, they did not land on the Moon.

One Picture = Your dream becomes reality

Keep the Dream Alive
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,815
Reaction score
22,979
It doesn’t change that the shadow angles are almost 90 degrees off. You have to admit that’s “off” at best.

The solution to the question shouldn’t be “well we have way better cameras”.

There’s a big gap between 1960s film, current day photography and interstellar photography.
Well Beaten-3.jpg
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
16,227
Reaction score
30,048
RRRR

show me ONE picture of Earth, taken from the Moon "Landing"

Ignorance = Lunar Module

Ignorance = Phone call from the Moon

Ignorance = Not believing Two Astronauts who STATE, they did not land on the Moon.

One Picture = Your dream becomes reality

Keep the Dream Alive
Well this is a new one, so I'll bite. Where did you hear that two astronauts stated they did not land on the moon?
 

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
14,945
Reaction score
36,640
Well this is a new one, so I'll bite. Where did you hear that two astronauts stated they did not land on the moon?
TY..

Russian Astronaut
post #894

I gotta search where Buzz.. tells the 6 y/o.. maybe one day we will land on the moon..




Telegram vid... I'll try to find it somewhere else.. if you can view it.
 
Last edited:

Echo Lodge

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
3,636
Reaction score
6,192
Its already in here

TY..

Russian Astronaut
post #894

I gotta search where Buzz.. tells the 6 y/o.. maybe one day we will land on the moon..




Telegram vid... I'll try to find it somewhere else.. if you can view it.

 

bentprops

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
757
Reaction score
948
You can find anyting you want on the net, dudes having babies, jet boats smoking v drives, heck i even see a chevy with 300k miles on it. All this stuff is irrelevant. What is relevant is the goverment is your enemy, not your neighbor.
 

rivermobster

Club Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
60,591
Reaction score
62,432
You can find anyting you want on the net, dudes having babies, jet boats smoking v drives, heck i even see a chevy with 300k miles on it. All this stuff is irrelevant. What is relevant is the goverment is your enemy, not your neighbor.

So when I was around 20, I moved back from Monterey to SoCal.

I moved in with a few friends that had an apartment for a bit, and one day the neighbor lady in the next apartment, knocks on the door with a plate full of cookies in her hand!

She's like, hi, these are for you guys!

Uh, thanks?

So that night I gather all the guys up and say...

So who's banging the lady next door??

The one that brings the cookies? Nobody, why?

Me: lemme get this straight. This good looking chick next door (maybe in her 40's) brings you guys cookies, and nobody is banging her???

No, why?

Needless to say, I went over there that night and banged the living shit outta her!

She Definitely wasn't from the government. 👍🏼
 

WYRD

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
4,329
Reaction score
9,454
You know I'm not a big conspiracy theorist.. but I have been in desolate areas with minimal light pollution (hell Havasu when I moved here was pretty dim) and you can see so many stars it's unbelievable..

I don't understand how on the surface of the moon you wouldn't see billions or trillions of them in the background?

RD
I bet you didn't see a single one of those Stars when that part of the Earth was facing the Sun🤔
 

MOUZER

The Legend
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
3,153
Reaction score
6,057
as i said before we did not land on the moon earth isnt spinning at a million miles a hr oh and earth is flato_O😲
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,601
Reaction score
52,192
If you ever wondered why th astronauts moved so funny on the lunar surface

 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,711
Reaction score
24,528
90's Scientist: We cloned a sheep! We landed a robot on Mars!

Scientist Today: For the last time, the earth is round.........
We’ll get to cloning humans shortly sir.
 

Bigbore500r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
18,397
Reaction score
38,907
This is my first time stopping in on this thread. What’s the outcome after 19 pages? Did we land on the moon? 🤣
All these guys are trying to keep the tread going long enough till somebody ACTUALLY does ...

Note- despite my doubt on the Apollo manned moon landings, THE EARTH IS ROUND - don’t lump me in with that flat earth bullshit 😂
 
Last edited:
Top