WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

How long before people realize the government(s) are killing us with the vaccine?

rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,970
Reaction score
34,008
20240206_153523.jpg
 
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,970
Reaction score
34,008
20240219_192334.jpg


For some people, covid never ended. The vaccine ended them.

Warning: Graphic and gross.

This is a video of me removing one of the strange white fibrous clots, from the right jugular vein. The person who was recording it is Nicky King, who is also an embalmer. I didn't notice it until I lifted the vessel up. I could feel it inside the vein. I only show this because people still don't believe it and ask for video evidence. What's causing this? I can't say for sure, but I didn't start seeing this until early 2021. Unfortunately, I still find strange clotting in several bodies that I embalm.

🔗link
 
Wedgy

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,445
Reaction score
15,997
No-one received informed consent. We did most certainly receive, deceived.
Herded right into the boxcar like cattle, for the greater good of Money Money Money...
 
92562

92562

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
2,184
Reaction score
5,404
Wedgy said:
No-one received informed consent. We did most certainly receive, deceived.
Herded right into the boxcar like cattle, for the greater good of Money Money Money...
Click to expand...
And truly frightening how many people just got in line and did what the gov't said. Completely explains complacent Germans during WWII. Sad part is all the young relatively healthy people I see in airports still wearing masks. I even had a male flight attendant yesterday with 2 masks on. I couldn't understand a word he said. These people are broken, it has become a mental illness.
 
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,970
Reaction score
34,008
t.me

The Voice of Q

Pfizer attempted to suppress their own Clinical Information for 75 years regarding known side effects following Clinical Trials of the mRNA Vaccines. Feel different after your injection? Take a look through these 29 pages of side effects & see if perhaps this is the cause...
t.me t.me
 
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,970
Reaction score
34,008
t.me

ℚ𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝔼𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕪𝕥𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘

This is Tony Shingler. This is what the government call 'safe and effective'. No it is not rare, yes it is very real. Tony is part of the #TruthBeTold family and one of the strongest and most resilient people I have met. '3 years ago today since I took the AstraZeneca jab, I was diagnosed...
t.me t.me
 
Chili Palmer

Chili Palmer

Master of My Domian
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
11,592
Reaction score
23,433
rmarion said:
t.me

ℚ𝕦𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝔼𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕪𝕥𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘

This is Tony Shingler. This is what the government call 'safe and effective'. No it is not rare, yes it is very real. Tony is part of the #TruthBeTold family and one of the strongest and most resilient people I have met. '3 years ago today since I took the AstraZeneca jab, I was diagnosed...
t.me t.me
Click to expand...
When the pharmaceutical companies that were providing the "vax" were given complete immunity, that should have been an indicator that something was going to go wrong and if it did there was nothing that you could do because you took it voluntarily, nobody forced you to take it. Now if your employer forced you to take it, you may have case.
 
Last edited:
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,970
Reaction score
34,008
Chili Palmer said:
When the pharmaceutical companies that were providing the "vax" were given complete immunity, that should have been an indicator that something was going to go wrong and if it did there was nothing that you could do because you took it voluntarily, nobody force you to take it. Now if your employer forced you to take it, you may have case.
Click to expand...
C/P

keep preaching... people gotta WTF UP...

they're gonna do it again.....

its not a conspiracy anymore.

2030 Agenda
 
Sandlord

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
10,921
Reaction score
27,343
CDC Study Confirms COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years

An official new study has confirmed that men who receive the Covid vaccine will tragically suffer a 24-year loss in their life expectancy.

Scientists have analyzed the official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the UK government to determine the long-term harms of mRNA jabs.

The study aimed to weigh the balance of risk for the vaccines by calculating how long the negative side effects of mRNA vaccines take to reduce over time after a person receives each dose.

Disturbingly, researchers found that the damage doesn’t lessen over time but, instead, increases with each shot.

The CDC All-Cause Mortality data has shown that each vaccine dose increased mortality by seven percent in the year 2022 compared to the same figures for 2021.

