kerry lake is awesome🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

[regor]

Found who's nuts 530 is swinging off of.

Not an original thought in his head as usual

Maricopa County Attorney Argues That Voters Who Wait Until Election Day to Vote Then Encounter Problems Reap What They Sow

redstate.com

That’s the fat ass attorney I was talking about in post 747.

Almost as good as My Pillow terrorist is paying for a witnesses’ flight!!!

 

[Racey]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1606046741425537026

"Should have voted by mail, losers" -530

Root Cause Analysis = wait till after new governor is sworn in, sweep under the rug, if they find out there is no remedy at that point, so no case to bring forward.

Fucking scumbags.

 

[t&y]

No proof of fraud to change an outcome has been shown yet. Just the possibility of fraud has been shown.

Sort of like I can show you the possibility of every flight, every day crashing and killing all.

Yet possibility is not proof of occurrence.

TRUMP








SAID








PUSSY!!!!!

 

[xlint89]

Lol


Here’s what I got for you.

You ever notice that all this kefuffle in Maricopa county is over “day of” voting.

Mail in voting appears to be safe and secure and not part of Lake’s trial, yet the only voting you and your fellow “patriots” want is “day of”voting, the kind that “failed” and you are complaining about.

I bet anyone with an IQ above freezing temperature gets that.

Americans have been voting in person for over 200 years. How come all of a sudden they can't seem to get it right?

I'll help you out.... It's called corruption.

Now go squirt some toilet bowl cleaner into your ears because all that shit swirling around inside your head has got to be leaving a stain.

 

[regor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605648409800613889

Then today the lying faggot testified that the 19" ballot issues have occurred over the last three elections!!!!!!

2022 Mid Terms
2022 Primaries
2020 General

Lock him up and then redo the election!!!!!

 

[regor]

Here’s today’s cross examination of the lying bitch.

Squirm motherfucker, squuuuuuuuirm!!!!

 

[530RL]

"Should have voted by mail, losers" -530

Root Cause Analysis = wait till after new governor is sworn in, sweep under the rug, if they find out there is no remedy at that point, so no case to bring forward.

Fucking scumbags.

Ok, so let’s just stipulate that you are much smarter than the entire judiciary system and have the expertise to run an election completely without any possible chance of fraud that any person could possibly imagine whether it happens or not as you portray.

Proof of fraud means nothing, only proof that fraud could possibly happen no matter how unlikely.

You are now in charge.

How do you prevent the smallest chance of any possible fraud no matter how small the risk as you demand. And knowing that proving fraud does not matter, only proving the risk of fraud is the criteria that is unacceptable.

What is your ruling and what is you resolution to the election of over 100 races in Arizona as well as 10 propositions?

And please recite the relevant Arizona law that backs your conclusions?

I look forward to your wisdom.

 

[regor]

FreedomForce on GETTR : Forwarded Midnight Rider Channel: Ben Bergquam GETTR- Scott Jarrett, Director of Maricopa County elections, confronted after po...

Forwarded Midnight Rider Channel: Ben Bergquam GETTR- Scott Jarrett, Director of Maricopa County elections, confronted after possibly lying under oath, first saying yesterday that a 19” inch image couldn’t be printed on a 20” ballot (paraphrased) and then today admitting that it happened in the...

gettr.com

 

[regor]

Ok, so let’s just stipulate that you are much smarter than the entire judiciary system and have the expertise to run an election completely without any possible chance of fraud that any person could possibly imagine whether it happens or not as you portray.

Proof of fraud means nothing, only proof that fraud could possibly happen no matter how unlikely.

You are now in charge.

How do you prevent the smallest chance of any possible fraud no matter how small the risk as you demand. And knowing that proving fraud does not matter, only proving the risk of fraud is the criteria that is unacceptable.

What is your ruling and what is you resolution to the election of over 100 races in Arizona as well as 10 propositions?

And please recite the relevant Arizona law that backs your conclusions?

I look forward to your wisdom.

Trouble sleeping cheater?

Nightmares of 19”er?

 

[Racey]

You are making a strawman argument.

