Epstein

[jimsplace]

Slim, you really need to find a way to understand reality. The world you call your place is a far cry from what is actually taking place.

Do you know this fruit loop that desperately made up stories to keep Kav from being sworn in? You may even be kin to her as you both see things that are not real and open up about them publicly

What ever you say 'OL TEX from Michigan.

However, the legal action to protect my property was real, as well as the outcome.
Win - Win for me. That was real.
You want proof? It's all public record filed with the Courts.

I Have to ask why you find my action to protect my property wrong, other than because of your very close and bestie friend, THATGAY, who's full of shit?
Why do you think he keeps bringing it up? I didn't bring it up. It's over.
You guys seem to have a strangely close relationship. Every time you or he post, you each link a like to the others post. It just seems more frequent than others. I assume you have that special bond. XXX

Try again " 'OL TEX" from Michigan. For real?

 

[Grandpa mac]

You're implying Trump doesn't feel the same way as before with no proof and he isn't picky about his friends. So, what's your proof?
You have none.
Trump isn't concerned who he associates with, if they can benefit him. That's been demonstrated time after time.

What's Kavanaugh got to do with it?
But, Yea, there was certainly a lot of evidence that what he was accused of happened.
The lady was much more credible than Kavanaugh.

We know how he felt about Epstein in the past because he told us. Epstein is a “fun guy who likes really young girls”. Has he repudiated his earlier comments on Epstein or do they stand? Well, he went ahead and hired Acosta two years ago KNOWING that Acosta gave Epstein the lightest sentence I’ve ever heard of for a serial child rapist, so maybe Trump thought Acosta was right to take it easy on fun guy Epstein.

 

[500bbc]

What ever you say 'OL TEX from Michigan.

However, the legal action to protect my property was real, as well as the outcome.
Win - Win for me. That was real.
You want proof? It's all public record filed with the Courts.

I Have to ask why you find my action to protect my property wrong, other than because of your very close and bestie friend, THATGAY, who's full of shit?
Why do you think he keeps bringing it up? I didn't bring it up. It's over.
You guys seem to have a strangely close relationship. Every time you or he post, you each link a like to the others post. It just seems more frequent than others. I assume you have that special bond. XXX

Try again " 'OL TEX" from Michigan. For real?

Who helps you put lipstick and panties on your goats?

Fucking Idiot

 

[500bbc]

We know how he felt about Epstein in the past because he told us. Epstein is a “fun guy who likes really young girls”. Has he repudiated his earlier comments on Epstein or do they stand? Well, he went ahead and hired Acosta two years ago KNOWING that Acosta gave Epstein the lightest sentence I’ve ever heard of for a serial child rapist, so maybe Trump thought Acosta was right to take it easy on fun guy Epstein.

Well you're a fun guy that likes really young boys so who are you to point fingers?

Fucking Idiot

 

[jimsplace]

Ha!
Typical left loon.

Jughead...in THIS country you are innocent until proven guilty.
“Prove he doesn’t still feel the same way”...man, you’ve posted some laughable shit before in between your rants of lunacy, but damn.

Certainly a lot of people on this site think Epstein is guilty.
There appears to be a close connection with Trump and with his words. That's documented with pictures and in print.

I haven't said anyone is guilty. You have an imagination and seem to try to create a lot of drama.
You're certainly not one to be making judgmental calls about anyone with your credibility.

 

[jimsplace]

Well you're a fun guy that likes really young boys so who are you to point fingers?

Fucking Idiot

You have an incredibly foul language problem. Lack of education is usually the reason.
Are you capable of communicating in a normal manner? Sometimes, but every post?

 

[wallnutz]

We know how he felt about Epstein in the past because he told us. Epstein is a “fun guy who likes really young girls”. Has he repudiated his earlier comments on Epstein or do they stand? Well, he went ahead and hired Acosta two years ago KNOWING that Acosta gave Epstein the lightest sentence I’ve ever heard of for a serial child rapist, so maybe Trump thought Acosta was right to take it easy on fun guy Epstein.

