WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

The Jan. 6th Circle Jerk

4Waters

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
36,731
Reaction score
94,036
rmarion said:
View attachment 1455451

@revelation__road on Instagram: "Since when do “insurrectionists” get special badges to enter the capital? Yeah, this is what you call a “false flag”. Many of us told you."

115K likes, 3,284 comments - revelation__road on November 25, 2024: "Since when do “insurrectionists” get special badges to enter the capital? Yeah, this is what you call a “false flag”. Many of us told you.".
www.instagram.com
Click to expand...
Maybe @530RL could answer that
 
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
23,181
Reaction score
22,604
stokerwhore said:
hiding exculpatory evidence. a felony.
Click to expand...
Really?

Hiding exculpatory evidence from a congressional hearing is a felony?

Could you cite the federal statute?

An officer of the court in a court of law is certainly precluded from such acts but a congressional hearing which is a political body? I suspect every hearing ever held in congress since the beginning of this Nation would be eligible for this “crime”?
 
17 10 Flat

17 10 Flat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
1,625
Reaction score
4,098
I’m curious. If someone is charged with a crime and evidence exists that would exonerate said person, and the evidence is destroyed resulting in a conviction. There was no crime committed by destroying evidence?
 
stokerwhore

stokerwhore

aka bordsmnj
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
4,418
Reaction score
4,940
530RL said:
Really?

Hiding exculpatory evidence from a congressional hearing is a felony?

Could you cite the federal statute?

An officer of the court in a court of law is certainly precluded from such acts but a congressional hearing which is a political body? I suspect every hearing ever held in congress since the beginning of this Nation would be eligible for this “crime”?
Click to expand...
Ooohhh, well then. I guess it's ok.
1733759834438.jpeg
 
regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,500
530RL said:
Really?

Hiding exculpatory evidence from a congressional hearing is a felony?

Could you cite the federal statute?

An officer of the court in a court of law is certainly precluded from such acts but a congressional hearing which is a political body? I suspect every hearing ever held in congress since the beginning of this Nation would be eligible for this “crime”?
Click to expand...

Well then, they'll need no pardons. 👍

rats scrambling .gif


😆
 
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
23,181
Reaction score
22,604
17 10 Flat said:
I’m curious. If someone is charged with a crime and evidence exists that would exonerate said person, and the evidence is destroyed resulting in a conviction. There was no crime committed by destroying evidence?
Click to expand...
The congressional committee was simply a political hearing with no power to charge anything.

That is why I am confused on how a member of that committee "hiding" exculpatory evidence would be a crime?

If it was, every R senator who was involved in "election rigging" hearings would be subject to the same criminal statute. Whatever that statute may be?
 
17 10 Flat

17 10 Flat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
1,625
Reaction score
4,098
530RL said:
The congressional committee was simply a political hearing with no power to charge anything.

That is why I am confused on how a member of that committee "hiding" exculpatory evidence would be a crime?

If it was, every R senator who was involved in "election rigging" hearings would be subject to the same criminal statute. Whatever that statute may be?
Click to expand...
That was a yes or no answer. I accused no one in particular.
Just yes or no
 
Mack

Mack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
290
Reaction score
779
I am sure the documents Liz misplaced would not have been detrimental to the prosecutions cases against defendants. However conspiring to hide evidence should be a crime that should be punishable. If so it would be a true miscarriage of justice if Liz was locked away in solitary confinement while waiting trial. Not sure how the justice department got to hide all the video recording that day derailing all the criminals cases assuring pleas or one sided trials. Further more hopefully no democrat president being elected for the next 3 terms would almost insure old Liz would have to sit her fat ass in jail and have no hope of a pardon. But brain dead Biden will more than likely offer and unconditional pardon for crimes not yet convicted.
 
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
23,181
Reaction score
22,604
Mack said:
I am sure the documents Liz misplaced would not have been detrimental to the prosecutions cases against defendants. However conspiring to hide evidence should be a crime that should be punishable. If so it would be a true miscarriage of justice if Liz was locked away in solitary confinement while waiting trial. Not sure how the justice department got to hide all the video recording that day derailing all the criminals cases assuring pleas or one sided trials. Further more hopefully no democrat president being elected for the next 3 terms would almost insure old Liz would have to sit her fat ass in jail and have no hope of a pardon. But brain dead Biden will more than likely offer and unconditional pardon for crimes not yet convicted.
Click to expand...
What specific documents?

Meme Rehashes Old, False Claim That J6 Committee Destroyed Evidence - FactCheck.org

The House committee that investigated the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, issued a more than 800-page report presenting and analyzing the evidence about what happened that day. It also released videos, transcribed interviews, depositions and other documents. But some high-profile...
www.factcheck.org
 
Mack

Mack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
290
Reaction score
779
There was lots of video and other evidence the government did not release to the defendants lawyers which was requested. How can a criminal trial ever be fair if all evidence is not released to be viewed by a jury. Evidence being withheld due to national security is such a convenient way to insure all defendants take a plea or proceed with kangaroo court to get a certain result.
 
