Brian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2009
- Messages
- 852
- Reaction score
- 578
You're right, an LS isn't a SBC.Oh well now you want to add “conventional “? Then I guess it’s not.
The same way an LS is not a small block.
You're right, an LS isn't a SBC.Oh well now you want to add “conventional “? Then I guess it’s not.
The same way an LS is not a small block.
If we could only find our way beyond the "What" and be enlightened on the "Why" For the nostalgic value, or to qualify for that particular class, or ? or ?If you can't call it a "heavily modified flat head, with Ardun heads" - What CAN you call it?
Lol
If we could only find our way beyond the "What" and be enlightened on the "Why" For the nostalgic value, or to qualify for that particular class, or ? or ?
I was raised in the world of working on 6 cylinder flathead marine engines and as dad used to say "If you want to water ski next summer, you best get on with lapping those valves son"Its the epitomy of nostolgic flathead technology, but it converts the engine to OHV.
I'm GUESSING purists get upset when these run in a flathead class, even if the class allows for modifications. The whole premise of a flathead is that the valves are in the block, and the head is...well....flat! These change the entire architecture of the engine to an OHV design, leaving only the block and rotating assembly as flathead components.
Sexy as hell though!
View attachment 1417504 View attachment 1417505
this is such a badass car... love the history too.This car has some cool history! View attachment 1414073
View attachment 1414074
View attachment 1414075
Well here’s the deal.Its the epitomy of nostolgic flathead technology, but it converts the engine to OHV.
I'm GUESSING purists get upset when these run in a flathead class, even if the class allows for modifications. The whole premise of a flathead is that the valves are in the block, and the head is...well....flat! These change the entire architecture of the engine to an OHV design, leaving only the block and rotating assembly as flathead components.
Sexy as hell though!
View attachment 1417504 View attachment 1417505
Haha, exactly!Well here’s the deal.
It’s why the class is called XXF/ , and not F/ .
Further explanation would be, you are still limited to the flathead shortcomings. Three main bearings, limited stroke and bore, etc.. Can’t see any reason why 80 year old technology should have to run with a 302 Chevy, or Cleveland 302 ford Unless you just wanted to kill the class. Even though they’re both OHV.
It’s Part of the reason there’s a flathead powered Pinto.
In Land speed racing there is a class for just about anything.
How big is the engine? What type of engine? What type of fuel? What type of body is it going in? Is the body modified? Modified only in front of the firewall? Or modify overall?
That’s why it’s the last form of racing where an amateur can compete.
Does that about cover it?
That’s why this;
View attachment 1418548
Will be running the same weekend as this View attachment 1418549
Next question; “But It’s not really racing…”
Ya they do. Year before there was some serious speed there. 312 Petie and Rick Yacouchi been over 4.Haha, exactly!
I love listening to your group's stories and info when we are camping, the land speed guys have some serious cojones and understanding of physics
I haven't been to Glamis.Wrigley Field, Mt Rushmore, Glamis, Big Helen at Sherries Cherry Patch Ranch,, Bonneville and other places should be on every persons must see list.
In my top 3 all time favorite movies.I really love the movie “The World’s Fastest Indian” when he gets to Bonneville and how the veteran racers took Burt Munro under their wing to get the officials to allow him to race.