WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Trump disqualified from running in 2024

2CHILL

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 24, 2011
Messages
536
Reaction score
555
Trump on Tuesday night derided the ruling as “eliminating the rights of Colorado voters to vote for the candidate of their choice.” But not only did Trump try to overturn the will of voters after the 2020 election, he has on myriad occasions pushed the idea that candidates should be disqualified irrespective of the voters’ will.

He built a base in the early 2010s with the ugly and false “birther” campaign, whose entire premise was that Barack Obama wasn’t eligible to be president

Trump didn’t stop there. During the 2016 GOP primary campaign, he repeatedly pushed the idea that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) might — and even should — be disqualified, both because he was born in Canada and because he purportedly cheated in the Iowa caucuses, which Cruz won.

Needless to say, there is more than a vein of irony in Trump’s having said that promoting false information about an election should lead the authorities to disqualify someone. And Trump has repeatedly pushed the idea that a candidate’s eligibility for president shouldn’t be left up to voters.
The candidate who a court now says is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president once showed great interest in having people he disagreed with disqualified under the Constitution’s standards.
  • And during the 2016 campaign, on dozens of occasions he said that Hillary Clinton shouldn’t “be allowed to run” because of her private email server. “She shouldn’t be allowed to run for president. She shouldn’t be allowed,” Trump said shortly before Election Day 2016. “I’m telling you, she should not be allowed to run for president based on her crimes. She should not be allowed to run for president.”

And if it sounds familiar, it should. After all, long before Trump derided the idea that a presidential candidate and former president like him could be indicted, he called for the prosecutions of both his 2016 and 2020 opponents, as well as former president Obama.

If the whole 14th Amendment exercise is the political farce that Trump says it is, he certainly played a role in writing the script.
 

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
35,292
Reaction score
89,563
Trump on Tuesday night derided the ruling as “eliminating the rights of Colorado voters to vote for the candidate of their choice.” But not only did Trump try to overturn the will of voters after the 2020 election, he has on myriad occasions pushed the idea that candidates should be disqualified irrespective of the voters’ will.

He built a base in the early 2010s with the ugly and false “birther” campaign, whose entire premise was that Barack Obama wasn’t eligible to be president

Trump didn’t stop there. During the 2016 GOP primary campaign, he repeatedly pushed the idea that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) might — and even should — be disqualified, both because he was born in Canada and because he purportedly cheated in the Iowa caucuses, which Cruz won.

Needless to say, there is more than a vein of irony in Trump’s having said that promoting false information about an election should lead the authorities to disqualify someone. And Trump has repeatedly pushed the idea that a candidate’s eligibility for president shouldn’t be left up to voters.
The candidate who a court now says is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president once showed great interest in having people he disagreed with disqualified under the Constitution’s standards.
  • And during the 2016 campaign, on dozens of occasions he said that Hillary Clinton shouldn’t “be allowed to run” because of her private email server. “She shouldn’t be allowed to run for president. She shouldn’t be allowed,” Trump said shortly before Election Day 2016. “I’m telling you, she should not be allowed to run for president based on her crimes. She should not be allowed to run for president.”

And if it sounds familiar, it should. After all, long before Trump derided the idea that a presidential candidate and former president like him could be indicted, he called for the prosecutions of both his 2016 and 2020 opponents, as well as former president Obama.

If the whole 14th Amendment exercise is the political farce that Trump says it is, he certainly played a role in writing the script.
The republicans say biden had dealings with hunters business partners but nothing officially leaked🙄 yet, he hasn't been charged with anything or convicted. Would you be ok with biden being removed from the ballot because of that.

It's a yes or a no, that's it no more and no need to explain anything. Yes or no
 

Angler

Tritoon Racing
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
6,279
Reaction score
15,573
Trump on Tuesday night derided the ruling as “eliminating the rights of Colorado voters to vote for the candidate of their choice.” But not only did Trump try to overturn the will of voters after the 2020 election, he has on myriad occasions pushed the idea that candidates should be disqualified irrespective of the voters’ will.

He built a base in the early 2010s with the ugly and false “birther” campaign, whose entire premise was that Barack Obama wasn’t eligible to be president

Trump didn’t stop there. During the 2016 GOP primary campaign, he repeatedly pushed the idea that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) might — and even should — be disqualified, both because he was born in Canada and because he purportedly cheated in the Iowa caucuses, which Cruz won.

