Animals I tell ya'

[Stainless]

[emoji23] LOL, please fact check, that one "fact" you think you have. LOL.
Later!

# 3? That was a give you one. [emoji6]

 

[jet496]

Fact 1, there have been no violent protests at any other candidates rallies. Protests, but not violent.

It's both people jumping on the bandwagon & also politicians organizing these dumbasses to raise hell at his rallies. I'd think even smarter tards are starting to think this is ridiculous & quite obvious.

These labels being applied to Trump & saying he's instigating the violence is the media preying on the weak minded peasants, which is probably 30 - 50% of the population. People need to pull their heads out of their asses & think rationally & for themselves. Don't let catch phrases stick in your head. That's what they keep throwing out there & some stick & some don't. They'll rally around the few that stick.

 

[Stainless]

It's both people jumping on the bandwagon & also politicians organizing these dumbasses to raise hell at his rallies. I'd think even smarter tards are starting to think this is ridiculous & quite obvious.

These labels being applied to Trump & saying he's instigating the violence is the media preying on the weak minded peasants, which is probably 30 - 50% of the population. People need to pull their heads out of their asses & think rationally & for themselves. Don't let catch phrases stick in your head. That's what they keep throwing out there & some stick & some don't. They'll rally around the few that stick.

I wouldn't even argue there's outside forces organizing some of the protestors. What I keep repeating over and over is Trump started it and now you guys are saying that's ok, people should just roll with it.

 

[RitcheyRch]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ging-riots-at-trump-rallies.html?intcmp=hpbt2

 

[AzGeo]

Obama takes action with whatever federal authority he can muster, and allows/demands illegals into this country . He creates shelters, food, health care, and money for those who should not be in this country .

Trump TALKS about building a wall . Calls criminals and drug dealers what they are, IDIOTS call that RACIST .

Obama insults US veterans, the NRA, self defense of home, family, business, and those who 'cling to their bibles and guns' . He drags the US Justice Department and FBI thru a few 'thug killings by cops'. He still has NO PLAN for defeating ISIL, because he does not want to .

In speeches, Trump defends the Second Amendment, LEOs across the land, US VETS, and US service people around the world, EXCEPT for that 'two faced sack of shit McCain' . Trump indicates that he will only go into war, TO WIN, never like Obama's worthless diplomacy and military failures .

Obama will not and has never released his school transcripts, actual admittance papers to Los Angeles' Occidental College that shows he applied as an 'Indonesian national', the 'secret side agreements' to the IRAN DEAL, his knowledge of Hillary's Email server, his knowledge of ISIL during the Iraq 'pullout', and a long list of other information US citizens should know .
So much for Obama's claimed, "TRANSPARENCY", which has turned out to be more like "TRANSGENDER-CY" .....

The left says, "Trump is a criminal for not releasing his tax returns !" Trump has hired real females to well paid high power positions in his companies over a number of decades, yet some leftys say he 'hates women' . No, he hates Rosie, Warren, and Hillary, all of which only CLAIM to be women .

How much of a "over reach of power" can one man exert in the oval office ? He created a new sub section of an existing law, there is nothing in writing, nor legal test case about 'his view' of the original law . He ORDERS the country to make changes to it's facilities, services, and mores, then directs the Justice Dept to enforce his view of the law .

The Executive branch under Obama no longer requires the Legislative Branch, nor the Judicial Branches of this government .

Where is the US Congress hiding while King Obama Rules with a heavy hand on the majority, and an open hand to a minority ? "Once, twice, three times a Monarch, that's Obama to me".

Trump speaks about 'equal trade partners', and IDIOTS cry "US business and job killer!', what do we have now you big business types ? Companies leaving, job losses, stagnant economy, false stock market, and getting into a bigger hole every day . US exports PAY a TARIFF going into every other country on the planet, yet we very rarely charge anyone to import anything into the USA, and that must stop .

And I come to the most glaring differences between the LEFT and the RIGHT, and much of it is listed above .

The LEFT decries "Trump's a divider, troublemaker, Racist !" For his WORDS Trump is vilified in the streets by mobs of 'left wing agitators, some paid to do it' .

Obama does illegal things in office, in secret, and often never speaks a word about those actions .

As Obama brings this country 'closer and closer to going down the drain', his left wing minions want more of his and Hillary's criminal activities, and FREE EVERYTHING .