The data revealed that each year, every vaccinated person becomes more and more likely to die at a rate of seven percent per dose, per year.

This means that the mRNA vaccines and booster shots are a “slow-acting genetic poison,” according to the study.

The study also found that the human body cannot recover from any amount of mRNA injections.

So taking 2021 as the baseline, a person who received five doses would be 350% more likely to die in 2031, 700% more likely to die in 2041, and 1050% more likely to die in 2051 than an unvaxxed person.

It is just like compound interest.

Using this result, we can calculate the loss in life expectancy for a 30-year-old male.

If we take the average life expectancy for the US, UK, and Canada, men are expected to live to around 80 years old today.

Life expectancy does increase over time but we can use 80 as a baseline for comparison.

Based on today’s life expectancy data, a 30-year-old unvaxxed male should expect another 50 years of life.

The findings from the study show that the life expectancy of a 30-year-old fully vaxxed person – two vaccines and three boosters – is now just 56 years.

When the data is analyzed compared to the number of vaccines, the study shows:

1 shot reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 13 years
2 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 18 years
3 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 20 years
4 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 23 years
5 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 24 years
 
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,970
Reaction score
34,008
Eliminator21vdrive

Eliminator21vdrive

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2016
Messages
2,109
Reaction score
4,360
Sandlord said:
CDC Study Confirms COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years

An official new study has confirmed that men who receive the Covid vaccine will tragically suffer a 24-year loss in their life expectancy.

Scientists have analyzed the official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the UK government to determine the long-term harms of mRNA jabs.

The study aimed to weigh the balance of risk for the vaccines by calculating how long the negative side effects of mRNA vaccines take to reduce over time after a person receives each dose.

Disturbingly, researchers found that the damage doesn’t lessen over time but, instead, increases with each shot.

The CDC All-Cause Mortality data has shown that each vaccine dose increased mortality by seven percent in the year 2022 compared to the same figures for 2021.

The data revealed that each year, every vaccinated person becomes more and more likely to die at a rate of seven percent per dose, per year.

This means that the mRNA vaccines and booster shots are a “slow-acting genetic poison,” according to the study.

The study also found that the human body cannot recover from any amount of mRNA injections.

So taking 2021 as the baseline, a person who received five doses would be 350% more likely to die in 2031, 700% more likely to die in 2041, and 1050% more likely to die in 2051 than an unvaxxed person.

It is just like compound interest.

Using this result, we can calculate the loss in life expectancy for a 30-year-old male.

If we take the average life expectancy for the US, UK, and Canada, men are expected to live to around 80 years old today.

Life expectancy does increase over time but we can use 80 as a baseline for comparison.

Based on today’s life expectancy data, a 30-year-old unvaxxed male should expect another 50 years of life.

The findings from the study show that the life expectancy of a 30-year-old fully vaxxed person – two vaccines and three boosters – is now just 56 years.

When the data is analyzed compared to the number of vaccines, the study shows:

1 shot reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 13 years
2 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 18 years
3 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 20 years
4 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 23 years
5 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 24 years
Click to expand...
LInk?
 
Chili Palmer

Chili Palmer

Master of My Domian
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
11,592
Reaction score
23,433
Sandlord said:
thepeoplesvoice.tv

CDC Study Confirms COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years

An official new study has confirmed that men who receive the Covid vaccine will tragically suffer a 24-year loss in their life expectancy.
thepeoplesvoice.tv thepeoplesvoice.tv
Click to expand...
I found a "fact check" on this, but it's riddled with inaccuracies. My comments are italicized and in orange.

leadstories.com

Fact Check: CDC Study Did NOT Confirm 'COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years' | Lead Stories

Did a study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirm that men who receive COVID-19 vaccines...
leadstories.com leadstories.com


Fact Check: CDC Study Did NOT Confirm 'COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years'​


Fact Check​



  • Sep 19, 2023
by: Madison Dapcevich

Did a study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirm that men who receive COVID-19 vaccines "will tragically suffer a 24-year loss in their life expectancy"? No, that's not true: Dr. Nabin Shrestha, an infectious disease expert and one of the cited study's authors, told Lead Stories that such claims are "clearly misleading" and do not authentically characterize the research. Furthermore, this study was not conducted by the CDC. The articles making this claim also cited a third-party analysis of all-cause mortality death data compiled by the CDC and the U.K. Office of National Statistics (ONS).


