WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Dive boat fire

RiverDave

In it to win it
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
126,031
Reaction score
163,740
Wow...Just wow.... I quit posting on the thread because I had nothing to add to it having no experience on one of these boats... And I was just repeating what the ignorant news people were speculating.. Now I see this!!!! What a disgrace you fools are bringing to RDP..Mini-brewery brew?? Really? Is that what you feel about 34 people that fucking died aboard this boat.. Your childish banter is totally below anything I want to be associated with.. Some posts, by those with experience on this very boat or her twins , is informative and quite likely a thread that comes up if non members are searching for news on this tragedy..Have a little class and respect, and at least respect RDP when posting on this very sensitive thread. I can not express my disappointment, the proper words just won't come to me right now...
Ray

Well said.. and the fact that some people are trying to be mean to a newer member that isn’t familiar with the software on top of it... sad.
 

Concierge

Active Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
40
Reaction score
10
Ryan Sims severely broke his leg. There is no doubt. The owners are obligated to pay for his medical treatments and his living expenses until he reaches maximum recovery. This is known as Maintenance and Cure from the Jones Act. It appears he is bringing a personal injury lawsuit against the owners that goes beyond his Maintenance and Cure. It smells like attorneys to me. Not very surprising.
 

GRADS

Phishing license is paid up to date
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
19,342
Reaction score
23,427
Well said.. and the fact that some people are trying to be mean to a newer member that isn’t familiar with the software on top of it... sad.
I get that there might be a little learning curve but come on. Look at the very next post after yours.:rolleyes:
 

stephenkatsea

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
8,546
Reaction score
12,712
I get that there might be a little learning curve but come on. Look at the very next post after yours.:rolleyes:

WTF? Internet wizards are NOT impressive, including those on RDP. Just sayin'.
 

HCP3

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2018
Messages
3,966
Reaction score
6,722
Cliff notes

“No physical evidence was recovered that could be identified as an ignition source or indicate a specific ignition location within that area,” the NTSB said. “Therefore, the cause of the fire is undetermined.”

 

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
33,676
Reaction score
85,055
“No physical evidence was recovered that could be identified as an ignition source or indicate a specific ignition location within that area,” the NTSB said. “Therefore, the cause of the fire is undetermined.”

I saw that coming
 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,217
Reaction score
23,210
That's the docket not the NTSB report itself.

Haven’t gone through all of it. But seems to have everything in there?

Is their final report just a compilation of these?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

SoCalDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
13,235
Reaction score
30,676
Having been on that boat a couple times I can’t even imagine how terrible it would have been
Glad you weren't on it at that time.
RIP to those that lost their souls that day. How tragic...
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,700
Reaction score
34,799
From what I’ve read elsewhere.

History of electrical issues in the galley according to a crew member

There were known safety issues that were not addressed by the owner



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not according to the NTSB report.
 

Sleek-Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,170
Reaction score
16,455
Haven’t gone through all of it. But seems to have everything in there?

Is their final report just a compilation of these?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The docket is their research and facts of the investigation.

The report is where you will get a cohesive narrative and the NTSB's findings on the case.
 

Sleek-Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,170
Reaction score
16,455
It’s in the interview with crew member section. So not sure if that doesn’t count because it’s only hearsay?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Reading the fire investigation board findings, there was work done in the galley area that was completed without the proper CG oversight or approval.

Based on the same report, it appears the fire started in the aft Salon area and not in the galley.

Reading between the lines, they are going to say it was a overheating battery being charged in the salon area that was the source of the fire.
 

stephenkatsea

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
8,546
Reaction score
12,712
Haven’t gone through all of it. But seems to have everything in there?

Is their final report just a compilation of these?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everything? I read and scanned the NTSB investigation report posted on this thread. I did not see an investigation report with the Captain. Unless I missed it, that seems odd. Appeared to be interviews with the owner and others who weren't even there that night. But, not one mention of if there was or wasn't a crew member maintaining the roving patrol that night. No interview wth the Captain. That seems vital to this tragedy.
 

stephenkatsea

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
8,546
Reaction score
12,712
Can only hope they stayed asleep.