Those same left wing minions get 'hurt feelings' when someone like TRUMP speaks against any 'left wing position'. The problem for those left wingers today is the fact that Trump is saying what many people want to hear, and it is possible he could actually make America Great Again, and that is what the right wing minions want ........

 

[AzGeo]

I wouldn't even argue there's outside forces organizing some of the protestors. What I keep repeating over and over is Trump started it and now you guys are saying that's ok, people should just roll with it.

He's not protesting, he's only TALKING !

He's not been violent, the protesters start the violence.

The Trump speeches are not loud nor violent, they are meant to be informative, as to Trump's positions .

The people OUTSIDE, who want to STOP FREE SPEECH, and then start violent trouble to attract attention .

THEY are the only people to blame !

 

[Stainless]

He's not protesting, he's only TALKING !

He's not been violent, the protesters start the violence.

The Trump speeches are not loud nor violent, they are meant to be informative, as to Trump's positions .

The people OUTSIDE, who want to STOP FREE SPEECH, and then start violent trouble to attract attention .

THEY are the only people to blame !

Nope!

Have you forgot Trump telling his supporters to "punch the protestors in the face...don't worry I'll pay your legal bills"? It went downhill from there. Eventually by advise from his staff he toned it down some but the damage had been inflicted.

We both hate Hillary correct?
I haven't seen any violent protestors at her rallies, have you? We can 5 Why this and conclude what the root problem is.

I'll post your comeback regarding Clintons protestors..."Trump supporters are peaceful".

You only see what you want to see AzGeo.

 

[Gelcoater]

Nope!

Have you forgot Trump telling his supporters to "punch the protestors in the face...don't worry I'll pay your legal bills"? It went downhill from there. Eventually by advise from his staff he toned it down some but the damage had been inflicted.

We both hate Hillary correct?
I haven't seen any violent protestors at her rallies, have you? We can 5 Why this and conclude what the root problem is.

I'll post your comeback regarding Clintons protestors..."Trump supporters are peaceful".

You only see what you want to see AzGeo.

I feel sorry for you,man.
Because of your views or beliefs?
No.
Because you have been on here since 4:55am.About 11 hours.You've put in a full work day of bashing the Donald.

It's warm out,and an otherwise beautiful day.You should go live your life rather than wasting on here arguing with seemingly everyone.Just my opinion of course,live your life as you see fit:thumbsup

 

[500bbc]

I wouldn't even argue there's outside forces organizing some of the protestors. What I keep repeating over and over is Trump started it and now you guys are saying that's ok, people should just roll with it.

He didn't "start" anything
He's just a mean mean man
I want my mommy!

They should hand these out in front of rallies.

 

[500bbc]

As stated above, Trump started nothing...

 

[Stainless]

I feel sorry for you,man.
Because of your views or beliefs?
No.
Because you have been on here since 4:55am.About 11 hours.You've put in a full work day of bashing the Donald.

It's warm out,and an otherwise beautiful day.You should go live your life rather than wasting on here arguing with seemingly everyone.Just my opinion of course,live your life as you see fit:thumbsup

...and I've been digging holes for fence corners in a 100 plus degree weather today.

 

[Stainless]

He didn't "start" anything
He's just a mean mean man
I want my mommy!

They should hand these out in front of rallies.

Yea, that's a good idea. [emoji106]

 

[AzGeo]

Nope!

Have you forgot Trump telling his supporters to "punch the protestors in the face...don't worry I'll pay your legal bills"? It went downhill from there. Eventually by advise from his staff he toned it down some but the damage had been inflicted.

We both hate Hillary correct?
I haven't seen any violent protestors at her rallies, have you? We can 5 Why this and conclude what the root problem is.

I'll post your comeback regarding Clintons protestors..."Trump supporters are peaceful".

You only see what you want to see AzGeo.

The ROOT PROBLEM are the idiots who are being paid to organize riots at Trump Rallys, and those who think that there is some other 'hidden meaning of hate' in Trump's world ....

He offered to pay for 'one guy's lawyers', the one who smacked the protester on the stairs INSIDE the venue . 'Hey everybody ! Trump's buying lawyers for everyone !' Are you really that slow, or blind ?

I don't look at Hillary's Rallys, she has plenty of Secret Service and paid minions to keep the agitators quiet . Just realize that many of the Trump protesters are 'left wing' illegals or criminals .

