Trump trial

[regor]

Can anyone intelligently discredit this?

You’re welcome.

 

[530RL]

LOL

Told you Hallett21

Might as well move it to the P&G.

 

[HTTP404]

The "messenger" is jerking off to the thought of a conviction.

 

[Lumpy]

It’s the mind of a Marxist.

We should ask him!
So,

@530RL

Are you a Marxist? Inquiring minds want to know!

 

[hallett21]

View attachment 1381136

You’re welcome.

His answer is based upon what the court case is today. That was my question. To @530RL credit I think he answered it correctly.

We can debate what’s “supposed to be happening”. I was just looking for information on how it would go from here.

 

[530RL]

His answer is based upon what the court case is today. That was my question. To @530RL credit I think he answered it correctly.

We can debate what’s “supposed to be happening”. I was just looking for information on how it would go from here.

Don’t be too critical of some of these individuals. They are doing the best they can.

 

[wet hull]

What are your thoughts on this idea in regards to the judge? He knows the charges are bullshit. He is so committed to Biden and all the other BS and hate for Trump, he made this trail such a spectacle and twisted everything he could knowing this case if found guilty would go to appeals court and get thrown out? This would allow him to look at everyone and say that he did what he could but it was the appeals court that set Trump free. It's not on me. Don't hate me, hate the other court systems and that judge.

With everything I have heard and read I just can't help but think what I wrote above might have some truth.

 

[regor]

LOL

Told you Hallett21

Might as well move it to the P&G.

Not digging the exposure?

 

[RiverDave]

9.3K views · 9K reactions | Be nice to them. Half the time they don’t even know where they are #satire thanks to @awakened_messenger | 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝕀𝕋 𝔹𝔸𝕋 ℙ𝕠𝕕𝕔𝕒𝕤𝕥

Be nice to them. Half the time they don’t even know where they are #satire thanks to @awakened_messenger.

www.facebook.com

 

[Hi-Jacked]

9.3K views · 9K reactions | Be nice to them. Half the time they don’t even know where they are #satire thanks to @awakened_messenger | 𝕃𝔼𝔾𝕀𝕋 𝔹𝔸𝕋 ℙ𝕠𝕕𝕔𝕒𝕤𝕥

Be nice to them. Half the time they don’t even know where they are #satire thanks to @awakened_messenger.

www.facebook.com

OMFG that is the best thing I've seen ever!!!!!

 

[Roosky01]

If Trump is “convicted”, it will be immediately appealed to the SC and be smacked down quick by the court along party lines. Then the left will run on the unbelievable corruption of “Trump’s” right wing SC.

The left has absolutely nothing to run on except made up fairy tale bullshit and everyone knows it if they are honest.

 

[playdeep]

 

[FreeBird236]

Assuming what he posted earlier is true I cannot find the 3 in 1 verbiage.

I'm no lawyer, but they can find he falsified business documents, federal campaign violations, or tax evasion, all brought out after the defense had rested, which in itself is unconstitutional. The foremost expert on federal campaign violations had already stated Trump did not violate any campaign laws, but basically wasn't allowed to testify because he would have been so handcuffed by Marchan he wouldn't have been able to state Trump broke no laws. This is absolute corruption, Marchan knows he will be overturned on many deliberate errors, but it keeps the circus going and trump off the campaign trail. If you truly want correct answers, read Andy McCarthy, Alan Dershowitz, or Jonathan Turley.

 

[MPHSystems]

unfortunately, I think they will convict him and will be overthrown in appeals court a year later.

During that time Biden wins the election.

A conviction will do NOTHING but help Trump. Still, Biden will win. You MAGGOTS don’t understand the power of women.

 

[530RL]

If Trump is “convicted”, it will be immediately appealed to the SC and be smacked down quick by the court along party lines. Then the left will run on the unbelievable corruption of “Trump’s” right wing SC.

