WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Good Lord Boeing

MPHSystems

Hallett 240
Joined
Sep 10, 2021
Messages
4,103
Reaction score
10,283
just saw on the news this morning a tire/wheel flew off a 777 at take off. not sure this can be blamed on Boeing but still the press they are getting.....
Serious question @DaveH are American runways better for landing without a tire? Why not jus land it in Japan without 1 wheel?
 

DaveH

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
2,876
Reaction score
4,238
Serious question @DaveH are American runways better for landing without a tire? Why not jus land it in Japan without 1 wheel?
my guess would be they had no way of knowing if when the tire came off there was any sort of other collateral damage. so the safest option would likely to be to get the thing back on the ground as soon as possible.
 

yz450mm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
3,646
Reaction score
7,464
Rolling the dice again, wish me luck!
1000007196.jpg
1000007197.jpg
 

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
14,962
Reaction score
36,690
20240311_191137.jpg




John Barnett, 62, was found dead in his truck in a hotel parking lot in South Carolina, cops said Monday - seven years after he retired following a 32-year career.
The ex-quality manager at Boeing's North Charleston plant died from a 'self-inflicted' wound, cops in Charleston said, adding that they were still investigating.

Barnett's death came during a break in depositions in a whistleblower retaliation suit, where he alleged under-pressure workers were deliberately fitting sub-standard parts to aircraft on the assembly line.

He said that in some cases, second-rate parts were literally removed from scrap bins, before being fitted to planes that were being built to prevent delays. A 2017 review by the FAA upheld some of his concerns, requiring Boeing to take action.

He had just given a deposition to Boeing's lawyers for the case this past week, his attorney Brian Knowles said.

an email, he called his client's death 'tragic'.

'Today is a tragic day,' Knowles wrote, revealing that Barnett 'was supposed to do day three of his deposition here in Charleston on his AIR21 case [on Saturday],' referring to a federal law that provides whistleblowers protection in the aviation industry.

'John had been back and forth for quite some time getting prepared,' he continued, providing a timeline of what transpired in the days before Barnett's death.

'The defense examined him for their allowed seven hours under the rules on Thursday.

'I cross examined him all day yesterday [Friday] and did not finish. We agreed to continue this morning at 10 am [co-counsel] Rob [Turkewitz] kept calling this morning and his phone would go to voicemail.

'We then asked the hotel to check on him,' the South Carolina jurist went on.

'They found him in his truck dead from an 'alleged' self-inflicted gunshot. We drove to the hotel and spoke with the police and the coroner.'

The Charleston County coroner, meanwhile, confirmed Monday the longtime Boeing staffer died Friday, while in town for interviews linked to the case.

Boeing also responded to the former worker's death in their own statement as news spread on Monday, saying it was 'saddened by Mr. Barnett's passing.'

The statement did not address any aspects of the case, but brass ultimately added: 'Our thoughts are with his family and friends.
 
Last edited:

cofooter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
6,126
Reaction score
10,619
I should have sold but I hold.
My GF bought a bunch of Boeing years ago on the advice of an ex Boeing Engineer. It is half now what it was when she bought it. Fact is, Boeing is the only US company competing with Airbus. It will take some time to sort things out but they will survive and thrive no matter what IMO.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,908
Reaction score
153,458


During Boeing's audit, the FAA conducted 89 product reviews, which evaluated the manufacturing process. Of the 89 audits, the planemaker passed 56 but did not meet specific standards in 33, resulting in 97 alleged noncompliance.

The presentation comes two months after a door plug ripped off a 737 Max 9 during an Alaska Airlines flight. Since then, Boeing has come under intense scrutiny over its manufacturing process. The latest findings should concern airlines operating fleets of these planes and passengers.

The audit then focused on Spirit AeroSystems, which makes fuselage or other parts for the 737 Max. According to the presentation, Spirit only passed six audits while failing seven.

FAA investigators noticed mechanics at Spirit using a hotel key card to measure door seals. Some mechanics also used Dawn soap as a "lubricant" during the door fitting process.
 

Waterjunky

RDP Inmate #94
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
4,993
Reaction score
4,426
Boeing has some issues , this isn't one of them.
That said, if the stock dips hard, I might buy.......
 

