TonyFanelli
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2023
- Messages
- 2,383
- Reaction score
- 8,591
What say you about this?
Is there a point you're trying to make?So you agree that you can see the non illuminated part?
When its new it completely missing. You should be able to see it.Is there a point you're trying to make?
Your missing the whole point of this exercise. The world whether flat or a ball is irelavent, Its going down the drain becasue people can't discus other postions with respect for someone else's postion.. We all have different opinons. How we treat each other is what's important.You know I stayed out of this thread until now..
If you are having a little fun it's one thing..
But at some point there's gonna have to be a minimum intelligence requirement to be a part of this forum. If you truly believe the earth is flat.. Even though you can quite literally fly around it to the other side..
You are probably gonna log off voluntarily or involuntarily.. This is fucking crazy the stupidity being displayed here. I'm assuming it's jokes.
RD
So honestly you think if you took a Gulfstream 650 and flew in a straight line some .Gov entity would either turn you around or shoot you down?Your missing the whole point of this excessive. The world whether flat or a ball is irelavent, Its going down the drain becasue people can't discus other postions with respect for someone else's postion.. We all have different opinons. How we treat each other is what's important.
No, you shouldn't. It's on the daytime side of the Earth during the new phase. You need to go to Hobby Lobby and buy a couple of Styrofoam balls and some string. Hang them in your basement, then walk around them shining a flashlight.When its new it completely missing. You should be able to see it.
No, you shouldn't. It's on the daytime side of the Earth during the new phase. You need to go to Hobby Lobby and buy a couple of Styrofoam balls and some string. Hang them in your basement, then walk around them shining a flashlight.
Depends on what route you take.So honestly you think if you took a Gulfstream 650 and flew in a straight line some .Gov entity would either turn you around or shoot you down?
You don’t think you’d go around the sphere?
View attachment 1319916
btw... circle area is North America
so will the REAL earth image stand up...
all images on NASA website
Antartaica is off limits, Why that is would be purely speculation. You can go to it on a touristy thing from Argentina. Guided tours only and they don't take you to the South Pole. The treaty strarts at the 60th southern parallel. That's 300 miles from Antartica. Its all quite interesting and worth a deeper dive if you have the time. I have found speclation from ice dome, ET, Nazi basses. Who knows what the truth is. In the 1930 the expeditions came back from there talking about a vast treasure chess of natrual resorces.So honestly you think if you took a Gulfstream 650 and flew in a straight line some .Gov entity would either turn you around or shoot you down?
You don’t think you’d go around the sphere?
Antartaica is off limits, Why that is would be purely speculation. You can go to it on a touristy thing from Argentina. Guided tours only and they don't take you to the South Pole. The treaty strarts at the 60th southern parallel. That's 300 miles from Antartica. Its all quite interesting and worth a deeper dive if you have the time. I have found speclation from ice dome, ET, Nazi basses. Who knows what the truth is. In the 1930 the expeditions came back from there talking about a vast treasure chess of natrual resorces.
Antarctic treaty
These would be the shortest flights over the Arctic however they dont use them.
View attachment 1321228
Says they did a sight seeing trip in a 747 in 2013. I wonder how low they’d fly.
I don’t totlay see it.
Watch the hair it totally give this away as fake. Object in motion should stay in motion, the hair should wave like a flag not stay sticking up. You can totlay see it when the red head turns her head to grab the mic.
Watch the hair it totally give this away as fake. Object in motion should stay in motion, the hair should wave like a flag not stay sticking up. You can totlay see it when the red head turns her head to grab the mic.
Watch the hair it totally give this away as fake. Object in motion should stay in motion, the hair should wave like a flag not stay sticking up. You can totlay see it when the red head turns her head to grab the mic.
On my large desktop monitor, it's easy to see the hair of both ladies react to the initial 'Action' of movement and follow up with a modest 'Reaction' or rebound. Plus let's not overlook various hair types and they're variations in thickness and stiffness. In this case the redhead's hair seems to react more easily to motion.You're assuming the hair is free to move as it sees fit. Looks to me like it has been pulled back with some sort of product (makes sense, would perpetually be in your face without).
The stuff floating around at 1:45 is a better indicator.
Watch the hair it totally give this away as fake. Object in motion should stay in motion, the hair should wave like a flag not stay sticking up. You can totlay see it when the red head turns her head to grab the mic.
Wasn't this photo taken at a filming studio in hollywiered before the "landing"?
Ha ha ha, i mean so much stuff shows nasa is a scam. How many times can someone lie to you before you stop beliving them? 2 or 3. Nasa unlimited. Why believe anything they say?
Ha ha ha, i mean so much stuff shows nasa is a scam. How many times can someone lie to you before you stop beliving them? 2 or 3. Nasa unlimited. Why believe anything they say?
You made a funny, LOL
With your track record of having revealed your extensive in depth 'Flawed' research , I can't believe you wrote that.
I was gonna say this thing flew off the rails from my first post lolCan we get this thread back on track?
Start an "Is the earth flat" thread if you want to talk about that madness.....
This thread is about how we maybe, possibly, metaphysicaly landed on the Moon!
That would certainly spice up Dave's increasingly boring thread.So what do you think will happen when ol bent gets his Speed car?
Will he drive it to the edge of the earth?