The left has absolutely nothing to run on except made up fairy tale bullshit and everyone knows it if they are honest.

If he was convicted, let’s assume the defendant was Average Joe to remove the emotion by some on this topic.

This is a state case regarding state law, how would the petitioner demonstrate to the Supreme Court that there is either a conflict between circuits; the lower court’s decision conflicts with Supreme Court precedent; or the case poses a question of federal law that is so important that the Supreme Court should take up the case even absent a conflict.

Why does the Supreme Court take up a state law case given their current majority view of limiting federal intervention as it affects a states rights to make laws as they so choose absent a specific prohibition in the Constitution.

What is the constitutional prohibition against New York’s State law in this case which would be the basis for the immediate appeal to the Supreme Court?

Why wouldn’t this fall under the ordinary appeal process through the state courts?

 

[FreeBird236]

If he was convicted, let’s assume the defendant was Average Joe to remove the emotion by some on this topic.

This is a state case regarding state law, how would the petitioner demonstrate to the Supreme Court that there is either a conflict between circuits; the lower court’s decision conflicts with Supreme Court precedent; or the case poses a question of federal law that is so important that the Supreme Court should take up the case even absent a conflict.

Why does the Supreme Court take up a state law case given their current majority view of limiting federal intervention as it affects a states rights to make laws as they so choose absent a specific prohibition in the Constitution.

What is the constitutional prohibition against New York’s State law in this case which would be the basis for the immediate appeal to the Supreme Court?

Why wouldn’t this fall under the ordinary appeal process through the state courts?

Why is the state charging a federal campaign violation?

 

[TeamGreene]

Anyone with half a brain knows this is total bullshit…I say hung jury for sure. If not it go’s to SCOTUS pronto.

530RL needs his head examined

As for the “Civil War” bullshit…come fucking on…not going to happen until cream corn in the can is off the shelf, Cops go home to protect family and the lawless go full swing. It's been worse but we are on our way.

Things won't change until people feel real pain…by then it may be too late.

Let this video soak in real good……………….

All you'll find is a big pile of TDS

 

[Roosky01]

If he was convicted, let’s assume the defendant was Average Joe to remove the emotion by some on this topic.

This is a state case regarding state law, how would the petitioner demonstrate to the Supreme Court that there is either a conflict between circuits; the lower court’s decision conflicts with Supreme Court precedent; or the case poses a question of federal law that is so important that the Supreme Court should take up the case even absent a conflict.

Why does the Supreme Court take up a state law case given their current majority view of limiting federal intervention as it affects a states rights to make laws as they so choose absent a specific prohibition in the Constitution.

What is the constitutional prohibition against New York’s State law in this case which would be the basis for the immediate appeal to the Supreme Court?

Why wouldn’t this fall under the ordinary appeal process through the state courts?

Why did the SC intervene in the Bush/Gore race? Did the State of Fl not have the right to run that election as they saw fit?

 

[rivrrts429]

Gloria Allred?

She’s going to remain nameless but she’s a corporate lawyer. Not a whacko like Gloria.

 

[regor]

If he was convicted, let’s assume the defendant was Average Joe to remove the emotion by some on this topic.

This is a state case regarding state law, how would the petitioner demonstrate to the Supreme Court that there is either a conflict between circuits; the lower court’s decision conflicts with Supreme Court precedent; or the case poses a question of federal law that is so important that the Supreme Court should take up the case even absent a conflict.

Why does the Supreme Court take up a state law case given their current majority view of limiting federal intervention as it affects a states rights to make laws as they so choose absent a specific prohibition in the Constitution.

What is the constitutional prohibition against New York’s State law in this case which would be the basis for the immediate appeal to the Supreme Court?

Why wouldn’t this fall under the ordinary appeal process through the state courts?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795617859869061334

 

[Singleton]

If Trump is “convicted”, it will be immediately appealed to the SC and be smacked down quick by the court along party lines. Then the left will run on the unbelievable corruption of “Trump’s” right wing SC.

