Looks like a nose gear collapse. Probably a lot to learn from that incident.He could of saved it
about 101.3 millionWonder how much that just cost us lol
So many issues with the swiss army knives of planes. They should have stuck with the F22.
Nose gear collapsed after he taco'd it.Looks like a nose gear collapse. Probably a lot to learn from that incident.
He’ll be on a book tour “ first to eject from an F-35B”Nose gear collapsed after he taco'd it.
Plane came to rest pretty quick after he bailed out--definitely some pilot error IMO.
But glad he is ok.
Sorry but he'll be "flying a cargo plane full of rubber dog shit out of Hong Kong" now.
If the f35 stays in the air.Has anyone here dissing these birds even sat in one? Better question, have you flipped down the visor screen and had a look? Yes an f-16 will out fly a f-35 no questions asked thats simple. However an f-35 will pluck it outta the air before the 16 knows what's up.
Has anyone here dissing these birds even sat in one? Better question, have you flipped down the visor screen and had a look? Yes an f-16 will out fly a f-35 no questions asked thats simple. However an f-35 will pluck it outta the air before the 16 knows what's up.
What rocket would the sub deploy if lets say their over lake vivi?So can a drone, or a submarine with a rocket, etc etc.
What rocket would the sub deploy if lets say their over lake vivi?
Floormat got stuck?Did Toyota develop the throttle control??
Didn't you state a submarine though? What other examples do you have to get "assets to get deep strikes" in this scenario?Doesn't have to be a sub, i just gave you an alternative, there are plenty of other assets to get deep strikes....
The issue with the F35 is the cost and trying to fulfill too many roles making too many trade offs and too much complexity. The program has become a joke if you compare where it is now, to what was promised originally.
Didn't you state a submarine though? What other examples do you have to get "assets to get deep strikes" in this scenario?
Reading the second part of your post, I'm not sure you know the technological capabilities of the plane, or systems in place. Why do you believe the program is a joke?
No reason to eject.
But I know shit about this .
Maybe why not .
A drone will not take out a 35 period. What other "existing missles, existing long range stealth bombers, existing conventional bombers" from another country will take out a 35?I stated drones also but you seem to ignore that, on top of existing missles, existing long range stealth bombers, existing conventional bombers.
The program is a joke because it's run on for 25 years before delivering an aircraft and cost more than 1 Trillion dollars, ridiculously behind schedule and ridiculously over budget. It never would have been approved for that cost and timeline. It never would have been approved at half the price and half the timeline.
A drone will not take out a 35 period. What other "existing missles, existing long range stealth bombers, existing conventional bombers" from another country will take out a 35?
I'm not here to agure with you but most people have no clue on the tech this "ridiculously over budget" plane has. How much did the B2 project cost in whole before it took flight? Or B21 if you wana go there. Let's go back to f22, there's a reason why it was superceded so quick.
I said a drone fired rocket or a land/sea rocket could take out an f16, you don't need an f35 to do that. Then you asked about making a deep strike at a lake in central russia, can be done with drones, bombers, sea fired missles etc.
You're such the expert why don't you educate all of us one what a trillion dollars and 25 years got us that can't be done by any other asset in the military l's toolbelt
I stated drones also but you seem to ignore that, on top of existing missles, existing long range stealth bombers, existing conventional bombers.
The program is a joke because it's run on for 25 years before delivering an aircraft and cost more than 1 Trillion dollars, ridiculously behind schedule and ridiculously over budget. It never would have been approved for that cost and timeline. It never would have been approved at half the price and half the timeline.
Winner winner chicken dinner! I'm always up for an educational lesson!.Why do the know it all’s always have to argue with people that we could learn something from and run them off.
Some of you guys literally think you know everything. Maybe take a step back and realize there might be someone here that knows more about a subject than you.
According to @Racey (the liar) how the budget and overspending is a joke on the J-35 platform, it's probably Debo on his stolen bike squeaking outta that cockpit.Mavrick woulda rode outta the cockpit on his motorcycle.
