paradise
Spooner
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2008
- Messages
- 4,737
- Reaction score
- 5,456
Exactly as I've thought. Definitely subscribing to this thread!!Imo, o/b power is perfect for these types of hulls.
Nice build sir. Watching this build on Dom8 FB. OB power is awesome and would like to see a dual helm, full rear bench version of this.
Dominator is using a splash of the placecraft 22 deck right? I have been wanting to see an outboard on this boat for so long. Stoked to watch this build! [emoji106]
Nice build sir. Watching this build on Dom8 FB. OB power is awesome and would like to see a dual helm, full rear bench version of this.
Congrats on the build. Looks like it is gonna be really cool. Why did go with the 350 verado?
Good enough for me. I'd really love to have an outboard boat next. Couple friends have them and they're pretty awesome. The pros outweigh the cons easily. I think for most people it's getting over the fact you don't have that big block sound anymore. That's the hardest part for me
Did dominator have thoughts comparing a 350 verado to a 300xs?
What do you plan for setback, hyd. Jackplate?, etc
If I were doing it, I'd definitely have a bracket for setback. Since it's uncharted territory for you and them with this package, I'd start with a pieced together bracket. Where you can change how far or close the motor is by changing the side plates of the braket. I'd probably start at 5" and see how it feels, then try a 10" doubt you'd need to try a 15" with how heavy that motor is.I wanted a 4 stroke so no real conversation there.
We are in mostly uncharted territory for them so between this boat and one other they are building hopefully we'll find the right setup.
As of now we are planning on a manual jack plate (didn't think it would be worthwhile for a hydraulic on a deckboat at 70mph, thoughts?).
We weren't planning on any setback
If I were doing it, I'd definitely have a bracket for setback. Since it's uncharted territory for you and them with this package, I'd start with a pieced together bracket. Where you can change how far or close the motor is by changing the side plates of the braket. I'd probably start at 5" and see how it feels, then try a 10" doubt you'd need to try a 15" with how heavy that motor is.
I would very much recommend a hydraulic jackplate if you are planning on towing anybody behind the boat. That combined with tunnel tabs will allow you to get and stay on plane at low speeds and keep the prop buried while doing so. Then when it's time to air it out, lift the tabs and jackplate and let'er fly!
I would do it. In the grand scheme of things it isn't that much more money and makes using it MUCH easier.We're doing tabs. The jack plate has about 6"-8" of setback built into it. Just wasn't convinced a hyd jack plate was necessary but maybe it is...
What part of the river do you go?
We are on the lower river. Hidden shores down by Fishers/Martinez
I would definitely go hyd. Jackplate then. Just to be able to get the lower out of the water when anchoring.
I would definitely go hyd. Jackplate then. Just to be able to get the lower out of the water when anchoring.
You guys win. Hydraulic Jackplate is added [emoji3]
Good choice! I wish I had the money to put one on my boat.You guys win. Hydraulic Jackplate is added [emoji3]
You guys win. Hydraulic Jackplate is added [emoji3]
Haha yeah it definitely takes some practice to read the river. I've been boating this area for 20+ years and we still find sandbars every once in a while
What jack plate are you going with Zack?
This past weekend the water was pretty low. We hit 3 times on our way up to Elbow sandbar and once coming back down.... Time to put the tri-toon up for the season maybe...
Ha ha good choice. I went to Fishers Landing for the first time with some regulars a couple of weeks ago and now I get to take my boat in to get backflushed due to the drive finding it's way into the sand.:grumble:
Just talked to Tony. It's a Bob's mechanical jack plate. We can always convert to hydraulic later if we wanted to but I'm going to have them price it out.
Man, that sounds like a crappy trip!!!! :eek
It was terrible NO ONE should ever go to the lower river ever again :eek
I've wanted to do one of these View attachment 521342
With a 300xs.
I'm interested to see how this boat runs with the 4 stroke.
The only problem with those are they are so low profile that you have no ability to take them anywhere but the lower river. Even if the wind picks up you've got a good chance to take a huge amount of water over the bow. We've seen those a couple times with six or so people in them and the bow is only a couple inches off the water at idle. [emoji15]
I don't have that many friends so it would just be me, wife and my son. [emoji22] lol
It would haul ass, that's for sure [emoji106]
But have you ever seen one with an outboard? I haven't. I've never heard of one until a couple this last year. I'd bet it doesn't sit nearly as low due to the reduction in drive train weight and that drive train weight being outside the hull. It should result in a higher and lighter riding nose.The only problem with those are they are so low profile that you have no ability to take them anywhere but the lower river. Even if the wind picks up you've got a good chance to take a huge amount of water over the bow. We've seen those a couple times with six or so people in them and the bow is only a couple inches off the water at idle. [emoji15]
But have you ever seen one with an outboard? I haven't. I've never heard of one until a couple this last year. I'd bet it doesn't sit nearly as low due to the reduction in drive train weight and that drive train weight being outside the hull. It should result in a higher and lighter riding nose.
But have you ever seen one with an outboard? I haven't. I've never heard of one until a couple this last year. I'd bet it doesn't sit nearly as low due to the reduction in drive train weight and that drive train weight being outside the hull. It should result in a higher and lighter riding nose.
It's a huge weight difference and CG difference. The weight of a 8.2 Merc big block is just shy of 1,200 lbs. A 300XS is 550#. You're talking about removing over 600# from the boat in total (give or take for rigging and different drive types and such), and the. Taking that remaining weight and moving it about 4 to 5 feet backwards. Everything else equal, that'll for sure raise the bow and allow the boat to sit a bit higher overall.No I have never seen one with an outboard, but those hulls have no freeboard. Put a couple people in the front and it doesn't matter where the other weight is at they're going to sit low in the nose.
I'm not saying it wouldn't be a fun boat, I just don't think it's a very practical hull for anywhere except for the lower river. I think I've only ever seen two of them even down here.
The only problem with those are they are so low profile that you have no ability to take them anywhere but the lower river. Even if the wind picks up you've got a good chance to take a huge amount of water over the bow. We've seen those a couple times with six or so people in them and the bow is only a couple inches off the water at idle. [emoji15]
View attachment 521348
That picture was taken in Havasu, not the lower river lol
But, you're right, it's a lower river boat. I think the bottom is similar to the 19' Cheyenne.
An efficient bottom that became a deck boat. When John D had the molds I think they had a top deck mold that gave you the closed deck option.
I have been in them a few times and they're great boats. I haven't been in one yet though (Placecraft, Shockwave, Ultra) that you wouldn't get a spray here and there on a rough Parker or Havasu weekend. I don't know anything about the Domn8ter and have never seen one in person. Looks big for its size which should help.
Looking forward to seeing this come together. Looks like it will be a fun boat with the outboard. Congrats [emoji106]