News media said, Recent release of the autopsy report of each victim indicated they each died from smoke inhalation. Many appeared to have been awake, based on having their shoes/boots on etc. May they RIP. Can't even imagine the burden the Capt must be carrying.
 

lbhsbz

Putting on the brakes
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
12,820
Reaction score
32,821
News media said, Recent release of the autopsy report of each victim indicated they each died from smoke inhalation. Many appeared to have been awake, based on having their shoes/boots on etc. May they RIP. Can't even imagine the burden the Capt must be carrying.
That is rather interesting...if I’m on a boat and smell smoke...the first thing that would go through my mind is getting off it into the water...in which case the last thing on my mind would be putting on shoes or boots.
 

Sleek-Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,170
Reaction score
16,455
That is rather interesting...if I’m on a boat and smell smoke...the first thing that would go through my mind is getting off it into the water...in which case the last thing on my mind would be putting on shoes or boots.

What's the first thing most people do when they get ready to go outside? Probably put their shoes on or get dressed if they have been sleeping.

Don't discount muscle memory when panicked.

It's why people grab suitcases when getting off airplanes in emergencies. Because that is what you do normally and habit takes over when the adrenaline is pumping.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,700
Reaction score
34,799
Everything? I read and scanned the NTSB investigation report posted on this thread. I did not see an investigation report with the Captain. Unless I missed it, that seems odd.

The US Attorney prohibited the captain from testifying because of the ongoing criminal investigation.

I read most of the docket, I didn't see anything that indicated criminal negligence by the owners or the captain. Based on all of the interviews, the fire almost certainly began in the starboard rear of the main salon, were large dive lights with lithium batteries were being charged.

Lithium battery fires burn hot and expand quickly, and that fits the crew's description of where the fire started and how the entire salon and galley quickly became an inferno.
 
Last edited:

lbhsbz

Putting on the brakes
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
12,820
Reaction score
32,821
What's the first thing most people do when they get ready to go outside? Probably put their shoes on or get dressed if they have been sleeping.

Don't discount muscle memory when panicked.

It's why people grab suitcases when getting off airplanes in emergencies. Because that is what you do normally and habit takes over when the adrenaline is pumping.
I thought about that...and I think they do that because safety is 30 feet away. In this case, “safety” is water, and then the island. These are divers...not your typical airline passenger dolt.
 

Sleek-Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,170
Reaction score
16,455
I thought about that...and I think they do that because safety is 30 feet away. In this case, “safety” is water, and then the island. These are divers...not your typical airline passenger dolt.

Maybe, but being awoken from a sound sleep after a day of diving? The cards were stacked against them.

From reading the reports, by the time the passengers were awoken there really wasn't any way out. The aft escape hatch was right next to the fire. The forward ladder was choaked with smoke, and most likely the ventilation system was pumping smoke and fumes into the bunk room.

Kind of stomach churning if you think about it.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,700
Reaction score
34,799
Don't discount muscle memory when panicked.

It's why people grab suitcases when getting off airplanes in emergencies. Because that is what you do normally and habit takes over when the adrenaline is pumping.

If I'm ever on an airplane that's being evacuated and some idiot in front of me is trying to get his giant roller bag out of the overhead, I'm going to hit him as hard as I can to focus his attention on the issue at hand.

Freekin' idiots.
 

Sleek-Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,170
Reaction score
16,455
If I'm ever on an airplane that's being evacuated and some idiot in front of me is trying to get his giant roller bag out of the overhead, I'm going to hit him as hard as I can to focus his attention on the issue at hand.

Freekin' idiots.

And that's probably what they need... LOL...
 

stephenkatsea

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
8,546
Reaction score
12,712
The US Attorney prohibited the captain from testifying because of the ongoing criminal investigation.

