WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Russia and Ukraine

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
10,942
Reaction score
27,470

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,243
Reaction score
50,315
You just described capitalism with all its strengths and weaknesses.

Why am I not surprised a member of the Comintern would view the fundamentals of capitalism as bad and destroying America.

Maybe some Marxism where the government would mandate what companies can and cannot do as opposed to those who risked their capital would be more to your liking?


Lol so your justification is capitalism used as a tool to advance socialism and communism is a good thing 🤣🤣🤣🤣 ho-lee-fuk 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Perfect example of your myopic narcissist view of the situation. 🤡🤡
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,985
Reaction score
21,140
Lol so your justification is capitalism used as a tool to advance socialism and communism is a good thing 🤣🤣🤣🤣 ho-lee-fuk 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Perfect example of your myopic narcissist view of the situation. 🤡🤡
LOL

You’re still struggling with reading comprehension I see.
 

HotRod82

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
3,062
Reaction score
7,621
The MAGA folks are so incompetent that they will now give away over 100 billion dollars and get nothing to secure the border.

Talk about 4D chess…..MAGA got beat bad.
MAGA got beat?
How about the American Taxpayers got beat bad.....as usual.
We are going bankrupt and the Government DGAF.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,459
Reaction score
143,920
The MAGA folks are so incompetent that they will now give away over 100 billion dollars and get nothing to secure the border.

Talk about 4D chess…..MAGA got beat bad.

Because yore going to partner with the D’s AGAIN like you did with yore last two spending bills you lil RINO crook? 😆
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,459
Reaction score
143,920

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

1707803114247.png



POS
 

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
10,942
Reaction score
27,470
IMG_1951.png


In a rare bipartisan move, Senate Republicans and Democrats worked together to push through a supplemental foreign aid bill that would send even more money (with virtually strings attached) to Ukraine.While conservatives in the Senate blasted the bill, their hopes were on the House killing it before it could be brought up to a vote. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky gave a fiery speech on the floor about the issue on Monday afternoon. (X Video) The bill has not formally passed the Senate, but it's already dead in the House. In a statement released on Monday night, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) announced that the bill would not be taken up
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,459
Reaction score
143,920
View attachment 1334478

In a rare bipartisan move, Senate Republicans and Democrats worked together to push through a supplemental foreign aid bill that would send even more money (with virtually strings attached) to Ukraine.While conservatives in the Senate blasted the bill, their hopes were on the House killing it before it could be brought up to a vote. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky gave a fiery speech on the floor about the issue on Monday afternoon. (X Video) The bill has not formally passed the Senate, but it's already dead in the House. In a statement released on Monday night, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) announced that the bill would not be taken up

I hope, but I don’t trust him.
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,985
Reaction score
21,140
Seems they'll all make a stand in front of the cameras, but once the spotlight is moved, palms are greased an on it goes.
Another alternative is that there are many in this country who believe helping Ukraine defend itself from a foreign power who invaded them and is committing war crimes against their citizens on a daily basis, is in the National Security Interest of the United States.

That is certainly worth considering as a possibility.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,459
Reaction score
143,920
Another alternative is that there are many in this country who believe helping Ukraine defend itself from a foreign power who invaded them and is committing war crimes against their citizens on a daily basis, is in the National Security Interest of the United States.

That is certainly worth considering as a possibility.

1707846704614.png


AND yore not in the majority............... 🖕
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,243
Reaction score
50,315
Another alternative is that there are many in this country who believe helping Ukraine defend itself from a foreign power who invaded them and is committing war crimes against their citizens on a daily basis, is in the National Security Interest of the United States.

That is certainly worth considering as a possibility.

Sure, but you'd have to ignore ignore all basic facts before you could reach that conclusion.

🤡🤡🎣
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,985
Reaction score
21,140
Sure, but you'd have to ignore ignore all basic facts before you could reach that conclusion.

