WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Sum Ting Wong

brgrcru

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
6,510
Reaction score
13,218
Can you imagine the threads in here, the tweets from Trump and the outrage by the TST's if the Harris administration had done the exact same thing if they won the election.

The hypocrisy is just joyful to watch.
That’s here say bs



we call out anyone who is a traitor
Republicans And Democrats and you

And no , your queen . Did not win the election
Thank god
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,486
You sure discredited him with this post. lol



And why does Elon need investigate? Didn’t RDP find the culprit in the first posts in this thread?

Big stool fan or just sticking up for a fellow money changer? 😆
 

Sportin' Wood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
2,831
Reaction score
8,497
Fair enough.

So your view is that when the media found out about HRC’s private server they should have not disclosed it? They should have just “contacted the administration and informed them of the breach”?

Same with Watergate and other similar items. That is the role of the media in a free society?
My view is biased by an authority complex.

It seems to me the media's role in politics took a turn for the worse during the Johnson administration. While the media has always had an ideological slant it seems more blatant than ever. This latest round of entertainers gives yellow journalism a run.

My comment was that if the Atlantic was concerned about American Lives, or National Security, they should not have run the story and informed the administration of the breach, or they could have done their job and researched how the breach happened and rooted out the truth. They had options, the choose greed. After-all we are capitalists are we not? Personally, I might have let it ride and collected more intelligence.

My view on HRC private server? I don't care and never did. Career politicians are mostly criminals, scoundrels, or lack a moral compass. Big surprise she broke the law. A proper investigation may have yield a better outcome, or not. Who knows, it does not matter to me.

The Watergate scandal happened long before I was born, however since you asked, I think they made a mountain out of a molehill. See my comment above, they all play dirty ticks, engage in behavior unbecoming and will sell out their mothers to remain in power. At least assassinations are deep in the tool box.

The media is propaganda. It is all lies, posturing and theater. I watch it through the same lens as I might watch WWE, or Yellowstone.

The media's role in society? Which media? The corporate media's role is to do the bidding of the platform they think brings in the most revenue. Investigative reporting is for poor people, tin foil hat societies and intellectuals that live in 4x8 plywood cabins in the woods or post on message boards. None of these actors on mainstream media are journalists. They traded away integrity for a paycheck and fame.

To be clear, I don't blame anyone for selling their soul, we all do it, every day, one compromise at a time.
 

ChumpChange

Commercial Banker
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
10,905
Reaction score
13,945
Big stool fan or just sticking up for a fellow money changer? 😆
Just go back to the first post of this thread. You post anything that fits a narrative that you want to believe. No better than Alvin Bragg. Find your false truth and then look for any supporting documentation and post it as fact. It’s kind of sad. But when you post as much as you do it’s gonna become noticeable at some point.

And anybody who post otherwise or has a different opinion you tell to Fuck Off. Those two words aren’t a very good argument when you’re trying to argue facts. It just shows that you are out truthed and definitely outclassed.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,486
Just go back to the first post of this thread. You post anything that fits a narrative that you want to believe. No better than Alvin Bragg. Find your false truth and then look for any supporting documentation and post it as fact. It’s kind of sad. But when you post as much as you do it’s gonna become noticeable at some point.

And anybody who post otherwise or has a different opinion you tell to Fuck Off. Those two words aren’t a very good argument when you’re trying to argue facts. It just shows that you are out truthed and definitely outclassed.

Trump tariffs got you profit margin down also?

You’ll be alright. 👍
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,905
Reaction score
22,345
My view is biased by an authority complex.

It seems to me the media's role in politics took a turn for the worse during the Johnson administration. While the media has always had an ideological slant it seems more blatant than ever. This latest round of entertainers gives yellow journalism a run.

My comment was that if the Atlantic was concerned about American Lives, or National Security, they should not have run the story and informed the administration of the breach, or they could have done their job and researched how the breach happened and rooted out the truth. They had options, the choose greed. After-all we are capitalists are we not? Personally, I might have let it ride and collected more intelligence.

My view on HRC private server? I don't care and never did. Career politicians are mostly criminals, scoundrels, or lack a moral compass. Big surprise she broke the law. A proper investigation may have yield a better outcome, or not. Who knows, it does not matter to me.

