Guliani Steam rolling through on Live TV...

[Grandpa mac]

Bring on the witnesses!!!!!!!!

I agree! It’s your party and Trump that is stonewalling and trying to hide shit.

 

[regor]

I agree! It’s your party and Trump that is stonewalling and trying to hide shit.

You morons fell for it.

 

[RVR SWPR]

I agree! It’s your party and Trump that is stonewalling and trying to hide shit.

Speak up,Post up.Hide what?Post up or stfu.As usual you got nothing.

 

[RVR SWPR]

TUESDAY 1/28/20
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 49% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance.

 

[RVR SWPR]

 

[94Nautique]

I agree! It’s your party and Trump that is stonewalling and trying to hide shit.

hmmm, so the democrats having secret witness interrogations in basements, and leaking certain info is totally on the up and up?

As a self professed MENSA mega-mind, you should know that the house does the investigation (even a rigged bogus piece of shit like this one) and the senate reviews the "evidence" (of which there is none.)

But thats cool, because there was no crime as well.

So, to recap, there is no crime, there is no evidence, and Fraudpa thinks the WH is stonewalling. Takes a special kind of stoooooooooopid to be Fraudpa.

Fraudpa, Go find this guy and look for your crow

fuck democrats

 

[regor]

I agree! It’s your party and Trump that is stonewalling and trying to hide shit.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) said on Wednesday that Hunter Biden would be a "relevant witness" in President Trump's impeachment trial over withholding aid to Ukraine while pushing for an investigation into allegations of Biden corruption.

"I think so — I really do," Manchin told MSNBC's "Morning Joe," adding "I don’t have a problem there because this is why we are where we are."

"Now, I think that he [can] clear himself — what I know and what I’ve heard ... But being afraid to put anybody that might have pertinent is wrong, no matter if you’re a Democrat or Republican."

 

[Old Texan]

How Hunter Biden could be a credible witness to anything is beyond me. His track record shows him as a drug addled liar that is all about himself. He's currently close to being held in contempt over supplying financial info in a child support claim. He's living high in HW with another pregnant womean by his side after failing with a couple others.

He's grown to feel he's privileged and above the law. He gives all indications he knows neither the difference between right and wrong, much less truth and lying to cover his ass. All because he was raised by a pro politician that has played the system his entire adult life while accomplishing little outside of using his smile and maneuvering to gain and hold high office.

Hunter gained a board spot based on one thing, the old man's abuse of power and actually holding up US aid to the Ukraine to get that spot and the kick backs it held.

Pretty damned obvious this sham is trying the wrong person in the whole of the debacle.....The real crook is Biden and the media ignores the fact

 

[regor]

How Hunter Biden could be a credible witness to anything is beyond me. His track record shows him as a drug addled liar that is all about himself. He's currently close to being held in contempt over supplying financial info in a child support claim. He's living high in HW with another pregnant womean by his side after failing with a couple others.

He's grown to feel he's privileged and above the law. He gives all indications he knows neither the difference between right and wrong, much less truth and lying to cover his ass. All because he was raised by a pro politician that has played the system his entire adult life while accomplishing little outside of using his smile and maneuvering to gain and hold high office.

Hunter gained a board spot based on one thing, the old man's abuse of power and actually holding up US aid to the Ukraine to get that spot and the kick backs it held.

Pretty damned obvious this sham is trying the wrong person in the whole of the debacle.....The real crook is Biden and the media ignores the fact

It starts with the crack head and then the pedophile.

 

[regor]

I agree! It’s your party and Trump that is stonewalling and trying to hide shit.

John Bolton Took Six Figures From Ukrainian Oligarch Clinton Foundation Donor
Quid Pro Quo?

by Patrick Howley
January 28, 2020

0



A financial disclosure shows that Bolton accepted $115,000 from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation for a pair of speeches in September 2017 and February 2018.

At the former speech in Kiev, Bolton sat on a panel and basically expressed that the national security establishment would not allow Trump to become unconventional on policy, stating, “The notion that [Trump’s presidency] is going to represent a dramatic break in foreign policy is just wrong. Calm down, for God’s sake.”

As the Washington Post noted, Pinchuk has exceeded $10 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.


Why are ALL your star witnesses crooks?

Donnie's playing you fools like a fiddle!!!!!!

 

[FreeBird236]

I think joe's the ringleader and he's hooked up the damn family.

 

[RVR SWPR]

Wednesday 1/29/20
SCHIFF responses to Questions today.

