Did we land on the moon?

[hallett21]

Soviet Union crashed on it.

India landed a rover last year. So…

Still we’re the only ones to walk though right?

 

[Taboma]

Still we’re the only ones to walk though right?

Damned Chinese are heading up soon as an answer to their housing shortage. Maybe it's time we starting reverse engineering their designs ??

 

[rmarion]

everyone will critique....

fakery is;

130k miles from so-call earth... earth image smaller than the moon at 240k away from Earth

Moon is 1/4 size of earth...

enjoy

 

[rmarion]

 

[Bigbore500r]

Soviet Union crashed on it.

India landed a rover last year. So…

Crashing someting into the moon is very different than landing on it, filming videos, playing golf, planting a flag, cruising around a battery powered dune buggy, and then boarding / launching and heading home........6 TIMES

 

[Blackmagic94]

Crashing someting into the moon is very different than landing on it, filming videos, playing golf, planting a flag, cruising around a battery powered dune buggy, and then boarding / launching and heading home........6 TIMES

Agreed. But what do the flat earthers claim about Indian and Chinese landing this decade. Still fake?

 

[Taboma]

everyone will critique....

fakery is;

130k miles from so-call earth... earth image smaller than the moon at 240k away from Earth

Moon is 1/4 size of earth...

enjoy

But the scale, the scale !!!!
I'll take Zoom Lens for $ 1,000 Alex.

Oh, for your esteemed handlers ---- Rads matter. Ohhhhh, 16 Rads and whatta get, another day older and well, if you were clinging to the outside, inside, a harmless 14Rads in one hour and a total time transiting the Belts Zones of 1.13 hours ---- And heeeeeee's SAFE

The total dosage for the trip is only 16 Rads in 68.1 minutes. Because 68.1 minutes is equal to 1.13 hours, his is equal to a dosage of 16 Rads / 1.13 hours = 14.0 Rads in one hour, which is well below the 300 Rads in one hour that is considered to be lethal. Also, this radiation exposure would be for an astronaut outside the spacecraft during the transit through the belts. The radiation shielding inside the spacecraft cuts down the 14 Rads/hour exposure so that it is completely harmless.

Come on man, you're not even trying.

 

[Tom Slick]

India landed on the moon using a 1980's video game

 

[Taboma]

India landed on the moon using a 1980's video game

View attachment 1314450

First time we landed there was 1865, got a photograph to prove it.

 

[rmarion]

Flat Earth Society

Aquanauten der ISS-Fakestation bei der Arbeit 🇩🇪Wow wogegen hilft diese Luke aus Pappe? Dachte im Weltall herrschen extreme Bedingungen, was den Außendruck angeht. Aber keine Sorge, dieses dünne Tür reicht bestimmt aus. 😂 Tja und es gibt immer noch Leute die diesen Zirkus glauben. 😳 🇺🇸Aquanauts...

t.me

 

[rmarion]

 

[rrrr]

View attachment 1314487

A quick reminder:

They had communications with Earth over the Unified S-Band comm and could transmit video. Those newspaper pictures were video captures from satellite feeds that were beamed to media around the globe on July 20th and 21st.

Generally speaking, communicating one's beliefs using memes is an excellent indicator the person is not knowledgeable about a subject.

 

[rmarion]

Flat Earth Society

🇩🇪Interne Regierungsdokumente sprechen von einer flachen, stationären Erde 🤫 🇺🇸Government documents speak about a flat, stationary earth 🤫 @FlacheErdeBibel

t.me

Government documents speak about a flat, stationary earth

@FlacheErdeBibel


rrrr and T

I concur...

believe what you read... these attached government documents must be all false..

Merry Christmas


PS...
I believed what I was taught in school...(64 yo).... I just started researching Nov 5, 2020...

shit don't add up... all good...

 

[rmarion]

A quick reminder:

They had communications with Earth over the Unified S-Band comm and could transmit video. Those newspaper pictures were video captures from satellite feeds that were beamed to media around the globe on July 20th and 21st.