The left has absolutely nothing to run on except made up fairy tale bullshit and everyone knows it if they are honest.

It can’t. It has to go through the state appeal process first, then if that fails to the SC.

 

[530RL]

Why is the state charging a federal campaign violation?

I’m not aware that they did. Here is the indictment. Can you show me where a state charged federal campaign law in this case?

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf

 

[86403]

Im glad I don't live in New York, I once removed a tag on a mattress I technically didn't own.

 

[530RL]

Why did the SC intervene in the Bush/Gore race? Did the State of Fl not have the right to run that election as they saw fit?

They did not intervene until after the case went through the entire State Court system including a ruling by the Florida Supreme Court.

The Bush/Gore decision overturned a Florida State Supreme Court ruling.

 

[Singleton]

I'm no lawyer, but they can find he falsified business documents, federal campaign violations, or tax evasion, all brought out after the defense had rested, which in itself is unconstitutional. The foremost expert on federal campaign violations had already stated Trump did not violate any campaign laws, but basically wasn't allowed to testify because he would have been so handcuffed by Marchan he wouldn't have been able to state Trump broke no laws. This is absolute corruption, Marchan knows he will be overturned on many deliberate errors, but it keeps the circus going and trump off the campaign trail. If you truly want correct answers, read Andy McCarthy, Alan Dershowitz, or Jonathan Turley.

NY has its own state campaign laws that applies to state and federal elections in NY, that was passed in 2019.
How a payment in 2016 violates a law passed in 2019 gets complicated, but the 2019 laws has a look back built into it.
This has been a setup, that has been coordinated for years

 

[TeamGreene]

This circus is not nor has it ever been about Trumps guilt or innocence. It was all rigged from the start to get the verdict that the Dems want and they believe they need before the election in order to get dementia Joe over the finish line. No matter where the appeal lands it will most certainly be overturned because of the obvious errors committed by Merchan but that will be long after the Nov election but they will get to hang the convicted felon moniker on him for the rest of the campaign.
So who's committing election interference now? They're just using the court to do it.

 

[regor]

'He Is Such a Great Judge': MSNBC's Weissmann Says He Has a 'Man Crush' on Judge Merchan

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Weissmann said Wednesday on MSNBC's "Andrea Mitchell Reports" that he has a "man crush" on Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over former President Donald Trump's New York business record trial. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

This was one of the pole smoking FBI leaders who were behind the Russia, Russia collusion hoax and shows the sick Obama lunatics that rule our nation.

Go to 1:40....................he's a Yes, Yes, Yes, & Yes fairy also!!!!

 

[zbudman]

So a George Soros backed DA who campaigned on getting Trump brings a convoluted case that everyone else passed on years later. Just like Laetitia James. If you don't think they're out to get him anyway possible, you might be a little slow.

 

[regor]

So a George Soros backed DA who campaigned on getting Trump brings a convoluted case that everyone else passed on years later. Just like Laetitia James. If you don't think they're out to get him anyway possible, you might be a little slow.

AND Biden's DOJ #3 man Michael Colangelo was brought in.

Who is Matthew Colangelo?

When Bragg appointed Colangelo in December, CNN simply reported he was "a senior official in the US Justice Department and before that served as an attorney on the Trump Foundation investigation with the New York attorney general’s office."

But CNN failed to report Colangelo is a lifelong leftwing activist (including NAACP lawyer for 7 years) and senior Democrat political appointee for nearly 15 years: - currently appointed to made-up position in Soros-backed Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's office (to get Trump; first indictment ever of a former president; bogus, trumped-up charges previously declined by prior Manhattan DA, US Attorney, FEC, and Bragg himself)


They can't win without cheating, just like they did in 2020.

 

[BabyRay]

What I don’t understand is how the judge can instruct the jury that they can disagree on what law(s) Trump broke and still convict him of the felony, when said felony requires that he broke one of those underlying laws. This just baffles me. The whole “get Trump” effort is bullshit, but this part really stands out.