Those who may protest Clinton would be 'right wingers' and would be AT WORK during the day .

I'm not worried about Clinton protesters, there's PLENTY of FBI officers in her little crowds .

As a child most of us were taught, "words are not something to fight over". "Fighting will not change the words or thoughts" . Yet as adults, the left refuses to listen to anything they don't like, and that is not a problem . The problem comes into the picture when those same people attempt to STOP free speech of anyone whom they disagree with .

I disagree with 'burning the US flag', and 'carrying the flag of another country in any public protest' . I do not condone those acts, but it is not my right to prevent you from doing so .

Should I block roadways, riot and create violence in or out of the public eye because I hate these two 'flag uses', most rational people would say NO .

If the above is the case for my opinion of flag uses, why is it not an equal answer for those who hate Trump's words ?

And to re-answer a previous question; Goldwater in 1964, had people marching in the streets against his nomination for the GOP . Little did those 'Black and liberal protesters' know that Barry would have made their jobs and lives better and ended the war much quicker, with a big military bang . More and better jobs, more honest, real equality, better schools, less death and war .

Instead they voted in Johnson . The biggest political Monarch, war machine feeder, and bigot in D.C. at the time . He was held at 'gunpoint' every time he signed any kind of 'equal rights bill', and did not want to really help bring equality to US citizens, he just wanted the glory and power of POTUS to make he and his friends all rich .

This is NOT all about Trump, but it is all about the 'protesters' and their penchant for violence !

Just remember, Bernie also had trouble with protesters, he even had them 'rush the stage' and actually TAKE OVER his venue . His people were able to 'pay off' the Black lives Matter group, and so they went away ......

 

[Stainless]

The ROOT PROBLEM are the idiots who are being paid to organize riots at Trump Rallys, and those who think that there is some other 'hidden meaning of hate' in Trump's world ....

He offered to pay for 'one guy's lawyers', the one who smacked the protester on the stairs INSIDE the venue . 'Hey everybody ! Trump's buying lawyers for everyone !' Are you really that slow, or blind ?

I don't look at Hillary's Rallys, she has plenty of Secret Service and paid minions to keep the agitators quiet . Just realize that many of the Trump protesters are 'left wing' illegals or criminals .

Those who may protest Clinton would be 'right wingers' and would be AT WORK during the day .

I'm not worried about Clinton protesters, there's PLENTY of FBI officers in her little crowds .

As a child most of us were taught, "words are not something to fight over". "Fighting will not change the words or thoughts" . Yet as adults, the left refuses to listen to anything they don't like, and that is not a problem . The problem comes into the picture when those same people attempt to STOP free speech of anyone whom they disagree with .

I disagree with 'burning the US flag', and 'carrying the flag of another country in any public protest' . I do not condone those acts, but it is not my right to prevent you from doing so .

Should I block roadways, riot and create violence in or out of the public eye because I hate these two 'flag uses', most rational people would say NO .

If the above is the case for my opinion of flag uses, why is it not an equal answer for those who hate Trump's words ?

And to re-answer a previous question; Goldwater in 1964, had people marching in the streets against his nomination for the GOP . Little did those 'Black and liberal protesters' know that Barry would have made their jobs and lives better and ended the war much quicker, with a big military bang . More and better jobs, more honest, real equality, better schools, less death and war .

Instead they voted in Johnson . The biggest political Monarch, war machine feeder, and bigot in D.C. at the time . He was held at 'gunpoint' every time he signed any kind of 'equal rights bill', and did not want to really help bring equality to US citizens, he just wanted the glory and power of POTUS to make he and his friends all rich .

This is NOT all about Trump, but it is all about the 'protesters' and their penchant for violence !

Just remember, Bernie also had trouble with protesters, he even had them 'rush the stage' and actually TAKE OVER his venue . His people were able to 'pay off' the Black lives Matter group, and so they went away ......

[emoji849]

 

[530RL]

and those who think that there is some other 'hidden meaning of hate' in Trump's world ....

And to re-answer a previous question; Goldwater in 1964, had people marching in the streets against his nomination for the GOP . Little did those 'Black and liberal protesters' know that Barry would have made their jobs and lives better and ended the war much quicker, with a big military bang . More and better jobs, more honest, real equality, better schools, less death and war .