Lake's lawsuit does not claim Fraud, it alleges violations of election procedure, and disenfranchisement from those violations. Improper ballot printing, chain of custody.

The chain of custody of 300k ballots is broken/non existent. And the improper printing of ballots that the states's own witness said could have only been done if someone intentionally set up the machine to do.

When you have 300k balotts with broken custody like that the only 2 options are throw them out, or hold a new election.

Since throwing them out would be ripe for fraud going forward (oops we lost chain of custody for these areas that lean heavily to one party) a snap election would be the more reasonable remedy, even though they are both shitty outcomes, especially since there was plenty ofwarnings going into the election about all this shit. There is no excuse.

You on the other hand make that case that since no system is perfect, a shitty and poorly run one is acceptable. I see the chinese communist philosophy has worked itself deep into your bones. And with a mindset like yours, it's no wonder over the last 50 years the government apparatus has gotten consistently less competent.

Nothing gets better because nobody is held accountable. So there is no incentive for anyone to follow rules. Well at least if you work in government, the rest of us....well

 

[Danger Dave]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605711715290664960

 

[Danger Dave]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1605690624694292482

 

[500bbc]

Found who's nuts 530 is swinging off of.

Not an original thought in his head as usual

Maricopa County Attorney Argues That Voters Who Wait Until Election Day to Vote Then Encounter Problems Reap What They Sow

redstate.com

RACIST!!!!!

 

[Racey]

The third option here is case dismissed and going forward everyone knows the AZ election system is a complete fucking joke (along with most other states tbh), run by morons with no oversight, no accountability.

An absolute shining beacon of American democracy

 

[530RL]

You are making a strawman argument.

Lake's lawsuit does not claim Fraud, it alleges violations of election procedure, and disenfranchisement from those violations. Improper ballot printing, chain of custody.

The chain of custody of 300k ballots is broken/non existent. And the improper printing of ballots that the states's own witness said could have only been done if someone intentionally set up the machine to do.

When you have 300k balotts with broken custody like that the only 2 options are throw them out, or hold a new election.

Since throwing them out would be ripe for fraud going forward (oops we lost chain of custody for these areas that lean heavily to one party) a snap election would be the more reasonable remedy, even though they are both shitty outcomes, especially since there was plenty ofwarnings going into the election about all this shit. There is no excuse.

You on the other hand make that case that since no system is perfect, a shitty and poorly run one is acceptable. I see the chinese communist philosophy has worked itself deep into your bones. And with a mindset like yours, it's no wonder over the last 50 years the government apparatus has gotten consistently less competent.

Nothing gets better because nobody is held accountable. So there is no incentive for anyone to follow rules. Well at least if you work in government, the rest of us....well

You keep repeating the same allegations that Lake’s attorneys did yet no one has shown any evidence of any of your allegations such as custody inconsistent with the elections manual or the law, or that changing the printer size from 20 to 19 was “intentional” misconduct, or that printing a 19 inch ballot disenfranchised anyone. Even Lake’s own witness admitted that when a ballot couldn’t be read by a vote center tabulator such as in the case of the 19 inch printing, he acknowledged it’s sent to a bipartisan board of workers that transfers the voter’s choices onto a fresh ballot so it can be tabulated.

Further, of the sworn declarations from 200 voters provided by Lake’s lawyers who said they were impacted by Election Day problems, only three of them, according to the county, didn’t vote and that was their choice. Declining to wait in line or put your ballot in a secure box, to be counted later, is not evidence of disenfranchised voters. It’s evidence of making shit up and submitting a farcical sworn declaration.

I don’t get it?

Maybe the judge does and will rule in your favor.

 

[Racey]

You keep repeating the same allegations that Lake’s attorneys did yet no one has shown any evidence of any of your allegations such as custody inconsistent with the elections manual or the law, or that changing the printer size from 20 to 19 was “intentional” misconduct, or that printing a 19 inch ballot disenfranchised anyone. Even Lake’s own witness admitted that when a ballot couldn’t be read by a vote center tabulator such as in the case of the 19 inch printing, he acknowledged it’s sent to a bipartisan board of workers that transfers the voter’s choices onto a fresh ballot so it can be tabulated.

