The Dungeon..

[Grandpa mac]

Oh one forgotten bit of irony is Dave insisting that he wasn’t Obama and was going to stick to the line he’d drawn in the sand and not allow ANY of the ban victims back before the week. He folded within about two posts of that and let everyone whose thinking mirrors his own return, while continuing to censor different viewpoints. Classic.

Am I banned yet?

 

[Doc]

Yet right out of the gate you immediately start stirring the pot and take jabs at Dave.

 

[JUSTWANNARACE]

Hey deplorables! I’m finally back from my vacation which is ironic for a couple reasons. First Dave admitted I hadn’t broken his rules, and second because I was singled out for the full week ban while those of you who did break his rules were allowed to return early. Apparently my rhetoric is so inflammatory that y’all can’t be trusted to keep it between the lanes while I’m around. It reminds me of those poor women under ISIS rule who are punished for dressing provocatively (ie showing their ankles) because men can’t be trusted not to rape them.

So my question for @LargeOrangeFont is what special regulations do I personally need to follow so that the anti-free speech Stalinists (Dave’s word- personally I think he could have picked an equally appropriate right wing totalitarian) won’t kick me out before the Inauguration when Dave and LBHSBZ have to pay out on their ill conceived bets?

By the way, in case this post alone activates the censors, y’all seem to have missed or largely ignored a lot of news this week. I’ll recap a few highlights.

Newsmax and Fox have both recanted their Dominion coverage because they have been warned they face lawsuits from those slandered by their lies (and suit has been filed against Newsmax)

Even Pat Robertson admits Trump is living in a fantasy world by trying to Cling to power, and God himself told Robertson Trump was going to win.

Trump just pardoned two Republican congressmen convicted by juries of financial crimes such as using campaign money for personal gain and inside trading with knowledge gained in office. Is this not the exact opposite of draining the swamp of political opportunists which you pretend to care about.

Trumpkins in Salem broke windows of the State House, bear sprayed State troopers guarding the doors, and boot stomped a journalist covering their unlawful assembly but all the people who criticized property destruction and shooting fireworks at police in BLM protests seemed to think this right wing violence was acceptable? Except @t&y I did notice he managed to rise above pure partisanship and condemn this right wing attack on the police, but I believe he was the only one. So much more, but I’m pretty sure you’ve all stopped reading by now anyway and/or the censors have deleted my post...

Let's start with your "tidbit" about Salem! your statements are wrong, that's what you read or heard on MSM and I call bullshit! There was more to it than your little "tidbit"!

But I know nothing sooo...

 

[Grandpa mac]

Let's start with your "tidbit" about Salem! your statements are wrong, that's what you read or heard on MSM and I call bullshit! There was more to it than your little "tidbit"!

But I know nothing sooo...

You yourself admitted that you just happened along and weren’t there from the beginning when your pals assaulted the police. But it is right there in the first video clip on that thread where you hear officers responding with their own pepper ball. Your arrive late and hide behind the barricades approach doesn’t qualify you as an all-knowing witness.

 

[JUSTWANNARACE]

You yourself admitted that you just happened along and weren’t there from the beginning when your pals assaulted the police. But it is right there in the first video clip on that thread where you hear officers responding with their own pepper ball. Your arrive late and hide behind the barricades approach doesn’t qualify you as an all-knowing witness.

But you not being there at all makes your statements gospel?!?! NOTED!

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

Hey deplorables! I’m finally back from my vacation which is ironic for a couple reasons. First Dave admitted I hadn’t broken his rules, and second because I was singled out for the full week ban while those of you who did break his rules were allowed to return early. Apparently my rhetoric is so inflammatory that y’all can’t be trusted to keep it between the lanes while I’m around. It reminds me of those poor women under ISIS rule who are punished for dressing provocatively (ie showing their ankles) because men can’t be trusted not to rape them.

So my question for @LargeOrangeFont is what special regulations do I personally need to follow so that the anti-free speech Stalinists (Dave’s word- personally I think he could have picked an equally appropriate right wing totalitarian) won’t kick me out before the Inauguration when Dave and LBHSBZ have to pay out on their ill conceived bets?

By the way, in case this post alone activates the censors, y’all seem to have missed or largely ignored a lot of news this week. I’ll recap a few highlights.

Newsmax and Fox have both recanted their Dominion coverage because they have been warned they face lawsuits from those slandered by their lies (and suit has been filed against Newsmax)

Even Pat Robertson admits Trump is living in a fantasy world by trying to Cling to power, and God himself told Robertson Trump was going to win.