Instead they voted in Johnson . The biggest political Monarch, war machine feeder, and bigot in D.C. at the time . He was held at 'gunpoint' every time he signed any kind of 'equal rights bill', and did not want to really help bring equality to US citizens, he just wanted the glory and power of POTUS to make he and his friends all rich .

Goldwater was a good man and was not a racist. He should have been President. But the history of America is littered with people who should have been President.

As founder of the Arizona National Guard, he made sure it was desegregated before any other National Guard in the states.

However, he voted against the Civil Rights Act and lost the election in the largest loss in American History at the time. He lost the minority vote by "yuge" margins. History has shown minorities absolutely believed Goldwater was a racist.

Bush II lost the popular vote and won the electoral college carrying 40% of the Latino vote. Romney only gathered 27% and lost.

It does not matter if you or I, or any other non-Latino believes that Trump is a racist.

All that matters is what the Latino community believes; and going after an American Federal Judge for the simple reason that he is "Mexican" and Trump is going to build a wall, as well as not being precise in his message, is not helping Trump convince Latino's that he only dislikes illegal Latinos.

For without the Latino vote, or as others have said "those animals", in higher numbers than Romney, Trump loses the election.

 

[RCDave]

Goldwater would have made a great positive impact to the nation. One of the solid conservatives running for office

 

[Skinny Tire AH]

Goldwater was a good man and was not a racist. He should have been President. But the history of America is littered with people who should have been President.

As founder of the Arizona National Guard, he made sure it was desegregated before any other National Guard in the states.

However, he voted against the Civil Rights Act and lost the election in the largest loss in American History at the time. He lost the minority vote by "yuge" margins. History has shown minorities absolutely believed Goldwater was a racist.

Bush II lost the popular vote and won the electoral college carrying 40% of the Latino vote. Romney only gathered 27% and lost.

It does not matter if you or I, or any other non-Latino believes that Trump is a racist.

All that matters is what the Latino community believes; and going after an American Federal Judge for the simple reason that he is "Mexican" and Trump is going to build a wall, as well as not being precise in his message, is not helping Trump convince Latino's that he only dislikes illegal Latinos.

For without the Latino vote, or as others have said "those animals", in higher numbers than Romney, Trump loses the election.

Funny you mention Goldwater, Most probably don't know that Mitt Romney's father (George) did exactly to Goldwater, what Mitt is attempting to do to Trump. History repeats itself.

The racist moniker is a toxic and reprehensible label. It is an intellectually lazy thing to attach to someone. It's "Demospeak" code talk. Like "women's health" means abortion "comprehensive Immigration reform" means open borders.

 

[530RL]

Goldwater would have made a great positive impact to the nation. One of the solid conservatives running for office

In hindsight, he was actually a constitutional libertarian which is why he voted against the civil rights act.

He was pro-abortion, pro-gay rights and thought Billy Graham and the overly religious movement within the Republican party would be its demise. One of his best friends was John F. Kennedy. Little early on his predictions.

 

[530RL]

Funny you mention Goldwater, Most probably don't know that Mitt Romney's father (George) did exactly to Goldwater, what Mitt is attempting to do to Trump. History repeats itself.

The racist moniker is a toxic and reprehensible label. It is an intellectually lazy thing to attach to someone. It's "Demospeak" code talk. Like "women's health" means abortion "comprehensive Immigration reform" means open borders.

Glad to see you coming around on Flake and McCain.

Looking forward to your reply in the "get your racism here" thread.

 

[Skinny Tire AH]

Glad to see you coming around on Flake and McCain.

Looking forward to your reply in the "get your racism here" thread.

Wasn't planning on commenting. My comment was all about my personal feelings toward hyphenated Americans. It's a distinction that needs not be attached. I might be Ok with something like this; "I'm an American of Jewish and German decent"

As to Trump. I think I've been pretty clear, I don't like him. AT ALL. However, since there isn't a viable alternative to HRC. I am simply a pawn blocking an advancing king on the opposite side of the board. Your stance as to voting for GJ, I get it. BUT...My vote for Ross Perot, gave us Bill Clinton. As I stated in a prior post in this thread "History repeats itself" but not this time for me.

I would relish a cogent, articulate third candidate that threw aside party labels. Ran on common sense foreign policy, fiscally responsible and not afraid to make the cuts required to keep America solvent.

