WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

They cost just $30M each

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
16,015
Reaction score
35,893
Why in hell doesn't California purchase a fleet of DHC-515 firefighting aircraft? Every year fires cause billions in damage and kill people.

It's OK to spend taxpayer money on everything else, but not this?

1599px-I-DPCN_at_work_03_%28cropped%29.jpg
 

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
34,897
Reaction score
88,416
Why in hell doesn't California purchase a fleet of DHC-515 firefighting aircraft? Every year fires cause billions in damage and kill people.

It's OK to spend taxpayer money on everything else, but not this?

1599px-I-DPCN_at_work_03_%28cropped%29.jpg
To busy spending our hard earned money on N95 masks from China, homeless and illegal immigrants to waste time on real things
 

oldman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
843
Reaction score
1,610
I think the lease is 10m a year and they have been leasing 2 of them for 30 years
Flat rate 10 mil, and they repair and maintain. May not be a bad deal. Known cost.

Side note, I watched them draw water out of Puddingstone puddle when they first leased them, we were Jet skiing and they pulled everyone off the lake as the two planes swooped down and drew water. They came in from the East low as hell, and pulled up right at the rock dam.
I swear that has to be the smallest body of water they could draw off of.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
16,015
Reaction score
35,893
Those planes wouldn't do a damn bit of good at this point. You can't stop these fires until the wind allows it.
The idea being to have effective firefighting capabilities before it gets to "this point."

Imagine that, knowing winds were forecast for 60 MPH plus and fire conditions were in play, several of these aircraft were manned and ready when the fire broke out hours ago. You know, when the sun was still shining and it had spread to just a few hundred acres?
 

Xring01

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2017
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
9,121
The idea being to have effective firefighting capabilities before it gets to "this point."

Imagine that, knowing winds were forecast for 60 MPH plus and fire conditions were in play, several of these aircraft were manned and ready when the fire broke out hours ago. You know, when the sun was still shining and it had spread to just a few hundred acres?

How about getting in front of the problem…
Build fire breaks in the forest and the necessary areas, so you have a chance of putting out a fire…. With out fire breaks and high winds.. literally pissing in the wind.

But that would mean the Libtards would have to fight the tree huggers… We all see how that strategy has played out.
 

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
34,897
Reaction score
88,416
Flat rate 10 mil, and they repair and maintain. May not be a bad deal. Known cost.

Side note, I watched them draw water out of Puddingstone puddle when they first leased them, we were Jet skiing and they pulled everyone off the lake as the two planes swooped down and drew water. They came in from the East low as hell, and pulled up right at the rock dam.
I swear that has to be the smallest body of water they could draw off of.


20180922_151934.jpg

12372.jpeg


At Castaic a few years ago, the planes are farther away than they look
 

EmpirE231

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
4,891
Reaction score
10,089
Because govt can’t do anything right… simple as that.

CA probably has the most fire stations and fire fighter per capita… and I’d bet the highest paid firefighters in the world… yet every-time there is a fire, it gets out of control.
 

HTTP404

New But Seasoned Inmate #2002
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
3,893
Reaction score
7,504
The idea being to have effective firefighting capabilities before it gets to "this point."

Imagine that, knowing winds were forecast for 60 MPH plus and fire conditions were in play, several of these aircraft were manned and ready when the fire broke out hours ago. You know, when the sun was still shining and it had spread to just a few hundred acres?
Wouldn't make a difference. These fires move so fast under these conditions. They did have fixed wing working this fire before the sun went down.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
16,015
Reaction score
35,893
That used to be the excuse. The billions in property damage and spent resources makes it a terrible reason.

You can’t justify the losses by showing you saved a few bucks leasing vs owning.
They're already spending millions to keep 40 year old helicopters flying, and they only place a fraction of the water that the 515 can.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
16,015
Reaction score
35,893
Wouldn't make a difference. These fires move so fast under these conditions. They did have fixed wing working this fire before the sun went down.
Type, quantity, and water capacity of fixed wing assets? Time to cycle?
 

oldman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
843
Reaction score
1,610
Because govt can’t do anything right… simple as that.

