28Eliminator
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2011
- Messages
- 11,494
- Reaction score
- 11,768
Can't take it anymore.. Turned the channel
Mitch daniels knocked it out of the park:thumbsup
I thought it was pretty good. One thing people need to remember, in my opinion, we need to be engadged and actively participate with whomever's in office. Government goes on regardless of party. Laws are passed, decisions made. If you wait for the stars to align, the perfect candidate (is there one?) nothing would ever get done. I agree sometimes our work is easier with a friendly, but we have to make strides every day.
Here's to hoping we can put the pettiness on the hill behind us continue to move ahead!:thumbsup
I bought a 30 pack of beer and had to shotgun one everytime Obama said the word "I" and took credit for something. I ran out of beer.
I thought it was pretty good. One thing people need to remember, in my opinion, we need to be engadged and actively participate with whomever's in office. Government goes on regardless of party. Laws are passed, decisions made. If you wait for the stars to align, the perfect candidate (is there one?) nothing would ever get done. I agree sometimes our work is easier with a friendly, but we have to make strides every day.
Here's to hoping we can put the pettiness on the hill behind us continue to move ahead!:thumbsup
I thought it was pretty good. One thing people need to remember, in my opinion, we need to be engadged and actively participate with whomever's in office. Government goes on regardless of party. Laws are passed, decisions made. If you wait for the stars to align, the perfect candidate (is there one?) nothing would ever get done. I agree sometimes our work is easier with a friendly, but we have to make strides every day.
Here's to hoping we can put the pettiness on the hill behind us continue to move ahead!:thumbsup
This State of the Union speech was, in effect, another campaign speech, Obama departs Wednesday morning on a three-day swing to five competitive states ? Iowa, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Michigan.
If he believed anything he said, he'd be in his office working to balance a budget and get our economy back on track but such activity is far beyond his pay grade.
I thought it was pretty good. One thing people need to remember, in my opinion, we need to be engadged and actively participate with whomever's in office. Government goes on regardless of party. Laws are passed, decisions made. If you wait for the stars to align, the perfect candidate (is there one?) nothing would ever get done. I agree sometimes our work is easier with a friendly, but we have to make strides every day.
Here's to hoping we can put the pettiness on the hill behind us continue to move ahead!:thumbsup
Intelligence is not welcome here:thumbsup
Can't take it anymore.. Turned the channel
This State of the Union speech was, in effect, another campaign speech, Obama departs Wednesday morning on a three-day swing to five competitive states ? Iowa, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Michigan.
If he believed anything he said, he'd be in his office working to balance a budget and get our economy back on track but such activity is far beyond his pay grade.
.dammm that monkey sure can talk alot...then I puked again..
I thought it was pretty good. One thing people need to remember, in my opinion, we need to be engadged and actively participate with whomever's in office. Government goes on regardless of party. Laws are passed, decisions made. If you wait for the stars to align, the perfect candidate (is there one?) nothing would ever get done. I agree sometimes our work is easier with a friendly, but we have to make strides every day.
Here's to hoping we can put the pettiness on the hill behind us continue to move ahead!:thumbsup
I really do not understand the "everyone deserves a fair chance" bullshit. Everyone HAS a fair chance today. I started with nothing, as did my wife. I worked 7 days a week (literally) to save up enough $$$ to start my own business. I then started working 14 days a week trying to survive. I made it on my own. My wife worked FULL TIME while going to night school, it took her 7 years to get her degree from SDSU. She now makes big $$$$ as director of finance for a Pharma co. She mad it on her own without a single student loan. I think you are born with "it" ....if you have "it" you will succeed, if you don't have it a government program will not help you.
I really do not understand the "everyone deserves a fair chance" bullshit. Everyone HAS a fair chance today. I started with nothing, as did my wife. I worked 7 days a week (literally) to save up enough $$$ to start my own business. I then started working 14 days a week trying to survive. I made it on my own. My wife worked FULL TIME while going to night school, it took her 7 years to get her degree from SDSU. She now makes big $$$$ as director of finance for a Pharma co. She mad it on her own without a single student loan. I think you are born with "it" ....if you have "it" you will succeed, if you don't have it a government program will not help you.
