The Jan. 6th Circle Jerk

[t&y]

So if police are around or are setting up a perimeter and feel that they can not safely intervene due to their force versus the total mob size, or are ordered not to intervene, such as during many BLM and Antifa riots, the crimes are legal and should be dismissed?

Well, many of those politicians that were sooooooooooooooooooooo affected by this totally violent insurrection would actually agree with excatly that, unless of course they thought those in the mob were Trump supporters. In fact, and again since you love video so much, they promoted it, funded it, paid for people to get out of jail after being arrested for it, and threatened for it to continue if Trump won the election. Seems like a broken record in here and the record is playing the alphabet song.

 

[t&y]

LOL.

Not
My
Problem.

As you may recall, somewhere much earlier in this topic, the J6 committee was NOT a court of law. So, 'counsel' is luxury indulgence that has no relevance. That's why the World's Least Likely to Procreate, Steve Bannon, didn't mind getting on their nerve and paying the contempt fine/time.

Well this clears your position up nicely. Funny that you question my ethics, yet seem to not care because in your own words:

"Not
My
Problem"

More and more evidence appears each day indicating that everything the J6 committee presented, and what was promoted across the globe via the main stream media, was altered, lied about, and possibly even hidden in cases that could have exonerated a person/s from criminal wrong doing.

Yet you simply don't seem to care. That is some higher level ethical shit you got going on there bud. You and your friend need to get over your TDS and recognize the big picture here.

 

[530RL]

1000 people prosecuted for trespassing, but all these videos show them being cordially invited in and escorted around by the officers.

To be invited inside by the authorities, and then to be prosecuted for trespassing and have the evidence of you being invited in hidden is the most basic example of Maoism type big government that could exist.

Having the government prosecutors threaten you with decades in jail on the most exaggerated charges, to be judged by a jury that is 95% liberal dem commies, or to sign a confession and plea deal....

Same jury that let Sussman off for flat out knowingly lying to Fisa judges, one that prosecuted Stone for incorrect timeline recollection, a process crime for even entertaining their corrupt investigations....

And yet that is so hard to grasp for those with TDS brain parasites.

Let’s assume the narrative you keep promoting that officers “cordially”, “freely” and willingly “welcomed”, “escorted” and “guided” all these individuals throughout restricted government property raises an interesting conundrum.

Someone is responsible for the obstruction of an official act of Congress while intending to commit assault upon members of Congress and committing assault on law enforcement. Those acts are all right on Tucker’s tapes.

Your argument is that some LE freely granted access to those in the videos then implies that some LE themselves are actually guilty of failure to perform their duty, freely granting illegal access to restricted government property, conspiracy to obstruct an official act of Congress and conspiracy of attempted assault and/or murder on an elected official.

Those crimes happened. You argue the police “welcomed” and “escorted” those who committed those crimes.

Your argument is not that those charged to date are innocent, but that LE are co-conspirators to those crimes.

That’s a head scratcher for me.

 

[SNiC Jet]

 

[t&y]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633534860747759630

In a clown world one or two would argue that everyone in that area is guilty of the vandalism that occurred.... Que the clowns any minute now.

 

[Luvnlife]

Ok

See post 1,397

 

[t&y]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633604027610017793

This is impossible. We were informed by some very intellectual and super informed types right here on the boards that it wasn't Antifa present that day leading the charge.

 

[Danger Dave]

 

[Racey]

Let’s assume the narrative you keep promoting that officers “cordially”, “freely” and willingly “welcomed”, “escorted” and “guided” all these individuals throughout restricted government property raises an interesting conundrum.

Someone is responsible for the obstruction of an official act of Congress while intending to commit assault upon members of Congress and committing assault on law enforcement. Those acts are all right on Tucker’s tapes.

Your argument is that some LE freely granted access to those in the videos then implies that some LE themselves are actually guilty of failure to perform their duty, freely granting illegal access to restricted government property, conspiracy to obstruct an official act of Congress and conspiracy of attempted assault and/or murder on an elected official.

Those crimes happened. You argue the police “welcomed” and “escorted” those who committed those crimes.

Your argument is not that those charged to date are innocent, but that LE are co-conspirators to those crimes.

That’s a head scratcher for me.

HOLY PRETZEL!!!!

