WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Get TRUUUUUUUUUMP!!!!!!

regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,511
Reaction score
150,808
530RL said:
Click to expand...

Good job clown, even the AP knows yore full of shit!!!! 🤣


apnews.com

Only 1 in 3 US adults think Trump acted illegally in New York hush money case, AP-NORC poll shows

Most Americans don't think Donald Trump acted illegally in his hush money case, the poll finds.
apnews.com apnews.com


530 KJP.jpg
 
clarence

clarence

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2019
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
4,449
Admiral Yamamoto is said to have opined that America could never be successfully invaded because “behind every blade of grass” there was a gun. A well-armed populace is indeed a bulwark against state tyranny.

But Yamamoto neglected to consider the possibility that a weaponized one-party state could cow and intimidate the populace to such an extent that its tyranny became a matter of a carefully choreographed takeover of all the institutions of cultural legitimation.

That would seem to be the real meaning of the experience we are even now undergoing.

 
R

rcmike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2013
Messages
1,865
Reaction score
7,643
530RL said:
We all have to play by the rules even if we disagree with them.
Click to expand...
The judge today forbid the press from reporting what they see in the courtroom.

This is in direct violation of the first amendment to the constitution of the United States of America. Do we all have to play by the rules or not? Or is this judge free to violate the rules if he feels like it?

More important is this.. The sixth amendment declares that all defendants have a right to a public trial. That would mean the press is free to report on that trial. So Trump has a right to have the press report on the trial. So is the judge free to prevent the press from reporting on what they see in the courtroom?

This judge and the DA are absolutely thumbing their noses at the constitution. This trial in a country that played by the rules would be over, and Trump would be suing for malicious prosecution to recover his defense costs.
 
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,483
Reaction score
21,886
rcmike said:
The judge today forbid the press from reporting what they see in the courtroom.

This is in direct violation of the first amendment to the constitution of the United States of America. Do we all have to play by the rules or not? Or is this judge free to violate the rules if he feels like it?

More important is this.. The sixth amendment declares that all defendants have a right to a public trial. That would mean the press is free to report on that trial. So Trump has a right to have the press report on the trial. So is the judge free to prevent the press from reporting on what they see in the courtroom?

This judge and the DA are absolutely thumbing their noses at the constitution. This trial in a country that played by the rules would be over, and Trump would be suing for malicious prosecution to recover his defense costs.
Click to expand...
Interesting.

The judge forbid reporters from doxing jurors given supporters of the defendant have a history of threats of violence against his “perceived” enemies and their families.

Your argument is that a judge protecting a juror’s name, place of work, or other personal information and his/her family’s information from probable violence or harassment is a violation of the defendants 1st or 6th amendment rights? An order that countless judges have repeatedly made in countless previous cases in the name of protecting jurors when defendants and/or their supporters have a clear and established history.

Seriously?

That’s pretty wild.
 
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,483
Reaction score
21,886
rcmike said:
So your argument is that the 1st and 6th amendments only apply if the defendant and the press are people you like?

That is actually wild.
Click to expand...
No.

Threatening and intimidating jurors and their families is out of bounds. And using a constitutional argument in order to threaten jurors and their families is absolutely antithetical to the constitution and its intent.

And that premise is exactly the point of the judicial order.
 
jet496

jet496

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
3,658
Reaction score
6,483
rcmike said:
So your argument is that the 1st and 6th amendments only apply if the defendant and the press are people you like?

That is actually wild.
Click to expand...
Reasoning with a libbie is a worthless waste of precious time. I'm convinced that the reasoning part of their brain is either missing or are that of a 5 year old. Just sayin'
 
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,483
Reaction score
21,886
rcmike said:
So the press that is breathlessly hoping for Trump to be given a life sentence is actively threatening jurors for him? LMFAO
Click to expand...
Got it. Now I understand why you don’t think the judges order and cautions were appropriate.

Let’s try a more thoughtful explanation. The “press” falls all over the map. From right to left. Some people even think a fictional character from Fight Club is the “press”.

