90 Laveycraft
SBC/Jet..Oh hell ya!
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2009
- Messages
- 625
- Reaction score
- 361
What's crazy is 50 years ago the Apollo rockets had 7.61 million pounds of thrust. 8.8 million is impressive but 7.6 million with slide rulers, pencil and paper is.....If I read correctly, the most powerful rocket to ever leave earth, 8.8 million pounds of thrust.
Oh, don't be such a negative nannySo 11 years, 25 billion dollars, the bulk made from leftover parts (engines etc) from the space shuttle (all designed in the 70s). Estimated 4 billion per launch....
I doubt this thing will launch, it will probably be scrubbed again like 2 months ago.
Meanwhile in the 11 years they spent desiging this thing, with the luxury of already having the motors made, Elon built rockets completely from scratch and figured out how to land them and reuse, all for about 1% of the cost per launch. 50 million per launch.
NASA is a joke, this is what happens when you divert the budgets to clinate change and diversity over actual technology and advancement.
I love discussing the Apollo program.What's crazy is 50 years ago the Apollo rockets had 7.61 million pounds of thrust. 8.8 million is impressive but 7.6 million with slide rulers, pencil and paper is.....
This rocket would be cool to watch live
Your not wrong the Obama administration screwed the whole thing up and then you add NASA and their bureaucracy and it will be a miracle if it worksIt will be a spectacular explosion and NASA will get out of the launch business.
They can design and build all the satellites they want and spacex can launch them.
All that friggin money for a Frankenstein launch platform? That isn’t standing on the shoulders of giants, it’s cheating and not even coming out ahead. Give the next 4 billion to spacex.
Watching it live on NASA and its making me sick , only women talking and everything is woke pc bs! launch the damn thing already before I puke!
Apparently you don’t have a government job. In such a job, the 1% chance of failure in a corporate environment becomes a 99% chance of failure in a government environment. And where that 1% success rate is most likely because the management took the day off.
On hold because of a bad ethernet switch... Im shocked.
You mean like damn near every other post on RDP ?Oh, don't be such a negative nanny
I had to stop watching. Damn NASA infomercial. Probably one of the worse run agencies on the planet.Watching it live on NASA and its making me sick , only women talking and everything is woke pc bs! launch the damn thing already before I puke!
Did they land the rockets after the launch?
They use stainless and aluminum to recycle the enginesLol no, they are in the ocean.
They may recover the tanks the but engines are gonna be junk after a bath in salt
The SRBs are just tubes with no real mechanics, the main section is a series of giant tanks on top of space shuttle motors
Should have never shutdown the shuttle programWell at least we only have to wait like four more years for the next launch.
In four years time spacex might be working on their NX-01 for Mars missions while NASA is still trying to human certify the disposable firework.
Well the shuttle program was its own issues. Designed in the 70s, a very fixed/rigid design that isn’t big enough for a lot of the current jobs, the shuttle itself was a maintenance nightmare, and it really couldn’t adapt.Should have never shutdown the shuttle program
Gotta remember this stack is almost exactly the same as the shuttle stack, but adding a 4th shuttle main engine and removing the weight and drag of the orbiter vehicle.6 minutes into the flight and it's doing 10,000 miles per hour . . .
NASA finally admits what everyone already knows: SLS is unaffordable
“At current cost levels the SLS program is unsustainable.”…arstechnica.com
Interviewed by The Government Accountable Office.
Why do I have Such a hard time seeing "government" and "accountability" in the same sentence??