 

[530RL]

View attachment 1207545​

Over a thousand charged and growing. Jury conviction after jury conviction.

Yet only you see it correctly and the majority of Americans and jury after jury are wrong.

 

[just_floatin]

This guy though

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633588333610770433

 

[Racey]

Over a thousand charged and growing. Jury conviction after jury conviction.

Yet only you see it correctly and the majority of Americans and jury after jury are wrong.

Yes, it's all DC juries, no change of venue allowed, 95% demographic of jury pool is deep blue Anti Trump

Same people that let Sussman off for a clear crime

No amount of evidence will change their minds, if you voted for Trump, you are guilty.
Prosecution hide the evidence anyway to make it even worse

That's what we call a Kangaroo court. The epitome of BIG GOVERNMENT

 

[t&y]

@530RL @Christopher Lucero

Just in case you guys missed it posted right above this. I challenge both of you to watch the video and point out all the obvious lies by Tucker. I know I know.... it's almost 20 mintues of video, and you are already experts.... obviously.... but give it a shot.

Bonus points if you can identify the guy instructing for him to be shot for his actions on video.

 

[Racey]

The first 30 minutes of Timcast from last night has a guy on that went through the whole process.

This guy never even went inside, was not on the side of the building with any of the Antifa and FBI shit stirring going on. And they charged him with crimes that carried 30 years of sentence, in a DC Jury, with a liberal communist Judge.... Or take this misdemeanor plea deal 3 years probation 2 months in jail....

Thats what we normal people refer to as coercion

 

[SNiC Jet]

Over a thousand charged and growing. Jury conviction after jury conviction.

Yet only you see it correctly and the majority of Americans and jury after jury are wrong.

Funny how you personally took that quote to heart......
No...I simply realize there are usually more than 2 sides to the story and I am not closed minded to consider the possibilities. And to add, I have never met or seen anyone who has as much faith and trust in our Government as you... especially an ultra Liberal regime...

 

[Christopher Lucero]

So what you are saying is every person present at a protest that eventually turned violent is responsible for the violence regardless of what evidence exists to the contrary?

No. I am saying that the organized criminal effort that day utilized classic insurrectionist methods, including useful stooges who could in an instant become violent useful stooges. Obviously, the capitol police were overwhelmed by the peaceful crowd, and barely able to contain the small number of violent actors. It is just one slight tipping point before the police are massively destroyed by a violent overwhelming crowd, whose intent through words were to kill and maim and torture lawmakers and anyone who stood in the way. EVen peaceful idiots who sit on chairs are just one action away from attaining information or materiel that compromises national security.
Since you are an expert, let me ask: What is your training when the assembled mass of citizens is far in excess of your squad's ability to maintain control of the situation?

No. Actually, I get paid to have an informed opinion and at times testify to it. You understand how Voir Dire works in the criminal court system regarding subject matter experts?

avoided answering the question...nearly the same as being silent. Ethics are important. VERY fing important. What are yours?

 

[t&y]

The first 30 minutes of Timcast from last night has a guy on that went through the whole process.

This guy never even went inside, was not on the side of the building with any of the Antifa and FBI shit stirring going on. And they charged him with crimes that carried 30 years of sentence, in a DC Jury, with a liberal communist Judge.... Or take this misdemeanor plea deal 3 years probation 2 months in jail....

Thats what we normal people refer to as coercion

Sorry Racey... He was present that day as admitted, so obviously he is guilty of Attempted Murder at a minimum.

 

[Christopher Lucero]

More and more evidence appears each day indicating that everything the J6 committee presented, and what was promoted across the globe via the main stream media, was altered, lied about, and possibly even hidden in cases that could have exonerated a person/s from criminal wrong doing.

Yet you simply don't seem to care. That is some higher level ethical shit you got going on there bud. You and your friend need to get over your TDS and recognize the big picture here.

LOL again.

I am not a peace officer, so, whatever my ethics, they do not impact people in the ways yours will.

hang in there, though. Let me know if you need a bigger shovel.

