sprintcvx
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2012
- Messages
- 6,200
- Reaction score
- 25,443
The bill should get tied up in the Supreme Court before it’s ever allowed to go forward.
You just described capitalism with all its strengths and weaknesses.
Why am I not surprised a member of the Comintern would view the fundamentals of capitalism as bad and destroying America.
Maybe some Marxism where the government would mandate what companies can and cannot do as opposed to those who risked their capital would be more to your liking?
The MAGA folks are so incompetent that they will now give away over 100 billion dollars and get nothing to secure the border.
LOLLol so your justification is capitalism used as a tool to advance socialism and communism is a good thing ho-lee-fuk
Perfect example of your myopic narcissist view of the situation.
LOL
You’re still struggling with reading comprehension I see.
MAGA got beat?The MAGA folks are so incompetent that they will now give away over 100 billion dollars and get nothing to secure the border.
Talk about 4D chess…..MAGA got beat bad.
The MAGA folks are so incompetent that they will now give away over 100 billion dollars and get nothing to secure the border.
Talk about 4D chess…..MAGA got beat bad.
View attachment 1334478
In a rare bipartisan move, Senate Republicans and Democrats worked together to push through a supplemental foreign aid bill that would send even more money (with virtually strings attached) to Ukraine.While conservatives in the Senate blasted the bill, their hopes were on the House killing it before it could be brought up to a vote. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky gave a fiery speech on the floor about the issue on Monday afternoon. (X Video) The bill has not formally passed the Senate, but it's already dead in the House. In a statement released on Monday night, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) announced that the bill would not be taken up
Neither do I. He kept McCarthys choices to lead every commitee.I hope, but I don’t trust him.
Neither do I. He kept McCarthys choices to lead every commitee.
Another alternative is that there are many in this country who believe helping Ukraine defend itself from a foreign power who invaded them and is committing war crimes against their citizens on a daily basis, is in the National Security Interest of the United States.Seems they'll all make a stand in front of the cameras, but once the spotlight is moved, palms are greased an on it goes.
Another alternative is that there are many in this country who believe helping Ukraine defend itself from a foreign power who invaded them and is committing war crimes against their citizens on a daily basis, is in the National Security Interest of the United States.
That is certainly worth considering as a possibility.
Another alternative is that there are many in this country who believe helping Ukraine defend itself from a foreign power who invaded them and is committing war crimes against their citizens on a daily basis, is in the National Security Interest of the United States.
That is certainly worth considering as a possibility.
Objectively, it would appear 70 US Senators disagree with your thought process.Sure, but you'd have to ignore ignore all basic facts before you could reach that conclusion.
Objectively, it would appear 70 US Senators disagree with your thought process.
Objectively, it would appear 70 US Senators disagree with your thought process.
What National Security Interest are we talking about? Here's another couple of question for you, at what point to we stop funding or say hey we have given enough for you to fund this war? We have given them tons of money, weapons, ammo, and so on.Another alternative is that there are many in this country who believe helping Ukraine defend itself from a foreign power who invaded them and is committing war crimes against their citizens on a daily basis, is in the National Security Interest of the United States.
That is certainly worth considering as a possibility.
Interestingly, they tried to cover all of that in a combined bill. The Democrats actually gave up way more than they ever have, more than they wanted to. And do you know why they did so?What National Security Interest are we talking about? Here's another couple of question for you, at what point to we stop funding or say hey we have given enough for you to fund this war? We have given them tons of money, weapons, ammo, and so on.
Considering the "war" that is going on there is little to no coverage here in the states, why is that? Growing up anytime there was a war it was on tv multiple times during the day.
Lastly, to top it all off we have an invasion at our southern border and you have democratic leadership in cities and states using our tax dollars to house and feed people and to make it even better they break the law beat down law enforcement and walk away clean, again due to liberal DA's who are bought and paid for. So I guess since you brought up National Security Interest and defend it (which is great) how about we worry about the interest here at home first and worry about abroad after.
Just the simple fact that you are ok with sending more money to other countries than our own boarder tells EXACTLY what kind of person you are.Interestingly, they tried to cover all of that in a combined bill. The Democrats actually gave up way more than they ever have, more than they wanted to. And do you know why they did so?
Because they knew that the MAGA folks in the house would throw out any effort to address the border in an election year as it is bad political strategy to attempt to hold on to power. Democrats knew that no matter how much they offered, it would never be accepted by the MAGA House Republicans. So it cost them nothing to offer it up.
So now we will get Ukraine and Israeli aid as it is in the National Security interest (you can go back in this thread and read the national security reasons) and the border will be left wide open.
The MAGA folks let the perfect get in the way of the good. They put their own lust for power and control over the national interest. And that is a shame because the bill, although far from perfect, would have been a great start to get a handle on the serious border and Asylum issues facing America.
Just the simple fact that you are ok with sending more money to other countries than our own boarder tells EXACTLY what kind of person you are.
