Blackmagic94
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2017
- Messages
- 5,378
- Reaction score
- 7,382
You have to ask yourself why someone would by a P80 kit that is not a complete firearm, that must be drilled out, for a cost of roughly $800 retail. A firearm that when complete, is less reliable, less safe , and less accurate. A firearm that attempts to copy a Glock 9mm which in the store can be purchased for about $500. Why someone would purchase an inferior product for $300 more.
I am for the second amendment, but I’m also for the government doing its part to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. They aren’t perfect but they should at least try. The overreach is silly at times, especially in California. They try to enact policies or solutions to problems that don’t exist. Solutions that don’t address the problem. I hate that.
Here, I applaud the ATF for doing its job. Polymer 80 does not pass the common sense test.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why is it less accurate, safe and reliable. That’s a stretch of the imagination. It literally uses Glock oem parts as they interchange so there is no difference. Your cost is also wrong as well. They can be built for around 500 dollars which is the same or less then most glocks oems. You don’t have to be a criminal to own one of these. That it just anti gun people being dramatic about things. You probably think that Randy weaver and the Branch Davidians deserved what the atf and fbi did as well.
free means free. And shall not be infringed goes the sameway. Eat a dick if you can’t understand that.