WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

ATF RAIDS P80

Blackmagic94

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
5,378
Reaction score
7,382
You have to ask yourself why someone would by a P80 kit that is not a complete firearm, that must be drilled out, for a cost of roughly $800 retail. A firearm that when complete, is less reliable, less safe , and less accurate. A firearm that attempts to copy a Glock 9mm which in the store can be purchased for about $500. Why someone would purchase an inferior product for $300 more.

I am for the second amendment, but I’m also for the government doing its part to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. They aren’t perfect but they should at least try. The overreach is silly at times, especially in California. They try to enact policies or solutions to problems that don’t exist. Solutions that don’t address the problem. I hate that.

Here, I applaud the ATF for doing its job. Polymer 80 does not pass the common sense test.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why is it less accurate, safe and reliable. That’s a stretch of the imagination. It literally uses Glock oem parts as they interchange so there is no difference. Your cost is also wrong as well. They can be built for around 500 dollars which is the same or less then most glocks oems. You don’t have to be a criminal to own one of these. That it just anti gun people being dramatic about things. You probably think that Randy weaver and the Branch Davidians deserved what the atf and fbi did as well.


free means free. And shall not be infringed goes the sameway. Eat a dick if you can’t understand that.
 

Sleek-Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,201
Reaction score
16,505
As this is playing out it is kind of obvious what has happened.

P80 got caught speeding. They were selling the BBS kits without first running it past the ATF or if they did the ATF has forgotten about it. Someone at the ATF finally woke up from their nap and went looking. That this all went down after Biden was elected I'll leave to others to discuss.

Lots of rumors out there about raids and such but I haven't seen any concrete evidence that the ATF is breaking down people's doors looking for these things. However, if I had purchased one I'd go ahead and serialize the frame and call it a day. Then it is all legal and shit. I imagine what is going on right now is the list of buyers is getting compared to databases to find the low hanging fruit.
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
Why is it less accurate, safe and reliable. That’s a stretch of the imagination. It literally uses Glock oem parts as they interchange so there is no difference. Your cost is also wrong as well. They can be built for around 500 dollars which is the same or less then most glocks oems. You don’t have to be a criminal to own one of these. That it just anti gun people being dramatic about things. You probably think that Randy weaver and the Branch Davidians deserved what the atf and fbi did as well.


free means free. And shall not be infringed goes the sameway. Eat a dick if you can’t understand that.

Eat a dick? Ok. Grow up. I don’t think it’s a stretch of the imagination to say Glock, which has tested and proven their firearms worldwide, supplying military and just about every law enforcement agency on the planet handguns, is a better manufacturer than someone who is drilling the thing at home. Period.

Of course they are interchangeable because they are copying them. Because it can take a Glock slide or use the same barrel doesn’t make it a Glock.

Show me a $500 kit.

We obviously have a difference in opinion and I don’t care to change yours. Mine is this. I don’t support zero regulation in relation to firearms. Guns should be serialized and registered. I don’t think felons should possess them. Event the second amendment isn’t written to allow carte blanche ownership of everything firearms.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Xtrmwakeboarder

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Messages
5,421
Reaction score
8,974
You have to ask yourself why someone would by a P80 kit that is not a complete firearm, that must be drilled out, for a cost of roughly $800 retail. A firearm that when complete, is less reliable, less safe , and less accurate. A firearm that attempts to copy a Glock 9mm which in the store can be purchased for about $500. Why someone would purchase an inferior product for $300 more.

I am for the second amendment, but I’m also for the government doing its part to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. They aren’t perfect but they should at least try. The overreach is silly at times, especially in California. They try to enact policies or solutions to problems that don’t exist. Solutions that don’t address the problem. I hate that.

Here, I applaud the ATF for doing its job. Polymer 80 does not pass the common sense test.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why do some people customize their own cars? Why do some people do their own remodels? Because they can and want to. This is America.