Further, of the sworn declarations from 200 voters provided by Lake’s lawyers who said they were impacted by Election Day problems, only three of them, according to the county, didn’t vote and that was their choice. Declining to wait in line or put your ballot in a secure box, to be counted later, is not evidence of disenfranchised voters. It’s evidence of making shit up and submitting a farcical sworn declaration.

I don’t get it?

Maybe the judge does and will rule in your favor.

And when they transferred the ballots they separated them from the originals so there is no ability to compare/audit and no chain.

 

[regor]

You keep repeating the same allegations that Lake’s attorneys did yet no one has shown any evidence of any of your allegations such as custody inconsistent with the elections manual or the law, or that changing the printer size from 20 to 19 was “intentional” misconduct, or that printing a 19 inch ballot disenfranchised anyone. Even Lake’s own witness admitted that when a ballot couldn’t be read by a vote center tabulator such as in the case of the 19 inch printing, he acknowledged it’s sent to a bipartisan board of workers that transfers the voter’s choices onto a fresh ballot so it can be tabulated.

Further, of the sworn declarations from 200 voters provided by Lake’s lawyers who said they were impacted by Election Day problems, only three of them, according to the county, didn’t vote and that was their choice. Declining to wait in line or put your ballot in a secure box, to be counted later, is not evidence of disenfranchised voters. It’s evidence of making shit up and submitting a farcical sworn declaration.

I don’t get it?

Maybe the judge does and will rule in your favor.

Desperate, desperate little money changer.

Congratulations, you and your friends have become the shining example of corruption and stolen elections. The best part is you KEEP trying to throw smoke when it's obvious to any person with a brain!!!

 

[Wedgy]

You keep repeating the same allegations that Lake’s attorneys did yet no one has shown any evidence of any of your allegations such as custody inconsistent with the elections manual or the law, or that changing the printer size from 20 to 19 was “intentional” misconduct, or that printing a 19 inch ballot disenfranchised anyone. Even Lake’s own witness admitted that when a ballot couldn’t be read by a vote center tabulator such as in the case of the 19 inch printing, he acknowledged it’s sent to a bipartisan board of workers that transfers the voter’s choices onto a fresh ballot so it can be tabulated.

Further, of the sworn declarations from 200 voters provided by Lake’s lawyers who said they were impacted by Election Day problems, only three of them, according to the county, didn’t vote and that was their choice. Declining to wait in line or put your ballot in a secure box, to be counted later, is not evidence of disenfranchised voters. It’s evidence of making shit up and submitting a farcical sworn declaration.

I don’t get it?

Maybe the judge does and will rule in your favor.

A brilliant career awaits as a sandwich Artisan. Of Bullshit Sammiches...

 

[Racey]

Furthermore if the burden is so high that 'malicious intent' is the only way a violation can occur, then the election procedures are essentially meaningless and not worth the paper they are written on.

So it's fucked either way.

 

[530RL]

And when they transferred the ballots they separated them from the originals so there is no ability to compare/audit and no chain.

That’s not proof of disenfranchisement nor is it inconsistent with accepted and legal procedures.

 

[Wedgy]

That’s not proof of disenfranchisement nor is it inconsistent with accepted and legal procedures.

That's a tasty treat right there. Nice Sammich!

 

[Racey]

That’s not proof of disenfranchisement nor is it inconsistent with accepted and legal procedures.

Yeah yeah yeah, but lying on fisa warrants is proof enough for wire taps, we know your bullshit, it's weak and inconsistent.

 

[regor]

That’s not proof of disenfranchisement nor is it inconsistent with accepted and legal procedures.

 

[Racey]

The fact is, if this was your boy Flake's election you would be on the other side all of a sudden, but because Lake aligns with Trump you carry water for Hobbs. You can't let it go, chronic derangement.

 

[Wedgy]

Trump/Lake 2024!!

 

[regor]

The fact is, if this was your boy Flake's election you would be on the other side all of a sudden, but because Lake aligns with Trump you carry water for Hobbs. You can't let it go, chronic derangement.