A version of the claim originated in a post published by The People's Voice on September 13, 2023, titled, "CDC Study Confirms COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years" (archived here). It began:

An official new study has confirmed that men who receive the Covid vaccine will tragically suffer a 24-year loss in their life expectancy.
Scientists have analyzed the official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the UK government to determine the long-term harms of mRNA jabs.
The study aimed to weigh the balance of risk for the vaccines by calculating how long the negative side effects of mRNA vaccines take to reduce over time after a person receives each dose.
Click to expand...

Similar versions of the claim were reposted by Expose News and Slaynews.com. The articles appear to misconstrue two sources of information: a so-called "CDC study" and Shrestha's research.


A CDC spokesperson confirmed to Lead Stories that there was no such study conducted by the health agency, writing in an email received on September 19, 2023:


The study in question is not done by CDC, nor is it based on CDC data. It was done by the Cleveland Clinic. This study addresses only the risk of infection, not the risk of mortality. Also, the CDC's all-cause mortality data does not show that vaccinated people die at a higher rate. The all-cause mortality data do not distinguish at all between vaccinated and unvaccinated decedents.
Click to expand...

Lead Stories also spoke with the lead study author, Shrestha, who confirmed that such claims are not an accurate reflection of their research.

No such study was conducted by the CDC​


Shrestha wrote to Lead Stories in an email received on September 18, 2023, that he was not aware of any CDC study that showed that "... every vaccinated person becomes more and more likely to die at a rate of seven percent per dose, per year," which appears to be the basis of the calculations presented in the story.


"As a general rule, predictions are difficult, and predictions about health outcomes 20 or 30 years into the future are likely to have so much uncertainty that they are quite meaningless," he wrote. "The [People's Voice] story also has lines that are clearly misleading, an example being, 'The study also found that the human body cannot recover from any amount of mRNA injections.' mRNA vaccines have not been around long enough for such a study to be done."
So all these years they've been telling us they can predict the health future is all BS? So now they tell us that the mRNA injections haven't been around long enough to see if there are any complications? So they have lied to us telling us the injection is safe.

The articles cited Josh Stirling, an insurance research analyst who has made other false claims regarding COVID vaccinations.

In January 2023, Stirling claimed that "The more doses on average you have in a region within the United States, the bigger increase in mortality that region has had in 2022 when compared to 2021." Stirling supposedly analyzed data collected by the CDC and the United Kingdom's Office of National Statistics -- this was not a study conducted by either health agency.

This claim was then cited by The People's Voice.

COVID vaccines are not a categorical cause of death in U.S.​

As Lead Stories has previously reported, adverse vaccine reactions are not a categorical cause of death recorded by health officials, and the vaccination status and records of deceased individuals are also not tracked.

The CDC National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) tracks mortality statistics annually. Data published for 2022, for example, reported that the three leading causes of death were heart disease (699,659), cancer (607,790) and unintentional injury or accidents (218,064).

In 2021, the leading causes of death were also heart disease (695,547), cancer (605,213) and COVID (416,893)

Similarly, in 2020, the leading causes of death were heart disease (696,962), cancer (602,350) and COVID (350,831).
But wait, we were all told that Covid-19 killed 7 million people here in the US, now it's way down? Did the accounting parameters change? Are they taking into account the negative effects the "vaccine" has had on people causing heart attacks in young healthy teens and adults? Did they take into account of the people who had compromised immune systems at the time, where a common cold would kill them? Or people that had died who had no symptoms of Covid, and their death was due to something totally unrelated, but because they had tested positive for covid, they listed that as the cause of death?