Trump just pardoned two Republican congressmen convicted by juries of financial crimes such as using campaign money for personal gain and inside trading with knowledge gained in office. Is this not the exact opposite of draining the swamp of political opportunists which you pretend to care about.

Trumpkins in Salem broke windows of the State House, bear sprayed State troopers guarding the doors, and boot stomped a journalist covering their unlawful assembly but all the people who criticized property destruction and shooting fireworks at police in BLM protests seemed to think this right wing violence was acceptable? Except @t&y I did notice he managed to rise above pure partisanship and condemn this right wing attack on the police, but I believe he was the only one. So much more, but I’m pretty sure you’ve all stopped reading by now anyway and/or the censors have deleted my post...

Yore not back, you didn’t leave. You just stopped using this screenname. So stop the lying would be my first piece of advice. If you want to hang around long enough to collect anything that is.

 

[Grandpa mac]

Yore not back, you didn’t leave. You just stopped using this screenname. So stop the lying would be my first piece of advice. If you want to hang around long enough to collect anything.

My account was suspended until today. I was the only one banned who wasn’t brought back the moment y’all started crying about free speech.

 

[Grandpa mac]

But you not being there at all makes your statements gospel?!?! NOTED!

View attachment 954580

The video shows what it shows. You claiming that Trumpkins did not bear mace the police and kick out windows before you were there to see it?

 

[Grandpa mac]

And the Oregon State Police will be proving it to a jury when the prosecute the four Trumpkins who were arrested and one who remains a fugitive from justice. If that was you just turn yourself in, cop-hater!

 

[SBMech]

My account was suspended until today. I was the only one banned who wasn’t brought back the moment y’all started crying about free speech. View attachment 954598

My ban was not lifted until monday, I would assume yours was lifted then as well.

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

My account was suspended until today. I was the only one banned who wasn’t brought back the moment y’all started crying about free speech. View attachment 954598

THAT account was suspended until today, or whenever. YOU were still posing here anyway in the meantime.

So give up the lines of BS and stop the sniveling. When you can actually abide by a ban and respect the consequences of being an insufferable fool, then you can cry to me how unfair your life is and maybe I will let you back on the field again.

 

[Grandpa mac]

Yore not back, you didn’t leave. You just stopped using this screenname. So stop the lying would be my first piece of advice. If you want to hang around long enough to collect anything.

And did I drop in to visit during my ban? Sure, I posted several quotes from our Founding Fathers and giants of the Court on the importance of free speech using the username December 15 1791 (the date the Bill of Rights was passed). Even that was too much for the censors, and that username was also banned and the thread deleted by you champions of free speech.

 

[Grandpa mac]

My ban was not lifted until monday, I would assume yours was lifted then as well.

Nope, mine was lifted this morning. That screen shot was last night just before I went to sleep. Trumpkins get special privileges.

 

[Grandpa mac]

THAT account was suspended until today, or whenever. YOU were still posing here anyway in the meantime.

So give up the lines of BS and stop the sniveling. When you actually abide by a ban and respect the consequences of being an insufferable fool, then you can cry to me to let you back on the field.

The BS is your pretense of caring about free speech. The 1st Amendment is about protecting unpopular speech, but all you and Dave really care about is giving lip service to that idea while ensuring seditious right wing speech is allowed and banning progressive counter arguments. American ideals be damned, Dave is concerned about advertising dollars!

 

[Grandpa mac]

THAT account was suspended until today, or whenever. YOU were still posing here anyway in the meantime.

So give up the lines of BS and stop the sniveling. When you can actually abide by a ban and respect the consequences of being an insufferable fool, then you can cry to me how unfair your life is and maybe I will let you back on the field again.

Why don’t you tell me why I was banned? Dave himself said I specifically do stay within the lines (no threats, no attacks on family, no calling people pedophiles). I was banned because the rest of you lack my restraint and are so incited by my mere presence that YOU cannot abide by the rules.

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

And did I drop in to visit during my ban? Sure, I posted several quotes from our Founding Fathers and giants of the Court on the importance of free speech using the username December 15 1791 (the date the Bill of Rights was passed). Even that was too much for the censors, and that username was also banned and the thread defeated by you champions of free speech.

As usual, you misconstrue free speech with the consequences of your own actions.

If you are issued a time out, that means your privilege to post here has been revoked for a period of time. It does not mean we want to hear from you masquerading behind some new alias.

 

[regor]

My ban was not lifted until monday, I would assume yours was lifted then as well.

Nice to have you back Patriot!!!!

 

[Grandpa mac]

But you might want to make sure Dave has a chance to PM me his address before you ban me again. Otherwise how will I be able to pay out on our wager?