CA probably has the most fire stations and fire fighter per capita… and I’d bet the highest paid firefighters in the world… yet every-time there is a fire, it gets out of control.
Not calling anyone out.
But after working around many many stations.. in many counties.
Some are more worried about how their uniforms look, and some get shit done.
 

scottchbrite

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
1,032
Reaction score
2,073
Because govt can’t do anything right… simple as that.

CA probably has the most fire stations and fire fighter per capita… and I’d bet the highest paid firefighters in the world… yet every-time there is a fire, it gets out of control.
You’re right on the first part, and probably right on the rest.

Im not in to making excuses, but we also have the LARGEST wild land/urban interface in the world here, coupled with the worst homeless problem in the world, and a unique climate that adds up to a perfect shit show.
I’d venture to say we dont have enough stations or manpower and money isnt enticing the next generation like you think it would be. Let’s not forget how the state and Feds fail at forest mgmt and fire prevention. The Feds and state are short staffed (current political parties in control?) and can’t hire or retain people and are leaning on local agencies to cover their failures. AND most of us are behind the curve with hiring and retention.
 

Dog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
1,625
Reaction score
4,799
You’re right on the first part, and probably right on the rest.

Im not in to making excuses, but we also have the LARGEST wild land/urban interface in the world here, coupled with the worst homeless problem in the world, and a unique climate that adds up to a perfect shit show.
I’d venture to say we dont have enough stations or manpower and money isnt enticing the next generation like you think it would be. Let’s not forget how the state and Feds fail at forest mgmt and fire prevention. The Feds and state are short staffed (current political parties in control?) and can’t hire or retain people and are leaning on local agencies to cover their failures. AND most of us are behind the curve with hiring and retention.
Don't forget environmental "extremists" get in the way of a lot of the management. If someone in charge would fuck them and do what needs to be done it wouldn't be to expensive to take care of these issues.
 
Last edited:

Rvrluvr

CLAMP ON RACING
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
7,091
Reaction score
6,660
My dad was LA county fireman for 35 years. Growing up all I heard was how every year the fires will get worse. The tree huggers wont let anyone clear brush and its just adding layers of fuel to the ground every year.
 

socal0487

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
466
Reaction score
545
How about getting in front of the problem…
Build fire breaks in the forest and the necessary areas, so you have a chance of putting out a fire…. With out fire breaks and high winds.. literally pissing in the wind.

But that would mean the Libtards would have to fight the tree huggers… We all see how that strategy has played out.
Fire breaks with this wind is useless when embers are spotting 1/2-1 mile ahead of itself.
 

socal0487

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
466
Reaction score
545
Why in hell doesn't California purchase a fleet of DHC-515 firefighting aircraft? Every year fires cause billions in damage and kill people.

It's OK to spend taxpayer money on everything else, but not this?

1599px-I-DPCN_at_work_03_%28cropped%29.jpg
California is pretty close to having one of the most robust aerial firefighting fleets in the world. They have 7 c-130 being outfitted right now along with many other aerial assets.

 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
15,984
Reaction score
28,832
It's all in the marketing. If they sold them necessary to protect the illegal immigrants from the fires, all the Libturds and super ultra conservatives would vote to tax the regular citizens of this state to pay for them.

Or they could just stop the free everything bullshit agenda and pay for them outright. :)
 

JDKRXW

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
3,079
Reaction score
4,203
Better to share ca taxes with Canada.

Usually a bad idea; but these planes get shared all over the place. Saskatchewan has around 8 and depending on the season, they could be anywhere in North or Central America.
To me, lending agreements with these big boys (and these smaller versions: https://www.firebossllc.com/) make great sense.
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,624
Reaction score
22,577
Two of those same "Quebec" Super Scoopers were working the Palisades Fire for a brief period earlier yesterday, along with a couple of smaller tankers during a short period when the winds had allowed.
The flight tracking for the two Super Scoopers showed them apparently refilling from the sea, making numerous small loops. Then again yesterday afternoon, again during a brief lull.
Yesterday afternoon during a brief lull they flew in a DC-10, as he was following the LEAD plane in for a drop, the two Super Scoopers had returned but were in a holding pattern just east of the fire until the DC-10 had departed. Not sure how long the winds allowed the Scoopers or other planes to work.
Meanwhile the helos seemed to be dropping all day and seem more effective during the higher winds.