Generally speaking, communicating one's beliefs using memes is an excellent indicator the person is not knowledgeable about a subject.

shit man...
240,000 miles from earth...LOL

 

[Taboma]

View attachment 1314487

No No No No, please oh please tell me a little light didn't go off in the back of your tar impregnated mind and you thought "Hmmmmmm, I wonder, I just wonder if those images could have been in a media package from NASA they clipped from their live feeds and given to us to share with the American People, kinda like the ones shown on TV that day, Hmmmmmm ????? ----- NAH, it's all been faked "

 

[Taboma]

shit man...
240,000 miles from earth...LOL

You can't still be ranting about the moon being too far for transmitting and receiving radio signals.

What's scary is, I'm starting to believe that you actually believe what you're writing ---- you don't really do you ????
It's a joke, right ???

 

[Go-Fly]

You can't still be ranting about the moon being to far for transmitting and receiving radio signals.

What's scary is, I'm starting to believe that you actually believe what you're writing ---- you don't really do you ????
It's a joke, right ???

They believe what they see or read 100% The just dont understand what they see or read. Like explaining money math to liberal.

 

[Taboma]

They believe what they see or read 100% The just dont understand what they see or read. Like explaining money math to liberal.

I really think NASA needs to rethink it's marketing methods to keep up with the times.

My suggestion would be, issue their media releases as catchy Meme's rumored to be generated by some fat kid, binging on Cheetos from his mom's basement.
You, know, something that will be widely accepted as being the credible truth.

 

[Go-Fly]

I really think NASA needs to rethink it's marketing methods to keep up with the times.

My suggestion would be, issue their media releases as catchy Meme's rumored to be generated by some fat kid, binging on Cheetos from his mom's basement.
You, know, something that will be widely accepted as being the credible truth.

You better not be talking Crunchy Cheetos. That's just wrong.

 

[rrrr]

shit man...
240,000 miles from earth...LOL

Compared to the current locations of Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 spacecraft, the transmission of radio signals between Earth and objects on the moon is about the same degree of difficulty as two kids with cheap handheld FRS radios experience in their backyard on Earth.

The Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 unmanned research spacecraft, launched in September and August 1977 respectively, continue to communicate with stations on Earth, even though Voyager 1 is 15 billion miles from Earth and Voyager 2 is 12 billion miles from our planet. Commands sent by radio signals to V1 take about 22.5 hours to be transmitted and received. A reply back to Earth takes another 22.5 hours.

 

[Taboma]

Compared to the current locations of Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 spacecraft, the transmission of radio signals between Earth and objects on the moon is about the same degree of difficulty as two kids with cheap handheld FRS radios experience in their backyard on Earth.

The Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 unmanned research spacecraft, launched in September and August 1977 respectively, continue to communicate with stations on Earth, even though Voyager 1 is 15 billion miles from Earth and Voyager 2 is 12 billion miles from our planet. Commands sent by radio signals to V1 take about 22.5 hours to be transmitted and received. A reply back to Earth takes another 22.5 hours.

Try putting all that on Meme and sign it "Q"

 

[paradise]

Compared to the current locations of Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 spacecraft, the transmission of radio signals between Earth and objects on the moon is about the same degree of difficulty as two kids with cheap handheld FRS radios experience in their backyard on Earth.

The Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 unmanned research spacecraft, launched in September and August 1977 respectively, continue to communicate with stations on Earth, even though Voyager 1 is 15 billion miles from Earth and Voyager 2 is 12 billion miles from our planet. Commands sent by radio signals to V1 take about 22.5 hours to be transmitted and received. A reply back to Earth takes another 22.5 hours.

the re-aim correction they did earlier this year was super impressive.

 

[TonyFanelli]

Try putting all that on Meme and sign it "Q"

View attachment 1314672

Liberty Bibberty

 

[rmarion]

Compared to the current locations of Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 spacecraft, the transmission of radio signals between Earth and objects on the moon is about the same degree of difficulty as two kids with cheap handheld FRS radios experience in their backyard on Earth.

The Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 unmanned research spacecraft, launched in September and August 1977 respectively, continue to communicate with stations on Earth, even though Voyager 1 is 15 billion miles from Earth and Voyager 2 is 12 billion miles from our planet. Commands sent by radio signals to V1 take about 22.5 hours to be transmitted and received. A reply back to Earth takes another 22.5 hours.

the first moon landing was solo?? aledgely..
240k mile communication on a LANDLINE????

 

[rmarion]

Ok....LOL


I've said before... I was a believer till 11.5.2020...


ex Government employee that I don't trust..

Killary.. talks about hopefully getting thru the "FIRMAMENT"


amateur sent a rocket up 5min???? hit the Firmament??? stopped on a dime...
this video is available...


too many coincidences....


I don't KNOW SHIT!!!

just a FUCKING ROOFER..

RRRR and T

answer these three questions

a. Moon lunar module.... roof hatch.. made out of cardboard type material... how in the fuck can that hatch withstand 1000's per hour speed thru space, break the firmament ???? and travel with speed threw low obit?

b. Moon SXS buggy.... where is the tire marks in the moon soil?

c. Apollo 11 leaves the moon (alledgely) filmed ..... when did they return, gather film and camera?


?????

 

[rrrr]

I don't KNOW SHIT!!!
just a FUCKING ROOFER..

answer these three questions

a. Moon lunar module.... roof hatch.. made out of cardboard type material... how in the fuck can that hatch withstand 1000's per hour speed thru space, break the firmament ???? and travel with speed threw low obit?

b. Moon SXS buggy.... where is the tire marks in the moon soil?

c. Apollo 11 leaves the moon (alledgely) filmed ..... when did they return, gather film and camera?


?????

A.

There's no atmosphere in space or on the moon to cause aerodynamic drag. It's a vacuum...you know, the absence of air? After an explosion crippled the Apollo 13 service module shortly after it left Earth orbit for the moon, the command and service module with the lunar module attached went around the moon and returned to Earth traveling around 5,000 MPH. Yep, 240,000 miles at that speed.


B.

From the National Air & Space Museum's website: Photos of the Apollo 17 moon landing site, taken from the command module in orbit after the astronauts returned to it and before they began their return to Earth, yep, 240,000 miles away.

C.

There is no film of Apollo 11 leaving the moon. The only successful filming of a lunar module launch was Apollo 17. The motor driven camera that filmed the ascent was aimed by a person on Earth at Mission Control. Yep, 240,000 miles away.

 

[Taboma]

View attachment 1314685


Ok....LOL


I've said before... I was a believer till 11.5.2020...


ex Government employee that I don't trust..

Killary.. talks about hopefully getting thru the "FIRMAMENT"


amateur sent a rocket up 5min???? hit the Firmament??? stopped on a dime...
this video is available...


too many coincidences....


I don't KNOW SHIT!!!

just a FUCKING ROOFER..

RRRR and T

answer these three questions

a. Moon lunar module.... roof hatch.. made out of cardboard type material... how in the fuck can that hatch withstand 1000's per hour speed thru space, break the firmament ???? and travel with speed threw low obit?

b. Moon SXS buggy.... where is the tire marks in the moon soil?

c. Apollo 11 leaves the moon (alledgely) filmed ..... when did they return, gather film and camera?


?????

Have you ever watched the real, unedited version of the Go-Fast Rocket attaining 73 miles, since I'm assuming this is the video all the Flat Earthers brag about as proof there's a solid Firmament ?
I'm not referring to the clipped version that causes the viewer to believe as you do it hit a dome. I mean the REAL video, where it shows the first stage separating, and the 2nd in the darkness of space --- AND TA DA --- a ROUND earth behind. It doesn't suddenly stop at all ----

Why don't you take a moment and look up the word "Firmament". It doesn't mean THIS.

Here's the REAL video of Go Fast

 

[Bigbore500r]

A.

There's no atmosphere in space or on the moon to cause aerodynamic drag. It's a vacuum...you know, the absence of air? After an explosion crippled the Apollo 13 service module shortly after it left Earth orbit for the moon, the command and service module with the lunar module attached went around the moon and returned to Earth traveling around 5,000 MPH. Yep, 240,000 miles at that speed.