Needless to say, there is more than a vein of irony in Trump’s having said that promoting false information about an election should lead the authorities to disqualify someone. And Trump has repeatedly pushed the idea that a candidate’s eligibility for president shouldn’t be left up to voters.
The candidate who a court now says is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president once showed great interest in having people he disagreed with disqualified under the Constitution’s standards.
  • And during the 2016 campaign, on dozens of occasions he said that Hillary Clinton shouldn’t “be allowed to run” because of her private email server. “She shouldn’t be allowed to run for president. She shouldn’t be allowed,” Trump said shortly before Election Day 2016. “I’m telling you, she should not be allowed to run for president based on her crimes. She should not be allowed to run for president.”

And if it sounds familiar, it should. After all, long before Trump derided the idea that a presidential candidate and former president like him could be indicted, he called for the prosecutions of both his 2016 and 2020 opponents, as well as former president Obama.

If the whole 14th Amendment exercise is the political farce that Trump says it is, he certainly played a role in writing the script.
Straight from the Washington Post...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/12/20/trump-refrain-disqualification-thee-not-me/

🤣🤣🤣
 
Last edited:

fast99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2020
Messages
521
Reaction score
1,341
The republicans say biden had dealings with hunters business partners but nothing officially leaked🙄 yet, he hasn't been charged with anything or convicted. Would you be ok with biden being removed from the ballot because of that.

It's a yes or a no, that's it no more and no need to explain anything. Yes or no
NO despite the fact he is on the other side no, same with Christie in Maine. This country is based on the people being able to speak via the voting booth. Eliminate that we have no voice. Until recently innocent until proven guilty.
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,371
Reaction score
21,709
Like the Feds did with Joe and Hunter Biden!
Been my point all along.

Little difference between Joe and Hunter versus Donald and Jared.

All after personal gain and selling influence at the expense of this Republic and its people.
 

HotRod82

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
3,086
Reaction score
7,714
Been my point all along.

Little difference between Joe and Hunter versus Donald and Jared.

All after personal gain and selling influence at the expense of this Republic and its people.
wow.
The Trumps made all their money actually building things while not holding public office......
The Biden's have never built anything while being in public office, then somehow became wealthy selling nothing but influence.
Pretty big differences in my book!
 

Sharky

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
Messages
1,779
Reaction score
6,602
Screenshot-2023-12-19-at-7.03.14 PM.jpeg


Screenshot-2023-12-20-at-7.22.04 PM.png
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,132
Reaction score
148,001
Been my point all along.

Little difference between Joe and Hunter versus Donald and Jared.

All after personal gain and selling influence at the expense of this Republic and its people.

Hey clown, answer me this.

If Trump would have walked on off into the sunset, these “felonies” would have never occurred. You know it, we know it.

So he brought these on himself and now he wants to run out the clock? 😆
 

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,593
Reaction score
16,235
Trump on Tuesday night derided the ruling as “eliminating the rights of Colorado voters to vote for the candidate of their choice.” But not only did Trump try to overturn the will of voters after the 2020 election, he has on myriad occasions pushed the idea that candidates should be disqualified irrespective of the voters’ will.

He built a base in the early 2010s with the ugly and false “birther” campaign, whose entire premise was that Barack Obama wasn’t eligible to be president

Trump didn’t stop there. During the 2016 GOP primary campaign, he repeatedly pushed the idea that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) might — and even should — be disqualified, both because he was born in Canada and because he purportedly cheated in the Iowa caucuses, which Cruz won.

Needless to say, there is more than a vein of irony in Trump’s having said that promoting false information about an election should lead the authorities to disqualify someone. And Trump has repeatedly pushed the idea that a candidate’s eligibility for president shouldn’t be left up to voters.
The candidate who a court now says is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president once showed great interest in having people he disagreed with disqualified under the Constitution’s standards.
  • And during the 2016 campaign, on dozens of occasions he said that Hillary Clinton shouldn’t “be allowed to run” because of her private email server. “She shouldn’t be allowed to run for president. She shouldn’t be allowed,” Trump said shortly before Election Day 2016. “I’m telling you, she should not be allowed to run for president based on her crimes. She should not be allowed to run for president.”

And if it sounds familiar, it should. After all, long before Trump derided the idea that a presidential candidate and former president like him could be indicted, he called for the prosecutions of both his 2016 and 2020 opponents, as well as former president Obama.

If the whole 14th Amendment exercise is the political farce that Trump says it is, he certainly played a role in writing the script.

Been my point all along.