 

[Racey]

Just breaking

 

[t&y]

No. I am saying that the organized criminal effort that day utilized classic insurrectionist methods, including useful stooges who could in an instant become violent useful stooges. Obviously, the capitol police were overwhelmed by the peaceful crowd, and barely able to contain the small number of violent actors. It is just one slight tipping point before the police are massively destroyed by a violent overwhelming crowd, whose intent through words were to kill and maim and torture lawmakers and anyone who stood in the way. EVen peaceful idiots who sit on chairs are just one action away from attaining information or materiel that compromises national security.
Since you are an expert, let me ask: What is your training when the assembled mass of citizens is far in excess of your squad's ability to maintain control of the situation?

avoided answering the question...nearly the same as being silent. Ethics are important. VERY fing important. What are yours?

Hahahahahahahahahaha..... My ethics, obviously different than yours. The masses can decide for themselves which ones are more righteous.

So you truly believe all the parties present that day were some part of a grand sceme to overthrow the government? I bet you are line for your 19th booster shot too.

My training consists of not allowing it to get to that point in the first place. One of the basics of that training consists of not setting barriers or attempting to defend indefensible positions. I faced crowds of thousands, they didn't get by us. What were you doing during the months of riots led by and funded by the Libturd party?

Those cops were set up for failure from the get go. Like already stated, it is becoming more and more apparent that the failed process we are all witnessing was planned and orchestrated by the very politicians you seem so concerned about. You are so far gone you probably can't accept that the plan for this to happen came from the opposite of who you think is responsible.

Keep throwing your personal jabs if you need to. But in case you missed it, I answered the question you have with an affirmative "No." Maybe you should go re-read what you actually asked.

 

[t&y]

LOL again.

I am not a peace officer.....

Thank god....

 

[Christopher Lucero]

@530RL @Christopher Lucero

Just in case you guys missed it posted right above this. I challenge both of you to watch the video and point out all the obvious lies by Tucker. I know I know.... it's almost 20 mintues of video, and you are already experts.... obviously.... but give it a shot.

Bonus points if you can identify the guy instructing for him to be shot for his actions on video.

watched it, but I like to use this app in my device that changes the audio to a female voice, or a sponge bob voice. makes listening a little easier. also, like to slow down or speed it up.

because, if you can't have fun in this life, then what is the point?

lies? what IS a lie anyway? To a pathological liar, to a narcissist, to a sociopath, the truth is an isolated view through a lens heavily distorted by a sad concentration on weirdness.

so the fact that there is a 'Tucker Truth" is not surprising to me...it is just a manifestation of mental illness. Unfortunately, the mental illness has an infectious element, a sort of 'viral' contagion that infects others, like yourself. (This may be construed as personal, but was not intended so. Still. if injury precipitated, apologies.)

IF ONLY there were a vaccine against it.

 

[t&y]

Just breaking

Interesting. But not really out of the norm to retract Informant information from criminal filings. For clarification, that is not to alter it, but to use legal exceptions to withhold identity. The difference is this generally requires motions and hearings with the judge who can ultimately rule that all the information needs to be exposed. When that happens you have a choice, move forward and reveal your source while burning your informant, or drop the case.

But who are we to consider any of this as furtherance of the real crimes going on here? I'm sure our experts will be along shortly to explain this away...

 

[just_floatin]

 

[Christopher Lucero]

believe all the parties present that day were some part of a grand sceme to overthrow the government?

uh, did you not read? you so obtuse. overthrow, perhaps not, but to affect it in ways of which subverted process and effected an autogolpe (self coup). the potential was there. the elements were all in place. still can't deny that.
why are you not answering about your ethical position? you believe you are just, but the evidence shows otherwise.
why won't you defend your flawed ethical bias?

Thank god....

Yes. Thank God. One thing we can agree upon for sure.

My training consists of not allowing it to get to that point in the first place. One of the basics of that training consists of not setting barriers or attempting to defend indefensible positions.

cool. you are such a success!!! YAAY! I wont ask if you fail because obviously you are a superior being, what about when others fail, like capitol police did that day...what's the response then? Is it any different from what they did? And what is your expectation from justice once the injured officers and destroyed public property and evidence of who injured and destroyed is gathered?

it is becoming more and more apparent that the failed process we are all witnessing was planned and orchestrated by the very politicians you seem so concerned about.

OMG LOL.

NOW who has some grand conspiracy at their core. sheesh. Still, I like the idea that "Q" suddenly disappeared after it was all over.

