STV_Keith
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 2,896
- Reaction score
- 1,520
Taken from the article posted above:
Bump stocks are legal and originally were intended to help people with limited hand mobility fire a semi-automatic without the individual trigger pulls required. They can fit over the rear shoulder-stock assembly on an automatic rifle and with applied pressure cause the weapon to fire continuously, increasing the rate from between 45 and 60 rounds per minute to between 400 and 800 rounds per minute, according to California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein?s office.
Is there any way that is accurate at all? That sounds a bit exaggerated but guess I should consider the source. :rolleyes Never used a bump stock, no desire to have one, don't even think I know anybody that owns one, but talk of bans/regulations/etc. always seems like it just opens the door for something else. Give 'em an inch & they'll take a mile comes to mind.
The bump stocks allow a user to use recoil to reset the trigger. That being the case, certainly recoil of the entire rifle is slower than the bolt is cycling in the weapon. The M16 (full auto military version of the AR-15) has a cycle rate of 750-900rpm. If the FA version will go 700-950, the bumpstock version will be somewhat slower. Also, bump stocks require user input and two hands. Most that I have seen have a hard time running through a full 30-round mag without a hiccup stopping the procession, and have to start again. More weight to move (ie, that 100round magazine/drum) means slower and less reliable bump operation. The liklihood of someone getting through an entire 100 round mag/drum without stopping, using a bump stock is very low IMO. Semi-auto fire can be much faster than 45-60 as well.