The objective fact remains he was set up by the FBI. SET UP BY THE FBI. THE GOVT OF THE USA SET UP A CITIZEN. That is a fact. Everything that happens AFTER THAT ILLEGAL ENTRAPMENT and SET UP is irrelevant.
Hahahahahahahahahaha this is the level of pedantry you have devolved to?.... hahahahahahahahahaahahahah I can't even take this seriously.....
Flynn Takes a plea deal after being bankrupted and subsequently having his own son threatened with the same level of inquisition and he is a liar, guilty of perjury.
Top FBI officials and Obama admin people fabricate and falsify information to violate due process procedures, and entrap people in fabricated charges and they are "Doing their jobs"
This is your version of conservatism ahahahahahahahaha
The objective fact that we all see is that this isn't about Flynn, it's about you and you being proved consistantly wrong.
Was Flynn set up and was he put under duress? Anything he does while under duress, during this set up nullifies any agreement he enters into.
The Republican Party left him. So did morals, values and self respect. A lot of things have left him.Hahahahahahahahahaha this is the level of pedantry you have devolved to?.... hahahahahahahahahaahahahah I can't even take this seriously.....
Flynn Takes a plea deal after being bankrupted and subsequently having his own son threatened with the same level of inquisition and he is a liar, guilty of perjury.
Top FBI officials and Obama admin people fabricate and falsify information to violate due process procedures, and entrap people in fabricated charges and they are "Doing their jobs"
This is your version of conservatism ahahahahahahahaha
Who fucking cares dude. You'll never know the real reason and at this point, it doesn't matter.
Shit, you are right. He should have told the VP what to say and do.
What exactly did he do again?
Did you even bother reading the entirety of the transcripts? or are you just opening your mouth for CNN to feed you their interpretation?
You want to talk about precedent? but you ignore excuse the massive 4th ammendmend violations, the flat out lying by the FBI to obtain FISA warrants to spy on political rivals? FBI conspiring to create entrapment schemes? get lost dude, you are a joke.
Naaa... Just want to see you go on record with the above.
Now all we have to do is wait until November. If Trump wins my guess is al this will magically go away as there is nothing to be gained by prosecuting these lying POS FBI agents. If he loses the narrative being driven now will be the basis for the defense.
A police officer pulls a guy over for speeding...
...And has the following exchange:
Officer: May I see your driver's license?
Driver: I don't have one. I had it suspended when I got my 5th DUI.
Officer: May I see the owner's card for this vehicle?
Driver: It's not my car. I stole it.
Officer: The car is stolen?
Driver: That's right. But come to think of it, I think I saw the owner's card in the glove box when I was putting my gun in there.
Officer: There's a gun in the glove box?
Driver: Yes sir. That's where I put it after I shot and killed the woman who owns this car and stuffed her in the trunk.
Officer: There's a BODY in the TRUNK?!?!?
Driver: Yes, sir.
Hearing this, the officer immediately called his captain.
The car was quickly surrounded by police, and the captain approached the driver to handle the tense situation:
Captain: Sir, can I see your license?
Driver: Sure. Here it is.
It was valid.
Captain: Who's car is this?
Driver: It's mine, officer. Here's the owner' card.
The driver owned the car.
Captain: Could you slowly open your glove box so I can see if there's a gun in it?
Driver: Yes, sir, but there's no gun in it.
Sure enough, there was nothing in the glove box.
Captain: Would you mind opening your trunk? I was told you said there's a body in it.
Driver: No problem.
Trunk is opened; no body.
Captain: I don't understand it. The officer who stopped you said you told him you didn't have a license, stole the car, had a gun in the glovebox, and that there was a dead body in the trunk.
Driver: Yeah, I'll bet the liar told you I was speeding, too.
Naaa... Just want to see you go on record with the above.
Now all we have to do is wait until November. If Trump wins my guess is al this will magically go away as there is nothing to be gained by prosecuting these lying POS FBI agents. If he loses the narrative being driven now will be the basis for the defense.