The Watergate scandal happened long before I was born, however since you asked, I think they made a mountain out of a molehill. See my comment above, they all play dirty ticks, engage in behavior unbecoming and will sell out their mothers to remain in power. At least assassinations are deep in the tool box.

The media is propaganda. It is all lies, posturing and theater. I watch it through the same lens as I might watch WWE, or Yellowstone.

The media's role in society? Which media? The corporate media's role is to do the bidding of the platform they think brings in the most revenue. Investigative reporting is for poor people, tin foil hat societies and intellectuals that live in 4x8 plywood cabins in the woods or post on message boards. None of these actors on mainstream media are journalists. They traded away integrity for a paycheck and fame.

To be clear, I don't blame anyone for selling their soul, we all do it, every day, one compromise at a time.
In this case, the media held the story until after the shooting was over and then disclosed in a careful and responsible manner protecting sensitive material that the administration and therefore Americans had a serious preventable security breach. That seems to me to be the job of the media.

With respect to further disclosures, which the Atlantic clearly was not going to do, they were only necessary when the Atlantic and the author were called flat out liars by the highest levels of the Administration.

I agree with you in general about media and their natural biases, but in this case I think journalism classes in the future will show it as an excellent example of doing journalism exactly as intended.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,486
I agree with you in general about media and their natural biases, but in this case I think journalism classes in the future will show it as an excellent example of doing journalism exactly as intended.

History will show it was just like Russia, Russia, Russia , Covid and J6, a set-up by the CIA to undermine the man that threatens their existence. Fools everywhere will buy into it, just like they did with all the rest. 🤣

mask low IQ.JPG
 

TeamGreene

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
5,005
Reaction score
10,658
All of the dems feigned outrage over "national security" is fucking laughable. Where was the outrage over Biden and Mayorkas opening the southern border? Which was a bigger threat? These same people covered up Bidens cognitive decline and called out anyone who questioned it. Again which one of these actual events were a threat to national security? There is no way that this POS Goldberg would have chosen this path had God forbid Kamala would have won. Actual journalism is and has been dead for a long time this why we no longer pay attention or believe anything they say and if there were any chance of them saving their reputations they completely sunk that with covid.
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,905
Reaction score
22,345
All of the dems feigned outrage over "national security" is fucking laughable. Where was the outrage over Biden and Mayorkas opening the southern border? Which was a bigger threat? These same people covered up Bidens cognitive decline and called out anyone who questioned it. Again which one of these actual events were a threat to national security? There is no way that this POS Goldberg would have chosen this path had God forbid Kamala would have won. Actual journalism is and has been dead for a long time this why we no longer pay attention or believe anything they say and if there were any chance of them saving their reputations they completely sunk that with covid.


Unlike others in here who have defended this, I don’t believe it is appropriate to communicate specific military attack launch times and equipment on an open network prior to sending US servicemen off to fight. A platform that is knowingly compromised by former US adversaries such as Russia, China and others. A disclosure that if further communicated, could have allowed the Houthi’s to set up more robust defenses.

Had the administration owned this as opposed to attempting to lie about it, this would have blown over by now. ThIs isn’t the fault of the media, the administration blew the handling of this. They screwed up crisis management 101, admit the mistake.
 

Sportin' Wood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
2,831
Reaction score
8,497
In this case, the media held the story until after the shooting was over and then disclosed in a careful and responsible manner protecting sensitive material that the administration and therefore Americans had a serious preventable security breach. That seems to me to be the job of the media.

With respect to further disclosures, which the Atlantic clearly was not going to do, they were only necessary when the Atlantic and the author were called flat out liars by the highest levels of the Administration.

I agree with you in general about media and their natural biases, but in this case I think journalism classes in the future will show it as an excellent example of doing journalism exactly as intended.
I'm not convinced that someone accidentally added a media outlet to a text chain. I just simply don't believe anything I don't see with my own eyes.

Question everything.

No doubt, Journalism class will celebrate themselves at every opportunity.
 

ChumpChange

Commercial Banker
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
10,905
Reaction score
13,945
Trump tariffs got you profit margin down also?

