WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Jim Acosta a rude; terrible person

squeezer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
5,900
Reaction score
2,796
I could give a fuck about his arm motion, it’s his jaw motion that ultimately sealed his fate.

And I could give the same amount of fucks about his jaw motion... This isn't an Acosta issue, very few things I could care less about that what he says or does.

What I do care about is the WH using fabricated evidence to assail the First Amenedment.

Why does the 1A mean so little to you guys now that Trump is president?
 

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
11,192
Reaction score
28,458
looks like a Karate chop to the cubital fossa.

Jim Acosta Assaults A Female White House Employee To Stop Her From Recovering The Microphone after repeatedly being told by the President.
Acosted.jpg
 

500bbc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
27,619
Reaction score
44,107
And its come the full circle...

The only reason the WH released the wording that did was to chum the water for you guys. There is now way this was a random spontaneous event. Trump calls on Acosta, Acosta does what everybody in the room expects him to do, young female intern reaches in to take a mike away from him four times, his hard pass gets pulled with reference to assault...

Just how stupid does the WH think its base is anyway ? (They know the rest of the world is going to see through it...)
You fucking feces slurping lying fucking imbecile, you can see that low life love of your life pushing her arm away on video, fucking misogynist.
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
53,353
Reaction score
102,448
And I could give the same amount of fucks about his jaw motion... This isn't an Acosta issue, very few things I could care less about that what he says or does.

What I do care about is the WH using fabricated evidence to assail the First Amenedment.

Why does the 1A mean so little to you guys now that Trump is president?

That’s fucking laughable. You libiots have gone after any and every threat from the right with nothing but fabrication and lies for the last 2 years.
Now you want to climb on your soapbox and preach about 3 frames of video equaling about 1/7th of a second?
Sorry Squeeze, your shit is weak, and you’ve lost any foothold when it comes to preaching about ethics.
 

500bbc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
27,619
Reaction score
44,107
LMAO, that is actually an idea/story that is being put out there... that it was all a set up? :confused: :p
Russians, it's the fucking Russians...WE MUST IMPEACH!!!!!
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,358
Reaction score
149,592
And I could give the same amount of fucks about his jaw motion... This isn't an Acosta issue, very few things I could care less about that what he says or does.

What I do care about is the WH using fabricated evidence to assail the First Amenedment.

Why does the 1A mean so little to you guys now that Trump is president?

giphy.gif


Keep reaching Squeegee, you're looking good!!!!

Does the thought of RBG's foot in the grave have you riled up? :)

giphy.gif
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
9,004
Reaction score
27,842
And I could give the same amount of fucks about his jaw motion... This isn't an Acosta issue, very few things I could care less about that what he says or does.

What I do care about is the WH using fabricated evidence to assail the First Amenedment.

There is NO "assail" against the 1A :rolleyes:......it's an assail against Acosta for being disrespectful to the entire WH News Conference/Staff and all of those in attendance....this WH Press Conference is a time set aside for reporters to ask the POTUS questions, Not to tell him he is wrong....... The POTUS considers and labels this current caravan as an "invasion", and Acosta disrespected the POTUS by arguing when he clearly voiced his personal opinion saying "no.... it's not an invasion". This was not the time to voice his personal opinions.......Instead of arguing and disrespecting, Acosta should have asked, "Why do you consider this an invasion" verses constantly interrupting and telling the POTUS he has WRONG.....Who does the fuck does Acosta think he is to tell the POTUS he is wrong!!!.....Not only was that incredibly stupid, but that my fiend is how you get you press pass revoked.

But IMO, this was only a ploy by design to get you Libs all "worked up" ....and it succeeded.
 
Last edited:

Devilman

lol, yeah, sure, ok......
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
1,953
Reaction score
2,851
Russians, it's the fucking Russians...WE MUST IMPEACH!!!!!

They are a clever bunch, I'll give them that. :p;) I thought he was kidding with that line of BS, but apparently not, lol... o_O
 

wallnutz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
7,681
Reaction score
16,758
There is NO "assail" against the 1A :rolleyes:......it's an assail against Acosta for being disrespectful to the entire WH News Conference/Staff and all of those in attendance....this WH Press Conference is a time set aside for reporters to ask the POTUS questions, Not to tell him he is wrong....... The POTUS considers and labels this current caravan as an "invasion", and Acosta disrespected the POTUS by arguing when he clearly voiced his personal opinion saying "no.... it's not an invasion". This was not the time to voice his personal opinions.......Instead of arguing and disrespecting, Acosta should have asked, "Why do you consider this an invasion" verses telling the POTUS he has WRONG..Who does the fuck does Acosta think he is to tell the POTUS he is wrong!!!.....Not only was that incredibly stupid, but that my fiend is how you get you press pass revoked.