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

The BS is your pretense of caring about free speech. The 1st Amendment is about protecting unpopular speech, but all you and Dave really care about is giving lip service to that idea while ensuring seditious right wing speech is allowed and banning progressive counter arguments. American ideals be damned, Dave is concerned about advertising dollars!

The 1st amendment protects your/our speech from the government. That is where it ends.

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

But you might want to make sure Dave has a chance to PM me his address before you ban me again. Otherwise how will I be able to pay out on our wager?

If I had a fuck to give about your wagers, I still wouldn’t give it.

 

[Grandpa mac]

As usual, you misconstrue free speech with the consequences of your own actions.

If you are issued a time out, that means your privilege to post here has been revoked for a period of time. It does not mean we want to hear from you masquerading behind some new alias.

What were my prohibited actions? I was banned because guys like Yuma can’t engage in conversation without embarrassing Dave. If I got banned for breaking a rule, post a link to the offending post.

 

[regor]

What were my prohibited actions? I was banned because it’s like Yuma can’t engage in conversation without embarrassing Dave. If I got banned for breaking a rule, post a link to the offending post.

You called me a monkey!!!!!

 

[MSum661]

heading southbound quick.

 

[Grandpa mac]

The 1st amendment protects your/our speech from the government. That is where it ends.

You called me a monkey!!!!!

View attachment 954606

Wasn’t on the banned words list when I called you monkey. Neither was pussy or dimwit. If somebody can point me toward the current list of naughty words I’ll happily oblige you by finding new words. But they may be polysyllabic so I fear their meaning may be lost on you.

 

[Grandpa mac]

@regor I think you will find this place very dull once I leave...

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

What were my prohibited actions? I was banned because it’s like Yuma can’t engage in conversation without embarrassing Dave. If I got banned for breaking a rule, post a link to the offending post.

I have no idea, I didn’t ban you. Nor do I care because you didn’t respect the ban in the first place.

Honestly here’s the deal Gramps. I don’t want to ban you, so please don’t conduct yourself like an insufferable ass and make me have to.

Read the new rules. If you read them read them again.

I don’t want to hear about wagers, welching, who is a pussy, or any of that crap from the past. It is done. Take your wagers and accusations up with the concerned parties via DM.

If you want do provide your socialist viewpoints, and MSN or Yahoo News links, go ahead.

If someone breaks the rules towards you, they are gone. If you incessantly exhibit antagonistic behavior towards other members, you are gone.

That’s is it. You are back, it’s over, have fun, and that was your one warning.

 

[regor]

Wasn’t on the banned words list when I called you monkey. Neither was pussy or dimwit. If somebody can point me toward the current list of naughty words I’ll happily oblige you by finding new words. But they may be polysyllabic so I fear their meaning may be lost on you.

Alright here's the list.

Climate Change
Single-payer health care
Abolishing ICE
Debt-free college
Gender

 

[Grandpa mac]

heading southbound quick.

Here’s a question. Whose posts are going to get Dave sued after Trump revokes the 230 law protecting social media platforms? My snarky comments or the guys who are openly advocating for felony sedition and violence against the left?

 

[SNiC Jet]

Damn, I have seen some severe crying and sniveling in my life, but never the likes of this.......

 

[WhatExit?]

@regor I think you will find this place very dull once I leave...

You've been promising to leave for quite some time now. If and when you do I'll "miss you" like a cancerous growth that a surgeon had to cut out because it just wouldn't go away on its own

 

[Grandpa mac]

I have no idea, I didn’t ban you. Nor do I care because you didn’t respect the ban in the first place.

Honestly here’s the deal Gramps. I don’t want to ban you, so please don’t conduct yourself like an insufferable ass and make me have to.

Read the new rules. If you read them read them again.

I don’t want to hear about wagers, welching, who is a pussy, or any of that crap from the past. It is done. Take your wagers and accusations up with the concerned parties via DM.

If you want do provide your socialist viewpoints, and MSN or Yahoo News links, go ahead.

If someone breaks the rules towards you, they are gone. If you incessantly exhibit antagonistic behavior towards other members, you are gone.

That’s is it. You are back, it’s over, have fun, and that was your one warning.

So “exhibiting antagonistic behavior toward other members” is the standard for removal? Is that just the standard for banning progressives or will you use the same standard to judge Regor et al too? I’ll abide by whatever rules you establish and enforce for ALL members.

 

[Grandpa mac]

Alright here's the list.

Climate Change
Single-payer health care
Abolishing ICE
Debt-free college
Gender

I reserve the right to point out that eventually karma is a real bitch and eventually anthropogenic wild fire and associated home insurance costs will get you.