Life isn't fair, never will be.
Now there you go...pissin in the Obama KoolAid.
There is a lack of fairness in your tone.
Some people wash cars and some people drive them. Some even drive Cobras and dont like Jeeps.
Don't know exactly what is considered "petty".
Common sense dictates there is never going to be a perfect candidate, but how much does one need to compromise? How much does one need to be submissive and just go along for the sake of getting along?
If money is being spent that isn't available and must be borrowed, is that something which should just be accepted without complaint? Because a person is chosen by open election, should that person be given carte blanc acceptance and prior actions overlooked and blindly accepted inspite of questionable facts that are sealed from public view?
How many folks really stop and think about the fact, government does not generate any income by performing an actual service or product? Every penny governmet spends is the result of taxation and fees paid by the populace. Money the government is entrusted with and allowed to increase the percentage "taken" amongst themselves. Government pensions, healthcare, travel, meals, and ceremonies among many other things are where "your" tax dollars are spent. How many private businesses could last using the same principles these folks use to run "our" govenment? Would shareholders allow members to sit on a board or be their CEO if they used the same principles our Admin and Congress rely on?
Government is getting to be like many charitable organizations with burgeoning administrative costs. Money is channeled far away from it's intended use. There seems to be less and less checks and balances allowing runaway spending on unnecessary things. Things that have no benefit to the taxpayer who is the one working for the country to survive. Working and sacreficing in order to pay growing taxes and fees. Working for wages that are effected negatively every day by rising cost associated with poor decisons by those elected to and appointed to offices. A SS system going broke while Congressional pensions grow unchecked. Is that fair? Is it right? Is it being petty to question why?
So is it really being petty to complain and demand the madness stop? Is it petty to ask for a candidate that actually goes to DC with plans to cut spendng, decrease the debt by eliminating waste and favors for "going along" with bad legisaltion? Is it to much to demand that a person lives up to his promises that gained your vote? Do we really compromise and work with a plan that will do nothing but increase taxpayer costs and lower taxpayer life standards?
Because special interest groups are louder and contribute funds which are "written off" to campaign coffers, should they be given an advantage over the independent majority who are too busy paying the bills to organize and fight back?
Just because things have always "worked out" and the dominant parties habitually rotate being in power, doesn't mean we will continue to live our lives and retire blissfully. The passive approach and "going with the flow attitude" may just one day grow a head with sharp teeth and bite us all in the asse.
Going along to get along ain't the answer. But it is the plan of many to entrench themselves and gain self serving "change" from the original framework. The same folks that keep things stirred up so the majority who do the work and pay the bills don't have time and are made to feel guilty if they stop and speak up against the "machine of change".......
So again, what is the definituion of "petty"???????
Gay!!!
Don't know exactly what is considered "petty".
Common sense dictates there is never going to be a perfect candidate, but how much does one need to compromise? How much does one need to be submissive and just go along for the sake of getting along?
If money is being spent that isn't available and must be borrowed, is that something which should just be accepted without complaint? Because a person is chosen by open election, should that person be given carte blanc acceptance and prior actions overlooked and blindly accepted inspite of questionable facts that are sealed from public view?
How many folks really stop and think about the fact, government does not generate any income by performing an actual service or product? Every penny governmet spends is the result of taxation and fees paid by the populace. Money the government is entrusted with and allowed to increase the percentage "taken" amongst themselves. Government pensions, healthcare, travel, meals, and ceremonies among many other things are where "your" tax dollars are spent. How many private businesses could last using the same principles these folks use to run "our" govenment? Would shareholders allow members to sit on a board or be their CEO if they used the same principles our Admin and Congress rely on?
Government is getting to be like many charitable organizations with burgeoning administrative costs. Money is channeled far away from it's intended use. There seems to be less and less checks and balances allowing runaway spending on unnecessary things. Things that have no benefit to the taxpayer who is the one working for the country to survive. Working and sacreficing in order to pay growing taxes and fees. Working for wages that are effected negatively every day by rising cost associated with poor decisons by those elected to and appointed to offices. A SS system going broke while Congressional pensions grow unchecked. Is that fair? Is it right? Is it being petty to question why?
