Did a crash cause the shock mount break or harmonics or just riding abuse ?
Back to work!
Ground out all of the old rigging through hull holes and rebuilt the areas with multiple layers of 1708 and CSM. Ground and sanded them pretty close to flat and flush. Didn't finish anything yet knowing I will need to address bigger sections when I get into blue printing the hull.
If you have followed along so far you know the Boss was raced in the Catalina Ski Race a couple of times early in its life, rode hard and put up wet later. When I first got it I did my best to lay a straight edge on the hull to see if it had any hook or rocker and thought it looked OK. There were some minor dips here and there where I could get to around the trailer bunks so I was feeling pretty good about it.
I have researched every thread on hull blueprinting here on RDP, and pretty much every other boat forum. The absolute best thread I have found on the subject comes from our very own @HydroSkreamin. In general blueprinting a hull means straightening, flattening and sharpening up the running surfaces, strakes and chines to best represent the plug (design intent) that the mold was pulled from. Over time as hull molds are used they flex, sag and warp deviating from their original shape. Once out of the mold, the hull can move around as well. Stresses applied during operation, a trailer that doesn’t fully support the hull both in transit and in storage, and even plain old gravity can cause the hull to change shape over time.
The Good:
Side to side at the transom is really straight. Using a straight piece of 12' long 1"x 2" aluminum tube as a straight edge; the front to back shape doesn't look too bad. When I spoke to Kornowski he said all Schiada's have a high spot on both sides between the strakes up near the shaft log. Mine does too.
I'm feeling pretty good at this point.
View attachment 859028 View attachment 859029 View attachment 859030
The Bad:
A couple feet forward from the transom the side to side starts to dip. WTF?
View attachment 859031
The Ugly:
At the aft end of the inner strake the hull has close to 3/8" of dip in it. I couldn't use my straight edge over the strake so I cut and jointed a piece of 3/4" plywood and found that the depression, dip, dish or whatever you call it goes to about 12' forward of the transom.
View attachment 859036 View attachment 859037 View attachment 859038 View attachment 859039
So at this point I was having a hard time getting my head around how the hull can be pretty straight (within 1/8") from the transom to 12' forward and dished 3/8" side to side. The shape is so consistent from the port to starboard sides that at one point I convinced my self that if was designed and molded that way! I sent Stan at Schiada some pics and he said it was NOT built that way and should be dead straight/flat front to back and side to side at least 100" forward of the transom. I asked him if it mattered performance wise and he said it was in essence a giant "hook" in the hull that would prevent to boat from taking a good set at speed, make the boat handle really bad, and that it needs to be fixed. I sent the same pics to Kornowski and he said it's pretty typical of older Schiadas, noting its one of the reasons blue printing can cost north of $10k.
After laying every straight edge I have on it, using a masons line and a construction I laser I was finally able to visualize the shape of the hull. Essentially, over time the hull kind of sagged down on either side of the main stringer (which sits on the main trailer bunk). It is kind of a gull wing (California Performance) hull like shape ending in a straight edge at the transom. I'm not sure what caused this. Maybe just time and gravity? Trailering on a rough I-40 for 41 years? I have suspected, based on the mold and fungus growing under the floors and water line stains up under the bow, that the boat may have been stored full of water for a period of time. Could the weight of that water have caused the sag? Not sure.
What I do know is that it needs to be fixed. Next step: grind the gelcoat off 75% of the hull so I can start laminating. WooHoo!
Gonna need another pail of resin i think.
I was told the trailer bunks sag and the hull follows the bunks especially in the heatBack to work!
Ground out all of the old rigging through hull holes and rebuilt the areas with multiple layers of 1708 and CSM. Ground and sanded them pretty close to flat and flush. Didn't finish anything yet knowing I will need to address bigger sections when I get into blue printing the hull.
If you have followed along so far you know the Boss was raced in the Catalina Ski Race a couple of times early in its life, rode hard and put up wet later. When I first got it I did my best to lay a straight edge on the hull to see if it had any hook or rocker and thought it looked OK. There were some minor dips here and there where I could get to around the trailer bunks so I was feeling pretty good about it.
I have researched every thread on hull blueprinting here on RDP, and pretty much every other boat forum. The absolute best thread I have found on the subject comes from our very own @HydroSkreamin. In general blueprinting a hull means straightening, flattening and sharpening up the running surfaces, strakes and chines to best represent the plug (design intent) that the mold was pulled from. Over time as hull molds are used they flex, sag and warp deviating from their original shape. Once out of the mold, the hull can move around as well. Stresses applied during operation, a trailer that doesn’t fully support the hull both in transit and in storage, and even plain old gravity can cause the hull to change shape over time.