Doxing jurors by some in the press, when by law jurors are allowed to remain anonymous, will in most likelihood lead to trump supporters threatening and intimidating the jurors and/or their families preventing the fair and equal application of the law. Jury intimidation is illegal and will bias a jury. Consistent with the law, and rational in thought, the judge would like to keep that from happening.
 
Racey

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,511
Reaction score
51,652
530RL said:
Got it. Now I understand why you don’t think the judges order and cautions were appropriate.

Let’s try a more thoughtful explanation. The “press” falls all over the map. From right to left. Some people even think a fictional character from Fight Club is the “press”.

Doxing jurors by some in the press, when by law jurors are allowed to remain anonymous, will in most likelihood lead to trump supporters threatening and intimidating the jurors and/or their families preventing the fair and equal application of the law. Jury intimidation is illegal and will bias a jury. Consistent with the law, and rational in thought, the judge would like to keep that from happening.
Click to expand...

Like when leftists dox'd Justice Kavanaughs home address and some nutjob showed up with intent to harm him and his family? 🤡🤡

Projection
 
530RL

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,483
Reaction score
21,886
Racey said:
Like when leftists dox'd Justice Kavanaughs home address and some nutjob showed up with intent to harm him and his family? 🤡🤡

Projection
Click to expand...
Exactly.

Or the law clerk during Trumps rape trial.

That conduct is not acceptable by either side and the judge is not violating the defendants rights in any manner.
 
Racey

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,511
Reaction score
51,652
530RL said:
Exactly.

Or the law clerk during Trumps rape trial.

That conduct is not acceptable by either side and the judge is not violating the defendants rights in any manner.
Click to expand...

Except in that case nobody actually showed at anyones home with weapons, they were just troll comments on social media.... 🤡🤡
 
bonesfab

bonesfab

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
6,317
Reaction score
28,245
530RL said:
Interesting.

The judge forbid reporters from doxing jurors given supporters of the defendant have a history of threats of violence against his “perceived” enemies and their families.

Your argument is that a judge protecting a juror’s name, place of work, or other personal information and his/her family’s information from probable violence or harassment is a violation of the defendants 1st or 6th amendment rights? An order that countless judges have repeatedly made in countless previous cases in the name of protecting jurors when defendants and/or their supporters have a clear and established history.

Seriously?

That’s pretty wild.
Click to expand...
What dispensery do you buy your shit from??? It is some potent shit and I wouldn't mind trying some to help me sleep.
 
Sandlord

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
11,229
Reaction score
28,677
530RL said:
No.

Threatening and intimidating jurors and their families is out of bounds. And using a constitutional argument in order to threaten jurors and their families is absolutely antithetical to the constitution and its intent.

And that premise is exactly the point of the judicial order.
Click to expand...
Did Trump threaten any of the jurors?
I hadn’t heard that.
 
T

thetub

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
3,863
Reaction score
3,502
breaking news Trump will be charged for murder for man setting himself on fire using extreme mind control....

"consistent with consistency this is fabulous excellent as consistent with consistency he has to be held responsible as We all have to play by the rules even if we disagree with them. " - 420Bs
 
Racey

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,511
Reaction score
51,652
92562 said:
If you feel that this is a useful form of protest, I am glad you eliminated yourself from the gene pool!
Click to expand...

He was a Democrat donor & Bernie supporter, just covered on Tim Pool's nightly podcast.

Go figure 🤦
 
regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,511
Reaction score
150,808
530RL said:
LOL

Hard to argue with the logic..... 😁

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782865070248149054
Click to expand...

There's NOTHING illegal about it, but on the other hand, the Mormon church is FULL of illegality all over and up in it!!!

Under current Utah law, people as young as 15 can marry with permission from their parents and the court, while 16- and 17-year-olds can marry.


LDS Horn Blow.jpg



PEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO's 🤣
 
Wedgy

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,601
Reaction score
16,248
regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,511
Reaction score
150,808
Uh oh.............faggots



The attorneys representing the corrupt DA in New York, Alvin Bragg, in their case against President Trump, have made a serious error in their case. President Trump’s attorneys must move to dismiss.


DA Bragg’s case is in serious trouble. The gang behind the prosecution of President Trump made a serious error that should lead President Trump’s team to move to dismiss.