B.

From the National Air & Space Museum's website: Photos of the Apollo 17 moon landing site, taken from the command module in orbit after the astronauts returned to it and before they began their return to Earth, yep, 240,000 miles away.

C.

There is no film of Apollo 11 leaving the moon. The only successful filming of a lunar module launch was Apollo 17. The motor driven camera that filmed the ascent was aimed by a person on Earth at Mission Control. Yep, 240,000 miles away.

It's 2023, and this is the most bitchin photo of the leftover moon landing site we can get
Keep in mind that lunar orbit is only 80 miles up.......

Here's some non-NASA photos taken by a 2 photographers, from EARTH
Sure would be awesome to see something with some horsepower take moden images of all the sweet stuff we left behind......

 

[Bigbore500r]

This is a very interesting read.
Some very interestng statements from the story, that seem to align with my thoughts on the mattter . . .that's all im gonna say

Why will NASA's Artemis 2 only fly around the moon, not orbit or land?

There's a very good reason.

www.space.com

Why will NASA's Artemis 2 only fly around the moon, not orbit or land?​

" Radiation levels of the deep space environment around the moon are much more intense than those found in low Earth orbit where the International Space Station resides. NASA will therefore need to gather data on Orion's ability to keep astronauts safe and healthy throughout the mission"

"In addition to checking out the crew life support systems, Artemis 2 will be used to test how well Orion can maneuver in space under human control"

"Artemis 2 will not land any humans on the moon because so many of the hardware and software systems, maneuvers and procedures involved with NASA's planned future moon missions have not been tested before — by a human crew or while under remote control"

"In addition, many of the hardware elements that will be required to land humans on the surface of the moon are not yet completed. SpaceX's Starship reusable rocket, which NASA has selected to be the Artemis program's first crewed lunar lander, has yet to make an orbital test flight around Earth. NASA and its associated contractors are likewise still developing the moonsuits, next-generation lunar rovers and other pieces of hardware that will be required to operate on the lunar surface"

 

[Racey]

It's 2023, and this is the most bitchin photo of the leftover moon landing site we can get
Keep in mind that lunar orbit is only 80 miles up.......

Here's some non-NASA photos taken by a 2 photographers, from EARTH
Sure would be awesome to see something with some horsepower take moden images of all the sweet stuff we left behind......

View attachment 1314871


View attachment 1314872

View attachment 1314873

That crater, it's called Copernicus, it's 60 miles across and 2 miles deep. So basically everything from Santa Monica to Ontario, and HB to Burbank would fit inside of it.

So yeah, might be kinda hard to see a person's foot prints with that telescope.

 

[Gelcoater]

You can't still be ranting about the moon being to far for transmitting and receiving radio signals.

What's scary is, I'm starting to believe that you actually believe what you're writing ---- you don't really do you ????
It's a joke, right ???

I’m perplexed by this post.
Someone with your advanced intellect, and notions of teaching us all about contrails vs chemtrails, or in this instance if we did or did not land on the moon would know a preposition “to” and an adverb “too” and the difference between the two

 

[Bigbore500r]

That crater, it's called Copernicus, it's 60 miles across and 2 miles deep. So basically everything from Santa Monica to Ontario, and HB to Burbank would fit inside of it.

So yeah, might be kinda hard to see a person's foot prints with that telescope.

I agree, not with a telescope from Arizona.

How do you feel about all of the other stuff presented in the article?

The planned Artemis mission will be interesting - With a manned spacecraft orbiting 80 miles up, I would expect some great forthcoming pictures of all of the Moon stuff we left behind....although im sure there will be a reason , like the camera required to take these wouldnt fit on the spacecraft for this mission, to heavy, can't simply take photos comparable to a spy satelite, etc ......

 

[Taboma]

I’m perplexed by this post.
Someone with your advanced intellect, and notions of teaching us all about contrails vs chemtrails, or in this instance if we did or did not land on the moon would know a preposition “to” and an adverb “too” and the difference between the two

I make no claims that I excelled in grammar during those years my hormones were raging and girls boobies were growing.
Just for fun I occasionally toss in a "too" on a whim, although I'm never certain why


I'm rather f*cking impressed that you know the difference and I really want to thank you for this learning experience.
I'll try not TOO f*ck that up in the future, of did I screw that up too.

