All liberals say yes
....unless it's one of them.
All liberals say yes
....unless it's one of them.
These are the kind of bullshit articles that need to be ignored. Old news with some twit media clown trying to be relevant.
...hmm, sounds like marriage, but I digressSo if your accused of something your automatically guilty forever? Sounds fair.
So if your accused of something your automatically guilty forever? Sounds fair.
If you commit a crime then you are guilty and that guilt doesn't somehow go away. Did he commit a crime? Well, we'll never know for sure but what we do know is the fact that he was Kobe Bryant, revered NBA player and ultra-wealthy guy enabled him to not have to go to court to face his accuser. If that was the "average Joe" the situation and outcome would surely have been very different.
Another story: https://itsgame7.com/teacher-calls-kobe-bryant-horrible-player-horrible-person/
To be fair, it didn't go to court because she didn't want to testify, she took a settlement.
I think you just made his point. He bought his way out of it.To be fair, it didn't go to court because she didn't want to testify, she took a settlement.
I think you just made his point. He bought his way out of it.
It is what it is now and really doesn't matter anymore..
If you commit a crime then you are guilty and that guilt doesn't somehow go away. Did he commit a crime? Well, we'll never know for sure but what we do know is the fact that he was Kobe Bryant, revered NBA player and ultra-wealthy guy enabled him to not have to go to court to face his accuser. If that was the "average Joe" the situation and outcome would surely have been very different.
Another story: https://itsgame7.com/teacher-calls-kobe-bryant-horrible-player-horrible-person/
What did you do before Google existed?
If you want to be "fair" you could provide the facts. This excerpt is from Time magazine - link below:
In July 2003, Bryant was charged with sexually assaulting a 19-year-old employee of the Lodge and Spa at Cordillera in Edwards, Colo.
He admitted that he didn’t explicitly ask for consent and initially denied even having sex with the woman.
He left a bruise on her neck and drew blood from her skin.
After Bryant’s defense team badly intimidated the victim and smeared her reputation, she refused to testify.
After the criminal case was dismissed, Bryant issued an apology that said, in part, “After months of reviewing discovery, listening to her attorney, and even her testimony in person, I now understand how she feels that she did not consent to this encounter.”
He later settled for an undisclosed sum in a civil suit.
https://time.com/5773151/kobe-bryant-rape-case-complicated-legacy/
That is true. If it was that big of a deal, she could have testified.. Its not like Kobe's last name was Clinton.
Life isn't fair, it is what it is.
Library and the encyclopedia, magazines and TVWhat did you do before Google existed?
Easy for you to say. You did read post #308 above, right?
Read books. You?
Believe OJ was actually found “not guilty”. Seems that is different than “innocent”. Not Guilty is a declaration by the jury that the evidence, as provided, was not sufficient to find him Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, Not Guilty was the jury’s finding about the evidence, not about the defendant. Perhaps an inmate with expertise in law would care to comment.OJ was found innocent.
To be fair, it didn't go to court because she didn't want to testify, she took a settlement.
Believe OJ was actually found “not guilty”. Seems that is different than “innocent”. Not Guilty is a declaration by the jury that the evidence, as provided, was not sufficient to find him Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, Not Guilty was the jury’s finding about the evidence, not about the defendant. Perhaps an inmate with expertise in law would care to comment.
Believe OJ was actually found “not guilty”. Seems that is different than “innocent”. Not Guilty is a declaration by the jury that the evidence, as provided, was not sufficient to find him Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, Not Guilty was the jury’s finding about the evidence, not about the defendant. Perhaps an inmate with expertise in law would care to comment.
Yes, OJ was found guilty in Civil Court. This verdict included substantial fines to be paid by OJ. I believe OJ has not paid even a dime towards those fines.OJ was also found guilty civilly.
One thing I find sad and disturbing about this helicopter crash that took innocent lives, why was there a sense of urgency to get to their destination? What if they cancelled or better yet taken a limo and showed up late what would it have mattered. The goal for all of us when traveling (land, air or sea) should be to get to our destinations safely, it's better than the alternative...
That is 100% how my dui worked. Haven’t had a drop in over 6 years and guess who’s still paying for it. Talked to my wife about this exact thing. I’m holding all other comments because now isn’t the time and this isn’t the thread. I’ve met Kobe though, and it was a pretty shitty experience.So if your accused of something your automatically guilty forever? Sounds fair.
That is 100% how my dui worked. Haven’t had a drop in over 6 years and guess who’s still paying for it. Talked to my wife about this exact thing. I’m holding all other comments because now isn’t the time and this isn’t the thread. I’ve met Kobe though, and it was a pretty shitty experience.
If you commit a crime then you are guilty and that guilt doesn't somehow go away. Did he commit a crime? Well, we'll never know for sure but what we do know is the fact that he was Kobe Bryant, revered NBA player and ultra-wealthy guy enabled him to not have to go to court to face his accuser. If that was the "average Joe" the situation and outcome would surely have been very different.