So is it really being petty to complain and demand the madness stop? Is it petty to ask for a candidate that actually goes to DC with plans to cut spendng, decrease the debt by eliminating waste and favors for "going along" with bad legisaltion? Is it to much to demand that a person lives up to his promises that gained your vote? Do we really compromise and work with a plan that will do nothing but increase taxpayer costs and lower taxpayer life standards?
Because special interest groups are louder and contribute funds which are "written off" to campaign coffers, should they be given an advantage over the independent majority who are too busy paying the bills to organize and fight back?
Just because things have always "worked out" and the dominant parties habitually rotate being in power, doesn't mean we will continue to live our lives and retire blissfully. The passive approach and "going with the flow attitude" may just one day grow a head with sharp teeth and bite us all in the asse.
Going along to get along ain't the answer. But it is the plan of many to entrench themselves and gain self serving "change" from the original framework. The same folks that keep things stirred up so the majority who do the work and pay the bills don't have time and are made to feel guilty if they stop and speak up against the "machine of change".......
So again, what is the definituion of "petty"???????
Don't know exactly what is considered "petty".
Common sense dictates there is never going to be a perfect candidate, but how much does one need to compromise? How much does one need to be submissive and just go along for the sake of getting along?
If money is being spent that isn't available and must be borrowed, is that something which should just be accepted without complaint? Because a person is chosen by open election, should that person be given carte blanc acceptance and prior actions overlooked and blindly accepted inspite of questionable facts that are sealed from public view?
How many folks really stop and think about the fact, government does not generate any income by performing an actual service or product? Every penny governmet spends is the result of taxation and fees paid by the populace. Money the government is entrusted with and allowed to increase the percentage "taken" amongst themselves. Government pensions, healthcare, travel, meals, and ceremonies among many other things are where "your" tax dollars are spent. How many private businesses could last using the same principles these folks use to run "our" govenment? Would shareholders allow members to sit on a board or be their CEO if they used the same principles our Admin and Congress rely on?
Government is getting to be like many charitable organizations with burgeoning administrative costs. Money is channeled far away from it's intended use. There seems to be less and less checks and balances allowing runaway spending on unnecessary things. Things that have no benefit to the taxpayer who is the one working for the country to survive. Working and sacreficing in order to pay growing taxes and fees. Working for wages that are effected negatively every day by rising cost associated with poor decisons by those elected to and appointed to offices. A SS system going broke while Congressional pensions grow unchecked. Is that fair? Is it right? Is it being petty to question why?
So is it really being petty to complain and demand the madness stop? Is it petty to ask for a candidate that actually goes to DC with plans to cut spendng, decrease the debt by eliminating waste and favors for "going along" with bad legisaltion? Is it to much to demand that a person lives up to his promises that gained your vote? Do we really compromise and work with a plan that will do nothing but increase taxpayer costs and lower taxpayer life standards?
Because special interest groups are louder and contribute funds which are "written off" to campaign coffers, should they be given an advantage over the independent majority who are too busy paying the bills to organize and fight back?
Just because things have always "worked out" and the dominant parties habitually rotate being in power, doesn't mean we will continue to live our lives and retire blissfully. The passive approach and "going with the flow attitude" may just one day grow a head with sharp teeth and bite us all in the asse.
Going along to get along ain't the answer. But it is the plan of many to entrench themselves and gain self serving "change" from the original framework. The same folks that keep things stirred up so the majority who do the work and pay the bills don't have time and are made to feel guilty if they stop and speak up against the "machine of change".......
So again, what is the definituion of "petty"???????
This pretty much sums it up
:thumbsup
Bush did sux pretty bad.
:thumbsup
Bush did sux pretty bad.
:thumbsup
Bush did sux pretty bad.
Oh boy. I can hear The Doctor pacing now. I sense a heated reply very shortly.