WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Why not a buggy?

evantwheeler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2015
Messages
3,122
Reaction score
6,262
always wanted a LT sand car before I died. how much in maintenance are they per season? More than the boat?
Depends what you buy, how you drive, and how much you use it. Ive gone 3 years and only minimal prep, but im an idaho for a week and 2 or 3 glamis trips a season kind of duner. I love driving the car, but have zero desire to go out for long trips or many times a season.
 

evantwheeler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2015
Messages
3,122
Reaction score
6,262
In October he lunched second or third, so that's probably why it's so shiny and pretty. The ring gear portion looks like it can house a pretty substantial gear set though. I like the stuff, but my bank account is more in the spectator range...and the cheap seats at that.
Pretty positive it is essentially a d60 r&p in the S4/5D. They are fantastic. You have to TRY to hurt them if properly built. My boss whoops on his and still on original R&P. Like does laps at Olds hill full throttle multiple times a trip, and only needed a couple bearings and a 2nd gear over the decade he has had it.

I bought one because of the abuse his takes, and with my power and the way I drive, i should never ever have to do anything but change the oil in it.
 
Last edited:

monkeyswrench

To The Rescue!
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
30,450
Reaction score
88,170
Pretty positive it is essentially a d60 r&p in the S4/5D. They are fantastic. You have to TRY to hurt them if properly built. My boss whoops on his and still on original R&P. Like does laps at Olds hill full throttle multiple times a trip, and only needed a couple bearings and a 2nd gear over the decade he has had it.
This guy has near 900hp, and it's his first buggy. It may have been a vertical learning curve. I believe it was doing wheelies down Olds :oops:
 

SeanRitchie

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
182
Reaction score
925
Here's some transaxle facts (consider me the horses mouth):

1. 90% of people put far more power through their H-pattern Mendeola 2D than they are capable of handling. (same as 525 pushing an Alpha 1 drive in a 25'+ boat). This is the majority of "transaxles are expensive to maintain!" talk.

2. The vast majority of buggies were built in the past 20 years with transaxles and engine packages that were matched to handle the power. Then new owners threw a cam, heads, stroker crank in the motor against the same transaxle that is not capable of handling that power. Yes, that requires more frequent services on the transaxle and replacing worn out parts.

3. There are far better transaxles on the market today that can handle 600+ HP and are extremely reliable (Weddle HV-24/HV-25), and are still a common H-pattern that your wife and kids and drive.

4. Yes, a new Albins is $35k. There are still plenty of ballers building high end cars that are willing to shell out for the best of the best. Yes, a Weddle S4D will handle nearly the same amount of power as an Albins for $20k, and cost a lot less to replace parts when the time comes. This is the "minor league baller" market.

5. Transaxles for off-road buggies are not a high volume production unit, therefor they cost more. We are not GM, Ford, Dodge, etc. This is a niche market. Gotta pay to play.

6. A ride in a high powered purpose built sand car or desert buggy is far more fun than any SxS ride. I've been in and driven both, I have skin in the game on this topic.

Enjoy your whiskey's tonight boys, I finally got 80 gallons of solvent in my parts wash tank today and actual work is getting through my shop. I smell as good as I look tonight.
 

monkeyswrench

To The Rescue!
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
30,450
Reaction score
88,170
Here's some transaxle facts (consider me the horses mouth):

1. 90% of people put far more power through their H-pattern Mendeola 2D than they are capable of handling. (same as 525 pushing an Alpha 1 drive in a 25'+ boat). This is the majority of "transaxles are expensive to maintain!" talk.

2. The vast majority of buggies were built in the past 20 years with transaxles and engine packages that were matched to handle the power. Then new owners threw a cam, heads, stroker crank in the motor against the same transaxle that is not capable of handling that power. Yes, that requires more frequent services on the transaxle and replacing worn out parts.

3. There are far better transaxles on the market today that can handle 600+ HP and are extremely reliable (Weddle HV-24/HV-25), and are still a common H-pattern that your wife and kids and drive.

4. Yes, a new Albins is $35k. There are still plenty of ballers building high end cars that are willing to shell out for the best of the best. Yes, a Weddle S4D will handle nearly the same amount of power as an Albins for $20k, and cost a lot less to replace parts when the time comes. This is the "minor league baller" market.

5. Transaxles for off-road buggies are not a high volume production unit, therefor they cost more. We are not GM, Ford, Dodge, etc. This is a niche market. Gotta pay to play.