A spokesperson for ONS told Lead Stories that the above articles are "clearly misleading" and are not representative of UK data, either, writing in an email received on September 20, 2023:
Overall, our data clearly show that people who are unvaccinated have a higher mortality rate overall.

We're not saying that all the difference is necessarily caused by the vaccine though: people who are vaccinated differ from those who are unvaccinated, and these differences vary by age group.

In children, and younger people, those who have received many doses of a vaccine tend to be in poorer health, and therefore have higher mortality (but this is not due to the vaccine).
Click to expand...
Lead Stories also contacted the CDC and NCHS for further comment and will update this article accordingly.

Shrestha study showed 'bivalent vaccine is less effective against more recent strains'​

People's Voice cited the Shrestha study titled, "Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine," which was published in the peer-reviewed journal Open Forum Infectious Diseases on April 19, 2023.

As Lead Stories wrote in August 2023, this study showed that the "bivalent vaccine is less effective against more recent strains" and that further research should be "done in other populations to see if the findings hold up."

"Our study did find an association of increased risk of COVID-19 with increasing number of vaccine doses. However, some of the [People's Voice] statements represent an over-interpretation of the findings," Shrestha wrote .
So there is a risk of getting sick with increased injections - how exactly does the report over-interpret the finding? There are either no risk or there are risks.


For example, the statement, "It can damage a person's immune system in a dose-dependent manner," and "This means the more doses that people receive, the more damage it will do to their immune systems," are not reasonable conclusions from the study, he wrote. "As for next steps, the association that was found in our study should be studied by other people in different settings to see if their findings are similar or different."
They are not saying it didn't do damage to the immune systems, and if it didn't why do they need to do more studies?

Lead Stories has debunked other false claims involving COVID, including that Pfizer employees in Australia received a special batch of imported COVID vaccines that were different from what the public was given; that a Pfizer manufacturing site in North Carolina "stocked with" COVID-19 vaccines was damaged by a tornado, and that Florida did officially classify COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as bioweapons.
 
Last edited:
TeamGreene

TeamGreene

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
4,940
Reaction score
10,446
Sandlord said:
CDC Study Confirms COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years

An official new study has confirmed that men who receive the Covid vaccine will tragically suffer a 24-year loss in their life expectancy.

Scientists have analyzed the official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the UK government to determine the long-term harms of mRNA jabs.

The study aimed to weigh the balance of risk for the vaccines by calculating how long the negative side effects of mRNA vaccines take to reduce over time after a person receives each dose.

Disturbingly, researchers found that the damage doesn’t lessen over time but, instead, increases with each shot.

The CDC All-Cause Mortality data has shown that each vaccine dose increased mortality by seven percent in the year 2022 compared to the same figures for 2021.

The data revealed that each year, every vaccinated person becomes more and more likely to die at a rate of seven percent per dose, per year.

This means that the mRNA vaccines and booster shots are a “slow-acting genetic poison,” according to the study.

The study also found that the human body cannot recover from any amount of mRNA injections.

So taking 2021 as the baseline, a person who received five doses would be 350% more likely to die in 2031, 700% more likely to die in 2041, and 1050% more likely to die in 2051 than an unvaxxed person.

It is just like compound interest.

Using this result, we can calculate the loss in life expectancy for a 30-year-old male.

If we take the average life expectancy for the US, UK, and Canada, men are expected to live to around 80 years old today.

Life expectancy does increase over time but we can use 80 as a baseline for comparison.

Based on today’s life expectancy data, a 30-year-old unvaxxed male should expect another 50 years of life.

The findings from the study show that the life expectancy of a 30-year-old fully vaxxed person – two vaccines and three boosters – is now just 56 years.

