RBG Has Died.

[530RL]

Remember guys - this doesn't have to happen before the election.......Trump and McConnell have until (if Trump loses) January 19 2021. One thing for sure, we know what the number one leading story will be from now until 11/4. The pubs need to play it cool, time is on their side.

Mark Kelly could be sworn into the U.S. Senate early if he wins race, experts say - Rose Law Group Reporter

By Yvonne Wingett Sanchez | Arizona Republic If Mark Kelly defeats incumbent Sen. Martha McSally in Arizona’s high-stakes U.S. Senate race, he may not have to wait long to start work in Washington, D.C. Two Republican and Democratic election attorneys agree that state law and Senate practices...

roselawgroupreporter.com

I heard earlier that he already said will refuse to vote before inauguration. Also heard that in the last day or so Murkowski said she would not vote on a SCOTUS judge either.

Right out of the 530 playbook lol.


if they have 50 votes, let Pence decide.

Let’s assume that Democrats controlled the Senate in 2016. What would have they done? They would have rammed Garland through consistent with the Constitution.

And when Trump won the election and control of the Senate; what would have the Republicans done? Expanded the court to 13 and filled it up with partisan R justices consistent with the Constitution.

Either way this appointment is meaningless if the Trump supporters hand the Senate and the Executive Branch to the Democrats. For the Democrats will simply do exactly what the Republicans would have done, expand the court consistent with the Constitution.

 

[regor]

Mark Kelly could be sworn into the U.S. Senate early if he wins race, experts say - Rose Law Group Reporter

By Yvonne Wingett Sanchez | Arizona Republic If Mark Kelly defeats incumbent Sen. Martha McSally in Arizona’s high-stakes U.S. Senate race, he may not have to wait long to start work in Washington, D.C. Two Republican and Democratic election attorneys agree that state law and Senate practices...

roselawgroupreporter.com

It’s Senate tradition that if a sitting senator is nominated for SCOTUS, hearings are waived & it goes straight to a floor vote.

Stick to what you know..............whoring for dollars

 

[TeamGreene]

Mark Kelly could be sworn into the U.S. Senate early if he wins race, experts say - Rose Law Group Reporter

By Yvonne Wingett Sanchez | Arizona Republic If Mark Kelly defeats incumbent Sen. Martha McSally in Arizona’s high-stakes U.S. Senate race, he may not have to wait long to start work in Washington, D.C. Two Republican and Democratic election attorneys agree that state law and Senate practices...

roselawgroupreporter.com

Let’s assume that Democrats controlled the Senate in 2016. What would have they done? They would have rammed Gorsuch through consistent with the Constitution.

And when Trump won the election and control of the Senate; what would have the Republicans done? Expanded the court to 13 and filled it up with partisan R justices consistent with the Constitution.

Either way this appointment is meaningless if the Trump supporters hand the Senate and the Executive Branch to the Democrats. For the Democrats will simply do exactly what the Republicans would have done, expand the court consistent with the Constitution.

Dems would have rammed Gorsuch through? The only party that’s talked about expanding the SC is the dems.

 

[530RL]

Dems would have rammed Gorsuch through? The only party that’s talked about expanding the SC is the dems.

Garland.

 

[530RL]

It’s Senate tradition that if a sitting senator is nominated for SCOTUS, hearings are waived & it goes straight to a floor vote.

Stick to what you know..............whoring for dollars

It was Senate tradition to give hearings to a SC nominee.

But McConnell played Constitutional Hardball. So here we are. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Your stated goal in a previous thread was to tear America apart. Get on board champ, you are getting your way!

 

[regor]

It was Senate tradition to give hearings to a SC nominee.

But McConnell played Constitutional Hardball. So here we are. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Your stated goal in the previous thread was to tear America apart. Get on board champ, you are getting your way!

Get it right, tear it away from you corrupt globalist whores and you’re damn right loser, this champ’s on board.

Stick it up their ass Mitch, it’s the least you can do for your corrupt RINO ways!!!!

It’s a shame Hillary didn’t get them.

ZERO credibility..........ZERO!!!!

 

[retaocleg]

Wait a minute...which Mr Obama are we talking about?

View attachment 924029

certainly not big mike......lmao.....that still slays me

 

[TeamGreene]

It was Senate tradition to give hearings to a SC nominee.

But McConnell played Constitutional Hardball. So here we are. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Your stated goal in a previous thread was to tear America apart. Get on board champ, you are getting your way!

So it would have been better to have another leftist instead of a constitutionalist on the SC? Mitch saved the court. We don’t need another Sotomayor or Kagen on the court.

