TX Foilhead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 622
- Reaction score
- 298
I think they want to get to 50ft, but they math says it's going to be more like 30.
And now comes the next straw.
They NWS iand County officials are reporting an imminent failure of a Levee on the North fork of the Mokelumne River. This will flood some areas near Walnut Grove.
Waterjunky, cover your ass brother....
I believe so. Nowhere else along that gouge appears to be threatening the spillway structure. I gotta imagine with all that force behind the spillway, if it got a little closer it'd punch right through underneath it.Is the damage on the emergency spillway the blip at the end? - Its hard to get a handle on the emergency spillways "damage".
D
Gentlemen, keep the partisan side of the politics outta this thread please. Feel free to start a related thread in the appropriate section.
Lets keep this on target.
I don't want to start moving posts. I am rusty at it and might accidentally ban someone.
Is the damage on the emergency spillway the blip at the end? - Its hard to get a handle on the emergency spillways "damage".
D
If you go back a couple of pages the pics of someone's computer screen shows what appears to water flowing in the bottom of that spot, that would be the issue. When you see the scale of everything it's really hard to pinpoint a particular spot. I wish they would start dropping the bags once you can see where it will be easier to know the issue for sure.
The dam itself might not, but what is the substructure of the emergency and regular spillway? If those were to get undermined and collapse, that water could erode any soft material for God knows how many feet til it's solid bedrock and that bedrock won't allow anymore erosion. It's pretty evident in the erosion that has already occurred below the emergency spillway that there is definitely a fair amount of lose material ripe for the erosion by a large release of water.This picture helps break down the issues and shows the emergency spillway and the compromised concrete spillway. The dam itself is not in danger.
![]()
That could likely let the top xx of feet come over......20 feet? 50 feet?eek:eek
That could likely let the top xx of feet come over......20 feet? 50 feet?eek:eek
Didn't moonbeam just declare another 270 day extension for the official drought?
The only thing that comes to mind, looking at all this water , is by May 1st Cali will say we have another drought. [emoji202]
Last I heard he wouldn't decide one way or another until the May snowpack readings.Didn't moonbeam just declare another 270 day extension for the official drought?
$$$$$That's the crazy part.. They will drain all the lake again and then say there is a water shortage? For the life of me I can't figure out why they do that?
RD
They have started flying boulders.
The first bags they are dumping are way over in the corner where the dam road turns into the parking lot. Apparently that was the location of a leak...rumor is this will be a 24-7 job...we will see.
On the dam road, right at the end where the washout took place they have positioned a concrete pump truck.
Flyingbowtie --- Have you read or heard anything about evacuations being lifted ? A few relatives including my wife's sister were evacuated out of Plumas Lake last evening.
No I have not. I was told that the Marysville evac is now voluntary, but I know where Plumas Lake is, and I don't think they would have opened that area up yet. They should call Yuba County for precise information.
My gut tells me they won''t be letting folks back til they get a good feel for the situation up at the Dam, meaning the level of progress.
Best of luck to them.
That's the crazy part.. They will drain all the lake again and then say there is a water shortage? For the life of me I can't figure out why they do that?
RD
I wonder if there was any sacrifices when they ramped up the damaged spill way to 100,000cfs. They said last week they lowered flow in damaged spillway from 75,000 to 50,000cfs to protect power line towers and the pump/hydropower plant. Haven't heard a word about either since they opened up the gates to 100,000cfs.
I wonder if there was any sacrifices when they ramped up the damaged spill way to 100,000cfs. They said last week they lowered flow in damaged spillway from 75,000 to 50,000cfs to protect power line towers and the pump/hydropower plant. Haven't heard a word about either since they opened up the gates to 100,000cfs.
This thread has been amazing on so many levels. Watching from afar but having some ties to the area and basic understanding of the scale of what is happening has been fascinating to me.
Several years ago a dam on the Columbia was in trouble, a crack became evidpreviouslyd the water level had to be dropped. it was a big deal in the local news even though it was on the other side of a mountain range and little impact to us on the western side. I just tried to pull up if it was fixed and stumbled upon this site.
http://www.hydroworld.com/articles/2014/06/grant-pud-updates-status-of-wanapum-dam-repairs.html
That link should take you to the 2 1/2" crack that opened up in one of the spillways.
If you refresh the site there is an update on the status of Oroville dam from this morning. What I heard clearly in that description is that the dam and intended and sacrificial spillway are separate structures. In my mind, with the current events, that means that bedrock separates the earth filled dam and the main and emergency spillways. They also mentioned a need to get the powerhouse back on line as a priority. Makes sense, if they can release water from the power house again it should assist with keeping the channel open to maintain releasing water from the power house and control the water level on the back side of the earthen dam.
This thread has been amazing on so many levels. Watching from afar but having some ties to the area and basic understanding of the scale of what is happening has been fascinating to me.
Several years ago a dam on the Columbia was in trouble, a crack became evident and the water level had to be dropped. it was a big deal in the local news even though it was on the other side of a mountain range and little impact to us on the western side. I just tried to pull up if it was fixed and stumbled upon this site.
http://www.hydroworld.com/articles/2014/06/grant-pud-updates-status-of-wanapum-dam-repairs.html
That link should take you to the 2 1/2" crack that opened up in one of the spillways.
If you refresh the site there is an update on the status of Oroville dam from this morning. What I heard clearly in that description is that the dam and intended and sacrificial spillway are separate structures. In my mind, with the current events, that means that bedrock separates the earth filled dam and the main and emergency spillways. They also mentioned a need to get the powerhouse back on line as a priority. Makes sense, if they can release water from the power house again it should assist with keeping the channel open to maintain releasing water from the power house and control the water level on the back side of the earthen dam.
I understand this is the first time the Emergency (Aux) spillway has seen action.
The intended purpose is obvious, given the short duration it's been flowing and the ensuing damage as a result, what was the original
design criteria ?
What did they think would occur ?
I'm curious if in the Dam's operation manual it outlines in the protocol, that use of the Emergency Spillway will result in it's self destruction after X amount of hours ?
Apparently it had or has one purpose, save the Dam, even if it means catastrophically dumping 30' of lake level on the communities below. :eek
There is a set of towers just above the wall on the downriver side of the spillway. I thought they we concerned about the lay down yard towards the dam that was the concern and the reason to close the floodgates, but the towers were pointed out in the press conference yesterday afternoon. Once the power plant became unusable I guess they decided the transmission line wasn't that important for the time being.
I think it serves a cpl of purposes. One of the purposes,of the dam is,flood control. The auxillary spillway provides a little extra storaget room. The 2nd purpose is the obvious,in that it gives a release point other than over the dam.
If it is stated that some damage is expected than I would say it is a last resort to EVER let water go over it. In this case no letting more water out was a choice made by the dam operators.
I would not expect the failure of the auxillary spillway is an option especially at the low volume that was passing over it. It was designed for at least 10x that amount of water in which case the water level would be even higher.
The lake is 15,000 acres at full pool. At the top of the auxillary spillway it even more. If the spillway is 20 feet tall you are talking in excess of 300,000 acre feet of water. Then you would have to take into account the downriver section is already strained and you are talking about inflows of 150,000cfs that would be passing through. Add to that you are above a major metro area.
I would say it is a major fail on the part of the,state not to upgrade the spillway in 2005. When looking at the erosion you seriously wonder how there was not a concrete apron.
Here's a pretty good graphic of what they think is going on.
View attachment 539173
Here's a pretty good graphic of what they think is going on.
View attachment 539173