 

[530RL]

The fact is, if this was your boy Flake's election you would be on the other side all of a sudden, but because Lake aligns with Trump you carry water for Hobbs. You can't let it go, chronic derangement.

LOL

I see you have quickly abandoned factual and logical arguments as you typically do.

 

[TeamGreene]

LOL pot/kettle much? This is always the way it goes no matter the issue.
First deny that it even happened
Then ok it may have happened
Then ok it happened but not to the extent that is claimed
Then well it wouldn't have changed the outcome so no harm no foul

 

[regor]

LOL

I see you have quickly abandoned factual and logical arguments as you typically do.

View attachment 1182734

Suck's when you've got nothing..............................eh crook?


Don't worry, the judge will probably rule in your favor, it's tough not to when the CJNG is involved and there's a gun to his head.

And you'll do your dance....................

 

[Racey]

LOL

I see you have quickly abandoned factual and logical arguments as you typically do.

View attachment 1182734

LOL

I just have a memory longer than a goldfish, and you have a long track record in these forums of defending false evidence to the grave when it's in your favor against Trump.

Kari Lake didn't have to fabricate evidence whole cloth to get her case heard, unlike your side.

 

[530RL]

LOL

I just have a memory longer than a goldfish, and you have a long track record in these forums of defending false evidence to the grave when it's in your favor against Trump.

Kari Lake didn't have to fabricate evidence whole cloth to get her case heard, unlike your side.

I haven't seen any evidence from the Lake side. Just theories.

But maybe your analysis is correct, mine is incorrect, and the judge will rule in your favor?

 

[Smitty7]

I haven't seen any evidence from the Lake side. Just theories.

But maybe your analysis is correct, mine is incorrect, and the judge will rule in your favor?

Why don't you tell your boss mission accomplished here and fuck off to some other site ?

 

[94Nautique]

You keep repeating the same allegations that Lake’s attorneys did yet no one has shown any evidence of any of your allegations such as custody inconsistent with the elections manual or the law, or that changing the printer size from 20 to 19 was “intentional” misconduct, or that printing a 19 inch ballot disenfranchised anyone. Even Lake’s own witness admitted that when a ballot couldn’t be read by a vote center tabulator such as in the case of the 19 inch printing, he acknowledged it’s sent to a bipartisan board of workers that transfers the voter’s choices onto a fresh ballot so it can be tabulated.

Further, of the sworn declarations from 200 voters provided by Lake’s lawyers who said they were impacted by Election Day problems, only three of them, according to the county, didn’t vote and that was their choice. Declining to wait in line or put your ballot in a secure box, to be counted later, is not evidence of disenfranchised voters. It’s evidence of making shit up and submitting a farcical sworn declaration.

I don’t get it?

Maybe the judge does and will rule in your favor.

Since you don’t understand chain of custody, think of it this way: Lets say you have a manufacturing company over seas, say in Asia somewhere. Let’s say your “employees” or little kids who get a paycheck from you, decide they want to get into the crack business. They think it’s a good idea to ship crack from your facility. Instead of using a legit freight forwarding company they use Bob’s boats and Trucks and decide to land in TJ and pass them to a panga run by Juan Hernandez who drives it up to Oceanside and lands, chucks the packages on the beach and hightails it back to TJ.

When the cops find the stuff your employees/child labor shipped, no one will know who actually shipped it since there was no chain of custody known to the authorities.

Same thing goes with ballots that are unsupervised for a period of time.

It doesn’t take a failed for-profit higher Ed board member to figure that problem out. Hell, even for-profit colleges have some form of chain of custody when it comes to tests and grades, right?

 

[regor]

I haven't seen any evidence from the Lake side. Just theories.

But maybe your analysis is correct, mine is incorrect, and the judge will rule in your favor?

Banking on the compromised system as always...............SHOCKING!!!!

 

[Wedgy]

I haven't seen any evidence from the Lake side. Just theories.

Dammit... Nice Sammich!

