Skinny Tire AH
This ain't all folks! Skater368
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2010
- Messages
- 10,260
- Reaction score
- 23,719
That’s kinda my point.Is it even still “racing” at that point?
That’s kinda my point.Is it even still “racing” at that point?
Have you heard that Michelle Obama is actually a man, has a penis, yet still gave birth to two children?
Wonder where they land on last years shootout winner?That’s kinda my point.
“If ya ain’t cheatin’ you ain’t racin.”Wonder where they land on last years shootout winner?
Prove it gave birth. No pictures of it pregnant.
He’ll never believe it.
Not because he thinks it’s impossible, but because he’d have to agree with us…and he’d die before he’d ever do that.
Funny that they don’t see the giant hypocrisy. They champion for the gay community, yet are utterly aghast at even mentioning the America voted in a gay man.He’ll never believe it.
Not because he thinks it’s impossible, but because he’d have to agree with us…and he’d die before he’d ever do that.
Seems cheaper to just buy a trophy at the store?That’s kinda my point.
LOLFunny that they don’t see the giant hypocrisy. They champion for the gay community, yet are utterly aghast at even mentioning the America voted in a gay man.
And we’re the homophobes? It’s essentially the same behavior trait that feels the minority populations need “white” America to help them succeed. The soft bigotry of low expectations.
The left are the judgemental ones.
Wonder where they land on last years shootout winner?
I think you guys may have missed my point. Cheating is subjective because we all hold ourselves to different standards and interpretations of rules. In our culture, I believe most people cheat in some way, every day. Cheat on paying taxes? I can think of multiple ways people do this and justify it for just as many reasons without a care in the world. To think the same mentality would not apply to election fraud is naive. I am being honest and saying we bent the spirit of the rules because the finite details missing left a void we found and exploited. It was cheating in my opinion, but much like registering a car in Arizona to beat out the California Smog inspection, we did it.“If ya ain’t cheatin’ you ain’t racin.”
Hold on, let's all grab a cup and getI think you guys may have missed my point. Cheating is subjective because we all hold ourselves to different standards and interpretations of rules. In our culture, I believe most people cheat in some way, every day. Cheat on paying taxes? I can think of multiple ways people do this and justify it for just as many reasons without a care in the world. To think the same mentality would not apply to election fraud is naive. I am being honest and saying we bent the spirit of the rules because the finite details missing left a void we found and exploited. It was cheating in my opinion, but much like registering a car in Arizona to beat out the California Smog inspection, we did it.
I believe the Democrats are more engaged in winning elections than the Republicans. Lately, Republicans like to cry over spilled milk, the Democrats seem to go back to the drawing board and find ways to win. Where is G Gordan Liddy when you need him? How about the folks from Tammany Hall? Vote early vote often? Republicans have settled into a grievance culture. Lose an election, cry, ask for money. Democrats have built an aggressive culture of activation. One needs to look no further than the Gay Marriage legalization strategy as a road map to influencing a national outcome. The legalization of weed seems to be following this same road map to a positive potential outcome. Dare I say, does Republican leadership really even want to win? Do they get more donations when they win or lose?
Honestly don't know or care who won the shootout last year, it serves no value to me, rich people's problems. About the same as a Trophy Truck race, the winner is quickly forgotten and of little consequence. My point is simply, we should not be surprised by election fraud, and ask what will Republicans do about it?
PS before you accuse me of being a Democrat, I have never voted for a democrat since 1988, but I dislike the duopoly and often vote third party. Like Regor says, they are both the same people in my experience.
It isn’t winning.I think you guys may have missed my point. Cheating is subjective because we all hold ourselves to different standards and interpretations of rules. In our culture, I believe most people cheat in some way, every day. Cheat on paying taxes? I can think of multiple ways people do this and justify it for just as many reasons without a care in the world. To think the same mentality would not apply to election fraud is naive. I am being honest and saying we bent the spirit of the rules because the finite details missing left a void we found and exploited. It was cheating in my opinion, but much like registering a car in Arizona to beat out the California Smog inspection, we did it.