 

[t&y]

watched it, but I like to use this app in my device that changes the audio to a female voice, or a sponge bob voice. makes listening a little easier. also, like to slow down or speed it up.

because, if you can't have fun in this life, then what is the point?

lies? what IS a lie anyway? To a pathological liar, to a narcissist, to a sociopath, the truth is an isolated view through a lens heavily distorted by a sad concentration on weirdness.

so the fact that there is a 'Tucker Truth" is not surprising to me...it is just a manifestation of mental illness. Unfortunately, the mental illness has an infectious element, a sort of 'viral' contagion that infects others, like yourself.

IF ONLY there were a vaccine against it.

More personal attacks. Super impressed.

So daily in my life I have to listen to people whose voices sound more like fingernails on a chalk board. But I still listen to it. Then I do my best to form an objective opinion based on a set of articulable facts and physical evidence. Doesn't matter if I don't like the sound of the voice, if the information that is factually correct isn't what I thought it was in the beginning. I have to consider it before moving forward. You should try that sometime.

 

[t&y]

uh, did you not read? you so obtuse. overthrow, perhaps not, but to affect it in ways of which subverted process and effected an autogolpe (self coup). the potential was there. the elements were all in place. still can't deny that.
why are you not answering about your ethical position? you believe you are just, but the evidence shows otherwise.
why won't you defend your flawed ethical bias?

Yes. Thank God. One thing we can agree upon for sure.

cool. you are such a success!!! YAAY! I wont ask if you fail because obviously you are a superior being, what about when others fail, like capitol police did that day...what's the response then? Is it any different from what they did? And what is your expectation from justice once the injured officers and destroyed public property and evidence of who injured and destroyed is gathered?

OMG LOL.

NOW who has some grand conspiracy at their core. sheesh. Still, I like the idea that "Q" suddenly disappeared after it was all over.

Yup, I've read, watched, and listened. Do you believe today, reading this information right here right now, there are things associated with the J6 incident that you do not know?

I'll take that a step further. How about do you believe that I, that would be ME, have more information regarding this entire J6 incident than you do sitting here today reading, listening, and watching?

I've answered your ethics questions multiple times. I can't help it if you are so worked up you keep missing it. I'm sure this will que more personal attacks.

I'm guessing you have no planning for this type of event in your background. What if the Russians suddenly dropped in like in RED DAWN and took over that day instead of thousands of lawful and peaceful protestors? I mean, if you just want to play a what if game then lets go all out. I heard Pelosi herself was using a body double in the chamber and was actually one of the black clad protestors seen trying to break through the glass...

Is it a conspiracy to intentionally decline needed supplies after multiple requests while allegedly being a position to know the real threat of violence that day? Call it a conspiracy if you must, but you might want to check the track record on the alleged conspiracies associated with our government and the information they are providing as of late.

Too easy... I'd suggest you take a break.

 

[Christopher Lucero]

More personal attacks

?
Huh?
There is literally no personal attack in any bit of this particular post. I stated people like you, NOT you.
Are you ok? Need a welfare check?
You think I am 'attacking' FTucker Carlson by modifying the A/V to make it fun for me? Just living my life and absorbing the message in a fun way.
It's better than the direct reception from an angry, constantly constipated entertainer...

because, you know, his employer says he cannot be taken seriously ...so I don't. They won in court, to reinforce the point that we should NOT take him seriously...think about that...if you BELIEVE him, you are falling for a deception even his employer says should not be fallen for.

 

[Christopher Lucero]

ethics questions multiple times

oh dear. How did I miss them? Wait, I know...because you did not answer.

lots of redirection, plenty of questioning my ethics, but no confrontation of your own inability to see that you are a compromised peace officer who will not serve justice fairly.

I'm guessing you ... Russians suddenly dropped in like in RED DAWN...Pelosi...body double...

OMG LOL WTF?
spinning.
we gotta stop. you are spinning.

I'd suggest you take a break.

we are in mutual agreement on this, as I suggest you take a break as well.

 

[Racey]

Interesting. But not really out of the norm to retract Informant information from criminal filings. For clarification, that is not to alter it, but to use legal exceptions to withhold identity. The difference is this generally requires motions and hearings with the judge who can ultimately rule that all the information needs to be exposed. When that happens you have a choice, move forward and reveal your source while burning your informant, or drop the case.

But who are we to consider any of this as furtherance of the real crimes going on here? I'm sure our experts will be along shortly to explain this away...