 

[was thatguy]

It was Senate tradition to give hearings to a SC nominee.

But McConnell played Constitutional Hardball. So here we are. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Your stated goal in a previous thread was to tear America apart. Get on board champ, you are getting your way!

The irony is almost unfathomable...

 

[Nokomis]

Start dropping names tomorrow to allow for grieving</sarc>, enjoy the exploding head show.

Senate should start the nomination process immediately and send a thank you note to Harry Reid.

Make the dems fight both the nomination and for the White House. Full Cobra Kai the motherfuckers. Strike first, strike hard, no mercy.

 

[squeezer]

With all the underhanded ways the dems have tried to derail this president they will get what they deserve .

Wow...

Something that happened BEFORE Trump waseven the Tepublican nominee is some how payback for his presidency.

Are people really this stupid?

 

[regor]

Wow...

Something that happened BEFORE Trump waseven the Tepublican nominee is some how payback for his presidency.

Are people really this stupid?

Stupid asking if people are stupid............priceless!!!

“BEFORE Trump waseven the Tepublican nominee”

Play nice Tepublicans.....

 

[The Phantom]

Who?

The former Nigerian stumble bum that was squatting in the White House.

 

[The Phantom]

Are people really this stupid?

Just look around Portland.

 

[wallnutz]

Wow...

Something that happened BEFORE Trump waseven the Tepublican nominee is some how payback for his presidency.
I don’t know, are they?

 

[SNiC Jet]

Your stated goal in a previous thread was to tear America apart. Get on board champ, you are getting your way!

 

[Royally PO'd]

DELUSIONAL !!!!

 

[Racey]

 

[Carlson-jet]

I sure hope they all wear masks at her funeral. Otherwise CNN is going to blame the next wave of covid on Trump for not doing enough.

 

[regor]

Do your job Barr.

 

[SNiC Jet]

 

[SNiC Jet]

Oh shit....this is PRICELESS!!!
https://www.reddit.com/r/donaldtrump/comments/iw022v

 

[rmarion]

 

[HST4ME]

View attachment 924355

Yeah....so forgive my bitterness, I hope both her and McTumor choke on dicks in the afterlife.

 

[regor]

Yeah....so forgive my bitterness, I hope both her and McTumor choke on dicks in the afterlife.

 

[Lavey29]

I'll guarantee Mr. T throws a name out this week. The vetting should have already been completed. Mr. T knew old RGB was dying weeks if not months ago and put together his list which he has now narrowed down to most likely a female federal judge. Smart move because the dems will have a hard time fabricating an attack against an accomplished female candidate like they did to poor kavanaugh. What are they going to bring a classmate from 40 years ago and say she was the class skank in school? The only thing that will disrupt this appointment is 4 rhino traitors. Of course if the socialist gain control they will throw what's left of the constitution into the fire and stack the court. Will be like a modern version of the 9th appellate court used to be before Mr. T cleaned that swamp. I can't wait to hear the socialist screaming and crying this week. Fuck em all Mr. President.

 

[500bbc]

I'll guarantee Mr. T throws a name out this week. The vetting should have already been completed. Mr. T knew old RGB was dying weeks if not months ago and put together his list which he has now narrowed down to most likely a female federal judge. Smart move because the dems will have a hard time fabricating an attack against an accomplished female candidate like they did to poor kavanaugh. What are they going to bring a classmate from 40 years ago and say she was the class skank in school? The only thing that will disrupt this appointment is 4 rhino traitors. Of course if the socialist gain control they will throw what's left of the constitution into the fire and stack the court. Will be like a modern version of the 9th appellate court used to be before Mr. T cleaned that swamp. I can't wait to hear the socialist screaming and crying this week. Fuck em all Mr. President.

RACIST!!!!!

 

[530RL]

I'll guarantee Mr. T throws a name out this week. The vetting should have already been completed. Mr. T knew old RGB was dying weeks if not months ago and put together his list which he has now narrowed down to most likely a female federal judge. Smart move because the dems will have a hard time fabricating an attack against an accomplished female candidate like they did to poor kavanaugh. What are they going to bring a classmate from 40 years ago and say she was the class skank in school? The only thing that will disrupt this appointment is 4 rhino traitors. Of course if the socialist gain control they will throw what's left of the constitution into the fire and stack the court. Will be like a modern version of the 9th appellate court used to be before Mr. T cleaned that swamp. I can't wait to hear the socialist screaming and crying this week. Fuck em all Mr. President.

If Trump forwards a name the Senate should absolutely vet that individual consistent with historical practices and bring it to a vote.