Little difference between Joe and Hunter versus Donald and Jared.

All after personal gain and selling influence at the expense of this Republic and its people.
When one looks at a political map of most any state, take Minnesota and Missouri for instance. There is a sea of red, with little pockets of blue. The blue is where the brainwashed stupid sheeple live. Alongside the Turdlers. "It's a powerful stench. Stings the nostrils,,," Smells like Fed policy...
 

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
35,292
Reaction score
89,563
The republicans say biden had dealings with hunters business partners but nothing officially leaked🙄 yet, he hasn't been charged with anything or convicted. Would you be ok with biden being removed from the ballot because of that.

It's a yes or a no, that's it no more and no need to explain anything. Yes or no
@2CHILL why did you ignore me? You're a typical democrat, once your logic is spun to put you in the same situation you can't agree with what's happening.
 

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
11,138
Reaction score
28,192

sprintcvx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
6,451
Reaction score
26,556

RVR SWPR

Almost Off the Grid
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
9,578
Reaction score
13,453
Quote - Reuters - December 28,2023 6:30pm

“The decision can be appealed to a state Superior Court, and Bellows ( Maine Secretary State) suspended her ruling until the court rules on the matter”.
More bullshit headlines from morons that assume nobody reads the entire story.
 

500bbc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
27,592
Reaction score
43,990

lbhsbz

Putting on the brakes
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
13,414
Reaction score
34,875
More bullshit headlines from morons that assume nobody reads the entire story.
Its truly shocking how many dumb fucks there are out there who don't read past the title/headline/pictures. I deal with it multiple times daily selling on eBay. I had no idea people were so stupid....but they are, and they're the majority.
 

spectras only

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,337
Reaction score
13,589
Women like her in charge needs to be schooled.

In Maine, the people do not elect the Secretary of State, Attorney General or Treasurer," Andrews told Fox News Digital. "They are chosen by elected Democrat Party insiders after deals are made in the back room of State House."

"Shenna Bellows knows that the process that put her there is extremely partisan," he continued. "She should know better and be going out of her way to be as neutral as possible to serve every citizen in Maine and not just registered Democrats."

"That’s why she swore an oath to the Constitution and not the Democrat Party," he added. "We are still a republic, but moves like this fracture that foundation, which ultimately is the point of all this."

Andrews said in his statement that he wants to impeach Bellows "on the grounds that she is barring an American citizen and [the] 45th President of the United States, who is convicted of no crime or impeachment, their right to appear on a Maine Republican Party ballot in March."

also in the news, California has Trump on the ballot. Go figure, Newsome is against removing Trump.
 

wallnutz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
7,674
Reaction score
16,718

wallnutz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
7,674
Reaction score
16,718
Trump on Tuesday night derided the ruling as “eliminating the rights of Colorado voters to vote for the candidate of their choice.” But not only did Trump try to overturn the will of voters after the 2020 election, he has on myriad occasions pushed the idea that candidates should be disqualified irrespective of the voters’ will.

He built a base in the early 2010s with the ugly and false “birther” campaign, whose entire premise was that Barack Obama wasn’t eligible to be president

Trump didn’t stop there. During the 2016 GOP primary campaign, he repeatedly pushed the idea that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) might — and even should — be disqualified, both because he was born in Canada and because he purportedly cheated in the Iowa caucuses, which Cruz won.

Needless to say, there is more than a vein of irony in Trump’s having said that promoting false information about an election should lead the authorities to disqualify someone. And Trump has repeatedly pushed the idea that a candidate’s eligibility for president shouldn’t be left up to voters.
The candidate who a court now says is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president once showed great interest in having people he disagreed with disqualified under the Constitution’s standards.
  • And during the 2016 campaign, on dozens of occasions he said that Hillary Clinton shouldn’t “be allowed to run” because of her private email server. “She shouldn’t be allowed to run for president. She shouldn’t be allowed,” Trump said shortly before Election Day 2016. “I’m telling you, she should not be allowed to run for president based on her crimes. She should not be allowed to run for president.”

And if it sounds familiar, it should. After all, long before Trump derided the idea that a presidential candidate and former president like him could be indicted, he called for the prosecutions of both his 2016 and 2020 opponents, as well as former president Obama.

If the whole 14th Amendment exercise is the political farce that Trump says it is, he certainly played a role in writing the script.
At least the SCOTUS agrees with you, oh wait I guess they did get it right. 😂 😂
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,132
Reaction score
148,001
Top