You’ll be alright. 👍
Couldn’t quite find a rebuttal for that, could you? Or maybe you went back and read the first few posts and realized the conspiracy theory that you found on the web to fit your narrative already fell apart when the actual participants in the Signal conversation started talking.

And yes, I will be alright. That’s what I do.
 
Last edited:

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,486
Couldn’t quite find a rebuttal for that, could you? Or maybe you went back and read the first few posts and realized the conspiracy theory that you found on the web to fit your narrative already fell apart when the actual participants in the Signal conversation started talking.

And yes, I will be alright. That’s what I do.

No, I'm just not one for long winded posts, especially to a two-faced POS who's proven it over and over and over. You've been around long enough to know the dynamics of my relationship with yore fellow money changer.

Mr. Wong is not out of the woods yet Chump and nothing has been said by the participants in the Signal conversation to dispute that. Just so you know and are clear, I believe this was just another CIA set-up perpetrated on a movement that's looking to destroy the corrupt establishment that rules this country.

Clear now?
 

ChumpChange

Commercial Banker
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
10,905
Reaction score
13,945
No, I'm just not one for long winded posts, especially to a two-faced POS who's proven it over and over and over. You've been around long enough to know the dynamics of my relationship with yore fellow money changer.

Mr. Wong is not out of the woods yet Chump and nothing has been said by the participants in the Signal conversation to dispute that. Just so you know and are clear, I believe this was just another CIA set-up perpetrated on a movement that's looking to destroy the corrupt establishment that rules this country.

Clear now?
I guess I’m clear on your point of view in taking a not clear view. I think that’s also known as a conspiracy theory. Good times. Keep up the fight for all us ignorant people. lol
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
16,345
Reaction score
30,472
I guess I’m clear on your point of view in taking a not clear view. I think that’s also known as a conspiracy theory. Good times. Keep up the fight for all us ignorant people. lol
Lol... Have you paid attention to the ratio of "Conspiracy Theory's" that have turned out to not be a conspiracy theory at all over the last few years? Of course, there will always be the Lizard People Flat Earthers running around out there, but not every "Conspiracy" is at that level.

Ask yourself if 10 years ago you would have believed that a political party and sitting administration in this country would have spied on a political opponent, filed false allegations to obtain FISA warrants, then conduct a public criminal investigation utilizing the FEDS and DOJ to go after a sitting President, based off of a paid false hit piece brought forth by a former Russian informant (discredited before any of this began I might add), paid for by the current minority party, against that same sitting President? Too crazy to be true of course, just a bunch of conspiracy's I'm sure.

Wake up dude, all us ignorant people sure have.
 

ChumpChange

Commercial Banker
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
10,905
Reaction score
13,945
Ah yes, the conspiracy card gets played..................... 🤣

View attachment 1490747
When you jump to a conspiracy within a day of something happening, yes you are a conspiracy theorist. You think everything has to have some ulterior motive. Sometimes shit happens.

Yes there are conspiracies that have played out over the years. I wait till it becomes a conspiracy. You start screaming it.

It’s like the Democrats in regards to January 6. The first month it was just a riot at the capital. Then suddenly Warren started calling an insurrection. Then the next dem called it an insurrection. I remember talking to my wife at that point and saying they are gonna make this insurrection whether it was or not. And this it began.

You keep spouting what you want it to be and it will be. I’ll wait for the fax to make my decision thereafter.

@t&y As we stay in the market, past performance is not indicative of future results.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,486
When you jump to a conspiracy within a day of something happening, yes you are a conspiracy theorist. You think everything has to have some ulterior motive. Sometimes shit happens.

Yes there are conspiracies that have played out over the years. I wait till it becomes a conspiracy. You start screaming it.

It’s like the Democrats in regards to January 6. The first month it was just a riot at the capital. Then suddenly Warren started calling an insurrection. Then the next dem called it an insurrection. I remember talking to my wife at that point and saying they are gonna make this insurrection whether it was or not. And this it began.

You keep spouting what you want it to be and it will be. I’ll wait for the fax to make my decision thereafter.

@t&y As we stay in the market, past performance is not indicative of future results.

No thanks, I've watched the actions of our government for decades and learned that MOST of the time, the conspiracy theorist gets paid.