6. A ride in a high powered purpose built sand car or desert buggy is far more fun than any SxS ride. I've been in and driven both, I have skin in the game on this topic.

Enjoy your whiskey's tonight boys, I finally got 80 gallons of solvent in my parts wash tank today and actual work is getting through my shop. I smell as good as I look tonight.
For a second, I thought you were going to say you had 80 gallons of whiskey....
Whiskey I understand, sequential transmissions I don't 🤣

Glad work is going for you!
 

DrunkenSailor

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Messages
7,835
Reaction score
11,413
Great responses.

Example of class 1 car currently listed for sxs prices.


Here's another


There are lots of these in the 60-70k range.
 

yz450mm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
3,651
Reaction score
7,478
Because 96% of sxs owners could not hop in and drive a manual transmission 2wheel drive anything in the sand without blowing it up or getting stuck.
Your property should be the Docktagon of off-road smack talk. I'll bring out the equipment and prep the track, then we go bracket style to name the true king of off-road toys!

Round one is @Wizard29 in his Ultra 4 VS @Bpracing1127 in a Speed SxS.

Brad can do a parade lap to show off his pirouetting prerunner, then Jonathan can do a lap in the AWD TT to show everyone up.
 

evantwheeler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2015
Messages
3,122
Reaction score
6,262

I like this. This car is probably good for 20 years with minimal upkeep depending on how and how much you run it.
Yes. Because the cars are designed properly, they don't "wear themselves out". I had a buddy with an alumicraft that had been modified in the front to fit bigger shocks and spindles by a shop that had a name, but not a great reputation. He was always replacing heims in the front end. Like multiple times a year. We have early 2000's Alumicrafts in our dune group that have heims that are decades old. That car also likely doesn't have enough power to destroy the 2D. That is a smoking deal for a great car, though it would be a ton more fun with a V8 and a sequential.
 

Backlash

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
14,987
Reaction score
29,717

I like this. This car is probably good for 20 years with minimal upkeep depending on how and how much you run it.
I'll bet that car handles EXTREMELY well and is well-balanced and nimble. That's a helluva deal on a really well-made car. 👍
 

Englewood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
4,025
Reaction score
6,845
I recently built 2 Baja bugs and remodeled a Monster Manx. Holy F*cking shit these things are expensive.

Dealing with fab shops will make you go postal in no time at all. When I sold my last car I decided I will never own anything for Offroad other than a UTV.
 

Attachments

  • 4F656FFC-44F4-45DC-A7C9-73023EFBF9E4.jpeg
    4F656FFC-44F4-45DC-A7C9-73023EFBF9E4.jpeg
    612.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 06E2D5B6-6571-447D-B6BC-D040869986F3_1_201_a.jpeg
    06E2D5B6-6571-447D-B6BC-D040869986F3_1_201_a.jpeg
    2.9 MB · Views: 0

EmpirE231

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
4,974
Reaction score
10,407
Here's some transaxle facts (consider me the horses mouth):



4. Yes, a new Albins is $35k. There are still plenty of ballers building high end cars that are willing to shell out for the best of the best. Yes, a Weddle S4D will handle nearly the same amount of power as an Albins for $20k, and cost a lot less to replace parts when the time comes. This is the "minor league baller" market.
So is the Albins in any way still superior to the S4D/S5D or not any longer?
 

Bpracing1127

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
10,832
Reaction score
14,289
Your property should be the Docktagon of off-road smack talk. I'll bring out the equipment and prep the track, then we go bracket style to name the true king of off-road toys!

Round one is @Wizard29 in his Ultra 4 VS @Bpracing1127 in a Speed SxS.

Brad can do a parade lap to show off his pirouetting prerunner, then Jonathan can do a lap in the AWD TT to show everyone up.
Hahah funny I still kick wizards ass in my 6 year old turbo s. Won’t be caught in a speed car cuz I don’t wanna walk
 

jesco

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
1,950
Reaction score
2,368
See when you guys say class 1 I think you are talking about this View attachment 1486788
Sheila is a BAAAAAAAD BITCH!!! Most iconic Class 1 "buggy" still out there racing... The ultimate Class 1 still has to be the Herbst's El Tiburon "truggy". This thing hurt some feelings!!!! I saw it years ago at their shop buried in the corner collecting dust. My buddy who works there told me there was a plan to bring it back to life, and they finally did!!! Its cool to see it running again.
maxresdefault.jpg
 

monkeyswrench

To The Rescue!
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
30,450
Reaction score
88,170
Sheila is a BAAAAAAAD BITCH!!! Most iconic Class 1 "buggy" still out there racing... The ultimate Class 1 still has to be the Herbst's El Tiburon "truggy". This thing hurt some feelings!!!! I saw it years ago at their shop buried in the corner collecting dust. My buddy who works there told me there was a plan to bring it back to life, and they finally did!!! Its cool to see it running again. View attachment 1486934
That's the same one?! Holy crap, that thing was a beast...still is, but now a "vintage" beast 🤣
 