 

[Racey]

'He Is Such a Great Judge': MSNBC's Weissmann Says He Has a 'Man Crush' on Judge Merchan

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Weissmann said Wednesday on MSNBC's "Andrea Mitchell Reports" that he has a "man crush" on Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over former President Donald Trump's New York business record trial. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

This was one of the pole smoking FBI leaders who were behind the Russia, Russia collusion hoax and shows the sick Obama lunatics that rule our nation.

Go to 1:40....................he's a Yes, Yes, Yes, & Yes fairy also!!!!

This is the asshole who "forgot the password" to his government issued phone during the Mueller investigation, had the phone in airplane mode (so no administrative password reset was available) and "accidentally" entered the wrong password 10 times wiping the phone of all his communications and data.... Oh and so did half a dozen or more of the people directly under him on his team of investigators. All had early onset Alzheimer's at the same time turning on airplane mode then forgetting their passwords and "accidentally" entering the wrong ones 10 times wiping the phones. Meanwhile the crux of their investigation surrounded whether or not Trump's people had destroyed evidence "obstructing justice".... But it's fine when they do it.

 

[regor]

This is the asshole who "forgot the password" to his government issued phone during the Mueller investigation, had the phone in airplane mode (so no administrative password reset was available) and "accidentally" entered the wrong password 10 times wiping the phone of all his communications and data.... Oh and so did half a dozen or more of the people directly under him on his team of investigators. All had early onset Alzheimer's at the same time turning on airplane mode then forgetting their passwords and "accidentally" entering the wrong ones 10 times wiping the phones. Meanwhile the crux of their investigation surrounded whether or not Trump's people had destroyed evidence "obstructing justice".... But it's fine when they do it.

Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes..........which is consistent with the constitution of course!!!!

 

[hallett21]

Been in the truck all day. How’s the deliberation going?

 

[regor]

Been in the truck all day. How’s the deliberation going?

Jaba the Hut weighed in.

 

[RitcheyRch]

Foxnews reporting verdict in and waiting for more details

 

[Heylam]

Come on now, we all know Trump knew what was going on. The big question is why he’s being held to different standards? We all know the answer to that as well
Now, the question is, what will the verdict be?

 

[brianwhiteboy]

Lots of guilty votes coming in!! No good

 

[hallett21]

Wow

 

[Singleton]

Come on now, we all know Trump knew what was going on. The big question is why he’s being held to different standards? We all know the answer to that as well
Now, the question is, what will the verdict be?

Nothing illegal about paying someone not to talk.
But the lawyer paid via a LOC, then asked for money and was reimbursed. Nothing illegal with that either.
How is it accounted for - not illegal either. It was an expense line item.

 

[regor]

Guilty on all counts...................

 

[angiebaby]

Why is the state charging a federal campaign violation?

. . . despite the fact that the FCC said there was no violation. LOL. These schmucks won't take "no" for an answer.

 

[hallett21]

34 out of 34

 

[Racey]

Lol is anyone surprised. This whole thing was a setup from the start

 

[shueman]

Appeal Time

 

[Singleton]

Will be overturned in appeal.
When that gets heard is a huge question - could be years.

will it impact the election - most likely, but how is the question

 

[TeamGreene]

I'm shocked! And they came back with it early enough for sleepy Joe to have his presser and use his convicted felon BS. What a fucking joke.

 

[Singleton]

I'm shocked! And they came back with it early enough for sleepy Joe to have his presser and use his convicted felon BS. What a fucking joke.

Early enough to hit the 6pm EST news cycle

 

[DUN]

Clown world.

I see future libtard riots and calls to abolish/pack the Supreme Court in our future.

 

[shintoooo]

Let me know what time you guys riot. I need a TV for my room.

 

[81Sprint]

Wonder how much the jury and judge got paid.