WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Where We Stand-Elections

Christopher Lucero

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
1,083
Yet you trust Fauci
huh?
where did I ever say that?
I trust my own experience, my own success...i think in that way we are the same. You trust your own experience as well.
I do not trust Regor as a medical professional. There are too many successful and honest healthcare practitioners I've known to suddenly abandon decades of experience. That's all I said.
In addition, Regor seems to want to force my judgement to adopt his way.
I don't know about you, but I am immediately wary of those who coerce and cajole.
Forceful insistence is not a successful way to influence people and make friends.
 

Christopher Lucero

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
1,083
Remember where you are? There are good reasons RD sent them all down here in the dungeon, and started a separate COVID section. 😉
I drop in once in a while to hear their anguished cries and their mutterrings of dysfunction.
I try to help them be happier, even if by providing an iconic ragdoll for them to beat on.
Its a form of entertainment.
For us all.
I think RD knows that.
 

Christopher Lucero

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
1,083
Confirms he's an imbecilic sheep.......................🤣
WRONG!
I am a tasty cinnamon treat

1620402592379.gif
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
25,795

Here is a brief chronology which focuses on the bureau’s key role in this ongoing scandal.

In December 2019, the FBI used a subpoena to take possession of the laptop Hunter Biden had abandoned at a Delaware repair shop the previous April. The bureau has not said what it did with the computer but, as it acquired the laptop in connection with a Hunter Biden investigation involving money laundering, it is hard to believe it did not authenticate the data.

Earlier this year, several news organizations, including the New York Times, the Washington Post and CBS News verified much of the laptop’s contents, connecting Joe Biden to his son’s lucrative influence-peddling schemes.

During the late summer and early autumn of 2020, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who had obtained a copy of the laptop hard drive, began trying to place the story in media outlets. Giuliani’s efforts almost certainly would have come onto the bureau’s radar, as he was already under investigation by federal prosecutors for his lobbying work in Ukraine.

Around the same time, the FBI warned executives at Twitter and Facebook to be on high alert for Russian “hack and leak operations” involving Hunter Biden. Mark Zuckerberg recalled that the bureau warned that “basically there’s about to be some kind of dump” of Russian propaganda.

These claims by the FBI – which, it bears repeating, possessed the laptop – would become the foundation of Democratic Party and media efforts to discredit the explosive material.


On Oct. 14, 2020, the New York Post ran the first article about the laptop whose headline – “Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad” – contradicted Joe Biden’s iron-clad claim that “I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.”

That first Post article also reported that the FBI had the laptop, telling social media platforms and rival journalists where they might go to check its authenticity. On the same day, Twitter and Facebook limited distribution of the Post article on the grounds that it could be hacked material.

The Twitter Files reveal that a prime force calling for the censorship of the news was James Baker, a lawyer who had previously worked at the FBI, where he was instrumental in furthering the Trump/Russia collusion hoax. It strains credulity to believe he never checked with his former colleagues at the bureau about the laptop before advising Twitter that “it’s reasonable for us to assume that they may have been [hacked] and that caution is warranted.”

The same goes for the rival news organizations that disparaged the laptop story. There can be little doubt that the bureau’s phone lines were burning that day, though we do not know who called, what they asked, or what they were told. But given the FBI’s long history of violating its own policy about not discussing ongoing investigations, and the national import of this story, it almost certainly had a duty to somehow set the record straight. Officially, there was only silence, which allowed disinformation to spread.


On Oct. 17, Rep. Adam Schiff, who had led the Democrats’ effort to paint Trump as Putin’s treasonous puppet during the Russiagate hoax, dismissed the laptop as a smear “from the Kremlin.”



and it goes on.


Clearly, the three letter agencies massively interfered with the 2020 election. If they went this far, its a fucking guarantee they helped rig votes to support their goal of ridding the US of Trump. No rational person could think otherwise. The govt ALWAYS has contingency plans...
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
25,795
"The FBI pressured Twitter to target an Oct. 26, 2020, tweet from a former Republican official who wrote that “between 2% and 25% of Ballots by Mail are Being Rejected for Errors,” journalist Matt Taibbi revealed."

"But that tweet was more accurate than the “New Truths” federal overseers imposed. When New York City relied on mail-in ballots for a June 2020 primary, up to 20% of ballots were declared invalid. The Daily News labeled the primary snafus a “dumpster fire.”


Clearly, the FBI had their finger on the scale of fairness, and tipped it at every chance against Trump

Again, why would they stop there, what keeps them from meddling in the actual vote? If Trump had said, target that tweet as "correct" then you lefties would have shit bricks, enough to build a wall from the pacific to Texas...
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
25,795
huh?
where did I ever say that?
I trust my own experience, my own success...i think in that way we are the same. You trust your own experience as well.
I do not trust Regor as a medical professional. There are too many successful and honest healthcare practitioners I've known to suddenly abandon decades of experience. That's all I said.
In addition, Regor seems to want to force my judgement to adopt his way.
I don't know about you, but I am immediately wary of those who coerce and cajole.
Forceful insistence is not a successful way to influence people and make friends.
Did you get the jab? Did you advocate for anyone to get the jab?
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
25,795
your government hates you/us. especially the non-elected govt leaches:




Holy shit, THEY HATE YOU/US
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
25,795

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,740
Reaction score
145,641

That’s what happens when you have a corrupt justice system, get used to it.

AND in other news.......