The Good:
Side to side at the transom is really straight. Using a straight piece of 12' long 1"x 2" aluminum tube as a straight edge; the front to back shape doesn't look too bad. When I spoke to Kornowski he said all Schiada's have a high spot on both sides between the strakes up near the shaft log. Mine does too.
I'm feeling pretty good at this point.
View attachment 859028 View attachment 859029 View attachment 859030
The Bad:
A couple feet forward from the transom the side to side starts to dip. WTF?
View attachment 859031
The Ugly:
At the aft end of the inner strake the hull has close to 3/8" of dip in it. I couldn't use my straight edge over the strake so I cut and jointed a piece of 3/4" plywood and found that the depression, dip, dish or whatever you call it goes to about 12' forward of the transom.
View attachment 859036 View attachment 859037 View attachment 859038 View attachment 859039
So at this point I was having a hard time getting my head around how the hull can be pretty straight (within 1/8") from the transom to 12' forward and dished 3/8" side to side. The shape is so consistent from the port to starboard sides that at one point I convinced my self that if was designed and molded that way! I sent Stan at Schiada some pics and he said it was NOT built that way and should be dead straight/flat front to back and side to side at least 100" forward of the transom. I asked him if it mattered performance wise and he said it was in essence a giant "hook" in the hull that would prevent to boat from taking a good set at speed, make the boat handle really bad, and that it needs to be fixed. I sent the same pics to Kornowski and he said it's pretty typical of older Schiadas, noting its one of the reasons blue printing can cost north of $10k.
After laying every straight edge I have on it, using a masons line and a construction I laser I was finally able to visualize the shape of the hull. Essentially, over time the hull kind of sagged down on either side of the main stringer (which sits on the main trailer bunk). It is kind of a gull wing (California Performance) hull like shape ending in a straight edge at the transom. I'm not sure what caused this. Maybe just time and gravity? Trailering on a rough I-40 for 41 years? I have suspected, based on the mold and fungus growing under the floors and water line stains up under the bow, that the boat may have been stored full of water for a period of time. Could the weight of that water have caused the sag? Not sure.
What I do know is that it needs to be fixed. Next step: grind the gelcoat off 75% of the hull so I can start laminating. WooHoo!
Gonna need another pail of resin i think.
Man, Lenmann, I feel for ya. Been there, done that.
I’m pretty sure you won’t be sorry about fixing it and doing it right, it’s just a LOT of work.
You’re right, time to grind the gel off and get after it. One of the things that happened when I did mine is that the difference changes when you grind the gel off. Remember the markings on my running surface and the shape of the pieces needed outlined in marker? I don’t know if that’s how the experts do it, but it sure was helpful for me.
One thing I cannot stress enough is that these laminations REALLY COUNT!! This is your running surface and has a buttload of pressure on it at speed, so please make sure you follow temp and catalizing guidelines, as well as air-free laminations. You got this, and if I can be of any verbal assistance, feel free to PM me and we’ll talk. I’m not an expert but I did take very good notes from one and am very happy with the performance results from our efforts.
I’m ready for my own drama here very soon, as I’ll be derigging the StressEliminator and flipping it once again to finish the job I should have the first time: removing the rest of the pod that I left originally.
Keep up the great work, don’t get discouraged. These old pieces of Tupperware take a lot of effort but I can tell you in my case, it was definitely worth it. Yours is even cooler, so you’ve got that going for you, which is nice, except Bob’s not nearly your uncle yet
PS Thanks for the kind words, the whole goal of my thread was to share my learning experience. Glad you got something from it.
I reread your post and looked at your bottom pictures today.
Those gaps are YUGE!! Are you thinking of maybe using some of your closed-cell foam to fill the large gaps? That’s a lot to fill just with fiberglass. It’ll take a long time and add a lot of weight. Just musing publicly...
I’d love to hear how a pro shop would tackle it.
If that’s from sitting on the bunks, I’d definitely add more bunk area to spread the load. Wow...
Mind-blowing right? I spoke to Schiada and Kornowski about it and they both said build it up with glass, 3 layers max at a time to avoid excessive exo-therm that might cause warping. Back of the bar napkin weight addition will be about 40 pounds. These aren't light boats to begin with, its one of the reasons that they handle rough water well, so maybe it won't hurt performance too bad. A nice straight hull will be a very good thing.
Makes sense, and I agree with the exotherm concerns.
Before I started my project I worked on a layup table and laid up a layer of CSM and 2 layers of 1808 about 3’ long and polyester resin. I cut a 1’ square and weighed it, coming in at 0.97 lbs. Are you getting about 0.020” per layer? I can’t remember now what each layer added.
Make sure the straight edge you’re using is accurate so you’re not fighting that as well. Remember I had a couple of levels I checked against a granite inspection table. A light (straight) file on the paint took the paint globs off and both 6’ and 8’ levels were within 0.005”.