🤡🤡🎣
Objectively, it would appear 70 US Senators disagree with your thought process.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,459
Reaction score
143,920
The RINO's in the Senate are now working with Hakeem for a Discharge Petition in order to bring their money laundering bill to the House floor. 🤣

Need 218 to bring and you KNOW those corrupt pieces of filth have a number of scumbags who are willing to step up. It also gives that whore Johnson cover.

Turdalini and Democrats, a match made in the swamp!!!!
 

Doc

2022 32 Doug Wright
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
1,253
Reaction score
2,647
Another alternative is that there are many in this country who believe helping Ukraine defend itself from a foreign power who invaded them and is committing war crimes against their citizens on a daily basis, is in the National Security Interest of the United States.

That is certainly worth considering as a possibility.
What National Security Interest are we talking about? Here's another couple of question for you, at what point to we stop funding or say hey we have given enough for you to fund this war? We have given them tons of money, weapons, ammo, and so on.

Considering the "war" that is going on there is little to no coverage here in the states, why is that? Growing up anytime there was a war it was on tv multiple times during the day.

Lastly, to top it all off we have an invasion at our southern border and you have democratic leadership in cities and states using our tax dollars to house and feed people and to make it even better they break the law beat down law enforcement and walk away clean, again due to liberal DA's who are bought and paid for. So I guess since you brought up National Security Interest and defend it (which is great) how about we worry about the interest here at home first and worry about abroad after.
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,985
Reaction score
21,140
What National Security Interest are we talking about? Here's another couple of question for you, at what point to we stop funding or say hey we have given enough for you to fund this war? We have given them tons of money, weapons, ammo, and so on.

Considering the "war" that is going on there is little to no coverage here in the states, why is that? Growing up anytime there was a war it was on tv multiple times during the day.

Lastly, to top it all off we have an invasion at our southern border and you have democratic leadership in cities and states using our tax dollars to house and feed people and to make it even better they break the law beat down law enforcement and walk away clean, again due to liberal DA's who are bought and paid for. So I guess since you brought up National Security Interest and defend it (which is great) how about we worry about the interest here at home first and worry about abroad after.
Interestingly, they tried to cover all of that in a combined bill. The Democrats actually gave up way more than they ever have, more than they wanted to. And do you know why they did so?

Because they knew that the MAGA folks in the house would throw out any effort to address the border in an election year as it is bad political strategy to attempt to hold on to power. Democrats knew that no matter how much they offered, it would never be accepted by the MAGA House Republicans. So it cost them nothing to offer it up.

So now we will get Ukraine and Israeli aid as it is in the National Security interest (you can go back in this thread and read the national security reasons) and the border will be left wide open.

The MAGA folks let the perfect get in the way of the good. They put their own lust for power and control over the national interest. And that is a shame because the bill, although far from perfect, would have been a great start to get a handle on the serious border and Asylum issues facing America.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,459
Reaction score
143,920
530 pinocchio.jpg


Lying ass piece of RINO filth........................ 🤣


You scumbags had a chance in 2016 when we controlled EVERYTHING and blocked Trump.


People with half a fucking brain may buy yore bullshit boy, but down here, yore nothing but a desperate and deceitful mouthpiece for the swamp. 😆
 

Flying_Lavey

Dreaming of the lake
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
21,233
Reaction score
18,894
Interestingly, they tried to cover all of that in a combined bill. The Democrats actually gave up way more than they ever have, more than they wanted to. And do you know why they did so?

Because they knew that the MAGA folks in the house would throw out any effort to address the border in an election year as it is bad political strategy to attempt to hold on to power. Democrats knew that no matter how much they offered, it would never be accepted by the MAGA House Republicans. So it cost them nothing to offer it up.

So now we will get Ukraine and Israeli aid as it is in the National Security interest (you can go back in this thread and read the national security reasons) and the border will be left wide open.

The MAGA folks let the perfect get in the way of the good. They put their own lust for power and control over the national interest. And that is a shame because the bill, although far from perfect, would have been a great start to get a handle on the serious border and Asylum issues facing America.
Just the simple fact that you are ok with sending more money to other countries than our own boarder tells EXACTLY what kind of person you are.