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
11,377
Reaction score
29,362
Not going there at this point
I had a 1000 shares I bought at 40-60 bucks around 2010, and sold it for 260-300 in 2018.

the thing about Boeing Stock, You’re only 1 plane crash away from losing most of your money at any time.
 

CLdrinker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
10,007
Reaction score
20,211
Not going there at this point
I had a 1000 shares I bought at 40-60 bucks around 2010, and sold it for 260-300 in 2018.

the thing about Boeing Stock, You’re only 1 plane crash away from losing most of your money at any time.
Buy after the crash. Sell over $200
 

CLdrinker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
10,007
Reaction score
20,211
Not sure I understand people coming to the defense of this company. They knowingly engineered MCAS software into the 737max without telling pilots it was present. They told airlines that no additional training was required for the max, and they put profits over safety. Trust is earned not given. If you want to fly "Bean Counter" airlines, be my guest.
Who is defending them?
 

Cobalt232

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2018
Messages
1,341
Reaction score
1,762
Not sure I understand people coming to the defense of this company. They knowingly engineered MCAS software into the 737max without telling pilots it was present. They told airlines that no additional training was required for the max, and they put profits over safety. Trust is earned not given. If you want to fly "Bean Counter" airlines, be my guest.
While the crews did not know about MCAS, a runaway stabilizer is a memory item (no checklist needed). The Ethiopian crew got it correct by using the stab cutoff switches but then turned them back on.
 

SkyDirtWaterguy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
997
Reaction score
3,563
While the crews did not know about MCAS, a runaway stabilizer is a memory item (no checklist needed). The Ethiopian crew got it correct by using the stab cutoff switches but then turned them back on.
Right! And anyone who has practiced it in the Sim knows it’s a very challenging maneuver and a unnatural feeling to release forward or back pressure to release the trim brake and manually trim.
 
Last edited:

Cobalt232

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2018
Messages
1,341
Reaction score
1,762
Right! And anyone who has practiced it in the Sim knows it’s a very challenging maneuver and a unnatural feeling to release forward or back pressure to release the trim break and manually trim.
It can also take a lot of strength if the horizontal stabilizer is loaded.
 

lbhsbz

Putting on the brakes
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
13,821
Reaction score
36,551

JDKRXW

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
3,131
Reaction score
4,302
50 injured during “technical event” on 787


View attachment 1346829

I find this ('technical even') extremely difficult to believe.

Im going to stick my neck out and say the crew did something like bumping the columns etc -- and there's a bunch of ass coveriing going on.

EDIT:
Looks like a big possibility of operator - (pilot or flight attendant) error.
There's even a name for this.
 
Last edited:

TPC

Wrenching Dad
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
32,366
Reaction score
27,251
Disney, Boeing and a few other companies time to go Private. Buy up the stock.
 

napanutt

Connoisseur
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
11,613
Reaction score
16,401
I’ll stick to the airbus 321 from SFO to BOS thank you very much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TPC

Activated

Deplorable
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
7,956
Reaction score
17,431
Its a 25yo plane.

Seems like this is more of a United problem than a Boeing problem.
I agree. I don’t care either way, just saw the info and shared.

At a minimum, Boeing has a PR problem that they should figure out how to get in front of.
 

shunter2005

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
1,953
My question is this: Why have all the last 4 or 5 major issues happened to United Arilines only? Any parts been falling off of Southwest planes recently? It certainly wouldn't surprise me that Boeing would use some inferior parts at times, but shouldn't a good ground crewman or jet technician spot issues and fix them? Shouldn't some of these issues get caught during routine inspections by the airlines? I gotta call BS on some of this and put some of the blame of United and/or Alaska airlines.
 

Activated

Deplorable
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
7,956
Reaction score
17,431

lbhsbz

Putting on the brakes
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
13,821
Reaction score
36,551
My question is this: Why have all the last 4 or 5 major issues happened to United Arilines only? Any parts been falling off of Southwest planes recently? It certainly wouldn't surprise me that Boeing would use some inferior parts at times, but shouldn't a good ground crewman or jet technician spot issues and fix them? Shouldn't some of these issues get caught during routine inspections by the airlines? I gotta call BS on some of this and put some of the blame of United and/or Alaska airlines.
Swift drivers crash Freightliners....why isn't Freightliner in the news?
 

shunter2005

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
1,953
Its a 25yo plane.