SeanRitchie

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
182
Reaction score
925
So is the Albins in any way still superior to the S4D/S5D or not any longer?
There are a few details on the Albins that are better than S4D, but really the only advantage in my opinion is the torsen diff in the Albins, which is far stronger than the spider gear diff in the S4D and works as an LSD to get both tires pushing under low traction.

I have no problem putting upwards of 1500 HP through an S4D. There are a few that have exceeded that with good reliability.
 

yz450mm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
3,651
Reaction score
7,478
Sheila is a BAAAAAAAD BITCH!!! Most iconic Class 1 "buggy" still out there racing... The ultimate Class 1 still has to be the Herbst's El Tiburon "truggy". This thing hurt some feelings!!!! I saw it years ago at their shop buried in the corner collecting dust. My buddy who works there told me there was a plan to bring it back to life, and they finally did!!! Its cool to see it running again. View attachment 1486934
The truggy and Ivan's PPI Toyota are easily the two coolest off road vehicles ever made, I'd rather have those than anything new.

1000010236.jpg
 

Deckin Around

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
2,818
Reaction score
7,348
Your property should be the Docktagon of off-road smack talk. I'll bring out the equipment and prep the track, then we go bracket style to name the true king of off-road toys!

Round one is @Wizard29 in his Ultra 4 VS @Bpracing1127 in a Speed SxS.

Brad can do a parade lap to show off his pirouetting prerunner, then Jonathan can do a lap in the AWD TT to show everyone up.

Instigator!😄 No more big trucks on the jump track… you know how this ended
IMG_0829.jpeg
 

Wizard29

43' Eliminator
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
3,184
Reaction score
9,228
Your property should be the Docktagon of off-road smack talk. I'll bring out the equipment and prep the track, then we go bracket style to name the true king of off-road toys!

Round one is @Wizard29 in his Ultra 4 VS @Bpracing1127 in a Speed SxS.

Brad can do a parade lap to show off his pirouetting prerunner, then Jonathan can do a lap in the AWD TT to show everyone up.

Ha, put some rock obstacles on that course and it'll be no contest. U4 will win every time.

And before any of you say, "But side by sides...King of the Hammers..." keep in mind that those cars are barely side by sides any more and one of them even snapped in half.

To the OP's original post that started this thread, not only is it about financing, ease of repair/maintenance, and the other pro-side by side reasons already mentioned, one other thing to consider is 4WD. Most buggies don't have that, which restricts them to certain terrain.

I have my Ultra4 and I also have an LS powered sand rail. Since I do both hard pack/rocky terrain riding as well as the sand dunes, I wanted the best tool for both jobs. I would never take my rail on the hard pack/rocky terrain rides. No way it would ever be able to climb the rocks and stuff like the Ultra4 can (too long, too low, and no 4WD). Conversely, I would never take the Ultra4 to the sand dunes. It could do them, but not even close to as well as the rail will.

My personal situation allows me to have both types of vehicles. I can wrench on them as needed and also have the facilities to park/store them. A lot of people don't have that, which is where side by sides come in.

As much as I despise side by sides because they have made Glamis and other places far too accessible to people who don't belong there, they do have that element of being a decent "all around" vehicle. They can do the sand and the hard pack/some rocks, reasonably well, but they aren't really the best vehicle out there for either type of riding.
 

jesco

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
1,950
Reaction score
2,368
The truggy and Ivan's PPI Toyota are easily the two coolest off road vehicles ever made, I'd rather have those than anything new.

View attachment 1486977
Agreed!!! Ivans "Toyota" was def a game changer and hurt a lot of feelings also. Most people don't even realize it was a single seat truck. When they said Ivan "Iron manned" the race.... they meant IRON MANNED IT SOLO!!! That dudes built different for sure, pretty sure he is the only person to win the overall solo in the 1000.
 

Sportin' Wood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
8,384
Ha, put some rock obstacles on that course and it'll be no contest. U4 will win every time.

And before any of you say, "But side by sides...King of the Hammers..." keep in mind that those cars are barely side by sides any more and one of them even snapped in half.