Dave said the dungeon is the conspiracy theorist's safe place. Stop harassing me, I feel threatened. 😆
 

Doc

2022 32 Doug Wright
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
1,309
Reaction score
2,850
Lol... Have you paid attention to the ratio of "Conspiracy Theory's" that have turned out to not be a conspiracy theory at all over the last few years? Of course, there will always be the Lizard People Flat Earthers running around out there, but not every "Conspiracy" is at that level.

Ask yourself if 10 years ago you would have believed that a political party and sitting administration in this country would have spied on a political opponent, filed false allegations to obtain FISA warrants, then conduct a public criminal investigation utilizing the FEDS and DOJ to go after a sitting President, based off of a paid false hit piece brought forth by a former Russian informant (discredited before any of this began I might add), paid for by the current minority party, against that same sitting President? Too crazy to be true of course, just a bunch of conspiracy's I'm sure.

Wake up dude, all us ignorant people sure have.
You have a point! The things that have actually happened were things you would only see on Tv shows lol. To see all the things you mentioned in your second paragraph actually go down is really scary and the levels of espionage within our government is mind blowing.
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,905
Reaction score
22,345
You have a point! The things that have actually happened were things you would only see on Tv shows lol. To see all the things you mentioned in your second paragraph actually go down is really scary and the levels of espionage within our government is mind blowing.
Next thing you know the government will disavow the three separate but equal branches of government, skip due process as provided by the constitution and start sending any individual they so choose off to foreign prisons without a single requirement to show cause.

I bet people will probably even applaud it.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,486
Next thing you know the government will disavow the three separate but equal branches of government, skip due process as provided by the constitution and start sending any individual they so choose off to foreign prisons without a single requirement to show cause.

I bet people will probably even applaud it.

Says the faggot that supported the DOJ's use of the Enron law that the Supreme Court struck down 6-3 in order to lock up J6 misdemeanors!!! 🤣


The US Supreme Court sided with a Jan. 6 Capitol riot defendant in a ruling that could affect hundreds of prosecutions, including the criminal case in Washington against former President Donald Trump.

Voting 6-3, the justices limited the Justice Department’s use of a 2002 law that makes it a crime to obstruct an official proceeding. The majority said that law, enacted in response to the Enron Corp. collapse, is designed to protect documents and other records and wouldn’t apply simply to the act of trying to stop a congressional proceeding.

Given that the law was “enacted to address the Enron disaster, not some further flung set of dangers, it is unlikely that Congress responded with such an unfocused and grossly incommensurate patch,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.


As usual, you sided with the 3 deranged libturds!!! 😆


530 WH Breasts.jpg




😆
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
16,345
Reaction score
30,472
Next thing you know the government will disavow the three separate but equal branches of government, skip due process as provided by the constitution and start sending any individual they so choose off to foreign prisons without a single requirement to show cause.

I bet people will probably even applaud it.
My guess is that will start with attempting to imprison your political opponent, then taking away the peoples freedom of speech, and then their means to defend themselves... Hmmmm Who has started down that path over the past 9 years? Oh that's right, the side you support.
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,905
Reaction score
22,345
My guess is that will start with attempting to imprison your political opponent, then taking away the peoples freedom of speech, and then their means to defend themselves... Hmmmm Who has started down that path over the past 9 years? Oh that's right, the side you support.

LOL

My side hasn’t won an election since 2004.

That would be your sides running down the path to authoritarianism with your 100 percent support.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
45,123
Reaction score
154,486
LOL

My side hasn’t won an election since 2004.

That would be your sides running down the path to authoritarianism with your 100 percent support.

Gig's up lil lyin one, they all see you.

Yore going to need to recruit some friends.
 

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
11,491
Reaction score
29,751
Gig's up lil lyin one, they all see you.

Yore going to need to recruit some friends.
Looks like AZ is getting some election attention.

Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes Says he Plans to Violate Federal Election Law – “Tell Them to Go to Hell”​

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/watch-arizona-secretary-state-adrian-fontes-says-he/

“It can be recalled that Fontes oversaw the stolen 2020 election in Maricopa County, Arizona, as the county's top election official, Maricopa County Recorder. He then ran for Secretary of State in the stolen 2022 election, where 60% of voting machines failed on election day, disenfranchising tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of in-person GOP voters.”
 
Top