The Republicans were wrong to not bring Garland up for a vote and the democrats would be equally wrong in this instance.

Principles should matter.

 

[regor]

Principles should matter.

Says the clown that utilizes slave labor to maximize profits.

 

[Lavey29]

If Trump forwards a name the Senate should absolutely vet that individual consistent with historical practices and bring it to a vote.

The Republicans were wrong to not bring Garland up for a vote and the democrats would be equally wrong in this instance.

Principles should matter.

Actually go look back and tell me how many times a lame duck president like your messiah either rep or dem was in office nearing the end of his term and he provided a court nominee to a different party controlled Senate and they moved forward?

I'll save you some time. It doesn't happen ever. But you can do the same research when the Senate and White House are the same party affiliation and see how the judicial appointee process moves forward.

 

[530RL]

Actually go look back and tell me how many times a lame duck president like your messiah either rep or dem was in office nearing the end of his term and he provided a court nominee to a different party controlled Senate and they moved forward?

I'll save you some time. It doesn't happen ever. But you can do the same research when the Senate and White House are the same party affiliation and see how the judicial appointee process moves forward.

Seriously it doesn’t ever happen ever?

Let’s just talk about SC nominees and not a “court nominee” as that number would be large and hard to calculate.

There have been 29 nominees for the SC in the last year of a President’s term.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in the same party 19 times.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in different parties 10 times.

 

[was thatguy]

Seriously it doesn’t ever happen ever?

Let’s just talk about SC nominees and not a “court nominee” as that number would be large and hard to calculate.

There have been 29 nominees for the SC in the last year of a President’s term.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in the same party 19 times.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in different parties 10 times.

What exactly are you arguing?
Is there a point?

 

[AzMandella]

Seriously it doesn’t ever happen ever?

Let’s just talk about SC nominees and not a “court nominee” as that number would be large and hard to calculate.

There have been 29 nominees for the SC in the last year of a President’s term.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in the same party 19 times.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in different parties 10 times.

You seem to leave out the fact that sitting the Pres nominated a Jurist all 29 times . And of the 29 times , 19 times the Senate and White house was controlled by the same party and they confirmed 17 times . And of the 29 times ,10 times the Senate and White House were held by different parties they were confirmed twice .

I think the Dems have brought this upon themselves . They have vowed to contest this election in the courts no matter what if they loose . Meaning we need to have a full strength SC to deal with it . They are pissed because they are going to loose the SC for a long time .

 

[YumaRivernaut]

Mark Kelly could be sworn into the U.S. Senate early if he wins race, experts say - Rose Law Group Reporter

By Yvonne Wingett Sanchez | Arizona Republic If Mark Kelly defeats incumbent Sen. Martha McSally in Arizona’s high-stakes U.S. Senate race, he may not have to wait long to start work in Washington, D.C. Two Republican and Democratic election attorneys agree that state law and Senate practices...

roselawgroupreporter.com

Let’s assume that Democrats controlled the Senate in 2016. What would have they done? They would have rammed Garland through consistent with the Constitution.

And when Trump won the election and control of the Senate; what would have the Republicans done? Expanded the court to 13 and filled it up with partisan R justices consistent with the Constitution.

Either way this appointment is meaningless if the Trump supporters hand the Senate and the Executive Branch to the Democrats. For the Democrats will simply do exactly what the Republicans would have done, expand the court consistent with the Constitution.

Again, it looks like you have some insider information on the AZ Senate election rigging. Better hurry up and send your bald headed gun grabbing gollum another check son.
Let me know when you have the fundraiser at your squat so I can come crash it and eat all your food, drink all your booze and bone all the hot women.

(That is if there are any, demoncrap women are usually fugly).
Fucking globalist fraud.

 

[wallnutz]

Again, it looks like you have some insider information on the election rigging. Better hurry up and send your bald headed gun grabbing gollum another check son.
Let me know when you have the fundraiser at your squat so I can come crash it and eat all you food and bone all the hot women. (If there are any, demoncrap women are usually fugly).
Fucking globalist fraud.

China has already stamped the approval.

 

[Lavey29]

Seriously it doesn’t ever happen ever?

Let’s just talk about SC nominees and not a “court nominee” as that number would be large and hard to calculate.

There have been 29 nominees for the SC in the last year of a President’s term.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in the same party 19 times.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in different parties 10 times.

Wrong, I said when there was a lame duck president in the last year. Think obama and Garland scenario ok? But of course you can rebut this scenario to because RBG said that a sitting president has the constitutional duty to select a nominee and the senate has the duty to vote unless of course you disagree with her too.