To the OP's original post that started this thread, not only is it about financing, ease of repair/maintenance, and the other pro-side by side reasons already mentioned, one other thing to consider is 4WD. Most buggies don't have that, which restricts them to certain terrain.

I have my Ultra4 and I also have an LS powered sand rail. Since I do both hard pack/rocky terrain riding as well as the sand dunes, I wanted the best tool for both jobs. I would never take my rail on the hard pack/rocky terrain rides. No way it would ever be able to climb the rocks and stuff like the Ultra4 can (too long, too low, and no 4WD). Conversely, I would never take the Ultra4 to the sand dunes. It could do them, but not even close to as well as the rail will.

My personal situation allows me to have both types of vehicles. I can wrench on them as needed and also have the facilities to park/store them. A lot of people don't have that, which is where side by sides come in.

As much as I despise side by sides because they have made Glamis and other places far too accessible to people who don't belong there, they do have that element of being a decent "all around" vehicle. They can do the sand and the hard pack/some rocks, reasonably well, but they aren't really the best vehicle out there for either type of riding.
C1C33BBC-75E7-4143-9752-F2F1701ADBE5.jpeg
 

c_land

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
1,964
Reaction score
4,402
I would disagree. Would you be telling me that one could go down to Bert's Mega Mall, buy a "modern" side by side and it will immediately perform as well as an Ultra4 will?

When that actually becomes the case, then I'll agree.

https://www.polaris.com/en-us/off-road/rzr/models/rzr-pro-r-factory/

Not sure you can buy it at Berts, but it beat all but one of the unlimited purpose built trucks at the mint, and you can load it up and drive in glamis the next weekend.

Mint 400 - SXS beats all but one of the unlimited purpose built vehicles in the desert.
KOH - SXS beats all of the unlimited purpose built vehicles in the rocks.

All we need is a a Sand Car Class in the RedBull Sand Scramble to fully settle the debate
 

evantwheeler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2015
Messages
3,122
Reaction score
6,262
I would disagree. Would you be telling me that one could go down to Bert's Mega Mall, buy a "modern" side by side and it will immediately perform as well as an Ultra4 will?

When that actually becomes the case, then I'll agree.
The problem is the definition of what an Ultra4 car is. A Gomez bros UFO? No. An EMC car? Arguably yes. Both are utlra4 cars. I have a retired 4800 car and it does nothing better than a new 2 seat ProR or MavR SXS except technical crawling and weigh more on a scale. I always wanted one, so i bought one. Love the sound of a V8, and have done the SxS thing, but i have no illusions that a new SXS wouldnt be a better all around tool for recreational off roading or even semi competitive racing.

On edit - i’d argue a retired U4 car is cheaper to repair in every aspect except tires after the initial purchase. Junkyard 5.3, th350, atlas, D60 diffs, all on par or cheaper to repair/replace than the SXS comparable parts. Wasnt someone here just recently talking about a $6k engine rebuild for an XP900 🤮🤮🤮I can buy a junkyard LS, auto trans and a new 2spd atlas for that price!!!
 
Last edited:

yz450mm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
3,651
Reaction score
7,478
Agreed!!! Ivans "Toyota" was def a game changer and hurt a lot of feelings also. Most people don't even realize it was a single seat truck. When they said Ivan "Iron manned" the race.... they meant IRON MANNED IT SOLO!!! That dudes built different for sure, pretty sure he is the only person to win the overall solo in the 1000.
I think they found one of the two original PPI trucks in MX, bought it and brought it back, and were restoring it to make a comeback in 2025 or 2026.

I haven't checked on the thread in a while, I'll see if I can find it tonight.
 

Wizard29

43' Eliminator
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
3,184
Reaction score
9,228
https://www.polaris.com/en-us/off-road/rzr/models/rzr-pro-r-factory/

Not sure you can buy it at Berts, but it beat all but one of the unlimited purpose built trucks at the mint, and you can load it up and drive in glamis the next weekend.

Mint 400 - SXS beats all but one of the unlimited purpose built vehicles in the desert.
KOH - SXS beats all of the unlimited purpose built vehicles in the rocks.

All we need is a a Sand Car Class in the RedBull Sand Scramble to fully settle the debate

Do you have one? Do you know anybody that does? What you reference there with the Pro-R factory is certainly an exception to the traditional side by side rule. Pretty much nobody has one and is it still really a side by side compared to what everybody else does actually have and what the "standard" for a side by side is? All Polaris has done there is started to build cars that have come full circle to what we already know off road race cars need to be. Bigger engines, bigger tires, bigger everything, basically. Looks to me like Polaris finally realized that the traditional side by side configurations aren't cutting it. Thanks for proving my point, Polaris.