 

[regor]

Whoopsie Daisy.....................

 

[530RL]

Trump says the book is all lies, yet the NSC says it is Top Secret?

It would appear the NSC just confirmed Bolton is telling the truth.

 

[regor]

Trump says the book is all lies, yet the NSC says it is Top Secret?

It would appear the NSC just confirmed Bolton is telling the truth.

Yet never mentioned a word about it to anyone and even if he did, it doesn't matter.....................

Quite the conundrum for you globalists.

 

[brgrcru]

fucking a clown show.
how they have dragged this country into the biggest sham ever, I have no idea. those clowns and there followers on the left, should be proud. what a bunch of fucking idiots.

 

[t&y]

Trump says the book is all lies, yet the NSC says it is Top Secret?

It would appear the NSC just confirmed Bolton is telling the truth.

Does the director of records verify information, or just deem whatever they are reading as potentially classified or not?

 

[SBMech]

Does the director of records verify information, or just deem whatever they are reading as potentially classified or not?

I would imagine that they themselves would need top level clearance to even determine what that was, I would guess that they read it and generalize it to fit in the "top secret" box?

Sounds like to me either way someone is singing about top secret level information...whom ever is involved is sure to be on a short list for some serious talks....

Well...that would depend on if our security agencies are actually secure at this point and not full of traitors and lying two faced whores.

What a twisted web one weaves, when one practices to deceive.

 

[530RL]

Does the director of records verify information, or just deem whatever they are reading as potentially classified or not?

If everything in the book is as Trump said a lie, how could any of it possibly be classified?

How do you classify a lie? What is the protocol for classifying lies? Do we have Top Secret classified facts and Too Secret classified lies?

 

[t&y]

If everything in the book is as Trump said a lie, how could any of it possibly be classified?

How do you classify a lie? What is the protocol for classifying lies? Do we have Top Secret classified facts and Too Secret classified lies?

Nice try. You suggest they know factual things. I am asking you for clarification. Is it there job to verify information, or see if anything pertained in the writings could potentially be classified?

You and I both know the answer, and you and I both know why you don't want to answer it.

 

[SNiC Jet]

You and I both know the answer, and you and I both know why you don't want to answer it.

 

[530RL]

Nice try. You suggest they know factual things. I am asking you for clarification. Is it there job to verify information, or see if anything pertained in the writings could potentially be classified?

You and I both know the answer, and you and I both know why you don't want to answer it.

Ummmmmm, wow.

So the human mustache writes for example Trump met with Putin and said X.

Trump says that is a lie.

And so they classify it as Top Secret?

Im starting to understand how OJ was found not guilty.

 

[SNiC Jet]

Ummmmmm, wow.

So the human mustache writes for example Trump met with Putin and said X.

Trump says that is a lie.

And so they classify it as Top Secret?

Im starting to understand how OJ was found not guilty.

WOW!!!
I never knew they could be this large...

 

[t&y]

Ummmmmm, wow.

So the human mustache writes for example Trump met with Putin and said X.

Trump says that is a lie.

And so they classify it as Top Secret?

Im starting to understand how OJ was found not guilty.

The first one was a nice try, this is desperation.

I'll ask again. Is it there job to verify information, or see if anything pertained in the writings could potentially be classified?

Are you suggesting he should be the new star witness for the Libturds?

 

[530RL]

WOW!!!
I never knew they could be this large...

Here is another pretzel for you.

John Bolton is a Yale educated attorney and a long time inside operator in the Federal Government. A pro who knows all the angles.

His attorney Charles Cooper is a former Supreme Court clerk, has argued multiple cases in front of the Supreme Court and is probably one of the best attorney’s in these matters in the United States.

Both of them know for sure what is classified and what is not. Both of them know that releasing or abetting the release of classified material is a felony and so my money is on those two with respect to whether or not the manuscript/book meets the legal requirements of protecting classified material.

Therefore it is logical to assume Trump and his NSC might be a wee bit worried about both i) revelations of fact in the manuscript/book and ii) that such revelations will be both factual and harmful.

So they resort to the contradictory strategies of it is a lie, and they are “classified lies” because the truth has not historically been President Trump’s friend.

 

[SNiC Jet]

Here is another pretzel for you.

Sorry,

 

[530RL]

Sorry,

Yes I understand you are full, but it ain’t pretzels.............

 

[t&y]

Here is another pretzel for you.

John Bolton is a Yale educated attorney and a long time inside operator in the Federal Government. A pro who knows all the angles.