Right here (please read the bold, before name calling 'liar')Yore a liar. Where did you state this? "I said a drone fired rocket or a land/sea rocket could take out an f16, you don't need an f35 to do that." Please advise if you did state that, but pretty sure looking though the post I didn't see that above in these 36 post.
Edit, after this idiotic response no need to further waste time continuing with engagement of subject with you.
My replyHas anyone here dissing these birds even sat in one? Better question, have you flipped down the visor screen and had a look? Yes an f-16 will out fly a f-35 no questions asked thats simple. However an f-35 will pluck it outta the air before the 16 knows what's up.
So can a drone, or a submarine with a rocket, etc etc.
Just to your last bit sir, outdated is a misnomer. Our aircraft go through constant block upgrades to stay relevant. Realistically all we truly need to accomplish, and are doing well at it, is staying ahead of our near peer adversaries.Right here (please read the bold, before name calling 'liar')
My reply
So i don't know what you are talking about at this point. Don't get your panties in a wad....
A trillion dollars, that is 1/30 of the entire national debt, for a single airframe.
Yeah that's a joke as far as I'm concerned. So much waste in that program. Don't take my word for it, i'm just relaying Pierre Sprey, a guy that helped design the F-16 and was even more integral in the design of the A-10, two of the most successful platforms we have.
My beef isn't with pilots.
Like i said, please educate us on what this Trillion dollars has accomplished.... I'm all ears, because as to date nobody has really shown anything mind blowing for a Trillion dollars and 25 years of development that is now mostly outdated as we see the rise of unmanned operations.
I agree with that, but from the time the f35 was incepted, to when it was meant to be delivered, to now when it has actually enterrd operation, we have had the rise of unmanned vehicles that were unimagined in '95, but sae their huge rise in the iraq/afghan theater before the f35 flew, and became a dominant force from that time till now. The f35 will probably be the last manned fighter.Just to your last bit sir, outdated is a misnomer. Our aircraft go through constant block upgrades to stay relevant. Realistically all we truly need to accomplish, and are doing well at it, is staying ahead of our near peer adversaries.
Albeit true during OIF/OEF, our RPA program is shrinking exponentially. Leadership is seeing first hand the value of manned aircraft and the training it takes to operate them in their fullest capacities since the Ukraine/Russia conflict popped off.I agree with that, but from the time the f35 was incepted, to when it was meant to be delivered, to now when it has actually enterrd operation, we have had the rise of unmanned vehicles that were unimagined in '95, but sae their huge rise in the iraq/afghan theater before the f35 flew, and became a dominant force from that time till now. The f35 will probably be the last manned fighter.
If the f35 had of been delivered by it's initial deadline there would have been a fair argument. But 10 years past that deadline into drones it all of a sudden looks like quite a wasted effort for the immense costs.
I mean the SLS rocket that took 10+ years and 25 billion is laughable in it's technology compared to what SpaceX accomplished in the same time frame with far less money. And the F35 program could pay for the SLS program 40 times over
Right here (please read the bold, before name calling 'liar')
My reply
So i don't know what you are talking about at this point. Don't get your panties in a wad....
A trillion dollars, that is 1/30 of the entire national debt, for a single airframe.
Yeah that's a joke as far as I'm concerned. So much waste in that program. Don't take my word for it, i'm just relaying Pierre Sprey, a guy that helped design the F-16 and was even more integral in the design of the A-10, two of the most successful platforms we have.
My beef isn't with pilots.
Like i said, please educate us on what this Trillion dollars has accomplished.... I'm all ears, because as to date nobody has really shown anything mind blowing for a Trillion dollars and 25 years of development that is now mostly outdated as we see the rise of unmanned operations.
This plan is the airforce Bradley tank/armored personnel carrier. To many jobs, to much money, to little ordinance. Good at many things but not great at any one thing.
And ya don't have to be a dick because you believe different.
Not aimed at you racey