The July-August issue of Popular Mechanics featured an extremely interesting article about firefighting aircraft, including a segment told by a seasoned pilot and the conditions they encounter attempting during windy conditions as they circle and maneuver to perform a viable drop, and being forced to return to base without having done so.
The story includes the story of one pilot who crashed.
It's a great read if you can find a copy or have access to an online magazine reader. I'd try to scan it, but gave it to my brother in law.

Popular Mechanics July-August 2024.jpg
 

Xring01

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2017
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
9,121
Fire breaks with this wind is useless when embers are spotting 1/2-1 mile ahead of itself.

OK… So your saying the wind never stops?
Exactly, when the wind does stop, you have a much better strategy to put out the fire, if you ahve fire breaks, and allows vehicles/FF Equipment to get closer to the fires.

When I lived in Murrieta, 4 of my neighbors where fire fighters…
Thats where I learned of the fire break strategy.

To add fuel to fire…
One of my former neighbors “Captain in Temecula” sold his house in Murrieta, moved to Alabama… Would commute to CA work for 20 something days on and 20 something days off… he was planning to do that for 5 years and retire. As far as I know he has 1 year left. When I moved, I lost touch with him.
Should I bring up the guys in Idaho, AZ and…………………
 
Last edited:

CLdrinker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
9,684
Reaction score
19,535
How about getting in front of the problem…
Build fire breaks in the forest and the necessary areas, so you have a chance of putting out a fire…. With out fire breaks and high winds.. literally pissing in the wind.

But that would mean the Libtards would have to fight the tree huggers… We all see how that strategy has played out.
Shit environmental will shut that down.

I’m arguing with some ass wipe right now that wants me to guarantee a crew will not step 6” NW of pole when replacing.

6” fuckin inches!!!
 

HNL2LHC

What is right and what is wrong these days!
Joined
Jun 25, 2018
Messages
16,111
Reaction score
30,891
Easier to get the 10% back to the big guy through other laundering methods. 🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♂️
 

socal0487

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
466
Reaction score
545

OK… So your saying the wind never stops?
Exactly, when the wind does stop, you have a much better strategy to put out the fire, if you ahve fire breaks, and allows vehicles/FF Equipment to get closer to the fires.

When I lived in Murrieta, 4 of my neighbors where fire fighters…
Thats where I learned of the fire break strategy.

To add fuel to fire…
One of my former neighbors “Captain in Temecula” sold his house in Murrieta, moved to Alabama… Would commute to CA work for 20 something days on and 20 something days off… he was planning to do that for 5 years and retire. As far as I know he has 1 year left. When I moved, I lost touch with him.
Should I bring up the guys in Idaho, AZ and…………………
Obviously it’s a sensitive subject to you. Did you ask how much OT they made? I guess you have it figured out though. Make Swiss cheese of the open space. 👍🏻
 

gqchris

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
8,991
Reaction score
14,933
The same reason people are too cheap to pay for Security for their PC's or Backup their data.

They assume it will "never happen to them".
 

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
34,897
Reaction score
88,416
California is pretty close to having one of the most robust aerial firefighting fleets in the world. They have 7 c-130 being outfitted right now along with many other aerial assets.

The problem is that those have to land to refill their water, a single super scooper will out perform 5 of those per hour
 

TPC

Wrenching Dad
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
31,788
Reaction score
25,593
I thought Newsom bought a few of them.
Evidently not.
Need dozens of them.
 

HALLETT BOY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
6,989
Reaction score
10,609
I love it when after about 5 days of Ca burning to the ground , after the weather service predicted to the minute the winds starting up , we have a multi media press conference with about 100 city hall and fire dept personnel including the Battalion chief explaining how again they got caught with their pants down again this fire season . Anyone who has lived in So Cal any lenth of time knows the fire season will start like clockwork. Why can we not have a fleet of C 130 ‘s , some converted Ariel tankers and super scoopers etc stationed at Edward’s or Mojave ? Instead we have to listen to some lame ass excuse that a requisition has been put in to Canada for an Ariel tanker and it’s in flight . Meanwhile billions are spent on feeble attempts to try to extinguish the fires . We also need to go back to cutting fire breaks , thin some dead Forrest areas and stop building next to scrub brush .
 