This wasn't to retract that the informant was present, it was to edit out the fact that the Agent was.

 

[t&y]

?
Huh?
There is literally no personal attack in any bit of this particular post. I stated people like you, NOT you.
Are you ok? Need a welfare check?
You think I am 'attacking' FTucker Carlson by modifying the A/V to make it fun for me? Just living my life and absorbing the message in a fun way.
It's better than the direct reception from an angry, constantly constipated entertainer...

because, you know, his employer says he cannot be taken seriously ...so I don't. They won in court, to reinforce the point that we should NOT take him seriously...think about that...if you BELIEVE him, you are falling for a deception even his employer says should not be fallen for.

Ohhhh... I see. I guess I must have mistaken the parts where you continually assert that I personally have questionable ethics and there for should not or cannot serve the public.

Regarding Tucker, you must have missed the post where I talk about having to listen to voices that are the equivelant of nails on a chalkboard. Some people possess the ability to actually hear the words spoken and analyze the information provided, and some cannot. In this very thread you have demonstrated you either lack the ability to form an objective opinion regardless of source, or you are just being a troll at this point. I'm patient, so the back and forth really isn't a problem. But the information being discussed doesn't change based on your ability to understand or accept it.

oh dear. How did I miss them? Wait, I know...because you did not answer.

lots of redirection, plenty of questioning my ethics, but no confrontation of your own inability to see that you are a compromised peace officer who will not serve justice fairly.

OMG LOL WTF?
spinning.
we gotta stop. you are spinning.


we are in mutual agreement on this, as I suggest you take a break as well.

No personal attacks but I am some how a compromised police officer? Did you forget what you were pontificating about mid-sentence?

 

[530RL]

@530RL @Christopher Lucero

Just in case you guys missed it posted right above this. I challenge both of you to watch the video and point out all the obvious lies by Tucker. I know I know.... it's almost 20 mintues of video, and you are already experts.... obviously.... but give it a shot.

Bonus points if you can identify the guy instructing for him to be shot for his actions on video.

So I watched the whole thing.

I can’t find any part of it that refutes or proves that Congress was not obstructed, that LE were not actually assaulted, that individuals did not in fact come with the intent to capture, injure and murder members of Congress as well as the executive branch and that individuals did not in fact break into the capitol grounds via broken windows doors and other methodologies.

Could you please point the time segments out where in that video those facts are refuted?

 

[t&y]

This wasn't to retract that the informant was present, it was to edit out the fact that the Agent was.

I get the allegations. Point being we are getting those allegations from an interpretation of "legal speak" which may sound egregious when it really isn't. Great example is when generally following a police involved shooting where a suspect dies, the news will come out and state the shooting has been ruled a Homicide... Well yeah, no shit. The life of one person was taken by another. But if they just speak of the legal definition of Homicide, people will automatically assume there is some illegal act associated with it.

We are also getting this information from a podcaster who is basing it all off of internet posts.

Don't get me wrong, if they actually altered evidence to allege criminal conduct, or hide their own criminal acts, then they need to be facing charges. Pretty sure we agree on that.

 

[t&y]

So I watched the whole thing.

I can’t find any part of it that refutes or proves that Congress was not obstructed, that LE were not actually assaulted, that individuals did not in fact come with the intent to capture, injure and murder members of Congress as well as the executive branch and that individuals did not in fact break into the capitol grounds via broken windows doors and other methodologies.

Could you please point the time segments out where in that video those facts are refuted?

Wow, it's getting piled pretty high here. Where in that video specifically did you garner intent to capture, injure, or murder members of congress? Are you able to read the minds of all those standing there at that protest?

And you must have simply missed that part about identifying the lies by Tucker? The fine leaders of our government have come out as late as yesterday alleging he is fabricating information to alter the message. You see any of that going on there?

I'll make it even easier for you. Do you believe Tucker has lied about or fabricated the video's he is posting?

 

[was thatguy]

HOLY PRETZEL!!!!

There is no way he didn’t pull a groin muscle with that one!

 

[t&y]

Real Life is calling... have fun.

 

[530RL]

Wow, it's getting piled pretty high here. Where in that video specifically did you garner intent to capture, injure, or murder members of congress? Are you able to read the minds of all those standing there at that protest?