My buddy is starting a gunsmithing company. This was a perfect project for him. Why buy a factory glock and then replace it with a better trigger, barrel, sights, and then send it out for custom stippling and slide serrations? This is cheaper, he learns how the firearm works, and he gets to spend some of his downtime working on his hobby. Good enough reasons for you?
 

Blackmagic94

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
5,378
Reaction score
7,382
Eat a dick? Ok. Grow up. I don’t think it’s a stretch of the imagination to say Glock, which has tested and proven their firearms worldwide, supplying military and just about every law enforcement agency on the planet handguns, is a better manufacturer than someone who is drilling the thing at home. Period.

Of course they are interchangeable because they are copying them. Because it can take a Glock slide or use the same barrel doesn’t make it a Glock.

Show me a $500 kit.

We obviously have a difference in opinion and I don’t care to change yours. Mine is this. I don’t support zero regulation in relation to firearms. Guns should be serialized and registered. I don’t think felons should possess them. Event the second amendment isn’t written to allow carte blanche ownership of everything firearms.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


you understand a serial number can be assigned to them? Guess you didn’t do your homework. Almost everything you said is a shade of wrong. Ponder that one
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
Why do some people customize their own cars? Why do some people do their own remodels? Because they can and want to. This is America.

My buddy is starting a gunsmithing company. This was a perfect project for him. Why buy a factory glock and then replace it with a better trigger, barrel, sights, and then send it out for custom stippling and slide serrations? This is cheaper, he learns how the firearm works, and he gets to spend some of his downtime working on his hobby. Good enough reasons for you?

But originally when the car was made, it was legally allowed to do so, then sold to the customer, registered annually and driven by person with a drivers license. Customizing firearms is not the issue here.

The difference is your buddy I would assume, is doing things legally. The firearms he is customizing are possessed legally. This company’s business plan is to get someone to purchase an 80 percent firearm under the loophole that they are just parts, then not serialize them and not care who buys them or what they do with them. These kits are made to have unserialized, unregistered guns on the street.

There is not a large market for good people to buy a build your own kit at an increase in cost, or even a compatible cost, for an inferior product. Yeah some might, but not a majority .

So no, not good enough reasons for me. What else you got? I’m going to need more than “because this is America”.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
you understand a serial number can be assigned to them? Guess you didn’t do your homework. Almost everything you said is a shade of wrong. Ponder that one

I know this and the good people will. But others will not. Looking at them closely it shows just a model number and the metal plate underneath the lower where Glock puts their serial number, is just a blank metal plate.

P80 should be ashamed for the amount of illegal guns they put on the street in the US.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
52,915
Reaction score
100,559
But originally when the car was made, it was legally allowed to do so, then sold to the customer, registered annually and driven by person with a drivers license. Customizing firearms is not the issue here.

The difference is your buddy I would assume, is doing things legally. The firearms he is customizing are possessed legally. This company’s business plan is to get someone to purchase an 80 percent firearm under the loophole that they are just parts, then not serialize them and not care who buys them or what they do with them. These kits are made to have unserialized, unregistered guns on the street.

There is not a large market for good people to buy a build your own kit at an increase in cost, or even a compatible cost, for an inferior product. Yeah some might, but not a majority .

So no, not good enough reasons for me. What else you got? I’m going to need more than “because this is America”.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your points have merit...but you do realize that the vast majority of “legally owned” firearms are not registered anywhere, right?
In fact, with certain exceptions like class 3, it is specifically PROHIBITED for a federal registration database to be maintained or assembled.
Your State has its own unconstitutional restrictions that make it easy to fall into a conditioning of acceptance of registration. I lived there almost 20 years and understand.

The federal background check does not specify anything beyond handgun, rifle, or gun part (lowers).

The whole “unregistered guns on the street” argument is strictly a CA and NY mindset.

