WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Where did the water go? 'Environmental lawsuits have had a very chilling effect' on CA water resiliency efforts

1manshow

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
262
Reaction score
325

1manshow

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
262
Reaction score
325
0EEE5590-651E-4137-AE97-E26C117A4D3D.jpeg
 

Flying_Lavey

Dreaming of the lake
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
21,281
Reaction score
19,000
Need to run up and see what Azusa Canyon looks like.

I noticed a couple of days ago a LOT of water being released!
Last year the river below was flowing like crazy. I had never seen all the gates open on the Santa Fe dam before last year. Wonder if they are that open again.
 

rivermobster

Club Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
59,629
Reaction score
60,300
I was zipping along the freeway this weekend and saw water above Irwindale for the first time in years!!

The really shitty thing is none of that is designed for storage. Just flood control. One would think since its just going to end up in a concrete lined "river" why not save it, store it and use it. No no!!

Ya know all those "seasonal ponds" at the 605 and 210?

Those are actually percolating ponds to refill all the underground aquifers Under Irwindale.

There is all kinna crazy shit that goes on underneath Irwindale. Including one huge Superfund clean up operation!

Lots of trippy shit goes on over there if you dig into it...

 

Flying_Lavey

Dreaming of the lake
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
21,281
Reaction score
19,000
Oh
Ya know all those "seasonal ponds" at the 605 and 210?

Those are actually percolating ponds to refill all the underground aquifers Under Irwindale.

There is all kinna crazy shit that goes on underneath Irwindale. Including one huge Superfund clean up operation!

Lots of trippy shit goes on over there if you dig into it...

I know. I literally worked in the shadow of the Santa Fe dam for years, my dad did so for decades. The amount of water that actually gets down into the aquifer is miniscule compared to what flows out of the canyon.
 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,381
Reaction score
23,699
@was thatguy

Is it a huge financial and engineering feat to set up “injection pumps” near lakes to pump water into the aquifers?

The reason I say near lakes is so that instead of preemptively releasing water out of the dam you could just force fill an aquifer.

Fill the reserve tanks before you dump the excess kind of idea.
 

84miller

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
571
Reaction score
888
With all of the rain think of the water you don't see. Underground water tables have risen. Places such as Borrego Springs had pretty much run out of water, their source is underground, they have relief now. Palm Springs has one of the largest underground water resources known. But I do agree more dam/water management would be beneficial.
 

traquer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2013
Messages
3,914
Reaction score
5,327
Ya know all those "seasonal ponds" at the 605 and 210?

Those are actually percolating ponds to refill all the underground aquifers Under Irwindale.

There is all kinna crazy shit that goes on underneath Irwindale. Including one huge Superfund clean up operation!

Lots of trippy shit goes on over there if you dig into it...

Yeah my dad used to work at the Irwindale Brewery. People open a Coors Light and think they're drinking rocky mountain glacier water, instead it's Irwindale sewer water lol.

With good filtration it doesn't matter, but still they're using a LOT of water in a place that doesn't have much..
 

rivermobster

Club Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
59,629
Reaction score
60,300
If you don't know who the Resnick's are, you should look em up. They basically own the biggest underground aquifer in the state.

More water than CA could EVER use! 😱

It's an amazing story. There are a number of documentaries on them.

 

Reddy Too

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
373
Reaction score
473
Oh

I know. I literally worked in the shadow of the Santa Fe dam for years, my dad did so for decades. The amount of water that actually gets down into the aquifer is miniscule compared to what flows out of the canyon.
This article might clearup some misinformation
 

Flying_Lavey

Dreaming of the lake
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
21,281
Reaction score
19,000
This article might clearup some misinformation
That's a really mis-leading article. Just because all that water was "captured" during the storms, doesn't mean all that water us being stored for future use. The permutation method loses a lot of water via evaporation and absorption into the soil (instead of percolating down to the aquifer). Also, not all that captured water is sent to the spreading ponds or other reclamation systems. Some of it is released to the ocean.
 

Crazyhippy

Haters gonna Hate
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
6,958
Reaction score
5,747
@was thatguy

Is it a huge financial and engineering feat to set up “injection pumps” near lakes to pump water into the aquifers?

The reason I say near lakes is so that instead of preemptively releasing water out of the dam you could just force fill an aquifer.

Fill the reserve tanks before you dump the excess kind of idea.

For a lake to remain a lake, it needs a fairly impermeable bottom.

For an aquifer to fill, you need a permeable bottom...
 

hallett21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
18,381
Reaction score
23,699
For a lake to remain a lake, it needs a fairly impermeable bottom.

For an aquifer to fill, you need a permeable bottom...
I guess when I meant “next too” I meant within a few miles and relatively “short” pipeline.
 

Mandelon

Coffee makes me poop.
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
14,630
Reaction score
20,319
I would think the storm channels should be set up with a check dam every hundred yards or so to slow down the flow and allow more time for the water to percolate down into the ground.