Happy Christmas to you too.

I'd like to get back to the moon now, too
OK, get out yer red pencil bubba and make it bloody.

You might be free for the Holidays, but it's my vacuuming day

 

[TonyFanelli]

 

[buck35]

View attachment 1314914 View attachment 1314915

So how does a flat Earth thinking work with a the sun goes down and that comes up somewhere else there's always 12 hours of daylight and 12 hours of sunlsomewhere else,on te opposite side of the globe, err,
plate?

 

[TonyFanelli]

So how does a flat Earth thinking work with a the sun goes down and that comes up somewhere else there's always 12 hours of daylight and 12 hours of sunlsomewhere else,on te opposite side of the globe, err,
plate?

Seriously I have no idea...I never even thought of the flat Earth idea, but after reading some of these posts, I thought I'd let A.I. take a crack at it

 

[hallett21]

@River Dave where’re do I cash my commission check when 100,000 flat earthers join the site?

 

[Taboma]

@River Dave where’re do I cash my commission check when 100,000 flat earthers join the site?

Flatearther/Chemtrail or Conspiracy section ? In either case, stimulating conversation and would certainly attract some new personalities.

 

[Racey]

I agree, not with a telescope from Arizona.

How do you feel about all of the other stuff presented in the article?

The planned Artemis mission will be interesting - With a manned spacecraft orbiting 80 miles up, I would expect some great forthcoming pictures of all of the Moon stuff we left behind....although im sure there will be a reason , like the camera required to take these wouldnt fit on the spacecraft for this mission, to heavy, can't simply take photos comparable to a spy satelite, etc ......

Spy satellites are built around around the camera, a giant camera with giant mm lenses and giant sensors. Are they planning on building the Artemis mission capsule around a massive spy camera?

 

[rivermobster]

everyone will critique....

fakery is;

130k miles from so-call earth... earth image smaller than the moon at 240k away from Earth

Moon is 1/4 size of earth...

enjoy

Hey dude, quick question for you...

Have you Ever noticed that a full moon will appear MUCH larger, when it first comes over the horizon, than it does when it's directly overhead?

Of course you have, who hasn't, right?

A lot of that has to do with the earth atmosphere, and how it changes the light as it travels though it.

A lot of that has to do with the viewing angle, and it actually being an optical illusion.

So when you realize the moon has NO atmosphere, the size difference makes a little more sense.

The Moon Illusion | Observe the Moon – Moon: NASA Science

Why does a rising Moon look much bigger than the same Moon seen high in the sky during the middle of the night? Turns out, it doesn’t—it's an illusion. Here's how to prove it.

moon.nasa.gov

 

[rrrr]

It's 2023, and this is the most bitchin photo of the leftover moon landing site we can get
Keep in mind that lunar orbit is only 80 miles up.......

Here's some non-NASA photos taken by a 2 photographers, from EARTH
Sure would be awesome to see something with some horsepower take moden images of all the sweet stuff we left behind......

View attachment 1314871


View attachment 1314872

View attachment 1314873

The moon is almost 100% monochrome gray. There isn't any visible color on its surface.

The photo you posted was taken through a telescope with a digital camera that has a resolution of several million megapixels. The photo has been modified with digital enhancement techniques and colorization differentials based on reflectivity and lighting values of the original.

The photo I posted was actually taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter in 2009, not by Apollo 17 astronauts. My mistake. As I have explained before, the LRO mission is to map potential landing sites for future manned and unmanned missions, and the more important imaging systems onboard use radar, along with infrared and ultraviolet wavelength camera systems. LRO images in the human visual wavelength and with the resolution seen in the photo I posted are adequate for their purposes.

From the 1970s until today, there hasn't been any reason to spend $100 million or more to build a spacecraft that can take tourist photos of Apollo landing sites. Even if that happened, basement incels would just dismiss the images as frauds and further proof the moon landing were faked.