 

[530RL]

Wasn't planning on commenting. My comment was all about my personal feelings toward hyphenated Americans. It's a distinction that needs not be attached. I might be Ok with something like this; "I'm an American of Jewish and German decent"

As to Trump. I think I've been pretty clear, I don't like him. AT ALL. However, since there isn't a viable alternative to HRC. I am simply a pawn blocking an advancing king on the opposite side of the board. Your stance as to voting for GJ, I get it. BUT...My vote for Ross Perot, gave us Bill Clinton. As I stated in a prior post in this thread "History repeats itself" but not this time for me.

I would relish a cogent, articulate third candidate that threw aside party labels. Ran on common sense foreign policy, fiscally responsible and not afraid to make the cuts required to keep America solvent.

Meh, in an attempt to be objective, Clinton was pretty good fiscally and with respect to welfare reform.

Two best Presidents in my voting lifetime from an economic/tax/welfare reform perspective were Reagan and Clinton. Just an opinion.

I'd still like to hear whether or not those comments, solely those comments, made by Trump were racist or not in your view. Trump attached the hyphenation you so despise.

 

[Skinny Tire AH]

I'd still like to hear whether or not those comments, solely those comments, made by Trump were racist or not in your view.

Nope, just the careless comments of a "Large and in Charge" bully. He's never been held responsible to his big mouth. He's always had money on his side and people have acquiesced to his financial power over them. But, I wouldn't argue someone else's analysis of it being racist.

 

[Skinny Tire AH]

Meh, in an attempt to be objective, Clinton was pretty good fiscally and with respect to welfare reform.

Two best Presidents in my voting lifetime from an economic/tax/welfare reform perspective were Reagan and Clinton. Just an opinion.

I'd still like to hear whether or not those comments, solely those comments, made by Trump were racist or not in your view.

Agree. But morally Clinton was a bankrupt man, who gave us Hillary.

 

[530RL]

Agree. But morally Clinton was a bankrupt man, who gave us Hillary.

If pure morality is the measure of a great President, we have never had one.

I'll take measurable results and just give up on the morality stuff.

Set low goals and exceed them. My motto in life.

 

[530RL]

Nope, just the careless comments of a "Large and in Charge" bully. He's never been held responsible to his big mouth. He's always had money on his side and people have acquiesced to his financial power over them. But, I wouldn't argue someone else's analysis of it being racist.

What happened to "morality"?

 

[Skinny Tire AH]

If pure morality is the measure of a great President, we have never had one.

I'll take measurable results and just give up on the morality stuff.

Set low goals and exceed them. My motto in life.

You're right. But the Clintons have set new lows as to whats acceptable by our elected leaders and or public servants. Good God, can you imaging a Republican running with HRC's baggage?

Theres yet another scandal emerging, Bill Clinton was the honorary head or something of a University that the state department (HRC's) funneled 55 million to?

I'm not certain of the details but the gist of my comment is generally accurate.

 

[Skinny Tire AH]

What happened to "morality"?

I'm not a fan of Trumps in any capacity. The older I get, the less I expect from our leaders.

 

[Gelcoater]

If pure morality is the measure of a great President, we have never had one.

I'll take measurable results and just give up on the morality stuff.

Set low goals and exceed them. My motto in life.

What are your thoughts on the first Republican president?
No morality?

Or are we strictly talking presidents in our life time?

Not a jab here,serious question.

 

[94Nautique]

# 3? That was a give you one. [emoji6]

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...trump-supporter-san-jose-rally-brags-twitter/ clearly, you can see the note from Trump to the protester falling out of his pocket...

 

[AzGeo]

Meh, in an attempt to be objective, Clinton was pretty good fiscally and with respect to welfare reform.

Two best Presidents in my voting lifetime from an economic/tax/welfare reform perspective were Reagan and Clinton. Just an opinion.

I'd still like to hear whether or not those comments, solely those comments, made by Trump were racist or not in your view. Trump attached the hyphenation you so despise.

and many women !

Clinton had the Republican Congress steering the budget, and the domestic agenda . Clinton 'sold out' many 'US advancements' both civil and militarily to CHINA . The largest 'Clinton give away deal to China' happened less than 60 days before 'Monica Gate' .

Bill Clinton was/is a 'Jimmy Carter', plus a whole lot of bull shit talk and deal makin', that Carter NEVER HAD . The Republican Congress GUIDED that a-hole thru a lot of good legislation, welfare reform, budget controls, social issues . However, the Republican Congress could not stop all his 'military base closings', nor stop him from 'selling state secrets' to China .