Smitty7

Smitty7

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2022
Messages
1,326
Reaction score
3,928
530RL said:
What specific documents?

Meme Rehashes Old, False Claim That J6 Committee Destroyed Evidence - FactCheck.org

The House committee that investigated the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, issued a more than 800-page report presenting and analyzing the evidence about what happened that day. It also released videos, transcribed interviews, depositions and other documents. But some high-profile...
www.factcheck.org
Click to expand...
Factcheck.org ? You gotta be fuckin kidding me. Jesus you are desperate. You fuckers will throw a hunk a shit down a hallway and call it a rose bush at the other end. Clowns.
 
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
23,181
Reaction score
22,604
Mack said:
There was lots of video and other evidence the government did not release to the defendants lawyers which was requested. How can a criminal trial ever be fair if all evidence is not released to be viewed by a jury. Evidence being withheld due to national security is such a convenient way to insure all defendants take a plea or proceed with kangaroo court to get a certain result.
Click to expand...
Those are all fair points.

But the house committee investigating January 6th did not prosecute those individuals nor did they have any legal obligation to turn over anything they found to anyone.

So once again, what is the exact crime and statute that Liz Cheney and other members on that committee violated?
 
4Waters

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
36,731
Reaction score
94,036
530RL said:
Those are all fair points.

But the house committee investigating January 6th did not prosecute those individuals nor did they have any legal obligation to turn over anything they found to anyone.

So once again, what is the exact crime and statute that Liz Cheney and other members on that committee violated?
Click to expand...
your-problem-obvious-guy-his-head-up-his-own-ass-your-problem-obvious-guy-his-head-up-his-own-...jpg
 
SNiC Jet

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
9,186
Reaction score
29,040
530RL said:
Those are all fair points.

But the house committee investigating January 6th did not prosecute those individuals nor did they have any legal obligation to turn over anything they found to anyone.

So once again, what is the exact crime and statute that Liz Cheney and other members on that committee violated?
Click to expand...
1733877145320.gif
 
regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,500
530RL said:
Those are all fair points.

But the house committee investigating January 6th did not prosecute those individuals nor did they have any legal obligation to turn over anything they found to anyone.

So once again, what is the exact crime and statute that Liz Cheney and other members on that committee violated?
Click to expand...


Soooooooo, yore in favor of no pardon needed, noted. 👍

What is glorious is you justifying the actions of a fellow scumbag for all to see................AGAIN!!!!! 🤣

New Texts Reveal Liz Cheney Communicated with Cassidy Hutchinson About Her Select Committee Testimony—without Hutchinson’s Attorney’s Knowledge—Despite Cheney Knowing it was Unethical

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration
cha.house.gov

Should Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson Be in Jail for Trying to Frame Trump for 'Insurrection'?

pjmedia.com

The Subcommittee recovered over one hundred deleted or password-protected files, including some files that were deleted days before Republicans took the majority. They also hid multiple transcribed interviews of witnesses who had firsthand knowledge of Trump‘s actions on January 6."


530 Nazi Baby.jpg
 
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
23,181
Reaction score
22,604
4Waters said:
View attachment 1458565
Click to expand...
That’s a clever meme. Once again can you please explain exactly what criminal act they engaged in? What legal obligation they had that they failed to comply with?

I get the whole Karen act you guys like to play as the victim. But what law did they violate?
 
regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,500

Hiding The Truth: Horowitz's Modified Jan 6 'Limited Hangout' | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com

The Horowitz report is a last ditch attempt, at the very last moment, to get ahead of that true story — which is that the FBI and its parent, the DOJ, have been lawlessly and in bad faith acting against their oaths to defend constitutional government.

For eight years — including the four when Mr. Trump as president — the FBI and DOJ worked tirelessly to run him out of office and make sure he could never return. The effort was prodigious and, astoundingly, it failed. It was launched initially to conceal the crimes of Bill and Hillary Clinton, especially their moneygrubbing in Russia around the Skolkovo project — Russia’s Silicon Valley — and the Uranium One scandal — which involved the sale of US nuclear assets to Russia’s state-owned Rosatom company. The Clinton’s problems became especially acute in the summer of 2016 when Hillary’s private (outside government) email server came to light with its thousands of potentially incriminating memos.
 
Activated

Activated

Deplorable
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
8,025
Reaction score
17,675
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
23,181
Reaction score
22,604
spectra3279 said:
Can a presidential pardon be revoked?
Click to expand...
If a pardon is issued, delivered and accepted, it cannot be revoked.

If a pardon was never delivered to a recipient, then the President that issued but never delivered the pardon may revoke it.

If a pardon was issued and delivered but never accepted, then the issuing or a future president may revoke it.
 
4Waters

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
36,731
Reaction score
94,036
Activated said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;Everyone&#39;s welcome, come on in.&quot;<a href="https://t.co/yeO4lcmlvz">pic.twitter.com/yeO4lcmlvz</a></p>&mdash; Defiant World (@DefiantWorld) <a href="
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868039510724104412
">December 14, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...
"That is so fucking violent, look at those officers being attacked by those violent protesters" -530
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top