It’s reason #146 I moved out of Kommiefornistan
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
52,915
Reaction score
100,559
I know this and the good people will. But others will not. Looking at them closely it shows just a model number and the metal plate underneath the lower where Glock puts their serial number, is just a blank metal plate.

P80 should be ashamed for the amount of illegal guns they put on the street in the US.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

“Illegal” says who?
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
Here is some homework







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

LowRiver2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
9,151
Reaction score
16,950
I know this and the good people will. But others will not. Looking at them closely it shows just a model number and the metal plate underneath the lower where Glock puts their serial number, is just a blank metal plate.

P80 should be ashamed for the amount of illegal guns they put on the street in the US.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You sure are talking a lot of “Cop Shit” in this thread....
ATF are Federal Cops

As a result of your posts, I am reaching out to my LA area ATF agents to get their take on P80’s and confiscations in so cal. I’m curious as to what they’ve encountered
 

havasujeeper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
2,738
Reaction score
5,456
What about the thousands of folks who purchased these 80% guns and completed them, when it was perfectly LEGAL to own and purchase?

What about the hundreds of thousands of folks who purchased AR-15's, without the Kamifornia Bullet Button, expandable stock, or attached bi or tripods?

What is legal today, and the government makes illegal tomorrow, are you OK with busting down doors?

Stand by folks. Kamal Toe and Sleepy Joe have more to come.
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
You sure are talking a lot of “Cop Shit” in this thread....
ATF are Federal Cops

As a result of your posts, I am reaching out to my LA area ATF agents to get their take on P80’s and confiscations in so cal. I’m curious as to what they’ve encountered

I’d say you could pull from your own experience but I’m sure it’s been awhile.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
52,915
Reaction score
100,559
Here is some homework







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lol!
If I want to read a bunch of liberal bullshit I’ll just search the WSJ on my own...

Lol, CNN, WSJ, etc...yeah, I wouldn’t call that homework.
Get out of CA more often, it’s great.
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
What about the thousands of folks who purchased these 80% guns and completed them, when it was perfectly LEGAL to own and purchase?

That is a valid point. My view is the damage P80 has done in other ways should not allow them to operate any longer. Those other people will have to use different means of purchasing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

LowRiver2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
9,151
Reaction score
16,950
I’d say you could pull from your own experience but I’m sure it’s been awhile.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
On what type of guns are being pulled off the streets by the fed? You are correct
Explosives ? Try me son, my wheel house.
As for LAPD and guns confiscated : P80’’s are NOT the majority of type or make.
Pretty much any brand of 9/40 cal pistol, a few AR’s , most of which were stolen in burglaries with homeowners that didn’t have said guns in safes

Next
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
52,915
Reaction score
100,559
What about the thousands of folks who purchased these 80% guns and completed them, when it was perfectly LEGAL to own and purchase?

Theyll have to scratch a number on them and pay $200 for the tag...or not...since they don’t exist.
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
So if one’s opinion is anyone should be able to own a gun and not have any record of it; I respect the opinion but don’t agree.

From a public policy stand point, even though legitimate sales take place, I refuse to turn a blind eye to sales of these kits to people who shouldn’t have them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Xtrmwakeboarder

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Messages
5,421
Reaction score
8,974
But originally when the car was made, it was legally allowed to do so, then sold to the customer, registered annually and driven by person with a drivers license. Customizing firearms is not the issue here.

The difference is your buddy I would assume, is doing things legally. The firearms he is customizing are possessed legally. This company’s business plan is to get someone to purchase an 80 percent firearm under the loophole that they are just parts, then not serialize them and not care who buys them or what they do with them. These kits are made to have unserialized, unregistered guns on the street.

There is not a large market for good people to buy a build your own kit at an increase in cost, or even a compatible cost, for an inferior product. Yeah some might, but not a majority .

So no, not good enough reasons for me. What else you got? I’m going to need more than “because this is America”.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How are the P80 kits not sold legally? From what I understand, there is/was nothing illegal about selling the kits.

