Former President Donald Trump indicted!

[regor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673436267634388992

 

[530RL]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673487276708331521

 

[Sandlord]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673487276708331521

No video and no document found in the raid.
so they resort to an illegal leak for the purpose of persecution from the public.

 

[Sandlord]

 

[530RL]

No video and no document found in the raid.
so they resort to an illegal leak for the purpose of persecution from the public.

I was wondering why you believe it is an illegal leak?

 

[regor]

I was wondering why you believe it is an illegal leak?

Dance boy, DANCE!!!!!!

Here's Why Jack Smith Leaked Audio of Trump Talking to CNN - It's the Opposite of CNN's Claimed Pearl Clutching... - The Last Refuge

This stuff is really so silly, and lawfare is so entirely predictable, it is difficult for me to remain serious when discussing it. This is also why serious litigation expert Eric Dublier was so funny in his Concord case briefings against the DOJ and their insufferable Lawfare efforts. CNN gets...

theconservativetreehouse.com

Despite the grand pontifications and breathless pearl-clutching by the CNN narrative engineers, the audio will NEVER be used at trial – if there is even a trial – which is highly unlikely, because it cannot be admitted into evidence. That’s why Jack Smith gave it to them. The audio is useless, except for the value in promoting the lawfare narrative engineering effort.

Why? Because the documents that are claimed to be heard in the audio are nowhere to be found. That’s right, the DOJ and FBI never found any “classified” or “super-secret” documents as described in the audio. As a result, the audio represents nothing, a literal nothingburger, because without the documents the audio is inadmissible.

You cannot submit evidence in court of a person talking about documents without the documents the audio is supposedly talking about. Can you see the issue now? As a result, the audio is nothing more than President Trump talking about something the prosecution cannot identify or prove. It’s inadmissible, hence no value, hence the leak.

 

[Sandlord]

I was wondering why you believe it is an illegal leak?

I heard Alan Dershowitz, Gregg Jarrett, and Jim Jordon all say that leaking Grand Jury evidence during an ongoing investigation is likely illegal. So I guess they are at least as smart as a catturd.

 

[94Nautique]

I was wondering why you believe it is an illegal leak?

Uh, any leak is illegal?

Do you even breath air now adays?

 

[530RL]

I heard Alan Dershowitz, Gregg Jarrett, and Jim Jordon all say that leaking Grand Jury evidence during an ongoing investigation is likely illegal. So I guess they are at least as smart as a catturd.

I completely agree that anyone associated with the prosecution or a member of the Grand Jury leaking such evidence is illegal, I was wondering what is the evidence that this was leaked by the prosecution or one associated with the Grand Jury when the natural source of this tape would be the one who recorded it or anyone who had access to that recording as it was a year old. Any of those individuals would be perfectly free to disseminate it.


https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-h...ump-leaked-classified-documents-audio-1809382

 

[retaocleg]

when i heard about the gag order, i knew it was only for trump, and was directed to trump.......tie his hands as the other side would leak, with him not able to respond about evidence.......lawfare is real, especially when one side has unlimited funds

Judge orders Trump lawyers not to disclose evidence in documents case

Motion was filed by prosecutors to restrict storage and use of discovery material turned over to defense in classified papers case

www.theguardian.com

 

[Sandlord]

Trump aide Margo Martin, who taped the conversation at Bedminster in July 2021, told lawyers she testified that she did not recall Trump showing off any documents to participants.

lol, she was the one that made the recording, and she did not see any Iran attack plans. And she told the investigators that.
But they got a search warrant anyway, and proved her right. There was no document found.

 

[94Nautique]

Trump aide Margo Martin, who taped the conversation at Bedminster in July 2021, told lawyers she testified that she did not recall Trump showing off any documents to participants.

lol, she was the one that made the recording, and she did not see any Iran attack plans. And she told the investigators that.
But they got a search warrant anyway, and proved her right. There was no document found.

Democrats never let facts and morals get in the way of fucking things up.

 

[Wedgy]

I completely agree that anyone associated with the prosecution or a member of the Grand Jury leaking such evidence is illegal, I was wondering what is the evidence that this was leaked by the prosecution or one associated with the Grand Jury when the natural source of this tape would be the one who recorded it or anyone who had access to that recording as it was a year old. Any of those individuals would be perfectly free to disseminate it.


https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-h...ump-leaked-classified-documents-audio-1809382

Dude? Step away from the Acyclovir. It's not helping...

 

[Orange Juice]

No video and no document found in the raid.
so they resort to an illegal leak for the purpose of persecution from the public.

They got a witness….

MSN

“
Speaking with host Michael Steele, attorney Alyse Adamson claimed the audio recording of Trump and aide Susie Wiles talking and laughing about the documents is helpful, but her testimony under oath likely will lead to more serious charges against the former president.

"How much damage could she cause Trump in his defense?" host Steele asked.

"I think it's very interesting," she replied. "I think it means it is ongoing and again, other charges are imminent."

 

[Orange Juice]

Dude? Step away from the Acyclovir. It's not helping...

It’s all fair game, when Trump can’t shut up. Looks like he’s been lying…..but now they have proof. More charges coming….wouldn’t be surprised if he’s arrested “again” on the Fourth of July, after he give a speech.

He just might be the first former Republican president to go to jail.

Fuck Trump!

 

[Wedgy]

It’s all fair game, when Trump can’t shut up. Looks like he’s been lying…..but now they have proof. More charges coming….wouldn’t be surprised if he’s arrested “again” on the Fourth of July, after he give a speech.

He just might be the first former Republican president to go to jail.

Fuck Trump!

Park the Bronco there OJ, let Sammy up for air! you're starting to swerve!

 

[530RL]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.76.0.pdf

 

[Wedgy]

Dude. Where do you think the Jihadishady lawyers work? You need glasses....

 

[SNiC Jet]

 

[530RL]

Donald Trump's New York hush-money trial will begin in 39 days with jury selection, a judge says

Donald Trump’s hush-money trial will go ahead as scheduled with jury selection starting on March 25, a judge ruled Thursday, turning aside requests for a delay from the former president's defense lawyers. In leaving the trial date intact, Judge Juan Manuel Merchan took advantage of a delay in a...

news.yahoo.com