You’re in the right mindset to get this task done correctly, and asking the right questions. Keep it rolling, bud!
I have been using this chart for glass and resin calcs. It's from a book titled Fiberglass Boatbuilding for Amateurs.
View attachment 859544
The area on each side of the hull to be filled is 11' x 1.5' = 16.5 sq ft. I am using 2 oz. CSM which weighs .413 lb/sq ft when laminated so 16.5 x .413 = 3.4 lb/layer. Each layer will be .060 thick so it will take 6 layers to fill the 3/8" deep depression. So 3.4 lb x 6 = 20.44 lb per side.
After typing out the math here I realized the depression in the hull isn't 3/8" deep all the way across, rather it tapers from zero at the edges to 3/8" deep in the middle, so the weight per side is roughly half, or 10.22 lbs.
Check my thinking here, and don't be bashful about shouting out if you see something wrong.
Very nice!!! Outstanding!
I've owned a few schiada's and all of them had really bad hooks except 1. Really nice work and your attention to detail is awesome. Your boat will be solid and rattle free and as far as i'm concerned the heavier the better thats why these boats ride so nice in the rough stuff for there size.
I've owned a few schiada's and all of them had really bad hooks except 1. Really nice work and your attention to detail is awesome. Your boat will be solid and rattle free and as far as i'm concerned the heavier the better thats why these boats ride so nice in the rough stuff for there size.
I had a 1982 RC that had a hook that I never fixed it ran right at 90 and handled great and is still running great with the new owner 10yrs later. I also had 1989 24 v-drive that I purchased not running and re did the entire boat but lost interest about 2 years into it and sold it. It was the Maroon 24 that rick at islander marine did a few years before he closed his shop. The last 21 was a 2006 which was blueprinted when it was being built new so can't really say if there was a difference? I'm like you though as far as OCD I would not even consider going as far as your going without addressing the bottom. I just like your attention to detail and you addressing all of the problems that the boat has from the factory and I really think it's going to be a very solid riding RC. Hopefully whatever shop you settle on for the gel-coat they see the amount of craftsmanship and love you put into it and match on there end!!!!! Thanks again for sharing your work.@tony Did you fix any of them? and did it make any difference? or could you tell the difference in the one that didn't have the hook?
I have talked to a couple of people who say all this blueprinting stuff is all BS black magic that fiberglass guys use to separate customers from greenbacks. They say it doesn't matter because the boat rides on a pretty small part of the hull at speed anyway.
Regardless, once I saw how bad it was my OCD wouldn't let me leave it alone. If the boat turns out to run like a dog I know it won't be because of the bottom!
Thanks guys, I appreciate that you are following along and the comments. I have learned that adding to this thread keeps me motivated to keep working on this old girl, so your encouragement matters and helps.
The funny thing about being OCD is that I always want things done right. Nothing pisses me off more than to pay good money and not get good work. Unfortunately it happens too often. The curse of having just a little bit of skill, some experience, and access to resources like RDP is that I take on stuff like this project telling myself it will be fun and not that big a job. Don't get me wrong, I am happiest when I am doing something with my hands and mind so this isn't time completely mis-spent and every time I finish a phase of it I get the very tangible satisfaction of having done something right that meets my standards.
It's mildly ironic that at close to 160 man-hours in on blue printing the bottom of this 41 year old boat that only the fish in what ever river or lake I boat in will ever see the result of my labors. But I will know it was done right.
Thanks again for following along.
You are making me feel like a lazy son of a bitch. Awesome buddy. I wish I had your shop too! Is this going to be a full interior boat when complete? What motor?
It's mildly ironic that at close to 160 man-hours in on blue printing the bottom of this 41 year old boat that only the fish in what ever river or lake I boat in will ever see the result of my labors. But I will know it was done right.
At this point you also need to think about flipping the boat and setting it back on the trailer with the bunks in raw wood (no carpet). I say to do that now so you can clean any mars caused by the raw wood. The reason being is the boat can contour to an ill fitting trailer. If you leave the carpet off the bunks to ensure the fit you will know it's right when you add the carpet for final assembly. Cut and re weld the supports or add wedges between the supports and wood to ensure a tight fit. You also need to ensure the bunks are solidly on the cav plate in the rear. Some of the trailers have the boat too far back.
This is amazing work. I'm betting @lenmann ends up doing his own OCD gelcoat job after seeing the attention to detail and the craftsmanship displayed.
The attention to detail is incredible. This is documenting the effort and hard work it takes to do it right ! Well done. Thank you for taking the time to post all the pictures and detail write up.
Who did you buy all your supplies from. Glass, resin, filler, primer and get coat. Thanks
atta boy. wish i went TTThanks Aaron. It will be a full interior boat, all white Arko/Conquest style. TT 540.
Damn!!!