But IMO, this was only a ploy by design to get you Libs all "worked up" ....and it succeeded.
But IMO, this was only a ploy by design to get you Libs all "worked up" ....and it succeeded.

This, just as it has been for two years. Sore losers.
 

Kfabe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
566
Reaction score
1,607
Yea, Faking Evidence... There is not a single reason someone would go in and remove three frames from that video in that exact spot other than to make Acostas arm motion look faster.


So your saying the Whitehouse removed 3 frames of the video?
 

squeezer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
5,900
Reaction score
2,796
There is NO "assail" against the 1A :rolleyes:......it's an assail against Acosta for being disrespectful to the entire WH News Conference/Staff and all of those in attendance....this WH Press Conference is a time set aside for reporters to ask the POTUS questions, Not to tell him he is wrong....... The POTUS considers and labels this current caravan as an "invasion", and Acosta disrespected the POTUS by arguing when he clearly voiced his personal opinion saying "no.... it's not an invasion". This was not the time to voice his personal opinions.......Instead of arguing and disrespecting, Acosta should have asked, "Why do you consider this an invasion" verses constantly interrupting and telling the POTUS he has WRONG.....Who does the fuck does Acosta think he is to tell the POTUS he is wrong!!!.....Not only was that incredibly stupid, but that my fiend is how you get you press pass revoked.

But IMO, this was only a ploy by design to get you Libs all "worked up" ....and it succeeded.


I got news for you sparky. It is by very definition Acostas job to tell the POTUS he is wrong.

If one politician says its raining and one says its sunny its not the job of the press to report a difference of opinion. Its their job to look outside and see what the weather is.

But let me be clear, I don't give a single fuck about Acosta, have not spent 30 seconds watching the guy in my entire life. What I care about is not only is it OK to fabricate evidence in order to limit the press there are people willing to justify the action...
 

wallnutz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
7,681
Reaction score
16,758
I got news for you sparky. It is by very definition Acostas job to tell the POTUS he is wrong.

If one politician says its raining and one says its sunny its not the job of the press to report a difference of opinion. Its their job to look outside and see what the weather is.

But let me be clear, I don't give a single fuck about Acosta, have not spent 30 seconds watching the guy in my entire life. What I care about is not only is it OK to fabricate evidence in order to limit the press there are people willing to justify the action...
But you see with CNN and Acosta, they would tell you it's snowing outside. They get everything they deserve, you claim you don't watch, maybe you should.
 

boatdoc55

Rest Easy Retired Boat Mechanic 😢🚤
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
7,814
Reaction score
11,273
I say someone presses charges against Acosta. Assault and battery!! Oh, BTW squeeg, Have I told you you're an asshole yet today!!!:D
 

JD D05

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
8,762
Reaction score
13,308
I got news for you sparky. It is by very definition Acostas job to tell the POTUS he is wrong.

If one politician says its raining and one says its sunny its not the job of the press to report a difference of opinion. Its their job to look outside and see what the weather is.

But let me be clear, I don't give a single fuck about Acosta, have not spent 30 seconds watching the guy in my entire life. What I care about is not only is it OK to fabricate evidence in order to limit the press there are people willing to justify the action...

Fabricating evidence....where have I seen that before....?
 

Bobby V

Havasu1986
Joined
Dec 20, 2007
Messages
23,897
Reaction score
13,742
Acosta should have grabbed her by the pussy. Trump would have been ok with that. :D
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
9,004
Reaction score
27,842
If one politician says its raining and one says its sunny its not the job of the press to report a difference of opinion. Its their job to look outside and see what the weather is.

OK squeezy, sorry, but you've lost it.......First off...we are talking about the POTUS, .....not just a mere "one politician"...read what you posted....It's their job to observe, question. and REPORT,.... NEVER to argue and debate.....this was NOT the time and place to argue and tell the POTUS he is wrong. Do you believe Acosta has all the information that is available to the POTUS that gives him a superior or equal authority to argue with the POTUS and tell him is is WRONG? :rolleyes:

I realize you have no respect for our President Trump......but IMO, you should at least respect the office of the POTUS.

Hell, why do we even have a POTUS when we have Acosta and the MSM who according to your argument,.... knows better and what's best :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Old Texan

Honorary Warden #377 Emeritus - R.I.P.
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
24,479
Reaction score
25,980
Yea, Faking Evidence... There is not a single reason someone would go in and remove three frames from that video in that exact spot other than to make Acostas arm motion look faster.
Now Biff you know how you get when you start reading that comic book of yours from the future.....All those wild conspiracies start up in your head.

Get help

BiffBanner.jpg
 
Last edited:

Activated

Deplorable
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
7,908
Reaction score
17,237
And I could give the same amount of fucks about his jaw motion... This isn't an Acosta issue, very few things I could care less about that what he says or does.