Sure hope he takes pics for the rest of us, beings that no one else Ever has!
Except for Captain Jack Sparrow of course...
Can you imagine an advanced race from beyond reading this shit --- let's hope these aren't the same ones that pushed the "Noah Reset Button" about 4,400 years ago.I was gonna say this thing flew off the rails from my first post lol
Can you imagine an advanced race from beyond reading this shit --- let's hope these aren't the same ones that pushed the "Noah Reset Button" about 4,400 years ago.
Move this fucking thread down to regorvill.
Lol read page 1. This was a normal convo for a whileNot needed. If everyone points and laughs at the ignoramus, hopefully they will get a clue.
General synopsis... Yes, we landed on the moon. It was broadcast on every TV on earth 55yrs ago. Yes the ISS is orbiting a fairly spherical earth. Eratosthenes calculated the earths size more than 2,000 yrs ago. Just because the latest mouth breathers don't understand basic science doesn't cancel that.
Not needed. If everyone points and laughs at the ignoramus, hopefully they will get a clue.
General synopsis... Yes, we landed on the moon. It was broadcast on every TV on earth 55yrs ago. Yes the ISS is orbiting a fairly spherical earth. Eratosthenes calculated the earths size more than 2,000 yrs ago. Just because the latest mouth breathers don't understand basic science doesn't cancel that.
Well, that’s pretty much what the RDP mob does these days anyway. Ignoramus or just someone with a minority opinion.Not needed. If everyone points and laughs at the ignoramus, hopefully they will get a clue.
Well, that’s pretty much what the RDP mob does these days anyway. Ignoramus or just someone with a minority opinion.
You wanna know what’s wrong with RDP?
It isn’t the old guys, it’s this.
Oh, and btw this thread was never a debate about a moon landing, it’s been a debate about the validity of NASA footage and images.
No, I’m limiting my exposure to 5 minutes a month or so…Hey! You're back!
You gonna be home for awhile?
No, I’m limiting my exposure to 5 minutes a month or so…
No, I’m limiting my exposure to 5 minutes a month or so…
Well, that’s pretty much what the RDP mob does these days anyway. Ignoramus or just someone with a minority opinion.
You wanna know what’s wrong with RDP?
It isn’t the old guys, it’s this.
Oh, and btw this thread was never a debate about a moon landing, it’s been a debate about the validity of NASA footage and images.
Um, I can read the title."Did we land on the moon?" Is the title of the thread... Not only are you wrong about the debate, you're wrong about the perceived validity of NASA footage and images.
Um, I can read the title.
it’s titled as such, then dives right into using nasa footage as the qualifiers.
You don’t know what I think because I haven’t said what I think about the nasa footage.
But for the record, I think the footage of Buzz aldrin calling out telemetry as Neil Armstrong manually sets it down while over riding the auto pilot is some of the most riveting heroic shit ever recorded. Ever, of all time.
The balls on those guys.
The nature of humans when it comes to debate and denial is to automatically consider all evidence as mutually exclusive, when the truth is more likely (as always) that some is real and legit, and some may be embellished. Each side will choose the appropriate frames to make their argument.
But to the point, coming from one of the historical assholes of all time on this site, it’s unseemly watching the mob pile on with insults.
RDP is more and more like face-book or Twitter or whatever site is the current home of shit slinging know it alls.
I think BP is 100% mistaken on everything he’s claimed, but I haven’t seen him throw the insults that the gang of geniuses has thrown at him.
If his ideas anger you then don’t read the fucking thread.
I agree."His ideas" are regurgitated Q conspiracy whack job ideas, and have been debunked consistently. How many times should I tell you not to step into traffic, so you don't get hit by a fucking bus, before laughing and calling you a dumbass for stepping on front of a bus?
I agree.
But I’m not gonna spend my time standing there waiting for him to step into traffic.
He hasn’t said one ill word to any of you, unless I’ve missed it?
Have you considered that you might be driving that bus?
In summary…so what?
And there's rmarion giving you a thumbs up, thinking he was included as one of the 'Normal' participantsLol read page 1. This was a normal convo for a while
In the end the only thing that matters is how we treat eachother. The rest will be irrelevant.Um, I can read the title.
it’s titled as such, then dives right into using nasa footage as the qualifiers.
You don’t know what I think because I haven’t said what I think about the nasa footage.
But for the record, I think the footage of Buzz aldrin calling out telemetry as Neil Armstrong manually sets it down while over riding the auto pilot is some of the most riveting heroic shit ever recorded. Ever, of all time.
The balls on those guys.
The nature of humans when it comes to debate and denial is to automatically consider all evidence as mutually exclusive, when the truth is more likely (as always) that some is real and legit, and some may be embellished. Each side will choose the appropriate frames to make their argument.
But to the point, coming from one of the historical assholes of all time on this site, it’s unseemly watching the mob pile on with insults.
RDP is more and more like face-book or Twitter or whatever site is the current home of shit slinging know it alls.
I think BP is 100% mistaken on everything he’s claimed, but I haven’t seen him throw the insults that the gang of geniuses has thrown at him.
If his ideas anger you then don’t read the fucking thread.
“There is more in heaven and earth, Horatio, than is dreamt of in your philosophy”
In the end the only thing that matters is how we treat eachother. The rest will be irrelevant.