I read most of the docket, I didn't see anything that indicated criminal negligence by the owners of the captain. Based on all of the interviews, the fire almost certainly began in the starboard rear of the main salon, were large dive lights with lithium batteries were being charged.

Lithium battery fires burn hot and expand quickly, and that fits the crew's description of where the fire started and how the entire salon and galley quickly became an inferno.

I agree with all you've said. Since this report did not mention any aspect of the USCG required Roving Patrol, there appeared to be no criminal negligence in this NTSB, as posted. The use of flammable "RubberMade" trash receptacles was about the only minor infraction noted. The "elephant in the room" remains the status of the Roving Patrolman that night, or lack there of.

I was Captain of USCG inspected vessels in SoCal for a few years early in on my career. The dive boat Truth, the base of this organization, was in operation then. I knew of the boat. It had a very good reputation. Good crew, and good owners. This NTSB report describes an operation that safely carried many repeat customers, time and time again, for many years. But, once that 2nd galley hand on the Conception went to bed that night, the boat, passengers and crew had no one on watch. That lack of a watchman was NOT addressed anywhere in this particular NTSB report.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,700
Reaction score
34,799
I agree with all you've said. Since this report did not mention any aspect of the USCG required Roving Patrol, there appeared to be no criminal negligence in this NTSB, as posted. The use of flammable "RubberMade" trash receptacles was about the only minor infraction noted. The "elephant in the room" remains the status of the Roving Patrolman that night, or lack there of.

I was Captain of USCG inspected vessels in SoCal for a few years early in on my career. The dive boat Truth, the base of this organization, was in operation then. I knew of the boat. It had a very good reputation. Good crew, and good owners. This NTSB report describes an operation that safely carried many repeat customers, time and time again, for many years. But, once that 2nd galley hand on the Conception went to bed that night, the boat, passengers and crew had no one on watch. That lack of a watchman was NOT addressed anywhere in this particular NTSB report.

I forgot about that issue, and it was addressed in the docket. I think it was in the survivability aspects report and two other reports. That could be the basis for a criminal indictment.
 

Sleek-Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,170
Reaction score
16,455
I agree with all you've said. Since this report did not mention any aspect of the USCG required Roving Patrol, there appeared to be no criminal negligence in this NTSB, as posted. The use of flammable "RubberMade" trash receptacles was about the only minor infraction noted. The "elephant in the room" remains the status of the Roving Patrolman that night, or lack there of.

I was Captain of USCG inspected vessels in SoCal for a few years early in on my career. The dive boat Truth, the base of this organization, was in operation then. I knew of the boat. It had a very good reputation. Good crew, and good owners. This NTSB report describes an operation that safely carried many repeat customers, time and time again, for many years. But, once that 2nd galley hand on the Conception went to bed that night, the boat, passengers and crew had no one on watch. That lack of a watchman was NOT addressed anywhere in this particular NTSB report.

We will have to wait for the actual Report to be released to see if the NTSB finds that the lack of a watchmen was a contributing factor.
 

Duramax

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
1,538
Reaction score
2,438
Was it the galley hand that plugged his phone in and watched it spark, then went to bed? Did he leave it plugged in? Kind of odd.
 

stephenkatsea

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
8,546
Reaction score
12,712
USCG regs state that when the berthing area is occupied and the vessel's crew is not up, there shall be a designated Roving Patrol Watchman. I read many mentions of other safety and manning issues in this NTSB report, but not one mention of the RP. If it's there, perhaps I missed it. Otherwise, it sounded like the Captain ran a good operation. Perfect? No. The multiple devices being charged should not have been allowed. BTW, the distinction between the salon and the galley areas on this boat is misleading. Believe they are within the same space with no bulkheads or doors between them. The galley (food prep area) was forward, salon seating area was aft.
 

Waterjunky

RDP Inmate #94
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
4,885
Reaction score
4,228
BTW, the distinction between the salon and the galley areas on this boat is misleading. Believe they are within the same space with no bulkheads or doors between them. The galley (food prep area) was forward, salon seating area was aft.