What I do care about is the WH using fabricated evidence to assail the First Amenedment.

Why does the 1A mean so little to you guys now that Trump is president?

#hertoo
 

brgrcru

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
6,425
Reaction score
12,940
And I could give the same amount of fucks about his jaw motion... This isn't an Acosta issue, very few things I could care less about that what he says or does.

What I do care about is the WH using fabricated evidence to assail the First Amenedment.

Why does the 1A mean so little to you guys now that Trump is president?

TDS to the core. lol
 

RiverDave

In it to win it
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
126,615
Reaction score
165,789
Modified video being used/shared by the White House to justify this action....???


You guys OK with that?
Where’s the modified version vs the original? What was modified?
 

RiverDave

In it to win it
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
126,615
Reaction score
165,789
Acosta, Acossted her! Lol

No seriously guys while highly inappropriate this isn't assault.
 

Waffles

Banned
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
5,422
Reaction score
9,590
Acosta, Acossted her! Lol

No seriously guys while highly inappropriate this isn't assault.

Dave you're a fucking idiot if you don't think it was assault. She CLEARLY assaulted him.

#ibelievehim
#himtoo

@4:50


Sent from my FRD-L14 using Tapatalk
 

JD D05

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
8,762
Reaction score
13,308
Acosta, Acossted her! Lol

No seriously guys while highly inappropriate this isn't assault.

Ya not even close. This stuff has spiraled completely out of control.
 

boatdoc55

Rest Easy Retired Boat Mechanic 😢🚤
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
7,814
Reaction score
11,273
When did Abby Huntsman turn into a cunt????
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,363
Reaction score
25,803
I got news for you sparky. It is by very definition Acostas job to tell the POTUS he is wrong.

If one politician says its raining and one says its sunny its not the job of the press to report a difference of opinion. Its their job to look outside and see what the weather is.

But let me be clear, I don't give a single fuck about Acosta, have not spent 30 seconds watching the guy in my entire life. What I care about is not only is it OK to fabricate evidence in order to limit the press there are people willing to justify the action...
But the 8 years Obama was on the podium, it was racist to tell him he was wrong, right on SparkPlug.

RBG to the rescue. Slip sliding away....

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T377A using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

LargeOrangeFont

We aren't happy until you aren't happy
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
49,689
Reaction score
76,183
And I could give the same amount of fucks about his jaw motion... This isn't an Acosta issue, very few things I could care less about that what he says or does.

What I do care about is the WH using fabricated evidence to assail the First Amenedment.

Why does the 1A mean so little to you guys now that Trump is president?

Tell me how his 1A was violated here? He can say whatever he wants, and be as rude as he wants, and swat at women all he wants.. just not in the White House press room.

He is free to say whatever he want on CNN. He was not jailed, or federally penalized for what he said or did. 1A protects free speech. It does not give anyone carte blanche to be rude and disrespectful with no consequences or repercussions.
 

Waffles

Banned
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
5,422
Reaction score
9,590
And I could give the same amount of fucks about his jaw motion... This isn't an Acosta issue, very few things I could care less about that what he says or does.

What I do care about is the WH using fabricated evidence to assail the First Amenedment.

Why does the 1A mean so little to you guys now that Trump is president?

But muh free speech

1541685882031.jpeg





Sent from my FRD-L14 using Tapatalk
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
16,280
Reaction score
36,729
Modified video being used/shared by the White House to justify this action....???


You guys OK with that?

It's being claimed it was modified, yet no one has come up with a forensic analysis of just what this modification is supposed to be.

In a redux of the Clinton "depends on what the definition of is is", the left is reduced to debating how quickly Acosta's arm moved when he contacted the intern's arm. Did it take .35 seconds, or .42 seconds?

The fact is he did indeed hit her arm, regardless of the speed in which it happened. Acosta has made himself the show, which violates every tenet governing the behavior of the press. They do not exist to showboat and inject their personal animus into the interviewing process. He needs to be permanently removed from the White House press pool.

CNN still hasn't acknowledged Acosta pushed her away and acted improperly, which is bullshit but not a surprise.

You are part of the hysteria and infected with TDS. Use your eyes and a brain if you have one.
 
Last edited:

Kfabe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
566
Reaction score
1,607
But... but...... it’s a doctored video that makes Acosta look bad.. NO! Acosta made Acosta look bad. That dude shouldn’t be aloud back in the Whitehouse... ever.
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
16,068
Reaction score
29,268
Acosta, Acossted her! Lol

No seriously guys while highly inappropriate this isn't assault.
You are absolutely right Dave. Under Cali law it would actually be battery (which assault is part of). Lol. While it's not your typical beat down, it's pretty obvious he pressed down hard on her arm while she was grabbing the mic. Probably realized she was a bit stronger than he thought and he couldn't break her grip.
 
Top