And as I already mentioned, the "side by side" that won at KOH is no longer really a side by side. It was heavily modified to come full circle to what a true off-road race vehicle needs to be. Lots of stock Can-Ams running 37" tires are there?

That's like me putting a smart car body on a full off-road race chassis, winning a race, and then saying smart cars can beat trophy trucks.
 

Wizard29

43' Eliminator
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
3,184
Reaction score
9,228
The problem is the definition of what an Ultra4 car is. A Gomez bros UFO? No. An EMC car? Arguably yes. Both are utlra4 cars. I have a retired 4800 car and it does nothing better than a new 2 seat ProR or MavR SXS except technical crawling and weigh more on a scale. I always wanted one, so i bought one. Love the sound of a V8, and have done the SxS thing, but i have no illusions that a new SXS wouldnt be a better all around tool for recreational off roading or even semi competitive racing.

On edit - i’d argue a retired U4 car is cheaper to repair in every aspect except tires after the initial purchase. Junkyard 5.3, th350, atlas, D60 diffs, all on par or cheaper to repair/replace than the SXS comparable parts. Wasnt someone here just recently talking about a $6k engine rebuild for an XP900 🤮🤮🤮I can buy a junkyard LS, auto trans and a new 2spd atlas for that price!!!

I agree, there are clarifications needed now as far as definitions since the lines are now getting blurred. People are modifying the shit out of side by sides to mimic Ultra4s and still calling them side by sides.

I could potentially argue that my Ultra4 is a side by side since I sit next to my passenger. They share a lot of the same attributes, but the Ultra4 is just bigger in every aspect.

Here's how I look at it:

2020 RZR versus my Ultra4 on hard pack variable terrain riding, no contest.

2020 Can Am versus my Ultra4 on hard pack variable terrain riding, no contest.

2025 RZR versus my Ultra4 on hard pack variable terrain riding, no contest.

2025 RZR versus my Ultra4 on hard pack variable terrain riding, no contest.

2020-2025 RZR or Can Am versus my Ultra4 in sand dunes, the RZR and Can Am probably win.

2020-2025 RZR or Can Am versus my sand rail in sand dunes, no contest.

Side by sides manufactured up to this point in time are not the best vehicles in any one type of riding, but are okay for all around use. Year after year, we see them getting bigger and more stout, which is proof that side by sides in their traditional sense aren't up to the demands of being the best tool for the job.

If the manufacturers keep on their current course, we're going to see basically production Ultra4s, but I don't think we're there yet.
 

Sportin' Wood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
8,384
I would disagree. Would you be telling me that one could go down to Bert's Mega Mall, buy a "modern" side by side and it will immediately perform as well as an Ultra4 will?

When that actually becomes the case, then I'll agree.
IMHO that is the case right now, if you consider the average Ultra4 car, not the top cars in the series. Driver plays a significant role so it would be really hard to prove a theory without intention.

There is little doubt in my mind that the UTV industry was inspired by Ultra4 vehicles to create today's high performance UTVs.
In 2010 I took a 100% stock brand new pre-production Kawasaki T4 off the trailer, drove it directly to Chocolate Thunder and drove the trail bottom to top with only a spotter and a spotter strap. That was not an Ultra4 car, but the Team Green motorsports manager, Reid Nordin, Joey D from UTV Underground, Jon Crowley and a handful of other UTV pioneers all ran around together as KOH expanded the racing opportunities to UTVs. It surprised everyone that that vehicle could drive up that trail. Somewhere I have video proof.

While I don't love my CanAm for a few different reasons, it outperforms many of the Ultra4 cars I have driven over the years. These new UTVs do exactly what the spirit of Ultra4 racing was created for. Ultra4 was designed to allow an owner the opportunity to race various disciplines with the same car and in doing so what was once seen as a joke to the desert racing community in turn influenced technology that made 4WD TTs practical and rendered the previous versions obsolete to the point they segregated the class. It speaks volumes that a stock performance UTV is at home in Glamis, The Rocky Mountains, Johnson Valley, The Southest Mud holes,Moab, The woods racing of the east coast, and Baja.

A stock CanAm with a decent driver would beat 2/3rds of the Ultra4 cars that sign up to race in pretty much any discipline. BUT as pointed out, in many cases an Ultra4 car is more robust and has a longer MTBF than a plastic production vehicle. It really depends on who built it and the maintenance.