Exactly, all one room. Been on that boat diving many times.
Good operation overall. Perfect? no. none ever are.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,700
Reaction score
34,799
USCG regs state that when the berthing area is occupied and the vessel's crew is not up, there shall be a designated Roving Patrol Watchman. I read many mentions of other safety and manning issues in this NTSB report, but not one mention of the RP. If it's there, perhaps I missed it.

I found the mentions of a roving watchman. It's in paragraph 4.8.2 of the Operations - Group Chairman's Factual Report.

It is mentioned again in the Survival Aspect Group's report on Page 37.
 
Last edited:

stephenkatsea

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
8,546
Reaction score
12,712
I found the mentions of a roving watchman. It's in paragraph 4.8.2 of the Operations - Group Chairman's Factual Report.

It is mentioned again in the Survival Aspect Group's report on Page 37.

Thanks. Good find. "A crew member sleeping among the passengers in the berthing space" is not going to suffice as a the CG required Roving Patrol. A RP should have also been on watch when the passengers boarded the night before departure and occupied the berthing space.

Having been in that type of operation, I doubt if proper log book entries were made pertaining to watches and drills. Once you move up a step to larger vessels, proper log book entries are the norm. There's an old Navy term, "Gun Decking". Meaning log book entries were made, but the particular action was never actually conducted. Not Good and typically followed by serious charges and penalties. Log book entries, if they occurred, do not pertain to this incident, since the vessel's logs were destroyed in the fire.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,700
Reaction score
34,799
. Once you move up a step to larger vessels, proper log book entries are the norm. There's an old Navy term, "Gun Decking". Meaning log book entries were made, but the particular action was never actually conducted.

It's funny you say that...my favorite book is The Caine Mutiny, written by Herman Wouk. It's about a WWII rundown minesweeper, whose captain is named Queeg.

When Queeg steams over his own towline and loses a shell target off Oahu because he's bitching out a Yeoman for having his shirttail out, Queeg is ordered to make a report to the Operations Officer at Pearl.

The LTCDR looks over the report, tosses it on his desk, and says "This is nothing more than a phony gun deck job". 😁

Wouk also wrote The Winds of War and War and Remembrance, which were made into a 16 hour ABC miniseries in the 70s. Maybe some of you remember that.
 
Last edited:

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,700
Reaction score
34,799
Log book entries, if they occurred, do not pertain to this incident, since the vessel's logs were destroyed in the fire.

Somewhere in the docket it's mentioned the owner claimed certain required duties and tasks were recorded in the logs, which were, of course, destroyed.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,700
Reaction score
34,799
Was it the galley hand that plugged his phone in and watched it spark, then went to bed? Did he leave it plugged in? Kind of odd.

That happened on a trip in 2018, and was mentioned in interviews of two crewmen. It was unrelated to the September 2019 fire.
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,418
Reaction score
22,222
It's funny you say that...my favorite book is The Caine Mutiny, written by Herman Wouk. It's about a WWII rundown minesweeper, whose captain is named Queeg.

When Queeg steams over his own towline and loses a shell target off Oahu because he's bitching out a Yeoman for having his shirttail out, Queeg is ordered to make a report to the Operations Officer at Pearl.

The LTCDR looks over the report and says "This is nothing more than a phony gun deck job". 😁

Wouk also wrote The Winds of War and War and Remembrance, which were made into a 16 hour ABC miniseries in the 70s. Maybe some of you remember that.

Didn't Queeg have some steel ball bearings he as was always rolling around in his hand ?
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,700
Reaction score
34,799
I am positive no one was locked into any where on the boat. That was the ridiculous response from the CG radio operator. The exits from the bunk area of the Conception go into the galley. There would have been an additional escape hatch. No doors were locked.

NTSB docket indicates the captain said 'blocked', not 'locked'.
 
Top