Prove he knew what Acosta gave him as a sentence. Then prove if it makes a difference. Also as stated more than once, Trump threw Epstein off of his properties years ago. So try to make your point again with facts not accusations.

 

[Uncle Dave]

Not looking good for Jeffrey.

He gets his day in court, after that we can get a rope - or not.

I understand pedos even less than I understand billionaires raping women when they can get all the pussy they want for free. (Cosby)

UD

 

[was thatguy]

Certainly a lot of people on this site think Epstein is guilty.
There appears to be a close connection with Trump and with his words. That's documented with pictures and in print.

I haven't said anyone is guilty. You have an imagination and seem to try to create a lot of drama.
You're certainly not one to be making judgmental calls about anyone with your credibility.

Liar.
You’ve said I’m guilty of calling you a troll.

My credibility is just fine.
You are the demented liar here.

Hey, you never answered, did you split your shake down cash with your supportive neighbors??

 

[500bbc]

You have an incredibly foul language problem. Lack of education is usually the reason.
Are you capable of communicating in a normal manner? Sometimes, but every post?

View attachment 773014

As stated before I'm merely a student of the habits of the Libturd, language, dress, sexual proclivities likes yours for young girls and the Scoutmasters for young boys.
I'm, as you've so adroitly noted, also a student of your language, all dialects. I choose to speak in your native language to make it easier for you to communicate.

You filthy shit eating, ass felching, snowballing, fucking pedo!


Fucking idiot


All the best!

 

[wallnutz]

As stated before I'm merely a student or the habits of the Libturd, language, dress, sexual proclivities likes yours for young girls and the Scoutmasters for young boys.
I'm, as you've so adroitly noted, a student of you language, all dialects. I choose to speak in your native language to make it easier for you to communicate.

You filthy shit eating, ass felching, snowballing, fucking pedo!


Fucking idiot


All the best!

You are a true wordsmith my friend. I wish I could state it as eloquently as you.

 

[jimsplace]

As stated before I'm merely a student or the habits of the Libturd, language, dress, sexual proclivities likes yours for young girls and the Scoutmasters for young boys.
I'm, as you've so adroitly noted, a student of you language, all dialects. I choose to speak in your native language to make it easier for you to communicate.

You filthy shit eating, ass felching, snowballing, fucking pedo!


Fucking idiot


All the best!

I'm sure your family must be proud of you.
Reminds me of someone who would stand on the bow and proudly piss into the wind.

 

[jimsplace]

Liar.
You’ve said I’m guilty of calling you a troll.

My credibility is just fine.
You are the demented liar here.

Hey, you never answered, did you split your shake down cash with your supportive neighbors??

Whatever you want to think !!!
But, don't think your credibility is just fine.
I'm not the only one who's questioned your character.

You need to get over yourself.

 

[squeezer]

FOR EFFECT

Understand that the following is irony from top to bottom, written to make a point. The writer is Newsweek columnist and University of New Hampshire Law Professor Seth Abramson.

---------------------------------------

Stop putting Trump's name in the same sentence as his friend Epstein's NYC sex trafficking charges

It's not like Trump ran a NYC "modeling agency" featuring girls of unknown age dubiously trafficked from overseas and paid little to no wages at the same time he was an Epstein pal.

Just because it's true doesn't mean we should keep repeating that Donald Trump has been accused of rape (in significant detail) by a 13-year-old, was known to barge into teen girls' dressing rooms at pageants, and has made inappropriate comments to/about underage girls on camera.

I resent the fact that reporters keep mentioning Trump's peculiar ongoing affiliations with pedophiles like Epstein and George Nader when all that does is limit the amount of air-time they have available to note that Trump ultimately endorsed pedophile Roy Moore for the US Senate.