 

[samsah33]

Pretty simple. The purpose of Chain of Custody is necessary to preserve the integrity of the entire batch of ballots. It's assumed that if the proper CoC is maintained, then the integrity of the entire batch is intact and the entire batch of ballots is valid. If CoC is violated, then the opposite is true and the entire batch is assumed to lack integrtity and therefore be invalid. This basically means that if the CoC is violated, then the burden of proof shifts from the plaintiffs having to prove that the entire batch is invalid to the defendants having to prove that the entire batch is valid.

The CoC is especially important in elections because once ballots are separated from the envelopes, then it's impossible to distinguish eligible from ineligible voters' ballots. There's no degrees of certainty or confidence intervals or possibilities or probabilities here, it's all or nothing, either the entire batch is good or it's not.

 

[Sandlord]

Looks like its on to the appeals court.

 

[530RL]

Judges ruling

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23547225/lake-lawsuit-tossed.pdf

 

[Kari Lake]

I'm going to appeal!

 

[regor]

I'm going to appeal!

Shoot yoreself in the foot lately game warden?

 

[regor]

Now you have a full display of how broken and corrupt the judiciary is.

Your vote means NOTHING in AZ, just like in CA.

Keep voting!!!!

 

[530RL]

Now you have a full display of how broken and corrupt the judiciary is.

Your vote means NOTHING in AZ, just like in CA.

Keep voting!!!!

Candidate quality matters. Maybe the primary voters should have considered that?

 

[Racey]

Candidate quality matters. Maybe the primary voters should have considered that?

View attachment 1183121

Is that why your boy Flake quit before even trying

 

[Outdrive1]

I'm going to appeal!

 

[regor]

Candidate quality matters. Maybe the primary voters should have considered that?

View attachment 1183121

MAGA or GTFO cheater.

I’ll take the burning down of America before I take you two-face corrupt scumbags in office. Anyone with a brain knows exactly what’s going on in that embarrassment of a county Maricopa, you’re a bunch of cheating corrupt fucks controlled by the cartels. Keep washing their money bitch, it was/is yore destiny.

perra gringo

 

[530RL]

Is that why your boy Flake quit before even trying

Yes, he knew the Arizona MAGA primary voter would only promote a general election loser for senate out of the primary. He knew as a conservative he had no chance in a MAGA primary.

And as it turns out, he was absolutely 100 percent correct in 18, 20 and 22.

 

[regor]

View attachment 1183126

Tell us you’re a clueless sheep without telling us you’re a clueless sheep.

Yes, he knew the Arizona MAGA primary voter would only promote a general election loser for senate out of the primary. He knew as a conservative he had no chance in a MAGA primary.

And as it turns out, he was absolutely 100 percent correct in 18, 20 and 22.

Nah, he knew MAGA would expose his corrupt ass and just like you crooks know that, so now you’re cheating for the Democrats. You people are corrupt scum trying to avoid further exposure and anyone with a brain knows it.

 

[530RL]

MAGA or GTFO cheater.

I’ll take the burning down of America before I take you two-face corrupt scumbags in office. Anyone with a brain knows exactly what’s going on in that embarrassment of a county Maricopa, you’re a bunch of cheating corrupt fucks controlled by the cartels. Keep washing their money bitch, it was/is yore destiny.

perra gringo

Tell us you’re a clueless sheep without telling us you’re a clueless sheep.


Nah, he knew MAGA would expose his corrupt ass and just like you crooks know that, so now you’re cheating for the Democrats. You people are corrupt scum trying to avoid further exposure and anyone with a brain knows it.

 

[regor]

View attachment 1183129

Doesn’t dispute it..........

 

[Outdrive1]

Tell us you’re a clueless sheep without telling us you’re a clueless sheep.


Nah, he knew MAGA would expose his corrupt ass and just like you crooks know that, so now you’re cheating for the Democrats. You people are corrupt scum trying to avoid further exposure and anyone with a brain knows it.

Tell us you live in a fantasy land without telling us you have your head up your ass. You really think that bs lawsuit is gonna overturn the election? Maybe blame the guy that endorsed her and told people not to send in mail in ballots. Stupidest fucking idea ever. Get a candidate that can pull moderate votes, and push mail in ballots. Problem solved.