What kind of POTUS/Patriot would sign over total control of our National Park System and it's lands to the United Nations ? If and when the UN decides that 'an emergency exists', they can legally take control of any and all US National Parks, and you all can thank Billy for that .

Hillary insists that she is not connected to Wall Street People, but who and how many of them did Billy pardon while in office ?

Reagan had good honest advisers, he made the call and Congress went along with positive input and results . No magic, just patriots doing their jobs .

If any of the Bush's, or Chaney's were running today, I'd be all over their bull shit too !

What short memories we seem to conveniently have about the Womanizer in chief . The country did well (except for the military and it's suppliers) under Clinton BECAUSE the Republican Congress kept the "resigned/disbarred lawyer from Arkansas on a short rope" .

Why do all the 'left wingers' since Johnson want to do everything they can to make the USA vulnerable to invasion and attack ? Reduce the military, pull the military out of critical areas around the world, allow open borders, and mandate the inclusion of illegal aliens, against law and the will of the people ?

One more point would be the actual positive results of all the 'left wing minority social issues' and the wasted time and money on programs that NEVER HELPED those who really needed the help .

Sir Charles Barkley said it best .

 

[Stainless]

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...trump-supporter-san-jose-rally-brags-twitter/ clearly, you can see the note from Trump to the protester falling out of his pocket...

Did he fill out the hurt feelings report 500 provided?

 

[Stainless]

I feel sorry for you,man.
Because of your views or beliefs?
No.
Because you have been on here since 4:55am.About 11 hours.You've put in a full work day of bashing the Donald.

It's warm out,and an otherwise beautiful day.You should go live your life rather than wasting on here arguing with seemingly everyone.Just my opinion of course,live your life as you see fit:thumbsup

Quoted so it will be easy to track me today.

 

[94Nautique]

Props Stainless, you have shown an almost maniacal focus and tenacity rarely seen. I wish I had your ability to stay tied to one point of view and to never waver. Not that anyone here will EVER change any view of yours, but ponder this:

Given you are fixated on the "fact" that NO OTHER candidate has anti-protesters, your assumption Trump is a racist, hate monger who has called the masses to wreak violence on the world.

1. If that is the case, he sucks as a leader because there are no cases of a person or people going on mass rampages to attack the vary people you claim Trump hates. If your supposition was true, there would be gangs of mask wearing, flag waving zealots willing to rip the hearts out of the opposition. (oops, there are these freaks, but on the wrong side for you. We can thank occupy and ferguson for the brazen acts of the left)

2. Like the hundreds of Jihad attacks we have seen the world over in the last 2 decades, where are the moderates in THIS story? Where are the democrats at the Trump rallies that are the peace makers? Where is the mass democrat TV denouncing of the leftist violence at Trump rallies? Where? (hint, nowhere, because down deep they LOVE this SHIT)

3. Being a bigot against lawbreakers is a bad thing how? (once you've had an immediate family member murdered by a random illegal alien in a road rage accident like I have, you might understand why we feel all these folks must go) Calling someone a bigot is big man talk, except when that person is bigoted against murders, rapists, thugs. Of all people, the Trump is the guy that would sign up for guest worker programs in an instant. Key being LEGAL.

4. When the democrat convention rolls around, and you start seeing protesters burning shit down, beating people up, etc, do you think there will be ONE republican demonstration? Then move to Cleveland, watch the fucking idiots run berserk there TOO. At that point, maybe, just maybe you're realize its YOUR side that has no will to help quell this bullshit that YOUR side is leading in an effort to chill free speech.

5. Last thing, your maniacal focus on Trump being a racist is odd, without mention of the racism bubbling beneath the surface of Bern and Hills. Bern says whites dont know what its like to be poor. http://www.npr.org/2016/03/07/469545384/bernie-sanders-faces-criticism-over-comments-on-race and Hills, well we all know she is quick to jump into her various dialects, including the demeaning example of her going urban here: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...acist-joke-why-would-you-do-this-hillary.html or her native American comment here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._of_hillarys_off_the_reservation_comment.html

But with any true savant, you will not allow reality to get in your way, to move you in another direction. For this I am amazed and freighted at the same time, but based on my decades of experience dealing with leftys it does not surprise me. Anyway, feel free to read, ponder, respond. I'm out all day, probably wont say much but party on.