 

[Lavey29]

And what's really funny RL is your boy sleepy Joe whining about it too saying the American voters should decide. A complete opposite of what he was saying in 2016 with Garland. Face it, you and your libturd sheep lose again to a man you thought had zero chance of being elected. Shit RBG probably been dead for 6 months and we just hear about it now.

 

[AzMandella]

What exactly are you arguing?
Is there a point?

There would be if he included all the history .

And what's really funny RL is your boy sleepy Joe whining about it too saying the American voters should decide. A complete opposite of what he was saying in 2016 with Garland. Face it, you and your libturd sheep lose again to a man you thought had zero chance of being elected. Shit RBG probably been dead for 6 months and we just hear about it now.

The American Voters did decide . One of the number one things the exit poles from 2016 showed why people voted for DT was SC appointments . The people spoke and he is still the Pres . He will be speaking for the people .

 

[530RL]

And what's really funny RL is your boy sleepy Joe whining about it too saying the American voters should decide. A complete opposite of what he was saying in 2016 with Garland. Face it, you and your libturd sheep lose again to a man you thought had zero chance of being elected. Shit RBG probably been dead for 6 months and we just hear about it now.

I'm not voting for any D's just as I am not voting for any Trumpists for identical reasons. And that is I think government is the problem where as both Democrats and Trumpists think government is the solution.

With respect to this vacancy, as I have repeatedly stated and stated in post 128 above, Garland should have gone ahead to a vote as should whoever is nominated now.

Having principles and believing in the written words of the Constitution means standing by them. Not picking and choosing when it is convenient and when it is not.

 

[was thatguy]

I'm not voting for any D's just as I am not voting for any Trumpists for identical reasons. And that is I think government is the problem where as both Democrats and Trumpists think government is the solution.

With respect to this vacancy, as I have repeatedly stated and stated in post 128 above, Garland should have gone ahead to a vote as should whoever is nominated now.

Having principles and believing in the written words of the Constitution means standing by them. Not picking and choosing when it is convenient and when it is not.

 

[regor]

With respect to this vacancy, as I have repeatedly stated and stated in post 128 above, Garland should have gone ahead to a vote as should whoever is nominated now.

Having principles and believing in the written words of the Constitution means standing by them. Not picking and choosing when it is convenient and when it is not.

We all know he would have never been confirmed, so why waste MORE of the Senate's time and taxpayer money?

The only reason for not having a vote on Garland was the D's wanted to expose the R Senators and get them on record in order to use it against them in the 2016 election.

You see, it's ALWAYS about politics, just like it is now and anyone who cries about the 2016 words from Senators and their flip flopping, obviously does not understand the game.

Your "Principle" garbage doesn't work anymore, you and your Democrat friends have been exposed.





RINO=DEMOCRAT

 

[was thatguy]

We all know he would have never been confirmed, so why waste MORE of the Senate's time and taxpayer money?

The only reason for not having a vote on Garland was the D's wanted to expose the R Senators and get them on record in order to use it against them in the 2016 election.

You see, it's ALWAYS about politics, just like it is now and anyone who cries about the 2016 words from Senators and their flip flopping, obviously does not understand the game.

Your "Principle" garbage doesn't work anymore, you and your Democrat friends have been exposed.





RINO=DEMOCRAT

Month and a half to go and he’s already falling on his sword.
He’s going to be insufferable after November.

 

[YumaRivernaut]

I'm not voting for any D's

Bullshit son.
Quit fucking lying.

 

[wallnutz]

Month and a half to go and he’s already falling on his sword.
He’s going to be insufferable after November.

Will you be able to tell a difference?

 

[94Nautique]

Seriously it doesn’t ever happen ever?

Let’s just talk about SC nominees and not a “court nominee” as that number would be large and hard to calculate.

There have been 29 nominees for the SC in the last year of a President’s term.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in the same party 19 times.

Of those 29 times the President and the Senate were in different parties 10 times.

1880 was the last time...did the nominee take a car to the hearings?

honk honk

 

[94Nautique]

Month and a half to go and he’s already falling on his sword.
He’s going to be insufferable after November.

Didn’t Grads have an epic melt down shortly after Trumps first ever election?

honk honk B E E (best election ever) until 2020!

 

[The Phantom]

What exactly are you arguing?
Is there a point?

Mr. 530 likes to impress. At least he is impressed and maybe his cheerleader Squeezer.

 

[Lavey29]

RACIST!!!!!

No Sir, just a humble honky

 

[rmarion]

 

[old rigger]

Oh shit....this is PRICELESS!!!
https://www.reddit.com/r/donaldtrump/comments/iw022v

That was awesome!!!