There is nothing stock about an Ultra4 car, except the Ultra4 cars that Polaris, CanAm, Honda, Yamaha Kawasaki and Speed are building on a production line. Those are all Ultra4 cars. But what would I know? :)
 

jesco

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
1,950
Reaction score
2,368
I think they found one of the two original PPI trucks in MX, bought it and brought it back, and were restoring it to make a comeback in 2025 or 2026.

I haven't checked on the thread in a while, I'll see if I can find it tonight.
Yes, Rory Ward has it and restoring it and the McMillin 001 High Jumper that they started offroad racing in. Rory is an AWESOME guy and loves restoring old iconic offroad cars and keeping them alive.
 

Wizard29

43' Eliminator
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
3,184
Reaction score
9,228
IMHO that is the case right now, if you consider the average Ultra4 car, not the top cars in the series. Driver plays a significant role so it would be really hard to prove a theory without intention.

There is little doubt in my mind that the UTV industry was inspired by Ultra4 vehicles to create today's high performance UTVs.
In 2010 I took a 100% stock brand new pre-production Kawasaki T4 off the trailer, drove it directly to Chocolate Thunder and drove the trail bottom to top with only a spotter and a spotter strap. That was not an Ultra4 car, but the Team Green motorsports manager, Reid Nordin, Joey D from UTV Underground, Jon Crowley and a handful of other UTV pioneers all ran around together as KOH expanded the racing opportunities to UTVs. It surprised everyone that that vehicle could drive up that trail. Somewhere I have video proof.

While I don't love my CanAm for a few different reasons, it outperforms many of the Ultra4 cars I have driven over the years. These new UTVs do exactly what the spirit of Ultra4 racing was created for. Ultra4 was designed to allow an owner the opportunity to race various disciplines with the same car and in doing so what was once seen as a joke to the desert racing community in turn influenced technology that made 4WD TTs practical and rendered the previous versions obsolete to the point they segregated the class. It speaks volumes that a stock performance UTV is at home in Glamis, The Rocky Mountains, Johnson Valley, The Southest Mud holes,Moab, The woods racing of the east coast, and Baja.

A stock CanAm with a decent driver would beat 2/3rds of the Ultra4 cars that sign up to race in pretty much any discipline. BUT as pointed out, in many cases an Ultra4 car is more robust and has a longer MTBF than a plastic production vehicle. It really depends on who built it and the maintenance.

There is nothing stock about an Ultra4 car, except the Ultra4 cars that Polaris, CanAm, Honda, Yamaha Kawasaki and Speed are building on a production line. Those are all Ultra4 cars. But what would I know? :)

We all speak mainly from personal experience. My experiences have been that when riding hard pack/rocks in my Ultra4 with a group of side by sides, if I hammer down and really get aggressive, they cannot keep up. When riding the dunes in my sand rail with a group of side by sides, if I hammer down and get aggressive, they cannot keep up.

My experience has been side by sides can do both, but they won't do one or the other better and faster than a car that is purpose built for the job.

🤷‍♂️
 

sandshark1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2023
Messages
482
Reaction score
669
https://www.polaris.com/en-us/off-road/rzr/models/rzr-pro-r-factory/

Not sure you can buy it at Berts, but it beat all but one of the unlimited purpose built trucks at the mint, and you can load it up and drive in glamis the next weekend.

Mint 400 - SXS beats all but one of the unlimited purpose built vehicles in the desert.
KOH - SXS beats all of the unlimited purpose built vehicles in the rocks.

All we need is a a Sand Car Class in the RedBull Sand Scramble to fully settle the debate
You can order the Polaris team Pro R, but it will be a lot more than $150K for Chaney's winning Mav R at KOH. The Mav R was a full tube chassis purpose built Ultra 4.
 

Sportin' Wood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
2,797
Reaction score
8,384
We all speak mainly from personal experience. My experiences have been that when riding hard pack/rocks in my Ultra4 with a group of side by sides, if I hammer down and really get aggressive, they cannot keep up. When riding the dunes in my sand rail with a group of side by sides, if I hammer down and get aggressive, they cannot keep up.

My experience has been side by sides can do both, but they won't do one or the other better and faster than a car that is purpose built for the job.

🤷‍♂️
Sorry to pirate the thread.

Curious about your car, do you have a chassis from a U4 builder or a custom? Sorry I can't recall seeing it from the other debates.
 
Top