Again, it’s not an inferior product, if built correctly.

You’re argument is if a tool CAN be used for evil then it should be unavailable to the vast majority of law abiding citizens. That’s an extremely slippery slope. And instead of “because America” then how about “because the constitution allows it?”
 

LowRiver2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
9,151
Reaction score
16,950
512B0010-80B4-4BC3-B612-ED46BA53B94E.jpeg
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
52,915
Reaction score
100,559
That is a valid point. My view is the damage P80 has done in other ways should not allow them to operate any longer. Those other people will have to use different means of purchasing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Im curious about your argument now

What sort of criminals do you suggest are actually building 80%er’s?

Ive known a few criminals in my day.
Drug dealers mostly, but a few killers as well. They always had glocks and shit, hell they had bags of guns.
One thing that is true everywhere from coast to coast is that guns are easy to buy anywhere at anytime by anyone.

I could be out of touch with today’s gangsters, but it seems unlikely that building 80’s as guns for criminal enterprise is not really a good ROI?
 

Blackmagic94

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
5,378
Reaction score
7,382
I know this and the good people will. But others will not. Looking at them closely it shows just a model number and the metal plate underneath the lower where Glock puts their serial number, is just a blank metal plate.

P80 should be ashamed for the amount of illegal guns they put on the street in the US.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They haven’t put any illegal firearms on the market. They aren’t even a firearm manufacturer.

should we ban 3D printers, mills, files and hacksaws while we are at it because you can build the same things with those.
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
Well this article in 2019 stated ATF reported thirty
Percent of all firearms recovered in California were ghost guns, they didn’t specify brand.

And Los Angeles doesn’t keep track of Ghost Gun data.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
52,915
Reaction score
100,559
So if one’s opinion is anyone should be able to own a gun and not have any record of it; I respect the opinion but don’t agree.

From a public policy stand point, even though legitimate sales take place, I refuse to turn a blind eye to sales of these kits to people who shouldn’t have them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

On second thought, stay in CA.
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
Well this article in 2019 stated ATF reported thirty
Percent of all firearms recovered in California were ghost guns, they didn’t specify brand.

And Los Angeles doesn’t keep track of Ghost Gun data.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Blackmagic94

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
5,378
Reaction score
7,382
So if one’s opinion is anyone should be able to own a gun and not have any record of it; I respect the opinion but don’t agree.

From a public policy stand point, even though legitimate sales take place, I refuse to turn a blind eye to sales of these kits to people who shouldn’t have them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank god you don’t make any policy then.

You understand that from 1776 to 1999 there was no registration of any long gun sales new in the USA until after then. None. Omg 200 million rifles and shotguns off the books. Omg. The huge Manatee of it.
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
They haven’t put any illegal firearms on the market. They aren’t even a firearm manufacturer.

should we ban 3D printers, mills, files and hacksaws while we are at it because you can build the same things with those.

You come up with the most asinine arguments.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

LowRiver2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
9,151
Reaction score
16,950
Well this article in 2019 stated ATF reported thirty
Percent of all firearms recovered in California were ghost guns, they didn’t specify brand.

And Los Angeles doesn’t keep track of Ghost Gun data.
Seriously:
What is your profession ?

Pretty sure you don’t work LAPD, so how would YOU know if LAPD keeps records of a “ghost gun”?

By Captain Google?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
52,915
Reaction score
100,559
Well this article in 2019 stated ATF reported thirty
Percent of all firearms recovered in California were ghost guns, they didn’t specify brand.

And Los Angeles doesn’t keep track of Ghost Gun data.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I find that easy to believe. I’d like a further explanation of “recovered” though.
Recovered implies they were lost?

“Unintended consequences”...the hallmark of dem politics.