Prosecutors in New York have revealed what the other crime is that Donald Trump was allegedly trying to conceal when he was falsifying business records and they claim it was to unlawfully promote his candidacy. The fatal error is that the NY Statute they cite only applies to elections within the State of New York and not Federal Elections!

Trump was running for the federal office of President of the United States and not a State Office and therefore the premise of what the prosecution is trying to prove as the second crime used to get around the statute of limitations issue and to elevate this business records case to a felony must fail!

Prosecutors also cannot use a federal law as the second crime and additionally, the FEC, Federal Election Commission, declined on two occasions to prosecute the claim against Trump that the alleged hush money payment was in fact a federal violation.

In this case, Bragg and Colangelo, in an exercise of their legal analysis of the law maintain that Trump, Cohen, and Pecker conspired to get Trump elected to President of the United States. This is the basis for the elevation of charges.

This is enough to end the case but that’s not all.

The case refers to accounting entries “made” by President Trump (which is lunacy) or entries President Trump forced others to make. But these entries were made in 2017. So how could President Trump possibly impact the 2016 election with accounting entries that were made (clearly not by the President but by some entry-level accountant in his multi-billion dollar organization) in 2017?
 
2

2CHILL

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 24, 2011
Messages
541
Reaction score
569
Many voters acknowledge Trump’s immoral and unethical nature, but when asked why they back him, they rationalize their actions as support of conservative judges, anti-abortion legislation, overturning unfair trade agreements, tax benefits, or protecting the Second Amendment.

Although these are legitimate issues to consider, the reasons may mask a deeper and more frightening explanation: the bigoted beliefs, attitudes and behaviors of Donald Trump do not represent an isolated case or an “outlier,” but may reflect the unconscious values of a large segment of the population.

The concept of white supremacy, while no longer considered an acceptable topic of polite conversation, could partly explain the support Trump receives in opinion polls and at the ballot box. 

White supremacy is the individual, institutional and societal belief in the superiority of white Western-European cultural heritage (physical features, fair skin color, arts, crafts, traditions, customs, holidays, religion, language, beliefs, values, etc.) over all other groups and their heritage. Throughout history, our nation has enforced these standards through social, economic and political powers; the invisible undercurrent of white supremacy renders racism invisible, equates normality with whiteness, and mimics the norms of fairness, justice and equality.
With the changing complexion of society, the feminization of the workforce, and the graying of America, change and demands for it have upended the lives of many white Americans. There is fear that a “way of life” is being lost, that they have been forced to change without their consent, and that white-cherished values and traditions are being assailed. The slogan “Make America Great Again!” disguises white supremacy, and a yearning to return to a romanticized era where minoritized individuals “knew their place.” 

The MAGA slogan conceals a call to return to former days of clearly defined white power and privilege, when women were homemakers instead of in the workforce, when marriage was between a man and a
woman, and when homosexuality and other “queer” lifestyles were considered sinful and a mental disorder. Many of these bigoted beliefs and attitudes represent implicit biases that are outside the level of conscious awareness. It couches the rhetoric of white supremacy in the language of individual freedom and individual rights. Hate speech is justified as “free speech,” gun control is an attack on “the right to bear arms,” criticism of offending marginalized group members is seen as “political correctness” and vaccine mandates are seen as governmental intrusion.  

Making the “invisible” visible is the first step toward clarity, liberation and aneeded racial reckoning. As a nation, we must face the possibility that a large segment of the white population harbors strong racist and bigoted beliefs. Racism, bias and bigotry are deeply embedded in our society and psyche, and solutions directed toward symptoms do not address the virus of white supremacy. Only by naming and facing the unpleasantness and ugliness of racism will we move toward healing and emancipation.
 
brgrcru

brgrcru

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
6,436
Reaction score
12,978
what a fucking joke
2CHILL said:
Many voters acknowledge Trump’s immoral and unethical nature, but when asked why they back him, they rationalize their actions as support of conservative judges, anti-abortion legislation, overturning unfair trade agreements, tax benefits, or protecting the Second Amendment.

