WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

County Sales Tax Rises To Fund Transit Projects

RitcheyRch

Currently Boat-Less
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
67,958
Reaction score
92,856
Bastards. I'm still wondering when they are going to lower the sales tax from the San Francisco earthquake fund. Remember they raised the sales tax to help the quake victims many years ago. Well, they never lowered it like they claimed they would. KInd of figured they would never low it but can only hope


http://cbs2.com/local/Transit.Transportation.taxes.2.779426.html

A proposed ballot measure that would increase the county sales tax by a half-cent to fund transportation projects was approved today by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors.

The vote was 9-2 with one abstention and one absent in favor of the 30-
year, $40 billion tax measure, which would fund rail and bus rapid transit
capital projects, highways and bus service, as well as local transit projects and roadwork.

Before the measure can be placed on the November ballot, the county
Board of Supervisors must also approve it by Aug. 8. The measure would require a two-thirds majority of voters to go into effect, and might also require an exemption by the state Legislature, because the county sales tax is already near the statutory limit.

Duarte City Councilman John Fasana and county Supervisor Michael
Antonovich voted against the measure.

County Supervisor Gloria Molina abstained, and county Supervisor Don
Knabe was absent because his daughter was giving birth.

Earlier, Antonovich said he was against the measure because it slighted
the San Gabriel Valley and Gateway Cities in favor of the city of Los Angeles.

A coalition of board members that included Los Angeles Mayor and Metro
Board Chairman Antonio Villaraigosa spearheaded the push to approve the measure.

Villaraigosa has said the county is at a "breaking point" in terms of its transit needs, with gridlock snarling traffic and gas pricesskyrocketing.

"There is nothing more important to this region than the region coming
together, agreeing on a set of priorities and funding important public
transportation, highway and local traffic improvements that are needed in this region," Villaraigosa said.

But reaching a consensus on those priorities has been challenging.

The spending plan for the sales tax funds calls for more than $4 billion
to be devoted to the Westside Subway Corridor, provoking criticism from
Molina, who said at last month's meeting that it was unfair to fund an
expensive subway system for the Westside when East Los Angeles received a cheaper above-ground rail system instead.

Antonovich, meanwhile, has announced plans to craft a "Fair Share"
ballot measure that would require any funding raised by the sales tax to be equally allocated across the county population.

"County taxpayers deserve to see the tax dollars they generate fund
transportation projects in their communities," Antonovich said.

Since the sales tax measure would require the passage of state
legislation exempting it from the current tax cap and outlining specific
projects to be funded, it was not immediately clear how the "Fair Share"
ballot measure could be implemented.

Among Antonovich's concerns is the Gold Line Foothill Extension, a
proposed light-rail line through the San Gabriel Valley that he says lacks the immediate funding needed so that large federal grants can be pursued.

The project, he said, would not receive adequate funding from the sales tax to go all the way to Montclair.

Antonovich's supervisorial district includes the San Gabriel Valley.

Most of Metro's funding -- more than $1 billion annually -- comes from
two half-cent sales taxes previously approved by voters as Propositions A and C.
 

Scott E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
3,177
Reaction score
1,307
If they can assure me that it will lead to funding the Gold Line extension, sure I'll pay the extra dough...otherwise they can fock off! I don't live in LA city and I don't give a rats ass about a subway to the ocean! I'm sure those residents feel the same about the Gold Line but it needs to be spread across all of the county not just LA city...
 

RitcheyRch

Currently Boat-Less
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
67,958
Reaction score
92,856
Agree with you 100%. Seems most of these funds only help put the people in San Francisco.

If they can assure me that it will lead to funding the Gold Line extension, sure I'll pay the extra dough...otherwise they can fock off! I don't live in LA city and I don't give a rats ass about a subway to the ocean! I'm sure those residents feel the same about the Gold Line but it needs to be spread across all of the county not just LA city...
 

Flying_Lavey

Dreaming of the lake
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
21,330
Reaction score
19,094
Imagine that Villaraigosa proposing something like this cause his couty is at a breaking poin? Hmmm maybe its because if all the ILLEGALS you are harboring you little punk!
 

ChumpChange

Commercial Banker
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
10,644
Reaction score
13,242
which would fund rail and bus rapid transit
capital projects, highways and bus service, as well as local transit projects and roadwork.

Wonder how much would really go to these projects.....maybe 5%?:thumbsdown
 

Waterjunky

RDP Inmate #94
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
4,943
Reaction score
4,315
If you all want to hike your taxes, go for it.:smackhead Just leave the rest of the state out of it. :skull
 

RitcheyRch

Currently Boat-Less
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
67,958
Reaction score
92,856
My thoughts exactly. These hikes would not help a lot of cities and counties. Imagine a rail system in Blythe, Needles or Barstow.

If you all want to hike your taxes, go for it.:smackhead Just leave the rest of the state out of it. :skull
 

Scott E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
3,177
Reaction score
1,307
If you all want to hike your taxes, go for it.:smackhead Just leave the rest of the state out of it. :skull

Unless I read the article wrong this is only an LA County sales tax hike, not a statewide sales tax hike. It needs state approval as it would take the sales tax rate in LA County over and above the current sales tax cap imposed by the state.
 

RitcheyRch

Currently Boat-Less
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
67,958
Reaction score
92,856
I think you are right. Either way, some parts of LA County would not benefit from these transit programs.

Unless I read the article wrong this is only an LA County sales tax hike, not a statewide sales tax hike. It needs state approval as it would take the sales tax rate in LA County over and above the current sales tax cap imposed by the state.
 

Scott E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
3,177
Reaction score
1,307
Either way, some parts of LA County would not benefit from these transit programs.

Absolutely. That's why it needs to distributed over the whole county. I'm betting the Board of Supervisors votes it down and it therefore never gets to the November ballot.
 
Top