Your argument of "its better than nothing" is complete and utter bullshit and you know it. That's how we got where we are. By compromising on the subjects that should be universally accepted by all Americans. This one being our boarder is OUR boarder and securing it ensures OUR safety which needs to come before ANYOTHER country. Period. No ifs ands or buts.

However you and the rest of the left are OK even compromising that most BASIC fundamental principal.
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,243
Reaction score
50,315
Just the simple fact that you are ok with sending more money to other countries than our own boarder tells EXACTLY what kind of person you are.

Your argument of "its better than nothing" is complete and utter bullshit and you know it. That's how we got where we are. By compromising on the subjects that should be universally accepted by all Americans. This one being our boarder is OUR boarder and securing it ensures OUR safety which needs to come before ANYOTHER country. Period. No ifs ands or buts.

However you and the rest of the left are OK even compromising that most BASIC fundamental principal.

They didn't give up shit in the border bill, it allowed 5,000 plus another 3,500 illegals to cross per day, gave DHS the ability to approve asylum on site without a court proceding, grant Illegals work permits on site before releasing them into the country.... It was dog shit

530 is talking out of his ass as usual.

🤡🤡🎣
 

Flying_Lavey

Dreaming of the lake
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
21,233
Reaction score
18,894
They didn't give up shit in the border bill, it allowed 5,000 plus another 3,500 illegals to cross per day, gave DHS the ability to approve asylum on site without a court proceding, grant Illegals work permits on site before releasing them into the country.... It was dog shit

530 is talking out of his ass as usual.

🤡🤡🎣
Oh I know. But even just reading the surface of the bill shows what the left and RINOS truly stand for.
 

500bbc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
27,444
Reaction score
43,523
They didn't give up shit in the border bill, it allowed 5,000 plus another 3,500 illegals to cross per day, gave DHS the ability to approve asylum on site without a court proceding, grant Illegals work permits on site before releasing them into the country.... It was dog shit

530 is talking out of his ass as usual.

🤡🤡🎣
Fuck America First!!
 

monkeyswrench

To The Rescue!
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
29,180
Reaction score
82,936
I missed the response to my statement, made by the "Oracle", as Tommy would say. I'm glad things were put in order in my absence, and in that way I know I'm not in the minority.
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,985
Reaction score
21,140
Just the simple fact that you are ok with sending more money to other countries than our own boarder tells EXACTLY what kind of person you are.

Your argument of "its better than nothing" is complete and utter bullshit and you know it. That's how we got where we are. By compromising on the subjects that should be universally accepted by all Americans. This one being our boarder is OUR boarder and securing it ensures OUR safety which needs to come before ANYOTHER country. Period. No ifs ands or buts.

However you and the rest of the left are OK even compromising that most BASIC fundamental principal.
It’s not just me, it is a majority of the Senate and will most likely be passed with a majority of the House.

It might be worth taking the time to read it and what it does and then ask yourself why anyone wouldn’t vote to do something, even anything they could to address the problem.

Why are some voting against anything to secure the border and on top of it completely misrepresenting what is in the bill?

That is the question worth asking. Are they for securing the border or for attempting to leverage the border problem for political gain. Seems fairly obvious to me. 🤷🤷
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,459
Reaction score
143,920
It’s not just me, it is a majority of the Senate and will most likely be passed with a majority of the House.

It might be worth taking the time to read it and what it does and then ask yourself why anyone wouldn’t vote to do something, even anything they could to address the problem.

Why are some voting against anything to secure the border and on top of it completely misrepresenting what is in the bill?

That is the question worth asking. Are they for securing the border or for attempting to leverage the border problem for political gain. Seems fairly obvious to me. 🤷🤷

1707882722893.gif


🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,243
Reaction score
50,315
It’s not just me, it is a majority of the Senate and will most likely be passed with a majority of the House.

It might be worth taking the time to read it and what it does and then ask yourself why anyone wouldn’t vote to do something, even anything they could to address the problem.

Why are some voting against anything to secure the border and on top of it completely misrepresenting what is in the bill?