His attorney Charles Cooper is a former Supreme Court clerk, has argued multiple cases in front of the Supreme Court and is probably one of the best attorney’s in these matters in the United States.

Both of them know for sure what is classified and what is not. Both of them know that releasing or abetting the release of classified material is a felony and so my money is on those two with respect to whether or not the manuscript/book meets the legal requirements of protecting classified material.

Therefore it is logical to assume Trump and his NSC might be a wee bit worried about both i) revelations of fact in the manuscript/book and ii) that such revelations will be both factual and harmful.

So they resort to the contradictory strategies of it is a lie, and they are “classified lies” because the truth has not historically been President Trump’s friend.

That's interesting.

So is the Senor Director for Records, Access, and Information Security Management responsible for verifying information, or do they just see if anything pertained in the writings could potentially be classified?

 

[SNiC Jet]

Yes I understand you are full, but it ain’t pretzels.............

 

[530RL]

That's interesting.

So is the Senor Director for Records, Access, and Information Security Management responsible for verifying information, or do they just see if anything pertained in the writings could potentially be classified?

I have no idea.

But I’d bet that both Bolton and Cooper knew long before the manuscript/book was ever written or submitted for review.

They are really smart people who know the system inside and out. They are not wasting their time on some frivolous attempt to raise something up the flagpole to see if it works or not.

Bolton and Cooper are playing Trump like a fiddle right now. We will see if it really matters other than to sell some more books.

 

[530RL]

Snip......Gibberish.....Snip

Are you suggesting he should be the new star witness for the Libturds?

When you say libturds, are you talking the socialist Warren Sanders libturds or the socialist tax and spend, pro deficit, pro debt, anti-capitalism and anti-free market Trumpkin libturds?

It’s hard to tell the difference any more.......

 

[t&y]

You have no idea. I see. Well then why the need for the bullshit below?

Trump says the book is all lies, yet the NSC says it is Top Secret?

It would appear the NSC just confirmed Bolton is telling the truth.

You infer that NSC has some relevant ruling on whether what is being stated in the writings are factually accurate. Then when call to the carpet on it you deflect. Why not just admit you don't know, and were just being the usual smartass that we all play at times down here in the dungeon.

 

[530RL]

You have no idea. I see. Well then why the need for the bullshit below?



You infer that NSC has some relevant ruling on whether what is being stated in the writings are factually accurate. Then when call to the carpet on it you deflect. Why not just admit you don't know, and were just being the usual smartass that we all play at times down here in the dungeon.

So you believe that something that has been deemed by the POTUS to be totally made up, a fabrication, a total lie and in no way shape or form a fact or have a basis in reality, can be a matter of national security and classified?

Seems pretty much common sense to me that something that has no basis in fact, and has been affirmatively stated to be non-factual by the POTUS himself can actually be of national security and classified?

The President’s own assertion that all of it is entirely baseless makes it by definition not of national security.


Explain to me in simple terms how something that has been deemed by the POTUS himself as fake, can be classified? What is the basis that makes it Top Secret or classified? It has been deemed fake by the POTUS himself!

 

[t&y]

So you believe that something that has been deemed by the POTUS to be totally made up, a fabrication, a total lie and in no way shape or form a fact or have a basis in reality, can be a matter of national security and classified?

Seems pretty much common sense to me that something that has no basis in fact, and has been affirmatively stated to be non-factual by the POTUS himself can actually be of national security and classified?

The President’s own assertion that all of it is entirely baseless makes it by definition not of national security.

I believe that words submitted pertaining to an alleged incident/conversation/act...etc can be a matter of national security and classified. The fact basis behind the words at the time of print is irrelevant.

 

[Grandpa mac]

When you say libturds, are you talking the socialist Warren Sanders libturds or the socialist tax and spend, pro deficit, pro debt, anti-capitalism and anti-free market Trumpkin libturds?

It’s hard to tell the difference any more.......

Okay, now you’re going too far. I’m not so far left as Warren but grouping me anywhere close to Trump makes my asshole pucker.

 

[Grandpa mac]

So you believe that something that has been deemed by the POTUS to be totally made up, a fabrication, a total lie and in no way shape or form a fact or have a basis in reality, can be a matter of national security and classified?

Seems pretty much common sense to me that something that has no basis in fact, and has been affirmatively stated to be non-factual by the POTUS himself can actually be of national security and classified?

The President’s own assertion that all of it is entirely baseless makes it by definition not of national security.