Wooden check dams with rock reinforcement (Courtesy: D. Orr). | Download  Scientific Diagram
 
Last edited:

Reddy Too

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
373
Reaction score
473
That's a really mis-leading article. Just because all that water was "captured" during the storms, doesn't mean all that water us being stored for future use. The permutation method loses a lot of water via evaporation and absorption into the soil (instead of percolating down to the aquifer). Also, not all that captured water is sent to the spreading ponds or other reclamation systems. Some of it is released to the ocean.
The San Gabriel Basin in an a adjudicated groundwater basin which is managed by a Watermaster. Accodingly, the basin's spreading grounds and the unlined portions of the San Gabriel River captured and replenished 286,000 acre-feet (93,193,386,000 gallons) of stormwater into the basin in the 2022/23 water year. In addition, infiltration of water into the vadose zone eventually reaches the aquifer minus any utilized by plants.

https://www.watermaster.org/_files/ugd/af1ff8_e08e4f920e8d4ef68eb7b390b39fdbf6.pdf
 

Flying_Lavey

Dreaming of the lake
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
21,281
Reaction score
19,000
The San Gabriel Basin in an a adjudicated groundwater basin which is managed by a Watermaster. Accodingly, the basin's spreading grounds and the unlined portions of the San Gabriel River captured and replenished 286,000 acre-feet (93,193,386,000 gallons) of stormwater into the basin in the 2022/23 water year. In addition, infiltration of water into the vadose zone eventually reaches the aquifer minus any utilized by plants.

https://www.watermaster.org/_files/ugd/af1ff8_e08e4f920e8d4ef68eb7b390b39fdbf6.pdf
Yet according to the article you posted above states that 628,000 acres feet were captured.

I get that ground water needs to be replenished, but how about instead of having to use a process that is only about 40% efficient, we go away from pumping it up, and increase our reservoir capacity and holding capacity. A method that is FAR more efficient use of resources.
 

1manshow

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
262
Reaction score
325
Yet according to the article you posted above states that 628,000 acres feet were captured.

I get that ground water needs to be replenished, but how about instead of having to use a process that is only about 40% efficient, we go away from pumping it up, and increase our reservoir capacity and holding capacity. A method that is FAR more efficient use of resources.
BINGO 🙌🏻
 

1manshow

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
262
Reaction score
325
If a farmer spills a chemical into a drain ditch and a couple carp go belly up it’s a pollution crime. If politicians and environmentalists kill everything in the Klamath River it goes largely ignored
 

Attachments

  • 618AB050-1914-4ADD-8C3B-08D44FDBD4D8.jpeg
    618AB050-1914-4ADD-8C3B-08D44FDBD4D8.jpeg
    300.3 KB · Views: 35
  • D5F1B251-BA88-4D24-8C47-CB28CD8C1C5F.jpeg
    D5F1B251-BA88-4D24-8C47-CB28CD8C1C5F.jpeg
    550.4 KB · Views: 36
  • E50DF636-B7BD-4C52-8B23-649FFD88F3B0.jpeg
    E50DF636-B7BD-4C52-8B23-649FFD88F3B0.jpeg
    685.3 KB · Views: 35
  • Sad
Reactions: DWC

rivermobster

Club Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
59,629
Reaction score
60,300
If a farmer spills a chemical into a drain ditch and a couple carp go belly up it’s a pollution crime. If politicians and environmentalists kill everything in the Klamath River it goes largely ignored

Ignored?

They tore the whole Damm dam down! What a major league cluster fuck.

But it's only temporary, don't cha know...

 

1manshow

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
262
Reaction score
325
Ignored?

They tore the whole Damm dam down! What a major league cluster fuck.

But it's only temporary, don't cha know...

Yep it sure is and they got three more to to tear down still:( Its sickening to watch what they have done to this state and the lawyers and Non profits are mostly to blame for what’s happing.
 

Reddy Too

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
373
Reaction score
473
Yet according to the article you posted above states that 628,000 acres feet were captured.

I get that ground water needs to be replenished, but how about instead of having to use a process that is only about 40% efficient, we go away from pumping it up, and increase our reservoir capacity and holding capacity. A method that is FAR more efficient use of resources.
Statewide you are correct that reservoirs are needed to capture ”free” water from storm events. However in the San Gabriel Valley with its unique lithology, the most efficient way to capture free water is diverting it into spreading basins. The three dams in the canyon above Azusa have a capacity approximately 92,000 acre-feet the spreading grounds replenished 3X as much the previous water year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DWC

rivermobster

Club Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
59,629
Reaction score
60,300
Statewide you are correct that reservoirs are needed to capture ”free” water from storm events. However in the San Gabriel Valley with its unique lithology, the most efficient way to capture free water is diverting it into spreading basins. The three dams in the canyon above Azusa have a capacity approximately 92,000 acre-feet the spreading grounds replenished 3X as much the previous water year.

Three?

I'm only familiar with two. Where is this third one you speak of?

Screenshot_20240309_133709_Maps.jpg
 

Cray Paper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
3,862
Reaction score
3,998
WA State has been peppering / prepping us for the coming " drought" this year. Water shortages on the western side of WA do not happen....our dipshit governor Jay Inslee keeps pushing his global warming agenda even as he gets shoved out the door this year. Western WA running out of water is preposterous in anyone's view that has ever lived here for a couple of decades or more, yet that is what's being pushed in the local media.

This shit is part of a plan...and it isnt for our best interest.
 
Top