=River Perfection=
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2007
- Messages
- 571
- Reaction score
- 608
h
Last edited:
Recently switched to give business to a friend and the Insurance provider sent a survey co out that reported my Male Rottweiler. They sent me a cancellation letter if I do not get rid of the dog. Assholes!! So.. who will cover us in California? We will be bringing a female puppy rott home next month as well and I don't want to lie about my dogs.
Thanks Geoff
Recently switched to give business to a friend and the Insurance provider sent a survey co out that reported my Male Rottweiler. They sent me a cancellation letter if I do not get rid of the dog. Assholes!! So.. who will cover us in California? We will be bringing a female puppy rott home next month as well and I don't want to lie about my dogs.
Thanks Geoff
State Farm.
They don't discriminate on breed,but bite history.
If your dog has no bite history they will cover you.
give Jake a call....
She sounds hideous....
I have.I've never heard of a house with any type of dog inside being broken into ....
I have.
My parents were robbed last year,two Golden Retrievers.They probably brought the thieves tennis balls to throw,lol.
It was probably kids,happened in summer time,amateur hour.
They made away with some jewelry,high end perfume,loose change and some cash in the desk.
They did not hurt the dogs or go after things like the laptop,the guns,X-box or the like.
All in all maybe 5-7k worth of stuff,the jewelry has more sentimental value then street value.
That brings me to this point.
The insurer would rather deal with that 7-10k claim as opposed to the huge medical bill from the physical damage done to the body by the dogs on the "dangerous breed" list.
Lets face it,an Akita,a Rottie,a Doberman,most all of the dogs on "the list" can flat fuck someone up,and in many instances(like at my house) there's more than one of those dogs.(But at the same time,no one has broken in here)
The ER bill alone is beyond the replacement costs that may have been stolen,add reconstructive surgery bills,pain and suffering,possible loss of ability to work temporarily,etc,etc,etc.
It's a business.From their view point I can hardly blame them.Personally,if that were my business and I made the rules I would cover all breeds,but the ones in the list would be paying a much higher price than say,the guy with a couple of Pugs or something.
And the worst part is they are paying this to the thief who thought they could break into your house. [emoji107]I have.
My parents were robbed last year,two Golden Retrievers.They probably brought the thieves tennis balls to throw,lol.
It was probably kids,happened in summer time,amateur hour.
They made away with some jewelry,high end perfume,loose change and some cash in the desk.
They did not hurt the dogs or go after things like the laptop,the guns,X-box or the like.
All in all maybe 5-7k worth of stuff,the jewelry has more sentimental value then street value.
That brings me to this point.
The insurer would rather deal with that 7-10k claim as opposed to the huge medical bill from the physical damage done to the body by the dogs on the "dangerous breed" list.
Lets face it,an Akita,a Rottie,a Doberman,most all of the dogs on "the list" can flat fuck someone up,and in many instances(like at my house) there's more than one of those dogs.(But at the same time,no one has broken in here)
The ER bill alone is beyond the replacement costs that may have been stolen,add reconstructive surgery bills,pain and suffering,possible loss of ability to work temporarily,etc,etc,etc.
It's a business.From their view point I can hardly blame them.Personally,if that were my business and I made the rules I would cover all breeds,but the ones in the list would be paying a much higher price than say,the guy with a couple of Pugs or something.
Great post.
Same exact reason Skaters with 4,000 hp are nearly uninsurable. I understand folks whom dig these breeds. However, the odds are against you. I have a friend who's child is permanently disfigured by a Rot. The lawyers are still fighting any the numbers involved are staggering!!!
And the worst part is they are paying this to the thief who thought they could break into your house. [emoji107]
That brings me to this point.
The insurer would rather deal with that 7-10k claim as opposed to the huge medical bill from the physical damage done to the body by the dogs on the "dangerous breed" list.
Lets face it,an Akita,a Rottie,a Doberman,most all of the dogs on "the list" can flat fuck someone up,and in many instances(like at my house) there's more than one of those dogs.(But at the same time,no one has broken in here)
The ER bill alone is beyond the replacement costs that may have been stolen,add reconstructive surgery bills,pain and suffering,possible loss of ability to work temporarily,etc,etc,etc.
It's a business.From their view point I can hardly blame them.Personally,if that were my business and I made the rules I would cover all breeds,but the ones in the list would be paying a much higher price than say,the guy with a couple of Pugs or something.
all I can do is try to live in reality.This is refreshing to hear from a consumer point of view......
You would be amazed by my daily conversations with customers. They think insurance is a goverment subsidised program that there guaranteed to always get for a cheap price. I have had to deal with alot of these situations and it's never pleasent because people love there dogs... Insurance companies only see's numbers and statistics. If there is a certain driver, Dog or car that is causing them to loose $$$ then they will alter the program or pricing to deny or charge more for this item.
Nobody ever uses there insurance or has a dog that bites or a driver that crashes until they do.....Lets say you pay $1000 a year for homeowners insurance and have been a good client for 20 years. It takes 1 medium sized claim for you to go from profitable to a loss leader. If your risk still looks good they will probably keep you with the hopes that you might go 30 years before your next claim. For every good client I have I have 3 shitty ones that have been insured for 2 years and turned in $30,000 worth of claims. The insurance company will never ever get this $$$ back from your premiums and will at times shoose to part ways (non renew). It's not personal it's business.
I have several families that I would love to get rid of from my book of business becuse they hurt my loss ratio and make the rates worse for the good clients.
Certain Dogs are alot like young drivers with a new mustang cobra. Is there a chance that everything will be fine and there will never be an issue???. Absolutley.... there is a 15% chance that that dog won't bite someone or that kid won't loop his car and hurt his friends. Statistics prove that these are bad risks and you are either going to pay a higher premium then the guy with the Pug/kid with a 89 Dodge caravan or get non renewed and hope you get lucky finding a company that will take the risk.
all I can do is try to live in reality.
I have dogs on "the list",it's important to understand both sides of a business arrangement.
Do you insure homes with dogs on the list?
I wouldn't knock you either way,but it's always good to know alternatives.
As owners of these dog we assume ALL responsibility. We will not let our dogs around children at all, and other animals sometimes with a LOT of supervision. I understand all the risk, I also understand the insurance companies point of view. With that said.. I know that some companies will cover me, just trying to find out my best options. Rottweilers are super smart and very controllable if you work with them. How about home owners with live stock and horses, have family with horses and those guys could kill you faster than a Rottweiler, that's for sure.