Your argument of "its better than nothing" is complete and utter bullshit and you know it. That's how we got where we are. By compromising on the subjects that should be universally accepted by all Americans. This one being our boarder is OUR boarder and securing it ensures OUR safety which needs to come before ANYOTHER country. Period. No ifs ands or buts.
However you and the rest of the left are OK even compromising that most BASIC fundamental principal.
Oh I know. But even just reading the surface of the bill shows what the left and RINOS truly stand for.They didn't give up shit in the border bill, it allowed 5,000 plus another 3,500 illegals to cross per day, gave DHS the ability to approve asylum on site without a court proceding, grant Illegals work permits on site before releasing them into the country.... It was dog shit
530 is talking out of his ass as usual.
Fuck America First!!They didn't give up shit in the border bill, it allowed 5,000 plus another 3,500 illegals to cross per day, gave DHS the ability to approve asylum on site without a court proceding, grant Illegals work permits on site before releasing them into the country.... It was dog shit
530 is talking out of his ass as usual.
It’s not just me, it is a majority of the Senate and will most likely be passed with a majority of the House.Just the simple fact that you are ok with sending more money to other countries than our own boarder tells EXACTLY what kind of person you are.
Your argument of "its better than nothing" is complete and utter bullshit and you know it. That's how we got where we are. By compromising on the subjects that should be universally accepted by all Americans. This one being our boarder is OUR boarder and securing it ensures OUR safety which needs to come before ANYOTHER country. Period. No ifs ands or buts.
However you and the rest of the left are OK even compromising that most BASIC fundamental principal.
It’s not just me, it is a majority of the Senate and will most likely be passed with a majority of the House.
It might be worth taking the time to read it and what it does and then ask yourself why anyone wouldn’t vote to do something, even anything they could to address the problem.
Why are some voting against anything to secure the border and on top of it completely misrepresenting what is in the bill?
That is the question worth asking. Are they for securing the border or for attempting to leverage the border problem for political gain. Seems fairly obvious to me.
It’s not just me, it is a majority of the Senate and will most likely be passed with a majority of the House.
It might be worth taking the time to read it and what it does and then ask yourself why anyone wouldn’t vote to do something, even anything they could to address the problem.
Why are some voting against anything to secure the border and on top of it completely misrepresenting what is in the bill?
That is the question worth asking. Are they for securing the border or for attempting to leverage the border problem for political gain. Seems fairly obvious to me.
He plays the part of the Town Jester so well it really makes you think if it's an act, or a syndrome?Derangement. From. Reality.
No more back door in the houseAnnnnnnnnnnnnd Wa-la!!!!
House Democrats Eye 'Back Door' To Force Vote On Ukraine, Israel Funding
According to Jeffries, there are "more than 300 bipartisan votes" in the House...
WED FEB 14, AT 8:05 AM
Turdman Jones and his fellow Democrats team up AGAIN!!!!!
View attachment 1335035
Interestingly, they tried to cover all of that in a combined bill. The Democrats actually gave up way more than they ever have, more than they wanted to. And do you know why they did so?
Because they knew that the MAGA folks in the house would throw out any effort to address the border in an election year as it is bad political strategy to attempt to hold on to power. Democrats knew that no matter how much they offered, it would never be accepted by the MAGA House Republicans. So it cost them nothing to offer it up.
So now we will get Ukraine and Israeli aid as it is in the National Security interest (you can go back in this thread and read the national security reasons) and the border will be left wide open.
The MAGA folks let the perfect get in the way of the good. They put their own lust for power and control over the national interest. And that is a shame because the bill, although far from perfect, would have been a great start to get a handle on the serious border and Asylum issues facing America.
As explained dozens of times, they are complying with the laws on the books.Again why are they not following the laws on the books? You and your cohorts seem to not really care any laws. You all seem to do what you want and ignore the constitution and the current laws on the books.
Explain that please
As explained dozens of times, they are complying with the laws on the books.
The laws are written in a way that allows wide discretion. And that is why I have constantly stated the need to change the Asylum laws taking away such discretion.
But some people say the laws are fine. The exact laws that permit this. It’s mind boggling.
Complying? I see it more as exploiting and purposely distorting the laws on the books for political gains.As explained dozens of times, they are complying with the laws on the books.
Objectively, it would appear 70 US Senators disagree with your thought process.
It’s not just me, it is a majority of the Senate and will most likely be passed with a majority of the House
That must explain the Ukrainian armies advancement ”Westward”
Epstein didn't hang himself...
It's amazing the clouds left in the wake of military equipment rolling coal. The exit strategy was great.That must explain the Ukrainian armies advancement ”Westward”
It is a Thomas Friedman article from the NY Times.Interesting source...a guy in Armenia that has been known to flat out cut and paste articles lifted from sources he won't credit.
It is interesting though, as he's also known for Russian to English translation of "news"....
Then why grab it from the Armenian? No more or less trustworthyIt is a Thomas Friedman article from the NY Times.