I believe the Democrats are more engaged in winning elections than the Republicans. Lately, Republicans like to cry over spilled milk, the Democrats seem to go back to the drawing board and find ways to win. Where is G Gordan Liddy when you need him? How about the folks from Tammany Hall? Vote early vote often? Republicans have settled into a grievance culture. Lose an election, cry, ask for money. Democrats have built an aggressive culture of activation. One needs to look no further than the Gay Marriage legalization strategy as a road map to influencing a national outcome. The legalization of weed seems to be following this same road map to a positive potential outcome. Dare I say, does Republican leadership really even want to win? Do they get more donations when they win or lose?
Honestly don't know or care who won the shootout last year, it serves no value to me, rich people's problems. About the same as a Trophy Truck race, the winner is quickly forgotten and of little consequence. My point is simply, we should not be surprised by election fraud, and ask what will Republicans do about it?
PS before you accuse me of being a Democrat, I have never voted for a democrat since 1988, but I dislike the duopoly and often vote third party. Like Regor says, they are both the same people in my experience.
Yep. The left wants control. The only thing they ultimately care about is control. They control the minds of weak people, and are in the process of controlling enough people so as to never have to admit wrong, apologize or change course until they want.Funny that they don’t see the giant hypocrisy. They champion for the gay community, yet are utterly aghast at even mentioning the America voted in a gay man.
And we’re the homophobes? It’s essentially the same behavior trait that feels the minority populations need “white” America to help them succeed. The soft bigotry of low expectations.
The left are the judgemental ones.
Hmm. What to do..It isn’t winning.
It’s stealing.
And yes, Dems are much better at it.
I think you guys may have missed my point. Cheating is subjective because we all hold ourselves to different standards and interpretations of rules. In our culture, I believe most people cheat in some way, every day. Cheat on paying taxes? I can think of multiple ways people do this and justify it for just as many reasons without a care in the world. To think the same mentality would not apply to election fraud is naive. I am being honest and saying we bent the spirit of the rules because the finite details missing left a void we found and exploited. It was cheating in my opinion, but much like registering a car in Arizona to beat out the California Smog inspection, we did it.
I say stop pretending it’s a real race.Hmm. What to do..
I don’t do any of that.Or getting a Montana LLC to avoid paying California registration and sales tax People all over Havasu do that. I think there may be more Montana registered boats and RVs out there than CA or AZ ones. I don't believe there are that many schmucks out there like us who drive all the way from the Canadian border to the Mexican border on a regular basis
Ok, important question about "cheating":
If one partakes in a non-sanctioned, independent, contest between two vehicles, and no rules are set forth by the participants in regards to limitations...
Is nitrous oxide "cheating"?
No rules explicitly stated it could not be used.
No statement a car does or does not have it.
"...if a tree falls in a forrest" kind of question.
Fond memories of Carlsbad in the '70's.Match races are just that.
Run what ya brung.
It’s why they invented bracket racing.
I hated bracket racing. If you improved...you broke out and lost. Not to mention, then your time went out for all to see. That would have caused a pay cutMatch races are just that.
Run what ya brung.
It’s why they invented bracket racing.
Hold on, let's all grab a cup and get
comfy.
OK! Now do cheating in marriage...
Got a wife you'd like stolen?
Ok, important question about "cheating":
If one partakes in a non-sanctioned, independent, contest between two vehicles, and no rules are set forth by the participants in regards to limitations...
Is nitrous oxide "cheating"?
No rules explicitly stated it could not be used.
No statement a car does or does not have it.
"...if a tree falls in a forrest" kind of question.
Hidden like like 8 kilos in a Cadillac Escalade...Is the Nitrous Oxide hidden or communicated? Asking for a friend.
Nothing to see here, obviously lies printed by anti-American propagandists!@702sandman
@Sportin' Wood
Pennsylvania Proves Our Elections Are Corrupt
Dave McCormick needs undated mail-in ballots to win and suddenly they appear!emeralddb3.substack.com
Same time, different uniform.