A police officer pulls a guy over for speeding...
...And has the following exchange:
Officer: May I see your driver's license?
Driver: I don't have one. I had it suspended when I got my 5th DUI.
Officer: May I see the owner's card for this vehicle?
Driver: It's not my car. I stole it.
Officer: The car is stolen?
Driver: That's right. But come to think of it, I think I saw the owner's card in the glove box when I was putting my gun in there.
Officer: There's a gun in the glove box?
Driver: Yes sir. That's where I put it after I shot and killed the woman who owns this car and stuffed her in the trunk.
Officer: There's a BODY in the TRUNK?!?!?
Driver: Yes, sir.
Hearing this, the officer immediately called his captain.
The car was quickly surrounded by police, and the captain approached the driver to handle the tense situation:
Captain: Sir, can I see your license?
Driver: Sure. Here it is.
It was valid.
Captain: Who's car is this?
Driver: It's mine, officer. Here's the owner' card.
The driver owned the car.
Captain: Could you slowly open your glove box so I can see if there's a gun in it?
Driver: Yes, sir, but there's no gun in it.
Sure enough, there was nothing in the glove box.
Captain: Would you mind opening your trunk? I was told you said there's a body in it.
Driver: No problem.
Trunk is opened; no body.
Captain: I don't understand it. The officer who stopped you said you told him you didn't have a license, stole the car, had a gun in the glovebox, and that there was a dead body in the trunk.
Driver: Yeah, I'll bet the liar told you I was speeding, too.
There you have it folks, no response just deflection....
So Flynn was speeding?Naaa... Just want to see you go on record with the above.
Now all we have to do is wait until November. If Trump wins my guess is al this will magically go away as there is nothing to be gained by prosecuting these lying POS FBI agents. If he loses the narrative being driven now will be the basis for the defense.
A police officer pulls a guy over for speeding...
...And has the following exchange:
Officer: May I see your driver's license?
Driver: I don't have one. I had it suspended when I got my 5th DUI.
Officer: May I see the owner's card for this vehicle?
Driver: It's not my car. I stole it.
Officer: The car is stolen?
Driver: That's right. But come to think of it, I think I saw the owner's card in the glove box when I was putting my gun in there.
Officer: There's a gun in the glove box?
Driver: Yes sir. That's where I put it after I shot and killed the woman who owns this car and stuffed her in the trunk.
Officer: There's a BODY in the TRUNK?!?!?
Driver: Yes, sir.
Hearing this, the officer immediately called his captain.
The car was quickly surrounded by police, and the captain approached the driver to handle the tense situation:
Captain: Sir, can I see your license?
Driver: Sure. Here it is.
It was valid.
Captain: Who's car is this?
Driver: It's mine, officer. Here's the owner' card.
The driver owned the car.
Captain: Could you slowly open your glove box so I can see if there's a gun in it?
Driver: Yes, sir, but there's no gun in it.
Sure enough, there was nothing in the glove box.
Captain: Would you mind opening your trunk? I was told you said there's a body in it.
Driver: No problem.
Trunk is opened; no body.
Captain: I don't understand it. The officer who stopped you said you told him you didn't have a license, stole the car, had a gun in the glovebox, and that there was a dead body in the trunk.
Driver: Yeah, I'll bet the liar told you I was speeding, too.
thefederalist.com
You're wasting your time man.Flynn Transcripts Confirm Mueller Team Lied To The Court And Country
The newly released transcripts should cause Judge Emmet Sullivan to realize the error of his way and immediately dismiss the charges against Michael Flynn.
...
“The transcripts prove a treasure trove of evidence of the Deep State’s plot to frame Flynn, who pleaded guilty Dec. 1, 2017, to making false statements to FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka during a Jan. 24, 2017 interview of Flynn. In a “Statement of Offense” filed that same day with the D.C. District Court, federal prosecutor and Mueller team member Brandon Van Grack “stipulate[d] and agree[d]” that the facts detailed in the Statement of Offense were “true and accurate.”