Although these are legitimate issues to consider, the reasons may mask a deeper and more frightening explanation: the bigoted beliefs, attitudes and behaviors of Donald Trump do not represent an isolated case or an “outlier,” but may reflect the unconscious values of a large segment of the population.

The concept of white supremacy, while no longer considered an acceptable topic of polite conversation, could partly explain the support Trump receives in opinion polls and at the ballot box. 

White supremacy is the individual, institutional and societal belief in the superiority of white Western-European cultural heritage (physical features, fair skin color, arts, crafts, traditions, customs, holidays, religion, language, beliefs, values, etc.) over all other groups and their heritage. Throughout history, our nation has enforced these standards through social, economic and political powers; the invisible undercurrent of white supremacy renders racism invisible, equates normality with whiteness, and mimics the norms of fairness, justice and equality.
With the changing complexion of society, the feminization of the workforce, and the graying of America, change and demands for it have upended the lives of many white Americans. There is fear that a “way of life” is being lost, that they have been forced to change without their consent, and that white-cherished values and traditions are being assailed. The slogan “Make America Great Again!” disguises white supremacy, and a yearning to return to a romanticized era where minoritized individuals “knew their place.” 

The MAGA slogan conceals a call to return to former days of clearly defined white power and privilege, when women were homemakers instead of in the workforce, when marriage was between a man and a
woman, and when homosexuality and other “queer” lifestyles were considered sinful and a mental disorder. Many of these bigoted beliefs and attitudes represent implicit biases that are outside the level of conscious awareness. It couches the rhetoric of white supremacy in the language of individual freedom and individual rights. Hate speech is justified as “free speech,” gun control is an attack on “the right to bear arms,” criticism of offending marginalized group members is seen as “political correctness” and vaccine mandates are seen as governmental intrusion.  

Making the “invisible” visible is the first step toward clarity, liberation and aneeded racial reckoning. As a nation, we must face the possibility that a large segment of the white population harbors strong racist and bigoted beliefs. Racism, bias and bigotry are deeply embedded in our society and psyche, and solutions directed toward symptoms do not address the virus of white supremacy. Only by naming and facing the unpleasantness and ugliness of racism will we move toward healing and emancipation.
Click to expand...

what a load of fucking crap!

Give me a fucking break and grow up !
 
regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,511
Reaction score
150,808
2CHILL said:
Many voters acknowledge Trump’s immoral and unethical nature, but when asked why they back him, they rationalize their actions as support of conservative judges, anti-abortion legislation, overturning unfair trade agreements, tax benefits, or protecting the Second Amendment.

Although these are legitimate issues to consider, the reasons may mask a deeper and more frightening explanation: the bigoted beliefs, attitudes and behaviors of Donald Trump do not represent an isolated case or an “outlier,” but may reflect the unconscious values of a large segment of the population.

The concept of white supremacy, while no longer considered an acceptable topic of polite conversation, could partly explain the support Trump receives in opinion polls and at the ballot box. 

White supremacy is the individual, institutional and societal belief in the superiority of white Western-European cultural heritage (physical features, fair skin color, arts, crafts, traditions, customs, holidays, religion, language, beliefs, values, etc.) over all other groups and their heritage. Throughout history, our nation has enforced these standards through social, economic and political powers; the invisible undercurrent of white supremacy renders racism invisible, equates normality with whiteness, and mimics the norms of fairness, justice and equality.
With the changing complexion of society, the feminization of the workforce, and the graying of America, change and demands for it have upended the lives of many white Americans. There is fear that a “way of life” is being lost, that they have been forced to change without their consent, and that white-cherished values and traditions are being assailed. The slogan “Make America Great Again!” disguises white supremacy, and a yearning to return to a romanticized era where minoritized individuals “knew their place.” 

The MAGA slogan conceals a call to return to former days of clearly defined white power and privilege, when women were homemakers instead of in the workforce, when marriage was between a man and a
woman, and when homosexuality and other “queer” lifestyles were considered sinful and a mental disorder. Many of these bigoted beliefs and attitudes represent implicit biases that are outside the level of conscious awareness. It couches the rhetoric of white supremacy in the language of individual freedom and individual rights. Hate speech is justified as “free speech,” gun control is an attack on “the right to bear arms,” criticism of offending marginalized group members is seen as “political correctness” and vaccine mandates are seen as governmental intrusion.  