And for that matter, it seems unfair and piling on to at this moment note that there's an ongoing federal investigation into why so many of Trump's pals ended up in pictures with (or on the premises of) a Florida massage parlor owner whose employees appear to have been sex slaves.

And for the life of me I can't figure out why it's relevant that under-indictment sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein said of his friend and fellow child-rape accusee, "I want to set up my [NYC] modeling agency the same way Trump set up his modeling agency"

Candidly, I'd find the idea of a major Trump-Epstein connection more compelling (from an evidentiary standpoint) if someone could show me *any* evidence *whatsoever* that Trump named the prosecutor who signed an illegal non-prosecution deal with Epstein his Secretary of Labor.

 

[regor]

We know how he felt about Epstein in the past because he told us. Epstein is a “fun guy who likes really young girls”. Has he repudiated his earlier comments on Epstein or do they stand? Well, he went ahead and hired Acosta two years ago KNOWING that Acosta gave Epstein the lightest sentence I’ve ever heard of for a serial child rapist, so maybe Trump thought Acosta was right to take it easy on fun guy Epstein.

Certainly a lot of people on this site think Epstein is guilty.
There appears to be a close connection with Trump and with his words. That's documented with pictures and in print.

I haven't said anyone is guilty. You have an imagination and seem to try to create a lot of drama.
You're certainly not one to be making judgmental calls about anyone with your credibility.

FOR EFFECT

Understand that the following is irony from top to bottom, written to make a point. The writer is Newsweek columnist and University of New Hampshire Law Professor Seth Abramson.

---------------------------------------

Stop putting Trump's name in the same sentence as his friend Epstein's NYC sex trafficking charges

It's not like Trump ran a NYC "modeling agency" featuring girls of unknown age dubiously trafficked from overseas and paid little to no wages at the same time he was an Epstein pal.

Just because it's true doesn't mean we should keep repeating that Donald Trump has been accused of rape (in significant detail) by a 13-year-old, was known to barge into teen girls' dressing rooms at pageants, and has made inappropriate comments to/about underage girls on camera.

I resent the fact that reporters keep mentioning Trump's peculiar ongoing affiliations with pedophiles like Epstein and George Nader when all that does is limit the amount of air-time they have available to note that Trump ultimately endorsed pedophile Roy Moore for the US Senate.

And for that matter, it seems unfair and piling on to at this moment note that there's an ongoing federal investigation into why so many of Trump's pals ended up in pictures with (or on the premises of) a Florida massage parlor owner whose employees appear to have been sex slaves.

And for the life of me I can't figure out why it's relevant that under-indictment sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein said of his friend and fellow child-rape accusee, "I want to set up my [NYC] modeling agency the same way Trump set up his modeling agency"

Candidly, I'd find the idea of a major Trump-Epstein connection more compelling (from an evidentiary standpoint) if someone could show me *any* evidence *whatsoever* that Trump named the prosecutor who signed an illegal non-prosecution deal with Epstein his Secretary of Labor.

Quick question for you three.

Why wasn't there a focus in the two nights of your parties debate about Russian hacking or Russia/Trump collusion?

 

[squeezer]

Quick question for you three.

Why wasn't there a focus in the two nights of your parties debate about Russian hacking or Russia/Trump collusion?

Because neither of those topics are relevant to who will be the best pick for the next president...

 

[rrrr]

There are a lot of funny, funny guys here.
Are you really saying Trump hasn't been accused of anything?
---- REALLY?

rrrr, Your credibility has been established! XXX

Try to keep up, dumbass. A poster above implied Trump was being accused of committing crimes with Epstein. That is false.

My post said:

Trump isn't anywhere near a "close friend", and he certainly hasn't been accused of anything.

This statement referred specifically to interaction between Epstein and Trump, and it is factually accurate.

It's also a fact you are a clueless fucktard.

 

[regor]

Because neither of those topics are relevant to who will be the best pick for the next president...