And you must have simply missed that part about identifying the lies by Tucker? The fine leaders of our government have come out as late as yesterday alleging he is fabricating information to alter the message. You see any of that going on there?

I'll make it even easier for you. Do you believe Tucker has lied about or fabricated the video's he is posting?

I understand now.

You must not be aware there is more video than just what Tucker has shown. In those, which are being used in over a thousand prosecutions, one can garner intent to capture, assault and murder members of Congress and the executive branch. Not surprisingly to me, some people do not look at the videos objectively, but pick and choose snippets to further their narrative. And as such one can come to the conclusion that there were no crimes on J6.

To your question, neither Tucker, the J6 committee nor prosecutors have lied about the videos as the videos speak for themselves. Tucker, like the J6 committee is simply giving his opinion or promoting the narrative he believes, as do prosecutors and defense counsel. It is up to the viewers of Tuckers show, the voters in 22 and the juries to determine what is the right personal opinion/conclusion.

And each person, voter, or jury member is certainly entitled to their opinion as is Tucker.

 

[regor]

Top Dem On J6 Panel: We Actually Didn’t Review The Footage

Hiring investigators who 'kind of went through the video' doesn't sound like a very thorough investigation.

thefederalist.com

In a Wednesday night statement to CNN, select committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., claimed the panel never analyzed the blockbuster footage Fox News aired this week.

“I’m not actually aware of any member of the committee who had access,” Thompson said. “We had a team of employees who kind of went through the video.”

Hiring investigators who “kind of went through the video” doesn’t sound like a very thorough investigation.

 

[regor]

So if police are around or are setting up a perimeter and feel that they can not safely intervene due to their force versus the total mob size, or are ordered not to intervene, such as during many BLM and Antifa riots, the crimes are legal and should be dismissed?

 

[just_floatin]

Tour Guide Video Evidence

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633648025816952833

 

[SNiC Jet]

Keep throwing your personal jabs if you need to.

 

[500bbc]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633604027610017793

Why are the Proud Boys changing their clothes in the bushes?

 

[530RL]

View attachment 1207580

Tour Guide Video Evidence

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633648025816952833

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/case-multi-defendant/file/1430996/download

 

[500bbc]

Not sure why I even comment here, I know it's a fucking waste of time. Let me just say this. It wasn't a conservative that just presented an "International Woman of Courage" award to a biological male. But then we know you woke promoters are fine with it.

MSN

Jill Stevenson is the pussy Trump was talking about...

 

[regor]

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/case-multi-defendant/file/1430996/download

You got NOTHING and yore too much of a perra to admit you don’t.......

 

[530RL]

You got NOTHING and yore too much of a perra to admit you don’t.......

Nothing? Really?

You do have a problem with facts and reality.

DOJ says at least 1,000 Trump supporters arrested for Jan. 6 Capitol riot

The Justice Department is criminally investigating Donald Trump for actions before and the day of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters.

www.cnbc.com

 

[Racey]

Nothing? Really?

You do have a problem with facts and reality.

DOJ says at least 1,000 Trump supporters arrested for Jan. 6 Capitol riot

The Justice Department is criminally investigating Donald Trump for actions before and the day of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters.

www.cnbc.com

OMG GUYS DID YOU HEAR THAT!????

1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!

 

[regor]

Nothing? Really?

You do have a problem with facts and reality.

DOJ says at least 1,000 Trump supporters arrested for Jan. 6 Capitol riot

The Justice Department is criminally investigating Donald Trump for actions before and the day of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters.

www.cnbc.com

That's NOTHING but a kangaroo court with a bunch of bitch ass brown shirt jurors with a corrupt government behind it.

You know I'm winning the long game as more and more wake up to the spineless corrupt fraud you and yore friends are, along with EVERYONE here knowing yore full of shit now!!!

 

[just_floatin]

Nothing? Really?

You do have a problem with facts and reality.

DOJ says at least 1,000 Trump supporters arrested for Jan. 6 Capitol riot

The Justice Department is criminally investigating Donald Trump for actions before and the day of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters.

www.cnbc.com

@530RL The plea agreement reminds me of a saying I learned years ago and passed down to my offspring. “Just because the scoreboard is right, doesn’t make it right.”

 

[regor]

OMG GUYS DID YOU HEAR THAT!????

1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!1000 ARRESTS!!!!