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
34,897
Reaction score
88,416
I love it when after about 5 days of Ca burning to the ground , after the weather service predicted to the minute the winds starting up , we have a multi media press conference with about 100 city hall and fire dept personnel including the Battalion chief explaining how again they got caught with their pants down again this fire season . Anyone who has lived in So Cal any lenth of time knows the fire season will start like clockwork. Why can we not have a fleet of C 130 ‘s , some converted Ariel tankers and super scoopers etc stationed at Edward’s or Mojave ? Instead we have to listen to some lame ass excuse that a requisition has been put in to Canada for an Ariel tanker and it’s in flight . Meanwhile billions are spent on feeble attempts to try to extinguish the fires . We also need to go back to cutting fire breaks , thin some dead Forrest areas and stop building next to scrub brush .
They missed the winds by about a day, they changed when the winds were gonna show up about 12hrs before the showed up
 

Sportin' Wood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
8,003

In Montana we have a lot of privatized firefighting services. Not only aerial like Bridger Aerospace, but down to private brush truck operations with contracted crews.
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,624
Reaction score
22,577
The problem is that those have to land to refill their water, a single super scooper will out perform 5 of those per hour
The Major difference being, the Super Scoopers drop water, The C-130's drop Fire Retardant.
I know you're well aware of how dropping water offers a quick quench, but quickly evaporates, the Retardant a long lasting barrier, with the goal of confinement or at least slowing the fires progress.
I vote we get more heavy lift Sikorsky's and start training far more of the National Guard to utilized their heavy lift Helos.
 

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
34,897
Reaction score
88,416
The Major difference being, the Super Scoopers drop water, The C-130's drop Fire Retardant.
I know you're well aware of how dropping water offers a quick quench, but quickly evaporates, the Retardant a long lasting barrier, with the goal of confinement or at least slowing the fires progress.
I vote we get more heavy lift Sikorsky's and start training far more of the National Guard to utilized their heavy lift Helos.
I know what they drop but retardant is supposed to be used ahead of the fire not on the fire, both are top assets and needed but what we need direct attack aircraft as much as indirect attack.
 

Taboma

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
15,624
Reaction score
22,577
I know what they drop but retardant is supposed to be used ahead of the fire not on the fire, both are top assets and needed but what we need direct attack aircraft as much as indirect attack.
No argument from me, I'd support that shit all day long over pissing it away by the billions to Change Weather, how about we learn how to better defend ourselves and buy more tools to accomplish it. 👍
 

Angler

Tritoon Racing
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
6,201
Reaction score
15,339

In Montana we have a lot of privatized firefighting services. Not only aerial like Bridger Aerospace, but down to private brush truck operations with contracted crews.
Because Montana is worth saving, Ca is not!
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
16,015
Reaction score
35,893
California is pretty close to having one of the most robust aerial firefighting fleets in the world. They have 7 c-130 being outfitted right now along with many other aerial assets.

While it's great Cal Fire will someday be able to use these aircraft, they are of limited value in wildfires. The primary issue is that they must land and be refilled with water and retardant after each drop. Apparently right now there's not enough water in the DWP system to feed hydrants in the fire areas, and storage tanks are dry. How does that affect aerial operations?

Having to land and refill after every drop increases cycle times to maybe one an hour if everything goes well, but that's a reach. Compare this to CL-515 cycle times. Those aircraft can perform two or three per hour when a body of water is within a few miles. That exceeds the amount of water and retardant a C-130 drops in one load.

Maintenance on the C-130s will approach four times the cost of operating the CL-515. They're more than 30 years old. Many parts will have to be provided by the Air Force, taken from mothballed planes in Tucson. They have four large turboprop engines compared to two smaller engines on the CL-515. That means more than double the fuel burn and maintenance costs.

Cal Fire received the planes from the Air Force for "free." You know, like free boats. They cost taxpayers about $50 million in 2024 dollars when new, and converting them to tankers has cost about $28 million per aircraft. The CL-515 purchase price is around $30 million.
 