When the data is analyzed compared to the number of vaccines, the study shows:

1 shot reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 13 years
2 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 18 years
3 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 20 years
4 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 23 years
5 shots reduced the life expectancy of 30-year-old men by 24 years
Click to expand...
But you won't catch a cold.
 
Wedgy

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,445
Reaction score
15,997
Chili Palmer said:
I found a "fact check" on this, but it's riddled with inaccuracies. My comments are italicized and in orange.

leadstories.com

Fact Check: CDC Study Did NOT Confirm 'COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years' | Lead Stories

Did a study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirm that men who receive COVID-19 vaccines...
leadstories.com leadstories.com


Fact Check: CDC Study Did NOT Confirm 'COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years'​


Fact Check​



  • Sep 19, 2023
by: Madison Dapcevich

Did a study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirm that men who receive COVID-19 vaccines "will tragically suffer a 24-year loss in their life expectancy"? No, that's not true: Dr. Nabin Shrestha, an infectious disease expert and one of the cited study's authors, told Lead Stories that such claims are "clearly misleading" and do not authentically characterize the research. Furthermore, this study was not conducted by the CDC. The articles making this claim also cited a third-party analysis of all-cause mortality death data compiled by the CDC and the U.K. Office of National Statistics (ONS).


A version of the claim originated in a post published by The People's Voice on September 13, 2023, titled, "CDC Study Confirms COVID Jab Lowers Male Life Expectancy By 24 Years" (archived here). It began:



Similar versions of the claim were reposted by Expose News and Slaynews.com. The articles appear to misconstrue two sources of information: a so-called "CDC study" and Shrestha's research.


A CDC spokesperson confirmed to Lead Stories that there was no such study conducted by the health agency, writing in an email received on September 19, 2023:




Lead Stories also spoke with the lead study author, Shrestha, who confirmed that such claims are not an accurate reflection of their research.

No such study was conducted by the CDC​


Shrestha wrote to Lead Stories in an email received on September 18, 2023, that he was not aware of any CDC study that showed that "... every vaccinated person becomes more and more likely to die at a rate of seven percent per dose, per year," which appears to be the basis of the calculations presented in the story.


"As a general rule, predictions are difficult, and predictions about health outcomes 20 or 30 years into the future are likely to have so much uncertainty that they are quite meaningless," he wrote. "The [People's Voice] story also has lines that are clearly misleading, an example being, 'The study also found that the human body cannot recover from any amount of mRNA injections.' mRNA vaccines have not been around long enough for such a study to be done."
So all these years they've been telling us they can predict the health future is all BS? So now they tell us that the mRNA injections haven't been around long enough to see if there are any complications? So they have lied to us telling us the injection is safe.

The articles cited Josh Stirling, an insurance research analyst who has made other false claims regarding COVID vaccinations.

In January 2023, Stirling claimed that "The more doses on average you have in a region within the United States, the bigger increase in mortality that region has had in 2022 when compared to 2021." Stirling supposedly analyzed data collected by the CDC and the United Kingdom's Office of National Statistics -- this was not a study conducted by either health agency.

This claim was then cited by The People's Voice.

COVID vaccines are not a categorical cause of death in U.S.​

As Lead Stories has previously reported, adverse vaccine reactions are not a categorical cause of death recorded by health officials, and the vaccination status and records of deceased individuals are also not tracked.

The CDC National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) tracks mortality statistics annually. Data published for 2022, for example, reported that the three leading causes of death were heart disease (699,659), cancer (607,790) and unintentional injury or accidents (218,064).

In 2021, the leading causes of death were also heart disease (695,547), cancer (605,213) and COVID (416,893)

Similarly, in 2020, the leading causes of death were heart disease (696,962), cancer (602,350) and COVID (350,831).
But wait, we were all told that Covid-19 killed 7 million people here in the US, now it's way down? Did the accounting parameters change? Are they taking into account the negative effects the "vaccine" has had on people causing heart attacks in young healthy teens and adults? Did they take into account of the people who had compromised immune systems at the time, where a common cold would kill them? Or people that had died who had no symptoms of Covid, and their death was due to something totally unrelated, but because they had tested positive for covid, they listed that as the cause of death?