Another story: https://itsgame7.com/teacher-calls-kobe-bryant-horrible-player-horrible-person/
Believe OJ was actually found “not guilty”. Seems that is different than “innocent”. Not Guilty is a declaration by the jury that the evidence, as provided, was not sufficient to find him Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, Not Guilty was the jury’s finding about the evidence, not about the defendant. Perhaps an inmate with expertise in law would care to comment.
This is most lukely what went down, but he was MARRIED at the time. Which in my mind makes him a pos. Not too mention the rock he bought his wife created the saying "kobe" which later ob tiger woods said to an arresting officer after a dui.I remember the deal with the girl well and my reaction at the time. Some women go freaking crazy over celebrities, especially sports stars. To me this girl swooned and came on strong to Kobe. She initiated a sexual encounter and got in over here head. Should Kobe have ignored her? Hell ya he should, but he is human and a young male on the road and likely a tad lonely. Opportunity presented itself and he took it. Wrong choice but not an uncommon choice. It was in the beginning 2 consenting adults who later, in the middle of whatever happened, both realized they'd made a bad decision. Nothing more.....
To me the girl realized she put herself into a situation and was just as guilty, if not more. The outcome was just a bad situation correcting itself. I honestly believe in the end justice was served. Kobe got off without legal action and the girl got off with little more than a dent in here dignity. Both had to live with their poor decisions just like normal folks do on a daily basis. Both paid a small but rightful price.
One thing I find sad and disturbing about this helicopter crash that took innocent lives, why was there a sense of urgency to get to their destination? What if they cancelled or better yet taken a limo and showed up late what would it have mattered. The goal for all of us when traveling (land, air or sea) should be to get to our destinations safely, it's better than the alternative...
Fair enough, used the wrong word. Either way, he was free to search for the real killer. LOLBelieve OJ was actually found “not guilty”. Seems that is different than “innocent”. Not Guilty is a declaration by the jury that the evidence, as provided, was not sufficient to find him Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, Not Guilty was the jury’s finding about the evidence, not about the defendant. Perhaps an inmate with expertise in law would care to comment.
This is most lukely what went down, but he was MARRIED at the time. Which in my mind makes him a pos. Not too mention the rock he bought his wife created the saying "kobe" which later ob tiger woods said to an arresting officer after a dui.
The real question is why didnt his then wife leave him. If i was a betting man prenup.
One thing I find sad and disturbing about this helicopter crash that took innocent lives, why was there a sense of urgency to get to their destination? What if they cancelled or better yet taken a limo and showed up late what would it have mattered. The goal for all of us when traveling (land, air or sea) should be to get to our destinations safely, it's better than the alternative...
That does not mean there was bot other deals made. Cheating is one of the few things that i will end any relationship right then and there. Even the suspension of it, means i have lost the trust of that person and i would end it.Kobe and his wife had no prenup.
That does not mean there was bot other deals made. Cheating is one of the few things that i will end any relationship right then and there. Even the suspension of it, means i have lost the trust of that person and i would end it.
Believe OJ was actually found “not guilty”. Seems that is different than “innocent”. Not Guilty is a declaration by the jury that the evidence, as provided, was not sufficient to find him Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, Not Guilty was the jury’s finding about the evidence, not about the defendant. Perhaps an inmate with expertise in law would care to comment.
It is thier business, i still think he is a pos for doing itThen that would be a postnup. They had no prenup.
Most of these high profile figures have infidelity issues. How they deal with it is their business
Guilty until proven innocent right? The DA dropped the charges.
Most people don't understand false accusations until it happens to a friend or family member. Some even falsely accuse with no money to win. I'm not saying he did or didn't do it. I'm just saying money doesn't make the DA drop charges, a lack of evidence/credible testimony does.
They trusted him and died.
He used HotbotWhat did you do before Google existed?
So now it's Kobe's fault that they died? This thread doesn't disappoint.
So now it's Kobe's fault that they died? This thread doesn't disappoint.
I love the term "jaded"So do you feel the same way about Trump or just nakers?
I said it before in this thread. He wasn’t convicted. She didn’t go to court. She could have and gone to civil court as well. At this point she could have set him up and extorted him. You don’t know. I don’t know. Only she knows at this point. So your accusations are baseless at this point and you seem jaded over something that doesn’t affect you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
These guys know it all . . . LoLSo now it's Kobe's fault that they died? This thread doesn't disappoint.
It is thier business, i still think he is a pos for doing it
I love the term "jaded"
I am not married. I also had no intention of dating her, as if you read thr thread i was pretty sure she ws in it for the money, not a shock she was a gold digger. It was also okcupid, which is nothing like tinder.Says the guy posting nudes of hookers off tinder and asking if he should date her.. FFS