And yes, would find having a beer (or two or three) with you to be an amazing good time!! :thumbsup

 

[Gelcoater]

Quoted so it will be easy to track me today.

Damn you get up early,dude.:cool

 

[Stainless]

Damn you get up early,dude.:cool

Yea, I love the this part of the day. I walk the dogs from 4:30-5 due to the heat, they love it too.
Basically I adjust to the sunrise year round.

 

[Gelcoater]

Props Stainless, you have shown an almost maniacal focus and tenacity rarely seen. I wish I had your ability to stay tied to one point of view and to never waver. :thumbsup

If Stainless were ever looking for a job and I was in a position to hire,I'd hire him in a heartbeat.
i would imagine his work ethic mimics his dedication here.
An employee like that is worth his weight in gold.:thumbsup

 

[500bbc]

Meh, in an attempt to be objective, Clinton was pretty good fiscally and with respect to welfare reform.

Two best Presidents in my voting lifetime from an economic/tax/welfare reform perspective were Reagan and Clinton. Just an opinion.

I'd still like to hear whether or not those comments, solely those comments, made by Trump were racist or not in your view. Trump attached the hyphenation you so despise.

Oh pher phucks sake.


Republican congress, Newt Gingrich and the internet bubble (a hell of a bubble), forced to sign welfare reform the third time it was on his desk after being told it would be political suicide not to.

Yeah, he was a hell of a success.

I voted for the turd the first time.

 

[Skinny Tire AH]

Oh pher phucks sake.


Republican congress, Newt Gingrich and the internet bubble (a hell of a bubble), forced to sign welfare reform the third time it was on his desk after being told it would be political suicide not to.

Yeah, he was a hell of a success.

I voted for the turd the first time.

I've never been a Democrat, never voted for one either. I can't see the country through the same prism as the progressives do. However, Bill Clinton was, in my mind the last of the "Blue Collar" type Democrats. That party has changed and is polar from it's historical platform of "helping the middle class" The new party has an obvious MO of, divide into classes, create hate, import a permanent underclass of voters.

Just look at the delta between Bill and HRC's platform. Bill (was forced) to end welfare HRC is demanding we look the other way at illegal immigration, late term abortion, with no remorse as to 8-3/4 month's. She is possibly even further to the left than Obama is.

McDonnell-Beohner were the biggest political cowards to ever been in those positions. Gingrich dared Clinton to allow the government be shut down as he wasn't running for office, while in office. He was strong and principled.

 

[500bbc]

Difference is COTUS is just plain evil.

How do you watch patriots die in real time then stand in front of their families and lie to their faces?

 

[Skinny Tire AH]

Difference is COTUS is just plain evil.

How do you watch patriots die in real time then stand in front of their families and lie to their faces?

Agree. And I don't want it to appear I'm defending Bill. BUT...when you Juxtapose Bill and HRC, you find Bill's issues tend to be around him and his zipper. HRC, as you say is just fucking evil. Most of the scandals surrounding the Clinton Crime family are HRC's.

 

[Old Texan]

The bitch could give a shit about issues. Issues are just tools to gain votes. All she's after is the office, for her ego and the power it gives her to steal more.:thumbsdown

 

[wsuwrhr]

Yes, it's, umm right here, mmmm. right here some where.

Shoot, I left it in my other pants.

I'll be right back.

you forgot....


You racist!!!

 

[wsuwrhr]

Pheasant.

Dammit. Now I am hungry.

 

[94Nautique]

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2016...o-immigration-reform-in-sylmar-campaign-stop/ Hillary wants amnesty, and here's the reason illegals are so ballsie in protesting and the violence.

 

[Chili Palmer]

 

[regor]

I took a picture for a older Latin couple today with their "Make America Great Again" Hats on. Old man asked me to make sure I got the hats in the pic and also said, "I can only wear these here for now!" :finger

 

[brgrcru]

I really need to sell my businesses and move out of this state........

 

[Waffles]

View attachment 489402

Because Chelsea doesn't know who her real dad is?

 

[regor]

Because Chelsea doesn't know who her real dad is?

She kinda does look like Mickie Rooney.

 

[Skinny Tire AH]

View attachment 489402

Their willing accommplists, the left wing socialist media rats would never cross THAT line. If anyone thinks there isn't a double standard (Bobby V, Squeezer) can you answer that question?