WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Jan 6, and fani willis?

azsunfun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
2,950
Reaction score
4,708
Check out last Paragraph.
Screenshot_20240312_102825_Drive.jpg
 

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,539
Reaction score
16,138

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,539
Reaction score
16,138
"The Beast's, rears it's ugly heads.."
 

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,539
Reaction score
16,138
"It rubs the lotion on it's skin, or else it gets the hose again..." :oops:
 

sprintcvx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
6,329
Reaction score
26,022
She'll never completely comply.... she doesn't have to, just ask her


Willis’ Open Records Department denied any records about Jack Smith existed and cited a series of legal exemptions to justify the withholding of communications with January 6 Committee.

The only record she did handover was already public and it was a letter to January 6 Committee Chairman Benny Thompson.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,829
Reaction score
145,962

Willis’ Open Records Department denied any records about Jack Smith existed and cited a series of legal exemptions to justify the withholding of communications with January 6 Committee.

The only record she did handover was already public and it was a letter to January 6 Committee Chairman Benny Thompson.

That corrupt DEI skank is going down!!

The court makes it clear that it has substantive reason to believe Willis is withholding records:

"Defendant is further ORDERED to provide an explanation why such correspondence does not exist in Defendant’s records (or why it is being withheld)."

However, if Willis does turn over the records, it could provide proof of a criminal conspiracy. Oh, the irony.

🤣
 
Top