Explain to me in simple terms how something that has been deemed by the POTUS himself as fake, can be classified? What is the basis that makes it Top Secret or classified? It has been deemed fake by the POTUS himself!

You know the answer, 530. Trump is lying about the conversation which is how he routinely attempts to have his cake and eat it too.

 

[Grandpa mac]

I believe that words submitted pertaining to an alleged incident/conversation/act...etc can be a matter of national security and classified. The fact basis behind the words at the time of print is irrelevant.

There’s a pretzel! Who’s lying? Trump or Bolton? I’m sure even you will admit Trump lies routinely, but I can’t recall anyone ever alleging that Bolton is a liar until this week.

 

[t&y]

There’s a pretzel! Who’s lying? Trump or Bolton? I’m sure even you will admit Trump lies routinely, but I can’t recall anyone ever alleging that Bolton is a liar until this week.

No pretzel at all. So let me ask you. Are you as certain Trump is lying here, as your were certain that he colluded with Russia?

 

[t&y]

The Democrats have not and cannot understand their “Attempted Coop” takes up only a small segment of Trump Day.The expected “Trump will barracade himself into the WH” did not come about.Trump once again has outworked the Democrats.

Lol Don't let the actual work he is doing get in the way of a good story. hahahahaha

 

[RVR SWPR]

The Democrats have not and cannot understand their “Attempted Coup” takes up only a small segment of Trump Day.The expected “Trump will barracade himself into the WH” did not come about.Trump once again has outworked the Democrats.

 

[530RL]

The Democrats have not and cannot understand their “Attempted Coop” takes up only a small segment of Trump Day.The expected “Trump will barracade himself into the WH” did not come about.Trump once again has outworked the Democrats.

Fuck me. I’m arguing with people who think there is a “coop”.

 

[RVR SWPR]

 

[RVR SWPR]

Fuck me. I’m arguing with people who think there is a “coop”.

Lol,Thanks,these old fingers should not be typing on
iphone.I’m honored you read the post because you know the actual point is correct

 

[530RL]

I believe that words submitted pertaining to an alleged incident/conversation/act...etc can be a matter of national security and classified. The fact basis behind the words at the time of print is irrelevant.

Fair enough.

I was just pointing out that the POTUS has stated that the alleged incident/conversation/act never happened, is totally fabricated and made up.

So common sense tells me there is no national security basis for something the POTUS himself has stated is completely baseless in its entirety.

Unless of course it is not baseless?

 

[Grandpa mac]

No pretzel at all. So let me ask you. Are you as certain Trump is lying here, as your were certain that he colluded with Russia?

Yes.

 

[RVR SWPR]

RASMUSSEN
Wednesday, January 29, 2020
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 49% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance.

 

[RVR SWPR]

WEDNESDAY 1/29/20
General Michael Flynn

“I did not lie to them."
“With those words in a declaration and supplemental motion filed Wednesday, former national security adviser Michael Flynn formally asked a federal judge for permission to withdraw his guilty plea for making false statements to two FBI agents in the White House back on Jan. 24, 2017.”

“In a sweeping argument that took aim at the bureau's "outrageous" conduct, Flynn's legal team highlighted a slew of information that has come to light since Flynn's plea -- including that no precise record of Flynn's statements to the agents exists and that the original handwritten FD-302 witness report from the interview is "missing," with subsequent versions later "edited" in some undisclosed manner by anti-Trump FBI officials”

 

[regor]

So you believe that something that has been deemed by the POTUS to be totally made up, a fabrication, a total lie and in no way shape or form a fact or have a basis in reality, can be a matter of national security and classified?

Seems pretty much common sense to me that something that has no basis in fact, and has been affirmatively stated to be non-factual by the POTUS himself can actually be of national security and classified?

The President’s own assertion that all of it is entirely baseless makes it by definition not of national security.


Explain to me in simple terms how something that has been deemed by the POTUS himself as fake, can be classified? What is the basis that makes it Top Secret or classified? It has been deemed fake by the POTUS himself!

Is it Brexit or the signing of the USMCA that caused this TDS flare up?

 

[regor]

There’s a pretzel! Who’s lying? Trump or Bolton? I’m sure even you will admit Trump lies routinely, but I can’t recall anyone ever alleging that Bolton is a liar until this week.

You’re too easy monkey!!!!!

 

[RVR SWPR]

Bolton will be sitting in the Senate Gallery tomorrow with Parnas.
NEXT