The differences in image quality aren't surprising, and that you present digital photography that was taken through a telescope and heavily modified using computers and complex software as a valid example that NASA should have made more effort to take better pictures is rather silly.

There are thousands of color high resolution images taken on the moon that illustrate the activities of Apollo astronauts. This is just one of many taken with a modified Hasselblad 70 mm camera using standard Kodak Ektachrome film.

Those thingies behind the astronaut are the transmission and reception antennas of the Unified S-Band communications system that provided TV images of the Lunar Rover and its exploration of the Moon's surface. The Apollo 17 LRV traveled a total of about 22 miles and the farthest it went from the lunar module was 5 miles.

 

[Duffster]

Last nights moon 12/21/23

 

[Uncle Dave]

light speed isnt even fast enough to cover any real distances.

but lets say we could achive light speed.. 186,000 miles per SECOND. if you limited the acceleration TO 10 G's.......it would take 35 DAYS just to get to light speed.

cut in in half to a level most couldnt tolerate at 5G's....and you are talking more then 70days just to achieve light speed.

i dont believe we will ever see humans outside our immediate galaxy, let alone WAY out there due to distance a speeds need to do it.

at 17,000mph, the speed we commonly see with space craft.......it 4 months one way to mars. then think about the logistics of suppoting ONE life for that period of time......we are a long way off of ever having mass space flight to other planets.

If you are onboard the craft it is. It's is fast enough to get to certain places in a reasonable time - 1 year at 1g acceleration gets you in the high 95% of the speed of light more than enough for the occupants of a craft to have relativity slow down their aging.

Alpha Centauri is about 6.5 years trip time for this on earth and about 3.5 years for this onboard.

Given we can fuel a nuclear carrier for some 15 years - a craft that could convert energy to thrust (ion etcetera ) has enough theoretical range to do it.

Figuring out how to convert electricity or energy to thrust vs a chemical reaction is the trick that makes it all work.

This just gets us to our closest neighbors though. 1 g continuous opens up our own solar system to mining and other commerce.

 

[Uncle Dave]

The timeline of space travel is fascinating to me.

Sputnik went into orbit in the late 50s and 10 years later we put a man on the moon. Then we quit doing the moon 3-4 years later.

First shuttle goes into space in 1981 and first section of the ISS went up in 1998.

And now Elon has rockets launching and landing back on the pad.

Spacex so far 100 this year 90% reused.

 

[rmarion]

Last nights moon 12/21/23 View attachment 1315085

one hell of an image of an object 240k miles away???????????

is anyone aware the deepest (so called crater on the moon is 5 mile deep.)

amazingly moon craters are visible from *240,000 miles away*
HHHHMMMM

 

[rivermobster]

If you are onboard the craft it is. It's is fast enough to get to certain places in a reasonable time - 1 year at 1g acceleration gets you in the high 95% of the speed of light more than enough for the occupants of a craft to have relativity slow down their aging.

Alpha Centauri is about 6.5 years trip time for this on earth and about 3.5 years for this onboard.

Given we can fuel a nuclear carrier for some 15 years - a craft that could convert energy to thrust (ion etcetera ) has enough theoretical range to do it.

Figuring out how to convert electricity or energy to thrust vs a chemical reaction is the trick that makes it all work.

This just gets us to our closest neighbors though. 1 g continuous opens up our own solar system to mining and other commerce.

It's beyond mind boggling to try and think about space...

When you look out at the night sky, and try to imagine, ITS ENDLESS??? I can only think about that for so long.

How can it be endless? WTF else is out? Isn't there a fence somewhere?

Endless is Not a concept the human mind can comprehend.

Everything we know is finite. It all has a begining And and end.

Endless??? Who give a flying fuck about the moon. I wanna do some Star Trek shit!!!

 

[rmarion]

HHHHMMMM

amazing tires.... do not leave tread marks on the moon.

say Cheese

 

[rmarion]

Bad Moon Rising...

opps..

 

[rmarion]

NASA Images..


HHHMMMM same image??? my bad

 

[rmarion]

did cameraman have his own space shit?