Cobalt232

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2018
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
1,737
Two of those same "Quebec" Super Scoopers were working the Palisades Fire for a brief period earlier yesterday, along with a couple of smaller tankers during a short period when the winds had allowed.
The flight tracking for the two Super Scoopers showed them apparently refilling from the sea, making numerous small loops. Then again yesterday afternoon, again during a brief lull.
Yesterday afternoon during a brief lull they flew in a DC-10, as he was following the LEAD plane in for a drop, the two Super Scoopers had returned but were in a holding pattern just east of the fire until the DC-10 had departed. Not sure how long the winds allowed the Scoopers or other planes to work.
Meanwhile the helos seemed to be dropping all day and seem more effective during the higher winds.

The July-August issue of Popular Mechanics featured an extremely interesting article about firefighting aircraft, including a segment told by a seasoned pilot and the conditions they encounter attempting during windy conditions as they circle and maneuver to perform a viable drop, and being forced to return to base without having done so.
The story includes the story of one pilot who crashed.
It's a great read if you can find a copy or have access to an online magazine reader. I'd try to scan it, but gave it to my brother in law.

View attachment 1467302
The Bae 146... I used to fly on the PSA's 146's lots... Good tough airplanes. And that cool tail cone speedbrake...
 

Attachments

  • psa-bae-146_orig.jpg
    psa-bae-146_orig.jpg
    49.8 KB · Views: 0

socal0487

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
466
Reaction score
545
The problem is that those have to land to refill their water, a single super scooper will out perform 5 of those per hour
C130 can also carry 2.5x the amount of gallons than the super scoopers. 4000 compared to 1500. C130 can be loaded with phoschek and used to strengthen control lines ahead of fire. Super scoopers cannot. They just bomb a flank and dump their water over a 1/4 mile on an active fire flank. They cannot get into tight canyons. Fixed wing have many limitations. I would take a Firehawk helicopter that can carry 1000 gallons over super scoopers any day. Can hover and drop precisely in certain areas and in tight canyons.
 

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
34,897
Reaction score
88,416
C130 can also carry 2.5x the amount of gallons than the super scoopers. 4000 compared to 1500. C130 can be loaded with phoschek and used to strengthen control lines ahead of fire. Super scoopers cannot. They just bomb a flank and dump their water over a 1/4 mile on an active fire flank. They cannot get into tight canyons. Fixed wing have many limitations. I would take a Firehawk helicopter that can carry 1000 gallons over super scoopers any day. Can hover and drop precisely in certain areas and in tight canyons.
A super scooper can dump 20k gallons of water and hour depending on the available water source. The c130 can do 4k an hour if the airport is close. Post 42. We don't need 40 c130's, 20 is good and 20 super scoopers best of both worlds
 

socal0487

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
466
Reaction score
545
While it's great Cal Fire will someday be able to use these aircraft, they are of limited value in wildfires. The primary issue is that they must land and be refilled with water and retardant after each drop. Apparently right now there's not enough water in the DWP system to feed hydrants in the fire areas, and storage tanks are dry. How does that affect aerial operations?

Having to land and refill after every drop increases cycle times to maybe one an hour if everything goes well, but that's a reach. Compare this to CL-515 cycle times. Those aircraft can perform two or three per hour when a body of water is within a few miles. That exceeds the amount of water and retardant a C-130 drops in one load.

Maintenance on the C-130s will approach four times the cost of operating the CL-515. They're more than 30 years old. Many parts will have to be provided by the Air Force, taken from mothballed planes in Tucson. They have four large turboprop engines compared to two smaller engines on the CL-515. That means more than double the fuel burn and maintenance costs.

Cal Fire received the planes from the Air Force for "free." You know, like free boats. They cost taxpayers about $50 million in 2024 dollars when new, and converting them to tankers has cost about $28 million per aircraft. The CL-515 purchase price is around $30 million.
Super scoopers have many limitations. I would take a fleet of fixed wing (DC10, DC8, C130) for retardant drops on control lines ahead of fire and a fleet of Sikorsky Firehawks that can be used on active parts of fire. Get rid of the super scoopers.
 
Top