Making the “invisible” visible is the first step toward clarity, liberation and aneeded racial reckoning. As a nation, we must face the possibility that a large segment of the white population harbors strong racist and bigoted beliefs. Racism, bias and bigotry are deeply embedded in our society and psyche, and solutions directed toward symptoms do not address the virus of white supremacy. Only by naming and facing the unpleasantness and ugliness of racism will we move toward healing and emancipation.
Click to expand...

Ahhhh yes, a racist's drive-by!!!!! 🤣

Trump Black Employment.JPG


Blah blah blah lil desperate race hustler.........................🖕😆🖕
 
HST4ME

HST4ME

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
7,440
Reaction score
17,246
2CHILL said:
Many voters acknowledge Trump’s immoral and unethical nature, but when asked why they back him, they rationalize their actions as support of conservative judges, anti-abortion legislation, overturning unfair trade agreements, tax benefits, or protecting the Second Amendment.

Although these are legitimate issues to consider, the reasons may mask a deeper and more frightening explanation: the bigoted beliefs, attitudes and behaviors of Donald Trump do not represent an isolated case or an “outlier,” but may reflect the unconscious values of a large segment of the population.

The concept of white supremacy, while no longer considered an acceptable topic of polite conversation, could partly explain the support Trump receives in opinion polls and at the ballot box. 

White supremacy is the individual, institutional and societal belief in the superiority of white Western-European cultural heritage (physical features, fair skin color, arts, crafts, traditions, customs, holidays, religion, language, beliefs, values, etc.) over all other groups and their heritage. Throughout history, our nation has enforced these standards through social, economic and political powers; the invisible undercurrent of white supremacy renders racism invisible, equates normality with whiteness, and mimics the norms of fairness, justice and equality.
With the changing complexion of society, the feminization of the workforce, and the graying of America, change and demands for it have upended the lives of many white Americans. There is fear that a “way of life” is being lost, that they have been forced to change without their consent, and that white-cherished values and traditions are being assailed. The slogan “Make America Great Again!” disguises white supremacy, and a yearning to return to a romanticized era where minoritized individuals “knew their place.” 

The MAGA slogan conceals a call to return to former days of clearly defined white power and privilege, when women were homemakers instead of in the workforce, when marriage was between a man and a
woman, and when homosexuality and other “queer” lifestyles were considered sinful and a mental disorder. Many of these bigoted beliefs and attitudes represent implicit biases that are outside the level of conscious awareness. It couches the rhetoric of white supremacy in the language of individual freedom and individual rights. Hate speech is justified as “free speech,” gun control is an attack on “the right to bear arms,” criticism of offending marginalized group members is seen as “political correctness” and vaccine mandates are seen as governmental intrusion.  

Making the “invisible” visible is the first step toward clarity, liberation and aneeded racial reckoning. As a nation, we must face the possibility that a large segment of the white population harbors strong racist and bigoted beliefs. Racism, bias and bigotry are deeply embedded in our society and psyche, and solutions directed toward symptoms do not address the virus of white supremacy. Only by naming and facing the unpleasantness and ugliness of racism will we move toward healing and emancipation.
Click to expand...
Nice C&P.
 
FreeBird236

FreeBird236

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2012
Messages
14,074
Reaction score
13,421
regor said:
Ahhhh yes, a racist's drive-by!!!!! 🤣

View attachment 1364277

Blah blah blah lil desperate race hustler.........................🖕😆🖕
Click to expand...
Didn't Trump do something with the blacks and prison reform? Or was it something about permanently funding black colleges, or what was that deal about redevelopment funding for black business's, I just can't remember all of it, help me out here.
 
regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,511
Reaction score
150,808
FreeBird236 said:
Didn't Trump do something with the blacks and prison reform? Or was it something about permanently funding black colleges, or what was that deal about redevelopment funding for black business's, I just can't remember all of it, help me out here.
Click to expand...

The answer lil race hustler @2CHILL is………..

ALL OF THE ABOVE!!!!!!

IMG_0955.jpeg


🤣
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top