Eventually ALL guns in CA will be ghost. Lol
 

Blackmagic94

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
5,378
Reaction score
7,382
You come up with the most asinine arguments.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No it’s not. You understand people make ar15 lowers in the same process with the above tools with zero registration. You think a 80% Glock lower is the whole market. You are mistaken.
 

Blackmagic94

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
5,378
Reaction score
7,382
Hahah 30%. What a jaded fucking number to prove their false point


The us government was told by the Mexican government during Obama that 90% of all recovered firearms in Mexico were from USA sales illegally imported to Mexico.

What they forgot to tell you in that stat was the following.

90% of all weapons that were suspected of USA manufactured was the real state.

not 90% of all weapons.

Now apply that same false numbers to your 2019 atf bs report used to push a ban on a non problem.
 

CobraDave

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,303
Reaction score
3,003
I quoted the link. Like it or not, the internet has pretty good data. What would be a better way? Going door to door on my horse and carriage? Should I discount facts on the internet because another guy on the internet says so?

Anyway, I digress.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

havasujeeper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
2,738
Reaction score
5,456
After retiring with full honors from 25 years of law enforcement, my department gave me my duty weapon to keep.... my Glock 22, and 4 Hi-cap magazines. Actually not high capacity, but normal magazines. For a few years, they determined that my normal capacity magazines were illegal for myself to own. Now they made an exemption, and I can legally carry the gun and magazines I used for most of my career. Today they are legal, yesterday they were illegal, tomorrow they are legal, the day after they are again illegal. Seems rediculous to me.
 

Waffles

Banned
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
5,422
Reaction score
9,588
You have to ask yourself why someone would by a P80 kit that is not a complete firearm, that must be drilled out, for a cost of roughly $800 retail. A firearm that when complete, is less reliable, less safe , and less accurate. A firearm that attempts to copy a Glock 9mm which in the store can be purchased for about $500. Why someone would purchase an inferior product for $300 more.

I am for the second amendment, but I’m also for the government doing its part to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. They aren’t perfect but they should at least try. The overreach is silly at times, especially in California. They try to enact policies or solutions to problems that don’t exist. Solutions that don’t address the problem. I hate that.

Here, I applaud the ATF for doing its job. Polymer 80 does not pass the common sense test.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quoted for posterity because you clearly don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about 😂
 

Blackmagic94

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
5,378
Reaction score
7,382
I quoted the link. Like it or not, the internet has pretty good data. What would be a better way? Going door to door on my horse and carriage? Should I discount facts on the internet because another guy on the internet says so?

Anyway, I digress.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What you are missing is people present data in a slant for political purposes and you don’t understand that the data presented is jaded


just like you don’t understand a CNC mill or 3D printer to this question
 

LowRiver2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
9,151
Reaction score
16,950
I quoted the link. Like it or not, the internet has pretty good data. What would be a better way? Going door to door on my horse and carriage? Should I discount facts on the internet because another guy on the internet says so?

Anyway, I digress.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well
You discount the facts presented by a lot of us here, so there’s that 🙄
 

Blackmagic94

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
5,378
Reaction score
7,382
I also love the lefts theory

If there are no guns there will be no crime


yeah cause they won’t use a knife or a bomb or their bare hands to kill. So let’s just limit how law abiding good people can defend themselves against criminals and dictators.
 

Waffles

Banned
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
5,422
Reaction score
9,588
They haven’t put any illegal firearms on the market. They aren’t even a firearm manufacturer.

should we ban 3D printers, mills, files and hacksaws while we are at it because you can build the same things with those.
I can’t wait till they raid grainger for selling the material and supplies to be able to make those super scary untraceable ghost guns lol
 

Blackmagic94

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
5,378
Reaction score
7,382
I can’t wait till they raid grainger for selling the material and supplies to be able to make those super scary untraceable ghost guns lol
He is probably complete unaware that the ATF once told them what they were doing was legal but changed their mind when they included a barrel slide and parts kit in the same box after the fact.
 
Top