Flying_Lavey
Dreaming of the lake
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2008
- Messages
- 21,282
- Reaction score
- 19,004
Yup. Kinda like GM trucks tie rods. Much cheaper and easier to replace one of them versus the steering rack or box.Fusible links.
Its been mentioned in this thread earlier-
I'll keep this short, but I spent many, many years building off road cars with many, many championships.
I once had a driver who broke everything, every race. Suspension, drivetrain, axles, engines, you name it...He could break an anvil in a sandbox.
After months of rebuilding and upgrading everything that broke, the damage just got worse. Chassis bent. Transmissions with holes in the case. Shocks breaking rod ends.
The problem was the driver, no doubt from day one.
We stopped building the expendable parts as strong. He's going to break them, why make them better? Everything that was not chassis or drivetrain got lighter and "designed to fail". We built lots of spares.
Our race weekends got better (as a crew) and his results remained the same.
There is no difference in my story than any production manufacturer-failure points are built in. If CanAm or RZR makes arms that don't break, people will say that the frame is weak. If the axle or belt doesn't fail, people will say the trans is weak. This is engineered failure, and its the correct way to do things. Save the expensive parts, by sacrificing the cheap ones. Also, learn to fucking drive. (i've crashed a few things in my time, part of learning)