yz450mm
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2013
- Messages
- 3,580
- Reaction score
- 7,195
I'll try to keep this as brief as possible.
My daughter's mom and I each own our own separate homes, but have been looking to combine things for the last year or two.
Our list of requirements is very extensive, to include large horse property, a shop for me, built-in pool and spa, an office, keeping our daughter in the same school district, and a kitchen that she loves. We have looked at many, but none fit the full bill. Today we found the one that is absolutely perfect in every way, and it happens to be a friend of a friend that is selling the house. A handshake deal was done, and all parties are ready to move forward.
Her house: 2300 ft, four bedroom three bath, pool and spa, half acre lot. Positive equity is 240k.. Rental net income would be about 1k.
My house: 3,700 ft, 5 bedroom 3 bath 1450 ft attached eight car garage, separate detached 350 ft garage, almost 1 acre. Equity is around 300k. Net rental income could be $1,500 according to my realtor. The kicker on mine is that I've only owned it for 18 months, so capital gains will get me.
So here's the question, do we sell both, rent both, or what combo? According to most on here, being a landlord in California sucks balls. So just sell and invest the money? Take the hit on Capital gains, or can I avoid it by putting that money down on the new house? We would much rather use the sale proceeds from one of the houses to pay the down payment, but if that doesn't happen it's not a deal killer.
Money in the bank is always good, but so is real estate on the books. Not sure which is more desirable at this point...
My daughter's mom and I each own our own separate homes, but have been looking to combine things for the last year or two.
Our list of requirements is very extensive, to include large horse property, a shop for me, built-in pool and spa, an office, keeping our daughter in the same school district, and a kitchen that she loves. We have looked at many, but none fit the full bill. Today we found the one that is absolutely perfect in every way, and it happens to be a friend of a friend that is selling the house. A handshake deal was done, and all parties are ready to move forward.
Her house: 2300 ft, four bedroom three bath, pool and spa, half acre lot. Positive equity is 240k.. Rental net income would be about 1k.
My house: 3,700 ft, 5 bedroom 3 bath 1450 ft attached eight car garage, separate detached 350 ft garage, almost 1 acre. Equity is around 300k. Net rental income could be $1,500 according to my realtor. The kicker on mine is that I've only owned it for 18 months, so capital gains will get me.
So here's the question, do we sell both, rent both, or what combo? According to most on here, being a landlord in California sucks balls. So just sell and invest the money? Take the hit on Capital gains, or can I avoid it by putting that money down on the new house? We would much rather use the sale proceeds from one of the houses to pay the down payment, but if that doesn't happen it's not a deal killer.
Money in the bank is always good, but so is real estate on the books. Not sure which is more desirable at this point...