2.5 years of hysterics and non-stop stories and "Russia" election meddling/collusion is not relevant......................

Epstein's the same thing dope AND will bite your dumb asses like your Russia nonsense.

 

[Sandlord]

 

[jimsplace]

Try to keep up, dumbass. A poster above implied Trump was being accused of committing crimes with Epstein. That is false.

My post said:

Trump isn't anywhere near a "close friend", and he certainly hasn't been accused of anything.

This statement referred specifically to interaction between Epstein and Trump, and it is factually accurate.

It's also a fact you are a clueless fucktard.

You said Trump wasn't accused of anything !!!
---- Yes, or no? So, who is the, "Clueless fucktard?"

When you can't make an accurate statement, don't blame the other person.

 

[jimsplace]

So yer saying they have picture of the Scoutmaster and Pyscho Jim?

I'm shocked!

Is that what was said?
---- The fact you never get anything correct is no surprise to anyone.



500BBC fondest memories

 

[regor]

Imagine what we can get from the rest of the sick bastards?

 

[boatdoc55]

Ha!
Typical left loon.

Jughead...in THIS country you are innocent until proven guilty.
“Prove he doesn’t still feel the same way”...man, you’ve posted some laughable shit before in between your rants of lunacy, but damn.

Hey Tommy, are you responsible for bringing this DIPSHIT into our world, here on RDP???

 

[boatdoc55]

I'm sure your family must be proud of you.
Reminds me of someone who would stand on the bow and proudly piss into the wind.

Hey NOW, leave GRADS out of this!!!!

 

[500bbc]

Is that what was said?
---- The fact you never get anything correct is no surprise to anyone.



500BBC fondest memories

View attachment 773113

More kiddie fantasies I see.
Fucking Idiot

 

[500bbc]

Because neither of those topics are relevant to who will be the best pick for the next president...

Russia Russia Russia!

Fucking Idiot

 

[wallnutz]

Because neither of those topics are relevant to who will be the best pick for the next president...

Really, all of them are pro impeachment. How is it not relevant?

 

[squeezer]

Really, all of them are pro impeachment. How is it not relevant?

Because its not the job of a presidential primary field to impeach a sitting president.

Further, if all are pro impeachment how is that topic relevant in choosing a candidate? There is no differentiation between them so no debate time is required.

 

[Andy B.]

Saldwell is out one down 20 to go....

 

[regor]

Because its not the job of a presidential primary field to impeach a sitting president.

Further, if all are pro impeachment how is that topic relevant in choosing a candidate? There is no differentiation between them so no debate time is required.

 

[MSum661]

Ready for a good laugh out loud........https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bi...rible-crimes-former-presidents-spokesman-says

 

[regor]

Ready for a good laugh out loud........https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bi...rible-crimes-former-presidents-spokesman-says

 

[regor]

 

[wallnutz]

Because its not the job of a presidential primary field to impeach a sitting president.

Further, if all are pro impeachment how is that topic relevant in choosing a candidate? There is no differentiation between them so no debate time is required.

Yes it is when half of them hold an office seat that is actively trying to impeach him. How is that not relevant? It makes a big difference in picking a candidate, more than half of America is against impeachment.

 

[ChumpChange]

Google it yourself. I posted the article from 2002 as well as the quote where Trump talks admiringly of Epstein and his affinity for young girls. Acosta (picked by Trump for Secretary of Labor) was the US Attorney under Bush who give Epstein his deal in Florida. It’s all a few mouse clicks away if you’re willing to look at anything Hannity isn’t tube feeding you.

Would you say that the excerpt from your 2002 article would be superseded by Trump's comments in 2015 when he said "Nice guy -- uh, got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion, with the famous island, with Jeffrey Epstein," referring to Clinton's connections with Epstein. "A lot of problems." Seems he saw who this Epstein guy really was.

 

[jimsplace]

Liar.
You’ve said I’m guilty of calling you a troll.

My credibility is just fine.
You are the demented liar here.