You missed one, Mr. Wood. Hard Pass.. So? 32 years. I've got you by 2. And I didn't cheat. It's all good Mr. Wood. Until it's not.Is the Nitrous Oxide hidden or communicated? Asking for a friend.
There is always a chance a bigger better Dick could come along and steal the wife, but after 32 years, I have to assume she may not want to invest in starting the teaching process over. You better bring the A-game if you want to sweep her away. I may just take her back after she gets access to your assets. You'll never know if she is in on the hustle until it is too late.
I've got so few assets, they don't need protection. "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose".You missed one, Mr. Wood. Hard Pass.. So? 32 years. I've got you by 2. And I didn't cheat. It's all good Mr. Wood. Until it's not.
Cool Jason Bourne story though. Good advice. I got paid to teach this. What's the first rule? CYA, 2nd rule? Pay attention to what is going on around you. A shrewd individual such as yourself, I'm sure you made sure your assets are well insulated from your biggest danger, statistically, by far? And as Bill Cosby says, Riiiiight...
The classic rhetorical question. Nice...
I should clarify to Mr. Wood that the Wife stealing question is the same question as the Tree question. Don't need another Ex.
Cheat On. After all.
"All's fair, in Love and War..."
Funny how we can make assumptions about people within a few posts on a bulletin board. Better hold on to your wallet around Wood, he is a cheating MFer.
You appear to have no problems with open borders in a "trade off" for labor.....IMO, this is "selling out" the integrity of our Nation
It’s making sure you have the best ability to do well in that race, WITHOUT crossing any lines that will be cheating or getting dqued. So your wallet is safe around us off-road racersAssumptions?
You stated it outright! Lol
But my take on it is that I’d better hold on to my wallet around ANY off-road racer!
They’re all cheating MFers apparently.
It’s safe anywhere, as it’s usually quite empty!!It’s making sure you have the best ability to do well in that race, WITHOUT crossing any lines that will be cheating or getting dqued. So your wallet is safe around us off-road racers
I suppose my cheating at racing example missed the target completely.Assumptions?
You stated it outright! Lol
But my take on it is that I’d better hold on to my wallet around ANY off-road racer!
They’re all cheating MFers apparently.
Cool!I suppose my cheating at racing example missed the target completely.
Cheating is subjective. We all have a different threshold for cheating. We (humans) justify cheating in different ways.
The Nitros example was pretty good. Cheating? Perhaps? I think the piece of the puzzle missing is if the competitor asked and was told no. That is clearly cheating in my book. If they did not ask, then; no.
Let me share an example of how I cheated in JeepSpeed over 10 years ago. I don't race anymore. You can decide if I am a cheat and judge me accordingly.
Rule said you had to use a commercially available suspension kit. We designed our own suspension with components not available with any commercially available kit. The geometry was totally custom and it was built with robust materials not available commercially as a kit. We had a Lift kit company as a sponsor. We sent our final design to them, they manufactured it, took photos, and placed it in the company catalog for a ridiculous price. If someone wanted it, they could buy it and wait for a long lead time.
The spirit of the rules was to make the class affordable, We broke the spirit of the rule, but did not specifically violate the rule. I could give you many examples of things we did like this. In motorsports racing, this type of behavior is what is attractive to me. Study the rules and look for ways to gain an advantage. People do this with the Tax code every damn day. In the end, our effort to build an advantage trickled down into our sponsor's product line within other products. That relationship was more valuable to me than winning the race. I liked winning, but you did not really win anything of value. Desert racing in the end is an opportunity to drive your toy really fast in a somewhat safe environment.
We never blatantly cut the course.
What you did was not cheating, the process and exercise is exactly what made America great in the past. The effort and thought to improvise and compete. The ability to come up with new innovations that meet the rules, yet move the ball forward, forcing others to do the same to continue rapid advancement.I suppose my cheating at racing example missed the target completely.