That is the question worth asking. Are they for securing the border or for attempting to leverage the border problem for political gain. Seems fairly obvious to me. 🤷🤷

Derangement. From. Reality. 🤡🤡🎣
 

spectra3279

Vaginamoney broke
Joined
May 17, 2011
Messages
16,918
Reaction score
17,917
Interestingly, they tried to cover all of that in a combined bill. The Democrats actually gave up way more than they ever have, more than they wanted to. And do you know why they did so?

Because they knew that the MAGA folks in the house would throw out any effort to address the border in an election year as it is bad political strategy to attempt to hold on to power. Democrats knew that no matter how much they offered, it would never be accepted by the MAGA House Republicans. So it cost them nothing to offer it up.

So now we will get Ukraine and Israeli aid as it is in the National Security interest (you can go back in this thread and read the national security reasons) and the border will be left wide open.

The MAGA folks let the perfect get in the way of the good. They put their own lust for power and control over the national interest. And that is a shame because the bill, although far from perfect, would have been a great start to get a handle on the serious border and Asylum issues facing America.


Again why are they not following the laws on the books? You and your cohorts seem to not really care any laws. You all seem to do what you want and ignore the constitution and the current laws on the books.

Explain that please
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,985
Reaction score
21,140
Again why are they not following the laws on the books? You and your cohorts seem to not really care any laws. You all seem to do what you want and ignore the constitution and the current laws on the books.

Explain that please
As explained dozens of times, they are complying with the laws on the books.

The laws are written in a way that allows wide discretion. And that is why I have constantly stated the need to change the Asylum laws taking away such discretion.

But some people say the laws are fine. The exact laws that permit this. It’s mind boggling.
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,243
Reaction score
50,315
As explained dozens of times, they are complying with the laws on the books.

The laws are written in a way that allows wide discretion. And that is why I have constantly stated the need to change the Asylum laws taking away such discretion.

But some people say the laws are fine. The exact laws that permit this. It’s mind boggling.

You mean the ones they tried to change under Trump and your "True Conservatives" Blocked and you supported them blocking them because "Trump Bad" 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,982
Reaction score
27,755
As explained dozens of times, they are complying with the laws on the books.
Complying? 🤣🤣 🤣 I see it more as exploiting and purposely distorting the laws on the books for political gains.
And as always, you appear eager to defend and more than happy to assist! :cool:
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,982
Reaction score
27,755
Objectively, it would appear 70 US Senators disagree with your thought process.
It’s not just me, it is a majority of the Senate and will most likely be passed with a majority of the House

Now take into consideration that the vast majority of the American people DO NOT APPROVE of Congress, thus the majority do not side with you.
You are in the 24% ;)
Silly me, I thought the Constitution outlined that Congress was supposed to represent the people's voices rather than their own. 🤷‍♂️
1708281509323.png
 
Last edited:

monkeyswrench

To The Rescue!
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
29,180
Reaction score
82,936
That must explain the Ukrainian armies advancement ”Westward”
It's amazing the clouds left in the wake of military equipment rolling coal. The exit strategy was great.

The sad thing, they had already lost a lot of man power and had pulled out before. Then, they made a move to retake ground they conceded. They lost more lives, and had to retreat in a much less organized fashion.
 

monkeyswrench

To The Rescue!
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
29,180
Reaction score
82,936
Interesting source...a guy in Armenia that has been known to flat out cut and paste articles lifted from sources he won't credit.
It is interesting though, as he's also known for Russian to English translation of "news"....
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
21,985
Reaction score
21,140
Interesting source...a guy in Armenia that has been known to flat out cut and paste articles lifted from sources he won't credit.
It is interesting though, as he's also known for Russian to English translation of "news"....
It is a Thomas Friedman article from the NY Times.
 

monkeyswrench

To The Rescue!
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
29,180
Reaction score
82,936
It is a Thomas Friedman article from the NY Times.
Then why grab it from the Armenian? No more or less trustworthy 🤣

But the Armenian did have an adjoining article about the "Russian Army Targeting a Ukrainian Only Fans Model"...also an article about the questionable circumstances surrounding a transgender boy...or girl? Dunno, didn't read them.
 
Top