WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Biden just pardoned them all

Andy B.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
5,957
Reaction score
8,638
That in itself it is proof of the treasonous activities IMO

Declare them all null and void due to fraud and lack of mental capacities

F it....its war

Again they haven't been charged with a crime how can he pardon them??? WTF the innocent January 6 people need to sue these mother fuckers along with the families that were murdered or injured by the shot!!!
 

DILLIGAF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
19,150
Reaction score
29,190
Again they haven't been charged with a crime how can he pardon them??? WTF the innocent January 6 people need to sue these mother fuckers along with the families that were murdered or injured by the shot!!!
Civil court may be the way to go for them

Fauci and Gen Milley!

Pandemic was a farce

J6 was a farce

The election was treason

ITS ALL FUCKING TRUE!

Conspiracy theorists my ass
 

Sportin' Wood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
2,706
Reaction score
8,110
F it....its war


Simmer down, I think the right is winning battles right now.

This is no surprise, but it pisses me off also. Hopefully there is some clarity about the legality of preemptive pardons.

Fauci is looking over his shoulder every minute of the day and I'm sure this does not make that any less concerning for him.

Hopefully civil court and states launch an effort to bankrupt him. History should place him alongside some of the most evil people.
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
53,344
Reaction score
102,364
IMG_2646.jpeg
 

DILLIGAF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
19,150
Reaction score
29,190
Simmer down, I think the right is winning battles right now.

This is no surprise, but it pisses me off also. Hopefully there is some clarity about the legality of preemptive pardons.

Fauci is looking over his shoulder every minute of the day and I'm sure this does not make that any less concerning for him.

Hopefully civil court and states launch an effort to bankrupt him. History should place him alongside some of the most evil people.
No not a surprise but to actually see it done is not the same as talking about its possibility.

All hands on board for international, state, county and local courts to go after the scum bags criminally and civilly.

F them
 

angiebaby

Mountain Mama
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
4,901
Reaction score
6,994
Apparently Ford gave Nixon a preemptive pardon for any crimes he MAY HAVE committed against these United States. I just found this out this morning and had to look into it. All sources say it. Nixon was never charged.
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
53,344
Reaction score
102,364
And yet we’ve succeeded in almost no corrections.
Epstein’s gone, but that’s really just because he turned into a liability to the club.
Being “right” doesn’t mean a lot if nothing is done about it.
There’s been some movement on some things on that list, but not a lot.
 
Last edited:

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,348
Reaction score
21,673
Apparently Ford gave Nixon a preemptive pardon for any crimes he MAY HAVE committed against these United States. I just found this out this morning and had to look into it. All sources say it. Nixon was never charged.
Article 2 section 2 clause 1

“The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”
 

angiebaby

Mountain Mama
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
4,901
Reaction score
6,994
I'm hopeful that Johnson's interview over the weekend was designed to put into question the legality of his pardons and whether or not he actually had his full capacities when signing these documents. Most of us know he does not have his full capacities and hasn't for some time, but I'm hopeful they will perhaps use that and the WSJ article to undo some of these things. One can hope.
 

angiebaby

Mountain Mama
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
4,901
Reaction score
6,994
Article 2 section 2 clause 1

“The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”

Thanks. I've never read the Constitution before.

The question is not whether or not he has the power to grant pardons. The question is the legality and precedence of granting pardons when a person has not yet been charged with a crime.
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
16,017
Reaction score
28,959
I'm hopeful that Johnson's interview over the weekend was designed to put into question the legality of his pardons and whether or not he actually had his full capacities when signing these documents. Most of us know he does not have his full capacities and hasn't for some time, but I'm hopeful they will perhaps use that and the WSJ article to undo some of these things. One can hope.
We all know Biden couldn't spell "O" with a full box of Cheerios at this point in time. It would be nice to know who is actually coming up with a list of who needs pardons and exactly why.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
44,052
Reaction score
147,427
Those who accepted it IMO are guilty.
I hope Trump has other items he wants to accomplish vs living in the past and trying to right a wrong that occurred years ago.

This is why they ran rough shot over the old establishment R party. That and the fact that it was always a Uni-Party, until Trump woke up the people that couldn't be bothered with following politics.

If you do not prosecute these scumbags for what they've done, they will do it again.

There MUST be consequences for their actions.

The Trump administration can look forward and backwards at the same time.
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
53,344
Reaction score
102,364
Article 2 section 2 clause 1

“The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”
So are you now satisfied that Liz Cheney is guilty??🤷🏼‍♂️
 

DILLIGAF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
19,150
Reaction score
29,190
I'm hopeful that Johnson's interview over the weekend was designed to put into question the legality of his pardons and whether or not he actually had his full capacities when signing these documents. Most of us know he does not have his full capacities and hasn't for some time, but I'm hopeful they will perhaps use that and the WSJ article to undo some of these things. One can hope.
Plus he didnt have to give a deposition earlier because of his mental state

Its clear he isnt aware what he is doing

Let him and all fall that did this treason to our country
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
53,344
Reaction score
102,364
Hard to watch the inauguration proceedings without wondering if the Democreeps just don’t blow it up. Each time Trump is seen exiting the limo is scary time. So much to review and uncover who was really running the White House. FJB.
All I see is a bunch of mother fuckers living off of my sweat.
 

DILLIGAF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
19,150
Reaction score
29,190
Thanks. I've never read the Constitution before.

The question is not whether or not he has the power to grant pardons. The question is the legality and precedence of granting pardons when a person has not yet been charged with a crime.
The Nixon deal was never tested. Hopefully these are

This is way to important to let it slide
 

530RL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
22,348
Reaction score
21,673
Thanks. I've never read the Constitution before.

The question is not whether or not he has the power to grant pardons. The question is the legality and precedence of granting pardons when a person has not yet been charged with a crime.


A preemptive pardon does not preclude an investigation in any manner nor does it preclude a grand jury from indicting a pardoned individual.

If the incoming justice department believes these individuals should be investigated and wish to prioritize those matters, nothing precludes such investigation and/or indictments.

This matter is up to the incoming administration.
 

DILLIGAF

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
19,150
Reaction score
29,190
How great would it be if Trump had those marines take Fuck Face Biden into custody and “briskly” escort him off the property?
I imagined that earlier.

That would be awesome and talk about shock and awe. Oh ya......
 

Racey

Maxwell Smart-Ass
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
22,389
Reaction score
51,006
Apparently Ford gave Nixon a preemptive pardon for any crimes he MAY HAVE committed against these United States. I just found this out this morning and had to look into it. All sources say it. Nixon was never charged.

Yep, preemptive pardons are absolutely allowed.
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
53,344
Reaction score
102,364
Thanks. I've never read the Constitution before.

The question is not whether or not he has the power to grant pardons. The question is the legality and precedence of granting pardons when a person has not yet been charged with a crime.
Nice jab!
 

RiverDave

In it to win it
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
126,546
Reaction score
165,531
While I personally believe they are in fact all guilty.. I don’t necessarily think a pre-emptive pardon makes someone guilty any more than I think pleading the fifth amendment makes someone guilty..

My thought process is it would be used to protect from an incoming administration that wanted vengeance and ironically enough would use the legal system to persecute political opponents.

I don’t believe any of it would be even on the table if the Dems didn’t turn our government and media into a third world country for the last NINE years..

All this shit started about the time Trump started to have a chance at winning the first time.

RD
 

attitude

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2009
Messages
4,206
Reaction score
7,679
Why are we still acting like Biden has the mental capacity to make decisions? The dude is a vegetable, a very highly medicated vegetable but still a vegetable…

It is his “handlers” we should be worried about.
 
Last edited:
Top