Cheating is subjective. We all have a different threshold for cheating. We (humans) justify cheating in different ways.
The Nitros example was pretty good. Cheating? Perhaps? I think the piece of the puzzle missing is if the competitor asked and was told no. That is clearly cheating in my book. If they did not ask, then; no.
Let me share an example of how I cheated in JeepSpeed over 10 years ago. I don't race anymore. You can decide if I am a cheat and judge me accordingly.
Rule said you had to use a commercially available suspension kit. We designed our own suspension with components not available with any commercially available kit. The geometry was totally custom and it was built with robust materials not available commercially as a kit. We had a Lift kit company as a sponsor. We sent our final design to them, they manufactured it, took photos, and placed it in the company catalog for a ridiculous price. If someone wanted it, they could buy it and wait for a long lead time.
The spirit of the rules was to make the class affordable, We broke the spirit of the rule, but did not specifically violate the rule. I could give you many examples of things we did like this. In motorsports racing, this type of behavior is what is attractive to me. Study the rules and look for ways to gain an advantage. People do this with the Tax code every damn day. In the end, our effort to build an advantage trickled down into our sponsor's product line within other products. That relationship was more valuable to me than winning the race. I liked winning, but you did not really win anything of value. Desert racing in the end is an opportunity to drive your toy really fast in a somewhat safe environment.
We never blatantly cut the course.
What you did was not cheating, the process and exercise is exactly what made America great in the past. The effort and thought to improvise and compete. The ability to come up with new innovations that meet the rules, yet move the ball forward, forcing others to do the same to continue rapid advancement.
America now has a bunch of people who no longer believe that competition is the best path. So whenever someone improvises, figures out how to do something faster, better or cheaper, they cry to the governing body about how unfair it is that the old ways are being robbed from them. How unfair it is to be outwitted, outworked and out succeeded. Please governing body protect me. Or as one once said in here, put its hands on the scale to favor and protect the ones the governing body chooses.
And it is not just in racing, it has permeated most things including our capitalistic system and as a result, success based upon merit and results is now unfortunately deemed as unfair.
Tell me about it. Holee Smokes. Divorced, BKd, cruizen in the CB, living in the Cabin Cruiser. Close to the Earth keeps you in great shape. Sing it Janice.I've got so few assets, they don't need protection. "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose".
Sorry I did not understand the tree question in relation to the wife. Still don't; it went right over my head.
Funny how we can make assumptions about people within a few posts on a bulletin board. Better hold on to your wallet around Wood, he is a cheating MFer.
At racing.Cool!
All I’m saying is that it isnt assumptions, you told us you cheated.
I don't speak Wedgy very well, it seems.Tell me about it. Holee Smokes. Divorced, BKd, cruizen in the CB, living in the Cabin Cruiser. Close to the Earth keeps you in great shape. Sing it Janice.
Come on, it's a rhetorical question. You get it. Steal a race enthusiastically con Mucho Gusto/don't dare steal the wife there Sancho.
They work as statements too. Like, "Love means never having to say you're sorry." Or, "Cheater's never Prosper..."
Before you get a hard on Mr. Wood, now mind you, I'm not condemning rule bending/Aww Hell that Lia Thomas Dude....
Wouldn’t dream of it.At racing.
It would be fair to say, don't try racing against me.
What you did was not cheating, the process and exercise is exactly what made America great in the past. The effort and thought to improvise and compete. The ability to come up with new innovations that meet the rules, yet move the ball forward, forcing others to do the same to continue rapid advancement.
America now has a bunch of people who no longer believe that competition is the best path. So whenever someone improvises, figures out how to do something faster, better or cheaper, they cry to the governing body about how unfair it is that the old ways are being robbed from them. How unfair it is to be outwitted, outworked and out succeeded. Please governing body protect me. Or as one once said in here, put its hands on the scale to favor and protect the ones the governing body chooses.
And it is not just in racing, it has permeated most things including our capitalistic system and as a result, success based upon merit and results is now unfortunately deemed as unfair.