Seems like this is more of a United problem than a Boeing problem.
I watched a special yesterday about an Aloha 737 (early model) that lost the roof several years ago. A passenger saw a crack in the fuselage right next to the door when she was boarding. She asked her friend if she should say something. She didn't, but not her fault. If a passenger could see a crack in the fuselage, don't you think a "trained" technician or inspector for the airline should have seen it and grounded the plane until it was repaired? FAA said the crack was a debonding of the glue that holds one panel to another. Glue? Really? It's a special glue that was used along with rivets and other stuff to hold the plane together. It was actually pretty interesting to listen to. The glue was affected by the humidity which caused it to debond. They have since reformulated that glue to make it impervious to humidity.
 

DarkHorseRacing

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
7,051
Reaction score
14,167
I watched a special yesterday about an Aloha 737 (early model) that lost the roof several years ago. A passenger saw a crack in the fuselage right next to the door when she was boarding. She asked her friend if she should say something. She didn't, but not her fault. If a passenger could see a crack in the fuselage, don't you think a "trained" technician or inspector for the airline should have seen it and grounded the plane until it was repaired? FAA said the crack was a debonding of the glue that holds one panel to another. Glue? Really? It's a special glue that was used along with rivets and other stuff to hold the plane together. It was actually pretty interesting to listen to. The glue was affected by the humidity which caused it to debond. They have since reformulated that glue to make it impervious to humidity.
There was an Air Disasters episode on that. Need to remember the aircraft skin is a pressure vessel. They use epoxy on the overlapping seams to hold it together and then rivets as a final attachment.

That airframe was way over the manufacture limit for flight cycles, and the environment was a contributing factor.
 

shunter2005

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
1,953
There was an Air Disasters episode on that. Need to remember the aircraft skin is a pressure vessel. They use epoxy on the overlapping seams to hold it together and then rivets as a final attachment.

That airframe was way over the manufacture limit for flight cycles, and the environment was a contributing factor.
Might have been what it was. It had already started when I tuned in. I get that, but my point was why didn't a tech or inspector see what a passenger saw?
 

DarkHorseRacing

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
7,051
Reaction score
14,167
Might have been what it was. It had already started when I tuned in. I get that, but my point was why didn't a tech or inspector see what a passenger saw?
Absolutely agree. The Air Disasters episode said what the passenger saw was right next to the aircraft door frame on the way in.

That tells me two pilots and the rest of the crew walked right past that to board the plane themselves and neither noticed nor said anything.

One thing I have noticed is the pre-flight check walk around the plane seems to have died. Used to be something every pilot did. Now they just get on and go to the cockpit and none's the wiser.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
16,440
Reaction score
37,307
Absolutely agree. The Air Disasters episode said what the passenger saw was right next to the aircraft door frame on the way in.

That tells me two pilots and the rest of the crew walked right past that to board the plane themselves and neither noticed nor said anything.

One thing I have noticed is the pre-flight check walk around the plane seems to have died. Used to be something every pilot did. Now they just get on and go to the cockpit and none's the wiser.
It's required. A flight crew member does the walk before they enter the cockpit and passengers board.
 

Andy B.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
6,035
Reaction score
8,868
Absolutely agree. The Air Disasters episode said what the passenger saw was right next to the aircraft door frame on the way in.

That tells me two pilots and the rest of the crew walked right past that to board the plane themselves and neither noticed nor said anything.

One thing I have noticed is the pre-flight check walk around the plane seems to have died. Used to be something every pilot did. Now they just get on and go to the cockpit and none's the wiser.
I know a few pilots that fly for southwest and they all say I wouldn't get in the pilots seat without doing it. They are all captains.
 

shunter2005

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
1,953
Absolutely agree. The Air Disasters episode said what the passenger saw was right next to the aircraft door frame on the way in.

That tells me two pilots and the rest of the crew walked right past that to board the plane themselves and neither noticed nor said anything.
Wow!! I didn't even think about the flight crew entering the plane. They dang sure should have seen it.
 
Top