Hey, you never answered, did you split your shake down cash with your supportive neighbors??

Where did I say you were guilty?

 

[HotRod82]

Not looking good for Jeffrey.

He gets his day in court, after that we can get a rope - or not.

I understand pedos even less than I understand billionaires raping women when they can get all the pussy they want for free. (Cosby)

UD

No shit......I'll never understand how or why 18 isn't young enough. I really don't get it. If you're a billionaire and can't get laid you seriously have no game.

 

[squeezer]

Yes it is when half of them hold an office seat that is actively trying to impeach him. How is that not relevant? It makes a big difference in picking a candidate, more than half of America is against impeachment.

Yet again I ask, if all of them favor impeachment how is this a factor in determining which one is best suited to become the next president?

 

[Andy B.]

Yet again I ask, if all of them favor impeachment how is this a factor in determining which one is best suited to become the next president?

Non of the 19 left are suited to keep the country going in the right direction.

 

[Uncle Dave]

No shit......I'll never understand how or why 18 isn't young enough. I really don't get it. If you're a billionaire and can't get laid you seriously have no game.

I know - It just boggles the mind....

On top of being (allegedly) a pedo - he's as you said - a billionaire with no game, and surprisingly stupid for a billionaire.

He could easily afford places where the age of consent is low like Nigeria (11) The Philippines (12) and or Tokyo (13).

He could have lived his life remotely and be a predator within these bounds.

If guilty - At some point he had to know this was going to bring him down yet he kept it up.



UD

 

[wallnutz]

Yet again I ask, if all of them favor impeachment how is this a factor in determining which one is best suited to become the next president?

Read my last sentence. Makes a big difference, if you can’t see it don’t know what to tell ya.

 

[LargeOrangeFont]

I know - It just boggles the mind....

On top of being (allegedly) a pedo - he's as you said - a billionaire with no game, and surprisingly stupid for a billionaire.

He could easily afford places where the age of consent is low like Nigeria (11) The Philippines (12) and or Tokyo (13).

He could have lived his life remotely and be a predator within these bounds.

If guilty - At some point he had to know this was going to bring him down yet he kept it up.



UD

I think when you have that kind of money you simply get bored. Why would you waste your time if anyone tells you no. You are caught up in your own ego and have enough money to do whatever you want, however you want to do it. So he did what he wanted for literally decades it seems.

 

[Sandlord]

 

[was thatguy]

Whatever you want to think !!!
But, don't think your credibility is just fine.
I'm not the only one who's questioned your character.

You need to get over yourself.

And neither of you can show me what the hell either of you have accused me of.
Yeah...I’m ok Jughead.

 

[regor]

 

[regor]

 

[regor]

 

[Nokomis]

When it comes to this kind of shit I give zero fucks if you are a Dem or Rep, you gotta hang.

 

[Sandlord]

View attachment 773167


View attachment 773170

LOL slick Willie,

I never flew on his plane,
I never went to his Island,
and I never had sexual relations with those children.

yeah, right.

 

[jimsplace]

And neither of you can show me what the hell either of you have accused me of.
Yeah...I’m ok Jughead.

Just the two of us? Ha-Ha. What about the others?
You can be such a funny dude, or dudette, depending on the day and time.
If you yell it loud enough and long enough, does that really make it true in your mind? It shouldn't.

No, you are not Ok.
Over and over, You keep bringing up a legally resolved issue from 10 years ago. One that you know next to nothing about and weren't involved.
You just keep lying, and lying and fabricating stories that aren't true.
You're not Ok.
I know you've had some personal problems, but I'm tired of your shit and it's time to stop.

What do you have against people protecting their neighborhood or protecting their own homes? I've never understood what the problem is.
Even Rex Tillerson, the Chairman of Mobil Oil Company and Secretary of State, sued a drilling operation to protect his home.
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...x-tillerson-oil-ceo-and-secretary-state-pick/