Van Grack then attested in the Statement of Offense that Flynn knew that “on or about December 28, 2016, then-President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13757, which was to take effect the following day. The executive order announced sanctions against Russia in response to that government’s action intended to interfere with the 2016 presidential election (‘U.S. Sanctions’).”
...
www.lawfareblog.com
Did he admit that he's 100% political, and the fact that he lawyered up is purely incidental?Something for everyone in this filing.
Judge Sullivan Submits Brief to D.C. Circuit on Flynn Case
And right on que, TDS-30 jumped in with his "this is not the drone you are looking for" attempted jedi trick.You're wasting your time man.
Dude is such an insufferable prick and so ate the fuck up with TDS-10²⁷, it could all be on video or him witnessing it go down in person and he'd still deny it.
His absolute contempt for all us trying to reason with him, with FACTS, is and has been on display for all to see.
Fuck this guy. People like him are the reason we are where we are today.
Yeah, imagine my shock....pffft
thefederalist.com
The salient point to numbnuts continued ranting about Flynn “lied” so he must be punished:DOJ's Top Lawyer Unloads On Behavior Of Rogue Judge In Flynn Case
DOJ's top lawyer unloaded on the behavior of the anti-Flynn federal judge who has refused to dismiss the unlawful charges against Michael Flynn.
This pertains directly to your whackerdoodle idea.
He didn't even lie either time
In the original notes, and even subsequent early revisions of the 302s Flynn stated to agents that he "Did not remember" his own words. nearly 1 year later, the FBI hides this Brady material from Flynn's legal team, and says "our agents notes say you lied to them, here is the evidence right here" that evidence being solely the 302s, and corrupt agent's (Strzok) testimony.
At this point it's basically Flynn's word, and memories of:
a) the original call that happened 1 year earlier, and
b) the casual conversation with FBI agents that happened 11 months earlier.
vs the Prosecutions presentation of the 302s that were edited and changed to show Flynn lied,
All of this under duress.
At which point Flynn has no choice.
It's totally obvious that @530RL has not followed the case, or read any of the original documents, or subsequently released ones, and quite frankly doesn't know what he is talking about. Which is typical.
530 is emotionally and egotistically invested in trying to convince himself that he is correct, when in fact he is wrong, on this subject, and many others, but refuses to come to terms with that so constantly is moving the goal posts and restoring to more and more pedant interpretations of events and facts while having no sight left of the original issues.
Well, you might want to convince this former federal judge of your legal theories.........
Maybe an amicus curiae
Ex-judge says push to dismiss Flynn case is abuse of power
A former federal judge appointed to review the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss criminal charges against President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn said there was evidence of a “gross abuse” of prosecutorial power and that the request should be denied. Former...www.yahoo.com
Chopper down. We have a chopper down. Again, and again and again. Seems the cause of crash was TDS-30 in a TDS-10 zone.Well, you might want to convince this former federal judge of your legal theories.........
Maybe an amicus curiae
Ex-judge says push to dismiss Flynn case is abuse of power
A former federal judge appointed to review the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss criminal charges against President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn said there was evidence of a “gross abuse” of prosecutorial power and that the request should be denied. Former...
LOL. Uh, that would be Sullivan willing to risk every shred of common sense, right?
Well, you might want to convince this former federal judge of your legal theories.........
Maybe an amicus curiae
Ex-judge says push to dismiss Flynn case is abuse of power
A former federal judge appointed to review the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss criminal charges against President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn said there was evidence of a “gross abuse” of prosecutorial power and that the request should be denied. Former...
I guess everyone that pleads guilty to a parking ticket in lieu of a speeding ticket is guilty as well... Forget about the circumstance of being under duress, and under poor legal advice, and in the denial of and hiding of exculpatory evidence to your defense when making the plea....
You call yourself a conservative? Just another partisan hack.
Well then, you are going to finally admit TDS level 30 has engulfed you and influenced every action you have made in the last 3.5 years?