A spokesperson for ONS told Lead Stories that the above articles are "clearly misleading" and are not representative of UK data, either, writing in an email received on September 20, 2023:

Lead Stories also contacted the CDC and NCHS for further comment and will update this article accordingly.

Shrestha study showed 'bivalent vaccine is less effective against more recent strains'​

People's Voice cited the Shrestha study titled, "Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine," which was published in the peer-reviewed journal Open Forum Infectious Diseases on April 19, 2023.

As Lead Stories wrote in August 2023, this study showed that the "bivalent vaccine is less effective against more recent strains" and that further research should be "done in other populations to see if the findings hold up."

"Our study did find an association of increased risk of COVID-19 with increasing number of vaccine doses. However, some of the [People's Voice] statements represent an over-interpretation of the findings," Shrestha wrote .
So there is a risk of getting sick with increased injections - how exactly does the report over-interpret the finding? There are either no risk or there are risks.


For example, the statement, "It can damage a person's immune system in a dose-dependent manner," and "This means the more doses that people receive, the more damage it will do to their immune systems," are not reasonable conclusions from the study, he wrote. "As for next steps, the association that was found in our study should be studied by other people in different settings to see if their findings are similar or different."
They are not saying it didn't do damage to the immune systems, and if it didn't why do they need to do more studies?

Lead Stories has debunked other false claims involving COVID, including that Pfizer employees in Australia received a special batch of imported COVID vaccines that were different from what the public was given; that a Pfizer manufacturing site in North Carolina "stocked with" COVID-19 vaccines was damaged by a tornado, and that Florida did officially classify COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as bioweapons.
Click to expand...

For all the vaxxed children that have died, all of the 20, 30, 40 50 something peeps that died from myocarditis, HA, stroke?

I'd say that it's pretty accurate.
 
Wedgy

Wedgy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
10,445
Reaction score
15,997
The reality, is what is is. Here in West Texas? My Doc left town...
 
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,970
Reaction score
34,008
t.me

American Thinker

Journalist gets too close to the big secret! State Dept spokesman Matt Miller panics and refuses to comment on USAID funding of gain of function on Coronaviruses! USAID is the CIA proxy that funds bioweapons research in Ukraine as well. Subscribe to American Thinker
t.me t.me
 
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,970
Reaction score
34,008
Screenshot_20240409_192134_Telegram.jpg

Things that are causing the recent uptick in heart attacks according to the media:
The sun.
Hot tea.
Fluffing pillows.
Going to the gym.
Opening your blinds.
Cannabis.
Vitamins.
Ivermectin.
Eating basically anything from a farm.
Gardening.
Taking hot showers.
Climate change.
So many more…

https://twitter.com/AlexPleiad88379
 
Last edited:
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
13,970
Reaction score
34,008
www.instagram.com

2.4K comments | Book Of Leaders on Instagram: "Share your opinion in comments below 👇🏻 DM for credit or removal request (no copyright intended) ⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣. ©️ All rights and credits reserved to the respective owner(s)⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ #Success

book.of.leadersFebruary 24, 2024 on : "Share your opinion in comments below 👇🏻 DM for credit or removal request (no copyright intended) ⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣�..."
www.instagram.com www.instagram.com
 
regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
43,401
Reaction score
143,566
thehill.com

Accelerated aging may be a cause of increased cancers in people under 55

An increase in cancers among people 55 years old and younger may be related to accelerated aging in recent generations, according to a study presented at a conference earlier this month. Experts sa…
thehill.com thehill.com

An increase in cancers among people 55 years old and younger may be related to accelerated aging in recent generations, according to a study presented at a conference earlier this month.

Experts say years of research support this, though more questions remain to be answered.

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top