 

[Grandpa mac]

You've been promising to leave for quite some time now. If and when you do I'll "miss you" like a cancerous growth that a surgeon had to cut out because it just wouldn't go away on its own

The moment I collect my $2200. Though I suspect it’ll be hard not to stop by to say hello after Trump is indicted.

 

[Grandpa mac]

Hope y’all pay close attention to whatever post I’m banned for. That will be the bright line you dare not cross for fear of the censors.

 

[Grandpa mac]

It may even be simply asserting your right to speak your mind.

 

[Activated]

It may even be simply asserting your right to speak your mind.

Dude, take your meds please.

Edit....Didn’t mean to assume yore gender.

 

[SNiC Jet]

Hope y’all pay close attention to whatever post I’m banned for. That will be the bright line you dare not cross for fear of the censors.

 

[WhatExit?]

Hope y’all pay close attention to whatever post I’m banned for. That will be the bright line you dare not cross for fear of the censors.

Perhaps you're confused. I know you can read because I've seen you respond to my posts. Let me help you understand something:

* Talking about which line you've crossed when you get banned is irrelevant because...
* This website is not a democracy
* This website is owned by someone who has complete control over it
* There is no freedom of speech here - the terms & conditions of using this site are dictated to users who choose to come here
* The owner can ban anyone he chooses to

And the owner can apply his rules any way he sees fit without regard to "fairness" or "free speech" because this is not a democracy and you have a choice to abide by the rules and accept how they are applied.

And if this was my website you and your IP address would have been banned a long time ago simply because you have no respect for others here and it's clear you're only here to disrupt this site and piss off those who believe in America, the Constitution and our Freedoms

 

[RVR SWPR]

Welcome Back.I assume you will be working somewhere 12/25.

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

So “exhibiting antagonistic behavior toward other members” is the standard for removal? Is that just the standard for banning progressives or will you use the same standard to judge Regor et al too? I’ll abide by whatever rules you establish and enforce for ALL members.

They are the same rules for all members. I told you to read the rules again. If you are consistently escalating arguments you will be gone.

You snivel and annoy people until they snap, and then feign innocence. Other people simply threaten others with with vile imagery.

We aren’t doing either of those things anymore.

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

Hope y’all pay close attention to whatever post I’m banned for. That will be the bright line you dare not cross for fear of the censors.

No one else needs to worry. As you’ve told us repeatedly, yore the only MENSA patient here.

 

[was thatguy]

3...2...1...

 

[Canuck 1]

Hope y’all pay close attention to whatever post I’m banned for. That will be the bright line you dare not cross for fear of the censors.

For all your commie loving ways you don't play the victim very well, it comes across as whining. This is Dave Boat, his rules, his way

 

[perky]

The BS is your pretense of caring about free speech. The 1st Amendment is about protecting unpopular speech, but all you and Dave really care about is giving lip service to that idea while ensuring seditious right wing speech is allowed and banning progressive counter arguments. American ideals be damned, Dave is concerned about advertising dollars!

jesus, you got cbs,nbc,abc,cnn,msnbc the morning show, the afternoon show, the late show and the late late show and your mad cause we got the politics section at Daves ?

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

Here’s a question. Who’s posts are going to get Dave sued after Trump revokes the 230 law protecting social media platforms? My snarky comments or the guys who are openly advocating for felony sedition and violence against the left?

Should be fine, you’ll be sued as well. You already lost one job because of your work here right?

 

[perky]

I reserve the right to point out that eventually karma is a real bitch and eventually anthropogenic wild fire and associated home insurance costs will get you.

Holy shit dude, they spray your state with emotional juice or something? Your gonna have a friggin breakdown even after you won. GET A HOLD OF YOURSELF MAN! edit: or woman. double edit: even thou you had to cheat like a bastard to win !

 

[Backlash]

Nahhh, let him continue. Its entertaining how a grown ass man is conducting himself on a forum. Carry on, please!

 

[94Nautique]

All: FWIW, dont feed the trolls. Especially the ones that study crows and HATE POWERBOATS, POWERBOATERS, and women.

 

[rivrrts429]

If being a Mensa member manifests itself by having a full blown temper tantrum on a boating forum I’ll gladly remain a dumb fuck.

For a supposedly grown ass man he just fell to the floor kicking and screaming because he didn’t get his way.

 

[JUSTWANNARACE]

If being a Mensa member manifests itself by having a full blown temper tantrum on a boating forum I’ll gladly remain a dumb fuck.

For a supposedly grown ass man he just fell to the floor kicking and screaming because he didn’t get his way.

Being a "grown ass man" and being a "grown man that takes it in the ass" are 2 different things.. I think auto correct has fooled a few posts