Even the Federalist is now calling out you corrupt pieces of filth. 😆
 

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,527
Reaction score
16,116
View attachment 1202154

Not a surprise, what with this fucking idiot as governor. @Bobby V did I miss anything? Maybe @530RL could help with the math and the cheating…
With over a dozen of the largest Ag producers in the State quitting farming, out of business, LESS THAN 8 WEEKS INTO 2023, including the 3 largest Table Grape producers in the U.S. That, "Giant Sucking Sound." is going to get a LOT worse, California.

How many people does it take to farm 1,000,000 acres? That's how many Californian's are going to be laid off in 2023.
I'd say ScrewScum is off to a pretty good start so far this year, eh?
 
Last edited:

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,131
Reaction score
21,359
 

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,527
Reaction score
16,116
Shiny object. Whadabout Arizona's water...
 

samsah33

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
1,358
Reaction score
3,333
Yet still no discussion or consideration of the eligibility of the people casting the ballots... The article, as well as most other media sources, likes to emphasize that there was no "widespread" fraud... In a state of over 7 million people where Biden won by about 10k votes, "widespread" fraud was not needed to change the outcome.
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
25,795
CBFA8EB5-ACEE-42E9-B4F3-A169376FB2D7.jpeg


@530RL so, how does mail in voting not automatically count as loss in chain of control and by default election integrity issues, especially when a single county in a single state has 1,2000,000 names removed from their voting rolls?

Please keep your argument logical, cogent and pretzel free.
 

Doc

2022 32 Doug Wright
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
1,264
Reaction score
2,680
View attachment 1204134

@530RL so, how does mail in voting not automatically count as loss in chain of control and by default election integrity issues, especially when a single county in a single state has 1,2000,000 names removed from their voting rolls?

Please keep your argument logical, cogent and pretzel free.
Good luck on that one!

Let me just save you the time. It was ruled in the court of law that there was no cheating nor ballast harvesting, the end.
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
15,977
Reaction score
28,800
View attachment 1204134

@530RL so, how does mail in voting not automatically count as loss in chain of control and by default election integrity issues, especially when a single county in a single state has 1,2000,000 names removed from their voting rolls?

Please keep your argument logical, cogent and pretzel free.
Trump Said PUUUSSSSSSYYYYYYYYYYYYY!
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,131
Reaction score
21,359
@530RL so, how does mail in voting not automatically count as loss in chain of control and by default election integrity issues, especially when a single county in a single state has 1,2000,000 names removed from their voting rolls?

Please keep your argument logical, cogent and pretzel free.
Good luck on that one!

Let me just save you the time. It was ruled in the court of law that there was no cheating nor ballast harvesting, the end.
Let's assume for a minute that your repeated view is correct. That mail in voting causes such indefensible chain of custody and election integrity issues that it makes the 2020 election of Joe Biden illegitimate.

Following your logic, wouldn't that mean the 2016 election of that President was also illegitimate as mail in voting was widely used and over 33 million mail in votes were cast in that election?

Or are the problems with mail in voting only applicable, when your guy loses?

🤔🤔🤔
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
15,977
Reaction score
28,800
Let's assume for a minute that your repeated view is correct. That mail in voting causes such indefensible chain of custody and election integrity issues that it makes the 2020 election of Joe Biden illegitimate.

Following your logic, wouldn't that mean the 2016 election of that President was also illegitimate as mail in voting was widely used and over 33 million mail in votes were cast in that election?

Or are the problems with mail in voting only applicable, when your guy loses?

🤔🤔🤔
hahahahaha... Remember what happened with they started auditing those votes back in 2016 and Trump started getting even more votes...😂😂😂😂😂

Bring On Audits for Every Election. That Audit should start with an Identification Verification Every Single Time someone votes. I know I know.... that is just racist.
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
25,795
Let's assume for a minute that your repeated view is correct. That mail in voting causes such indefensible chain of custody and election integrity issues that it makes the 2020 election of Joe Biden illegitimate.

Following your logic, wouldn't that mean the 2016 election of that President was also illegitimate as mail in voting was widely used and over 33 million mail in votes were cast in that election?

Or are the problems with mail in voting only applicable, when your guy loses?

🤔🤔🤔
Bring it.

Every. Single. Election. Ever.

You are worried that your leftists would get pulled back. I have no problem, whatsoever on who would get thrown out. Cheat like your life depends on it favors democrats 100:1 so you will lose way more than us conservatives.

🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🚗🚗🚗🍩
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
25,795
Good luck on that one!

Let me just save you the time. It was ruled in the court of law that there was no cheating nor ballast harvesting, the end.
Ruled as not having standing…or due to national security (whatever context that could mean).

The left cheats hard, we need to level it back.
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,992
Reaction score
27,786
Or are the problems with mail in voting only applicable, when your guy loses?
No.
If voting processes were honest and possessed verifiable integrity and accountability, the correct candidate will always win and no honest American should have any problem with that. :cool:
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,740
Reaction score
145,641
Let's assume for a minute that your repeated view is correct. That mail in voting causes such indefensible chain of custody and election integrity issues that it makes the 2020 election of Joe Biden illegitimate.

Following your logic, wouldn't that mean the 2016 election of that President was also illegitimate as mail in voting was widely used and over 33 million mail in votes were cast in that election?

Or are the problems with mail in voting only applicable, when your guy loses?

🤔🤔🤔

It was a nice try as always clown!!!!! 🤣


The next thing the cheater will claim is that an audit costs too much and takes too much time!!!
 
Top